I reckon it's near Had it. Have a Look around lids of 50 Litre Chemical containers and I think it may be a standard type. Looks sun damaged. Better formed thread than most applications. Nev
Different things entirely. IF you wanted one, you would NOT be looking at the other. The Inversion level is very likely to be well over 10,000 Feet in the Inland in daytime on a hot day and 160 K would give you a rough ride below it. Nev
Folding the wings every time doesn't help a Gazelle. On a Hot day It won't go very high either. It might Bore you after a little while.. It WAS a Popular trainer for a Long time. Nev
Not the turbo.,- It was a very new engine on the Market at the time and it "Lived" at Lethbridge. The Carbs were electrically heated. The Owner built the whole project, which was well done. Nev
Free flight Power ratio if your dethermaliser fails will often result in the Loss of the Plane. It glides so well. I built a thing caller "the Eliminator". Nev
Did the test Flying and quite a few Hours in a HKS Kiev Prop, Skyranger. Quite adequate Power even 2 up after test completed and required 25 Hours. Tended to run a bit hot and put in colder plugs. Seemed like a quality Product Very good Prop for thrust. Nev
Where's the scam? Haven't we already dealt with this Plane? I see NO connection between it's landing difficulties and yours to the extent that you have described them. Inconsistent results are from the wrong technique. You can't do it by Numbers. You have to respond to how the Plane reacts all the way. Nev
Just unlicenced? Fair chance that's unsafe too. Hardly likely to be doing everything right/compliant If he doesn't bother to be Licenced.. Others sharing the sky deserve some assurance THEIR safety is NOT compromised. That's how the system works. Nev