RA-AUS renewal now with lots of Membership Terms and Conditions

[facthunter]

 I was referring to  something Worse than signing the RAAus document that Pilots have to cop. Nev

[pmccarthy]

6 hours ago, facthunter said:

It's so easy to stand back and criticise, but WHAT IF everybody did it. ? Nev

If everyone did it, I’d be a damn fool to do any different. - Yossarian. (I think)

[coljones]

1 hour ago, facthunter said:

 I was referring to  something Worse than signing the RAAus document that Pilots have to cop. Nev

Mr Nev, words of sage advice but could you reference the microstring that you are referring to.

 

Cheers, Col

[facthunter]

Sorry I don't get the question. Nev

[coljones]

1 hour ago, facthunter said:

 I was referring to  something Worse than signing the RAAus document that Pilots have to cop. Nev

Which "something worse" are you referring to? For example

 

Col

[facthunter]

 Specifically Being required to operate under a system Of "Strict Liability" By CASA No Lawyer would like that.  Nev

[Methusala]

Isn't driving on public roads subject to strict liability?

[facthunter]

Not to My Knowledge. Nev

[BrendAn]

Can someone explain why new members are not getting these papers with the seven signatures.

I know one bloke that signed up yesterday and they just took his payment and nothing else. He got told he has to do a bfr and medical before he can fly. He was a flying member years ago. Same thing with someone else 2 weeks ago.

Edited Saturday at 01:54 AM by BrendAn

[facthunter]

That rule applies to anyone who is not current. With RAAus you have to Be  paid up as a Member and comply with the other 2 as any pilot does. Nev

[BrendAn]

1 minute ago, facthunter said:

That rule applies to anyone who is not current. With RAAus you have to Be  paid up as a Member and comply with the other 2 as any pilot does. Nev

That's obvious about the bfr and medical. 

You tell me how a new member is exempt from the terms and conditions sign off. 

 

[facthunter]

How is that MY job? You are the One running the story. I don't even know IF they are.  Nev

[BrendAn]

7 minutes ago, facthunter said:

How is that MY job? You are the One running the story. I don't even know IF they are.  Nev

Why reply then . I thought you knew everything. I would have thought all members would have to acknowledge the terms and conditions , students and pilots.

[facthunter]

Oh How Nice! I reply when I think I might  Be of assistance  in general  Ask RAAus They are YOUR target not Necessarily Mine. PS try being a little LESS RUDE. It's not good for the site.  Nev

[BrendAn]

1 minute ago, facthunter said:

Oh How Nice! I reply when I think I might  Be of assistance  in general  Ask RAAus They are YOUR target not Necessarily Mine. PS try being a little LESS RUDE. It's not good for the site.  Nev

I just asked a question. I always assume you will know if anyone does. And follow your own advice. Pretty f##kin rude reply to me . 

 

[facthunter]

Grow Up. I'm reacting to you and have tried to give you good GEN all along.. Seems like I've been wasting my time and I don't like doing that. Nev

Edited Saturday at 02:46 AM by facthunter

[BrendAn]

5 minutes ago, facthunter said:

Grow Up. Nev

There you go again.

 

[facthunter]

IT WAS edited.  Nev

[T510]

1 hour ago, BrendAn said:

Can someone explain why new members are not getting these papers with the seven signatures.

I know one bloke that signed up yesterday and they just took his payment and nothing else. He got told he has to do a bfr and medical before he can fly. He was a flying member years ago. Same thing with someone else 2 weeks ago.

It seems to be the usual RAAus inconsistencies. I was speaking to a CFI the other day who was told that he needed to get the membership application form signed in all places before taking people for a TIF.

Another CFI I spoke to hadn't even been made aware of the new forms with the new signature requirements.

[onetrack]

2 hours ago, Methusala said:

Isn't driving on public roads subject to strict liability?

It certainly is, for many traffic offences. The police/road authorities only have to show you broke the law, not show that you intended to break it.

[turboplanner]

I was hunting through files looking for something and noticed this.

It seems there is a vacuum about this these days.

WX00147.pdf

[facthunter]

If you want to Investigate the unfairness of strict Liability  look up  Australian Law Reform Commission. nev

[jackc]

18 hours ago, turboplanner said:

I was hunting through files looking for something and noticed this.

It seems there is a vacuum about this these days.

WX00147.pdf 1.23 MB · 27 downloads

Maybe RAAus need to read this, a few important words spring to mind 👍

[clouddancer]

That is sadly well outdated, being pre Part 149, Part 103, pre-lots of good old days things. 

[facthunter]

We really have Lost it from where we once were.   Shame.  Nev