Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. facthunter

    facthunter

    First Class Member


    • Points

      93

    • Posts

      33,835


  2. red750

    red750

    Moderators


    • Points

      59

    • Posts

      7,893


  3. onetrack

    onetrack

    First Class Member


    • Points

      53

    • Posts

      7,766


  4. old man emu

    old man emu

    Moderators


    • Points

      32

    • Posts

      5,297


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/01/11 in Aircraft Comments

  1. To expand on my previous: Undaunted by aerodynamic reality, the design team at Pilatus/Britten-Norman has announced plans for the BN2-XL (Extra Loud), promising more noise, reduced payload, a lower cruise speed, and increased pilot workload. We spoke to Mr. Fred Gribble, former British Rail boilermaker and now Chief Project Engineer. Fred was responsible for developing many original and creative design flaws in the service of his former employer, and assures he will be incorporating these in the new BN2-XL technology under a licensing agreement. Fred reassured BN-2 pilots however that all fundamental design flaws of the original model had been retained. Further good news is that the XL version is available as a retrofit. Among the new measures is that of locking the ailerons in the central position, following airborne and simulator tests which showed that whilst pilots of average strength were able to achieve up to 30° of control wheel deflection, this produced no appreciable variation in the net flight path of the aircraft. Thus the removal of costly and unnecessary linkages has been possible, and the rudder has been nominated as the primary directional control. In keeping with this new philosophy, but to retain commonality for crews transitioning to the XL, additional resistance to foot pressure has been built into the rudder pedals to prevent overcontrolling in gusty conditions (defined as those in which wind velocity exceeds 3 knots). An outstanding feature of Islander technology has always been the adaptation of the 0-540 engine, which mounted in any other aircraft in the free world (except the Trislander) is known for its low vibration levels, so as to cause it to shake and batter the airframe, gradually crystallise the main spar, desynchronise the accompanying engine, and simulate the sound of fifty skeletons fornicating in an aluminium dustbin. Britten-Norman will not disclose the technology they applied in enhancing this effect in the XL, but Mr. Gribble assures us it will be perpetuated in later models and sees it as a strong selling point; "After all, the Concorde makes a lot of noise," he said, "and look how fast it goes." However, design documents clandestinely recovered from the Britten-Norman shredder have solved a question that has puzzled aerodynamicists and pilots for many years, disclosing that it is actually noise which causes the BN-2 to fly. The vibration set up by the engines and amplified by the airframe, in turn causes the air molecules above the wing to oscillate at atomic frequency, reducing their density and causing lift. This can be demonstrated by sudden closure of the throttles, which causes the aircraft to fall from the sky. As a result, lift is proportional to noise rather than speed, explaining amongst other things the aircraft's remarkable takeoff performance. In the driver's cab (as Gribble describes it), ergonomic measures will ensure that long-term PBN pilots' deafness does not cause inflight dozing. Orthopaedic surgeons have designed a cockpit layout and seat to maximise backache, enroute insomnia, chronic irritability, and terminal (post-flight) lethargy. Redesigned 'bullworker' elastic aileron cables, now disconnected from the control surfaces, increase pilot workload and fitness. Special noise retention cabin lining is an innovation on the XL, and it is hoped in later models to develop cabin noise to a level which will enable pilots to relate ear pain directly to engine power, eliminating the need for engine instruments altogether. We were offered an opportunity to fly the XL at Britten-Normans' developmental facility, adjacent to the Britrail tea rooms at Little Chortling. (The flight was originally to have been conducted at the Pilatus plant, but aircraft of Britten-Norman design are now prohibited from operating in Swiss airspace during the avalanche season). For our mission profile, the XL was loaded with fossil fuel for a standard 100 nm with Britrail reserves, carrying one pilot and nine passengers to maximise discomfort. Passenger loading is unchanged, the normal under-wing protrusions inflicting serious lacerations on 71% of boarding passengers, and there was the usual entertaining confusion in selecting a door appropriate to the allocated seat. The facility for the clothing of embarking passengers to remove oil slicks from engine cowls during loading has also been thoughtfully retained. Startup is standard, and taxying, as in the BN-2, is accomplished by brute force. Takeoff calculations called for a 250 decibel power setting, and the rotation force for the (neutral) C of G was calculated as 180ft/lbs of back pressure. Initial warning of an engine failure during takeoff is provided by a reduction in flight instrument panel vibration. Complete seizure of one engine is indicated by the momentary illusion that the engines have suddenly and inexplicably become synchronised. Otherwise, identification of the failed engine is achieved by comparing the vibration levels of the windows on either side of the cabin. (Relative passenger pallor has been found to be an unreliable guide on many BN-2 routes because of ethnic considerations). Shortly after takeoff the XL's chief test pilot, Capt. "Muscles" Mulligan, demonstrated the extent to which modem aeronautical design has left the BN-2 untouched; he simulated pilot incapacitation by slumping forward onto the control column, simultaneously applying full right rudder and bleeding from the ears. The XL, like its predecessor, demonstrated total control rigidity and continued undisturbed. Power was then reduced to 249 decibels for cruise, and we carried out some comparisons of actual flight performance with graph predictions. At 5000' and ISA, we achieved a vibration amplitude of 500 CPS and 240 decibels, for a fuel flow of 210 lb/hr, making the BN-2 XL the most efficient converter of fuel to noise since the Titan rocket. Exploring the constant noise-variable speed and constant speed-variable noise concepts, we found that in a VNE dive, vibration reached its design maximum at 1000 CPS, at which point the limiting factor is the emulsification of human tissue. The catatonic condition of long term BN-2 pilots is attributed to this syndrome, which commences in the cerebral cortex and spreads outwards. We asked Capt. Mulligan what he considered the outstanding features of the XL. He cupped his hand behind his car and shouted. "Whazzat?" We returned to Britten-Norman field convinced that the XL model retains the marque's most memorable features, while showing some significant and worthwhile regressions. Pilatus/Britten-Norman are however not resting on their laurels. Plans are already advanced for the three-engined Trislander XL, and noise tunnel testing has commenced. The basis of preliminary design and performance specifications is that lift increases as the square of noise, and as the principle of acoustic lift is further developed, a later five-engined vertical takeoff model is another possibility.
    5 points
  2. Here is our very own Australian Bug, based at Rollo’s Airfield near Murray Bridge, SA. It is Jabiru 3300 powered and tops out at close to 200ktas.
    5 points
  3. Some pics from my visit to the CallAir Museum in 2013. Glen Call was my guide.
    4 points
  4. I built a 1/4 scale R/C Jungmeister from plans. It spun to the ground on about the fourth flight, moved onto ultralights after that heart break.
    4 points
  5. It was disappointing that Garry was much maligned by some. He produced a design that is exceptionally strong and with a performance envelope as good as and often better than many plastic fantastics even today and that was 11 years ago. I was at his factory a number of times when people would call in & he would stop and show them around and discuss anything they asked about. When things got very busy he had some young people come in for work experience and in the case of the Sierra that hit the Ferris Wheel there were a few issues of holes being drilled in the wrong place etc. That may have been from inexperienced staff and the bits were not replaced so got picked up by ATSB and blown out of all proportion even though they had nothing to do with the incident. Scapegoats are always needed in public situations and they found one. So Garry lost his Factory licence, his Instructor rating and what was left of his faith in the system. The Ferris wheel aircraft was rebuilt and flew again well. It was eventually sold at a significant discounted price due to the history, nothing else. That incident cost Australia one of its most innovative aircraft designers and manufacturers. Garrys first love was Gliding and he is now in one of the best parts of the world to continue this. I am not sure how the structural failure event has changed anything as I have heard nothing since.
    4 points
  6. Gary's probably gone into hiding, to avoid this God-bothering idiot, below. I've never seen so much religious rubbish posted on one website. http://www.the-testament-of-truth.com/truth/web/gary1.htm
    4 points
  7. FIDO Fog Investigation and Dispersal Operation (which was sometimes referred to as "Fog Intense Dispersal Operation" or "Fog, Intense Dispersal Of") was a system used for dispersing fog and pea soup fog (dense smog) from an airfield so that aircraft could land safely. The device was developed for British RAF bomber stations, allowing the landing of aircraft returning from raids over Germany in poor visibility by burning fuel in rows on either side of the runway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fog_Investigation_and_Dispersal_Operation If you watch the film towards the end when the use of FIDO is shown, you see someone put a tag with the drawing of a dog on it beside the name of an airfield where FIDO was available.
    4 points
  8. EJJ is the Cavalier that flew from NZ and was based at Heck field , the owner built it in NZ he was a German guy Gunter it ws in the same hangar as our aircraft
    3 points
  9. I suspect the Jodel in the third pic is unrelated
    3 points
  10. I scratch built one of these as a scale control line model with a third line throttle control many years ago. Sadly, it never flew but I still have the now very much worse for wear relic that I can't bring myself to part with. All the numbers and decals were hand painted. It's hardly a competition winner but not bad for a 16 year old. Never thought that one day I'd have a pilot's licence and build a real aircraft.
    3 points
  11. Unless it's an optical illusion, there seems to be a small hinged door on the port side of the front cockpit visible in the yellow one.
    3 points
  12. And our very own one at Goolwa, albeit stretched.
    3 points
  13. As a slight thread drift, I have a huge (6ft long) photo adorning my lounge room wall of Sunderland VH-BRF coming into land on the lagoon at Lord Howe Island back in 1974. These old aircraft had quite interesting history's, and VH-BRF was no exception if anyone is interested reading about it in the attached link. https://aussieairliners.org/shortfb/vh-brf/vhbrf.html
    3 points
  14. That's terrifying!........deep respect for the test pilot/s........
    3 points
  15. That's a pretty awesome plane. Van's Aircraft is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year. More than 13,000 flying now. Van's total performance is a real thing.
    3 points
  16. Many years ago I saw 3676 at (I think) Goolwa, SA. It took me a while for the blue painted script name to register:- "Proctalgia" When looking for a plane to build I considered the Rebel, but thought it a tad heavy for RaAus rego.
    3 points
  17. Nev, Wood and fabric may be old fashioned skills BUT they are materials that are better suited to repair than composites and easier than metal... and potentially more 'green' than the fashionable composites. This coming from a middle aged fart who has built and played in all construction methods and I am trending back towards wood and fabric for my last two aircraft and looking at replacing the composite wing on one of mine with replacement in wood n fabric.
    3 points
  18. Back to the Sierra: years ago I dropped in to Garry’s Taree factory for some industrial espionage- I was looking for design ideas for my wing flaps. Garry is the sort of energetic, Can-Do bloke this country is running short of. He insisted I go for a fly. His son took me up in a Sierra and impressed me with its stability and speed.
    3 points
  19. Garry was (is?) a member of this forum, and his profile spells his name with 2 R's - Garry.
    3 points
  20. The A-12 Oxcart was built for the CIA as a single seater and could fly 10,000 feet higher than the SR-71, had a top speed of Mach 3.35 (SR-71 3.2), but a shorter range. Its first flight was April 26 1962 and it was retired 1968 following a catfight with USAF who wanted the glory (the SR-71 flew from 1966 - 1999). The CIA flew the Oxcarts out of Area 51 on Groom Lake. The book Area 51 by Annie Jacobsen describes the early days of the Oxcart reconnaisance of Russia. The aircraft skins were made of Titanium and after a flight remained so hot that several mechanics were badly burned when they started working on them too soon. The Russians used to overfly Area 51 and the mechanics would sit an Oxcart out on the apron and use gas heaters to heat the skin so it would be giving an infra red heat signal when the Russians arrived. The aircraft were retired when the CIA were able to put photographic equipment into satellites and take the same pictures from orbit in the comfort of their offices. This photo of Groome Lake, Nevada shows the long runways across the lake. To the right of the solid line is another, longer runway which curves around to the right giving the pilot a lot more length. Groom Lake is a satellite field of Nellis Air Force Base. I flew a Cherokee over Nellis AFB in 1979 on the way to the Grand Canyon. Groom Lake is not far away, but I didn't know about it then. Will have to go back some time.
    3 points
  21. The best looking military jet of its time.
    3 points
  22. The Bantam was designed and built by Max Clear who had his own airfield at Te Kowhai near Hamiltion in NZ. Max was an amazing aviator and I lived not far away and used to watch him doing very good aerobatics in the Pitts he built in the 70s from my veranda on warm Summer evenings. At the peak of production his company Micro Aviation was shipping quite a few to South Africa each month & he had various people helping to build them. I got to fly a few and they were delightful. All of the Bantams I flew were 2 stroke Rotax powered. Sadly Max died of cancer in 2011 and his family were not interested in the business or aviation. The business sold but at the time in 2012 the airfield did not. There were 6 hangars there at the time. Total production before Max's death was 354 Bantams. The airfield was eventually sold to a private consortium and they hold flying events and country fairs etc there. I flew the C172 and Archer in many times & there was always a great welcome, cup of tea & a yarn.
    3 points
  23. But Nev that was in the days when an air ticket cost a year’s pay.
    3 points
  24. There is a photo of the fuselage of the first one received in 2004 on the Avspecs website & it is almost unrecognisable. I imagine they just removed all the fittings & completely built a brand new airframe & wings. The photos they have of the new wings and fuselage show impeccable workmanship which is reflected in the videos of the finished product. There is another Mossie that has recently been found in a shed in Mapua near Nelson. The old bloke, John Smith died 6 months ago and he was an avid collector of old military aircraft. He had a P51, Tiger Moth, Vampire, 2 x P40s as well as multiple bits of many different aircraft. The Mossie looks in pretty good nick & is going to be restored and displayed at Omaka as far as I know. It looks like it would easily be able to be restored to flying condition though. Details are HERE
    3 points
  25. Most of the Coachwood was sourced in North Queensland by forester Ian Gillison, who worked for the Commonwealth Foresty Bureau in Mackay. His sons now live in Yungaburra and near Albury. Many wooden propellors used in WW2 planes were made of North Queensland rainforest timbers. The Venables sawmill in Cairns handled a lot of the timber. My father flew Mosquitoes in 85 Squadron and mostly in night fighters. Also late in the war dropped propaganda pamphlets over France and Italy to demoralise German troops. Very high casualty rate, of the 70 guys he started with only six were left at the end of the war.
    3 points
  26. Ceratopetalum apetalum, the coachwood, scented satinwood or tarwood, is a medium-sized hardwood tree, straight-growing with smooth, fragrant, greyish bark. It is native to eastern Australia in the central and northern coastal rainforests of New South Wales and southern Queensland, where is often found on poorer quality soils in gullies and creeks and often occurs in almost pure stands. Its timber is light and easily worked. It is used for flooring, furniture and cabinetwork, interior fittings, turnery, gun stocks, wood carving, veneers as well as spars and masts for boats. Courtroom number three of The High Court of Australia is beautifully and completely furnished with coachwood timber. The Genus Ceratopetalum includes C. gummiferum, the New South Wales Christmas bush. (I love that bloody tree.)
    3 points
  27. Mr Google says top of range is US $ 350k which computes to OZ $ 540,000 .................. I think 20:1 glide ratio looks real good (price not so good)
    2 points
  28. The Pipistrel Taurus Electra is an electric powered version of the Pipistrel Taurus self launching glider. Refer Gliders section.
    2 points
  29. Thank you Red 750, My R80 (BushCaddy kit number 105) was to my knowledge the second one to fly in Australia, now over 19 years ago. It still serves me very well.
    2 points
  30. Very much built for a purpose. Nev
    2 points
  31. For those who have forgotten their Latin, Agricola means "peasant". In the fifties, a lot more people would remember their Latin, so it might not be such an endearing name for an aircraft.
    2 points
  32. Yes agree, but the gopro footage will earn you kazzilions of dollars and likes on youtube... these are modern times, nobody cares about slip skid AoA, they just want to see brown pants action! So you cannot make the wool too long lest it be seen in the camera view and detach viewer fake news brain cell.
    2 points
  33. Probably not the best name for a warplane!
    2 points
  34. I finally found the ATSB report on the crash of VH-RMQ. https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/24427/196800001.pdf
    2 points
  35. Here you go. Side by side.
    2 points
  36. There is still one of these remaining on the Darling Downs. Built in 1931 (?) And flown by several generations of the same family.
    2 points
  37. A Vari-Eze sounds different because the prop is disturbing the sound waves coming from the exhaust pipes. My grandson used to have great fun by standing in front of a circulation fan making a monotone sound with his voice and projecting it towards the rotating fan blades.
    2 points
  38. You would have to really need an amphibian to buy one. There was one at Gawler a few years ago, having flown from WA. It sounded strange in the air. This is because there is a big separation of airflow just where the fuse contracts to make way for the pusher prop. The sound of the prop is different when travelling through the shaded zone and the unshaded zone. The result is poor performance and high fuel consumption. I learned about pushers from this... but I have to agree its a good-looking plane.
    2 points
  39. Not sure what device you are using. If it's a PC/laptop, there should be a menu down the left side. Select Aircraft. This gives you the aircraft as they are added, most recent first. On the right is a list of categories. Click on the category you wish to see. eg. Airliners. This give you all airliners in alphabetical order. You could enter the aircraft in the Search box at the top of the Aircraft page, but that will give you each word in every occurance, including comments. eg. Enter Miles Gemini and it will give every occurrence of Miles, and every occurrence of Gemini. Use double quotes "..." and it will drop out individual words. Make sure you do this on the Aircraft page, or it will search the entire site.
    2 points
  40. LOL thats my wife and i landing at Clifton fly in Qld ,
    2 points
  41. Here's a YouTube video of the TU-144 story. The rumours that it was merely a copy of the Concorde were proven to be incorrect, as the TU-144 was longer, heavier, and faster than the Concorde - and it sported retractable front canard wings to assist with lift. But apparently, the cost of all the Russian one-upmanship was the noise of the afterburners inside the TU-144 was dreadful, resulting in normal conversation becoming impossible, and passenger having to converse with written notes.
    2 points
  42. My sincere apologies, gentlemen. No idea how that happened (wearing the wrong glasses probably). Over 1300 profiles and never had a screw-up like that before. All corrected now.
    2 points
  43. the 472.5 kg is for the ultralight regulations in Europe. In other countries they are 600 kg with the design weight of 750 kg when the new categories open up. A normal one has 130 L of fuel with an option for 180 L according to their website. There is even one flying as a turbine which has been designed for military training for countries that can't afford bigger aircraft just to be used for training
    2 points
  44. Thinks: I could overtake one of those........)
    2 points
  45. Another major source of aircraft listings is the manufacturers production lists on airport-data.com, here. Sometimes has good photos, but no design or development details, few specs, (seating capacity and engine) and no performance details. Often may list 30 or more airframe profiles by registration/construction number with no photos, particularly Canadian registered aircraft. The major problem with this listing is that it is sorted by registration (tail number) and numbers with photos have a camera icon beside them. The tail number may have been allocated to a number of airframes over time. You may be looking for a particular aircraft, but the tail number has also at some stage been allocated to, say, a Cessna 172. When you click on the tail number to open the page, you may findthat there is a photo of the Cessna, but not the aircraft you are interested in. Having identified a model, then you have to do an internet image search for photos.
    2 points
  46. I look at the wheel spats on that thing and wonder.... why?
    2 points
  47. All of this and it can only lift 10 tons and do 80 kn ? I saw the good year blimp at Oshkosh trying to land just before a storm front. It was one of the most dangerous things I have ever seen. As it happens they were actually doing a live cross at the time for the Chicago news which got replayed just about everywhere and the reporter was getting violently thrown around, one minute she was on the floor, the next minute she was on the roof and she was screaming "we are going to die" they cut away from the story after that but said afterward she survived without a scratch. She did a follow-up later in the evening bulletin saying they hit some minor turbulence and she apologized for swearing etc. in calm winds, these things must be fantastic but if you get anywhere near a storm front I think you are lucky to live because not only does it go up and down it also goes left to right, sideways and every other direction at the same time. After the storm it passed through we went over and spoke to some of the guys who are looking after the mooring mast and they said it was the closest to disaster they had ever seen. This blimp pictured above is about 4 times bigger which probably makes it 10 times less maneuverable
    2 points
  48. Yeah "fighting for peace" is like "F***ing for virginity".
    2 points
  49. DG is an RAF serial prefix, and VT registrations are from India.
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...