Jump to content

facthunter

First Class Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    34,570

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1,262

 Content Type 

Everything posted by facthunter

  1. facthunter
    Keep going.. N
  2. facthunter
    Why is it better to fly faster if you are Heavy? Nev
  3. facthunter
    No-one with any brains at all would start something not Knowing what it will do and Maybe cannot be stopped. How Many idiots does it take to crash a Plane?
  4. facthunter
    Sorry I'm out of cigars. Good answer. Nev
  5. facthunter
    You better tool up and go big Kyle. Nev
  6. facthunter
    Spot on. Thanks. You get the Cigar. Nev
  7. facthunter
    Stellantis Now has Many of those Brands. Wartime Production figures 363,000 by willys & 280,000 by ford. . They were able to Pull substantial weights. I thought they were TOO short to ride well and found them uncomfortable for any distance but they were Pretty tough. Nev
  8. facthunter
    Some Wartime Jeeps were Made by FORD and some by WILLYS and they are a basic simple 4 cyl sidevalve engine and quite reliable but not that Powerful. The engine is a Willys design. Todays Jeeps are BY Chrysler and have been for Ages. Nev
  9. facthunter
    I haven't been able to down load any of that. Nev
  10. facthunter
    It's a BAK question every pilot should know the answer to.. Nev
  11. facthunter
    A nose heavy Plane stalls at a higher airspeed and will use more fuel . Discuss? Nev
  12. facthunter
    I suggest it would be very worthwhile to refer to NSTB USA ERA17LA246 (Final report) if you want to operate your 9xxx motor safer. This is authoritative stuff. Nev
  13. facthunter
    Is that the Best way to do it? Nev
  14. facthunter
    There's a Glider Museum at Bacchus Marsh which can handle groups for a Guided tour. I went there a few weeks ago. Comfortable size about 12.(That's My estimate ). . Nev
  15. facthunter
    Flew out of Bond Springs in 1969 in a Blanik. No trouble finding thermals but 2 other Gliders joined me in tight formation which I found a bit disconcerting. Nev
  16. facthunter
    Only responding. You wrote a lot more than you requote. Just a few FACTS which could not be refuted and you chose to ignore. Nothing assumed. Nothing personal. Unlike your comments, which I feel get very Personal though you May not realise it.. Play the Ball and not the Man, please. Nev
  17. facthunter
    Most planes at an aerobridge cannot depart without a Push back by a TUG. Engines are started during pushback and push against the tug at ground idle thrust. Nev
  18. facthunter
    I am JUST discussing things & If you don't like it don't bother reading it. I NEVER SAY sell it. Don't tell me the carburettors haven't given concerns, Take the drowning floats as an example, they have been known to stick with the dashpot wide open. No-one could really argue they are Located in a place that could be better. A float Carby sitting there is BS really. Its a fire risk and hard to keep the fuel lines cool. That's why you have to have that silly fuel return bleed thing which adds fuel to one tank and mucks up any fuel flow measurement and may cause Low fuel Pressure which is NOT safe. Lets not kid ourselves. A lot of other set ups are not as finicky. Nev
  19. facthunter
    Looks impressive. Nev
  20. facthunter
    I'm not against Innovation at all and don't suggest that I am. She fixed an existing Problem without much help from the USUAL Knockers, who wouldn't do anything about it. Nev
  21. facthunter
    Hey you guys who want Bigger cross over pipes than Rotax do, Reconcile that with your Blind faith that Rotax Knows best? Nev
  22. facthunter
    I'm very careful around aircraft and not likely to change at this stage and I've not scratched a Plane or injured a passenger. The situation where you can't say a word about Rotax that isn't praise is JUST not Logical. You're Paying a considerable price and expect it to be good. All things CAN fail. .I Pick on all Motors Non are perfect, Even the Merlin never had a TBO above 650 Hours. and that's got RR in front of it. Nev
  23. facthunter
    It stands to reason that a Motor with Less hours will be MORE reliable. The cost is for insurance covering the added risks of running engines over the normal TBO. You don't run Aero engines till they start to lose performance. Planes are certified on the assumption the engine makes pretty much the Power it did when new. It's a well Known fact that the older engines deteriorate faster than Better condition Newer ones do due Mainly to less engine contamination by blowby gasses etc Nev.
  24. facthunter
    They would have to be aware of the shortcomings. They are NOT idiots but at the end of the day it's about $$$s and a relatively Low rate of production As compared to the MASS Production unit cost. ANY experienced Race engine tuner Knows the fundamentals of all this. Carburettors should not be on the top of an aeroengine. Fuel lines too are in a bad Place and heat rises after an engine is shut down. it seems you only read what suites your case which is Basically it's Rotax so don't you dare criticise anything about it which is illogical. I evaluate ALL engines I have to deal with and Plenty of so called good (and expensive) ones have Basic obvious weaknesses that let them down. Nev
  25. facthunter
    That plane's wings to start with But No plane has an aerobridge Hooked up and some are Positioned wrong. Nev
×
×
  • Create New...