Jump to content

Gnarly Gnu

Members
  • Posts

    1,940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Posts posted by Gnarly Gnu

  1. unless you plan to go into the aviation business in some way, the ATO will look askance at attempts to deduct any flying-related costs.

    I'm not an accountant but I spend $10 - $20k per year on Qantas for domestic business travel so it would seem entirely legitimate to do some of this travel using my own or a hired aircraft rather than using public transport. I'm not sure if the travel aspect is damoski's position though.

     

     

  2. Yes dazza, it's quite common in the USA. Guy loved hunting so they bury him in his hunting outfit clutching his 12 gauge, stuff like that. Kinda weird to most of us in Oz but they don't bat an eyelid (the living friends and relatives that is, as well as the corpse one would hope). Good to be different I guess. Being buried with a fire extinguisher might figuratively be of more use for some folk though.... 068_angry.gif.cc43c1d4bb0cee77bfbafb87fd434239.gif

     

    Er not OT very much.... great hangar Compulsion!

     

     

  3. Well #2 comes over that way Gentreau, denigrating the explanation as unworthy as it was from an 'American news channel'. Is a linked yoke more visible to both pilots than an unlinked side-shift control? Yes or no? Discussing the actual claims of the video was the point, you are free to disagree with it of course but surely you would agree this needs to be on something more substantial than nationality to be adult.

     

     

  4. What Sully said and demonstrated seems very logical to me so I was just wondering if you were able to refute it, seems not so just a bit of anti-Boeing / anti-American eh. Most Airbus technology is copied from Boeing, this is one of the exceptions and they got it wrong by not linking the controls.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...