rodgerc Posted June 5 Posted June 5 From my point of view, it’s nothing more than a turf war….A bit like being a Ford or Holden supporter….There are disadvantages/advantages in both schools and don’t see an overwhelming reason to consider one any better than the other. Personally I maintain both licences and fly my amateur built RA-AUS registered taildragger on Saturdays and VH registered experimental RV on Thursdays. The costs are comparable in either camp and eventually I’ll be forced to drop one of the two options….It’s a toss-up at present, but if RA-Aus get CTA access over the line it’ll likely be my Part 61 license/VH aircraft that will go, simply because I’m finding my local RA flying community a lot more “relaxed” and “convivial”….And I find the folk at RA-Aus generally helpful and easy to approach. Happy to accept though that others’ experience may be different….No doubt the turf wars will continue until natural selection determines the dominant species. 4 1
Love to fly Posted June 5 Posted June 5 4 hours ago, BurnieM said: Don't forget one years membership of SAAA as well so a little over $800 to do MPC for your CASA reg amateur built. Class 5 medical is actually 2 small coffees 🙂 Class G pretty much became a waste of time when CASA announced class 5 medical shortly after. This was CASA tho after delaying class G several times then introducing class 5 med. Logical thing would have been for RAAus to abandon class G and immediately put effort into driving controlled airspace endorsement. This did not happen and here we are. For us MPC waa done years ago. Pre CofA, along with weight and balance certificate. We remain SAAA members but it isn't mandatory to do so.. Just like the friends and social aspect. 1
Love to fly Posted June 5 Posted June 5 1 hour ago, sfGnome said: That price is about to more than double. Will be published shortly. Is that for the MPC, or the new hands on course to enable non builders to do their own maintenance? 1
BurnieM Posted Friday at 11:46 PM Posted Friday at 11:46 PM That happened in May. Ops Manual still not approved and RAAus are saying Q3 of this year (earlier they said 2025). 1 1
sfGnome Posted Friday at 11:51 PM Posted Friday at 11:51 PM 12 hours ago, Love to fly said: Is that for the MPC, or the new hands on course to enable non builders to do their own maintenance? The MPC. They noted that after holding the price steady for many years, it had to be increased. Big jump, but cheaper than paying someone to do my maintenance. 2 1
BurnieM Posted Friday at 11:59 PM Posted Friday at 11:59 PM Will there be any difference in pricing between the MPC builder and non-builder course ? I believe the non-builder course will be 2 days longer. 2
BurnieM Posted Saturday at 12:16 AM Posted Saturday at 12:16 AM SAAA paper on RAAus to VH aircraft conversion 2
Love to fly Posted Saturday at 02:51 AM Posted Saturday at 02:51 AM 2 hours ago, sfGnome said: The MPC. They noted that after holding the price steady for many years, it had to be increased. Big jump, but cheaper than paying someone to do my maintenance. Sure. But if you didn't build you still need to do the other course as well. MPC just about paperwork etc. 1
Reynard Posted Sunday at 07:28 AM Posted Sunday at 07:28 AM The training module for CTA access has now been issued to RA AUS instructors. The revised ops manual still needs to be approved however. 1 3
Roundsounds Posted Sunday at 10:30 PM Posted Sunday at 10:30 PM On 6/6/2026 at 9:46 AM, BurnieM said: That happened in May. Ops Manual still not approved and RAAus are saying Q3 of this year (earlier they said 2025). The never ending story. GFA pilots have always had CTR/CTA access and on a self certified medical. I know a class 5 is only $10, but that will become $100. 1
facthunter Posted Sunday at 11:29 PM Posted Sunday at 11:29 PM Gliders don't go to Major Airports or have to comply with other requirements you will be asked to do. Nev
facthunter Posted yesterday at 08:44 AM Posted yesterday at 08:44 AM The Vid has you flying over tall Buildings . Why would you want to do that in a single engined Plane? Nev
Moneybox Posted yesterday at 08:47 AM Posted yesterday at 08:47 AM 2 minutes ago, facthunter said: The Vid has you flying over tall Buildings . Why would you want to do that in a single engined Plane? Nev I guess it's better than crashing into them? 🤪 4
Garfly Posted yesterday at 09:37 AM Posted yesterday at 09:37 AM (edited) 55 minutes ago, facthunter said: The Vid has you flying over tall Buildings . Why would you want to do that in a single engined Plane? Nev That's not a vid, that's a 'composite image' to illustrate the article. CLICK FOR FULL REZ. Regulatory changes clear CTA path for RAAus - Australian Flying WWW.AUSTRALIANFLYING.COM.AU Last month, CASA amended the Civil Aviation Orders to permit Recreational Pilot Certificate (RPC) holders to access controlled airspace. Edited yesterday at 09:39 AM by Garfly 1 1
walrus Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago (edited) Ahhhh yes, the old bait and switch trick. You require a class 5 medical certificate. Given the age of RAA aircraft owners, how many are going to clear that little hurdle? Begging of course the question of the relevance of medical certification to light aircraft safety.... Edited 23 hours ago by walrus 1
Love to fly Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 1 hour ago, walrus said: Ahhhh yes, the old bait and switch trick. You require a class 5 medical certificate. Given the age of RAA aircraft owners, how many are going to clear that little hurdle? Begging of course the question of the relevance of medical certification to light aircraft safety.... My understanding is that the Class 5 isn't that onerous, but if you have ever been rejected for a Class 2 you are ineligible for a Class 5. Given that's why many change to raaus..... 1
BurnieM Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) Nope. I have a class 5. It is pretty much the same as RAAus declaration just CASA want you to have a ARN and record your declaration in their system. And take $10. While this could always go up I do not believe it is in their interest to raise it too high. Will be interesting to see if they loosen the things you can do after the review. Class 4 will also be interesting. Anybody have any details on requirements/activities you can perform on this medical ? Edited 22 hours ago by BurnieM 1
T510 Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Class 5 = Do a 1 hour online course with assessment questions at the end, complete online declaration on the MyCASA portal, pay $10 and you are done. 1
Love to fly Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, T510 said: Class 5 = Do a 1 hour online course with assessment questions at the end, complete online declaration on the MyCASA portal, pay $10 and you are done. Wonder what's in the detail of the declaration, and think there is a document you're saying you've read and that you meet the requirements of? 1
T510 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I did mine a couple of weeks ago. The declaration covers the usual stuff: Any impairments that would stop you getting a car licence Have you failed a class 1 or 2 previously Heart disease/conditions Neurological disorders Mental health Medications It's all done through the MyCASA portal 1
Love to fly Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 9 minutes ago, T510 said: I did mine a couple of weeks ago. The declaration covers the usual stuff: Any impairments that would stop you getting a car licence Have you failed a class 1 or 2 previously Heart disease/conditions Neurological disorders Mental health Medications It's all done through the MyCASA portal Sorry I misunderstood. It's the previous failure of a Class 2 or Class 2, and the other ineligibilities that I think some are missing. 1 1
BurnieM Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I love the mental health declarations/drugs declarations on anything. Does anybody with a problem (obviously not me or you) ever answer these honestly ? 1 1
BurnieM Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Love to fly said: Sorry I misunderstood. It's the previous failure of a Class 2 or Class 2, and the other ineligibilities that I think some are missing. This is one of the things the the Technical Review group recommended be changed. Maybe it happens, maybe not. If it does happen I expect lots of conditions.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now