Jump to content

RFguy

Members
  • Posts

    3,528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by RFguy

  1. LOL this has got to be the widest thread drift ever
  2. 2nd paragraph "The Cessna had departed from Dalby toward forecast en route weather unsuitable for visual flight, despite the pilot only being qualified for flight in visual conditions." I stopped reading there...
  3. Yes, the LS might be one option for an RV10 if you couldnt buy a '540 anywhere. An IO540 is going to make 300 hp. You'd want a 450cu + LS if you were going there. not a job for a 350.......and it still wouldnt be as reliable as a IO540. looking at prices... it would be only worthwhile if you got the vehicle engine cheap. A new io540 is abotu 60kUSD. you might be able to get one yuu can bulk strip for 10-15k and spend 20 on parts to get it back the air Certainly VH-experimental buys a bit of flexibility there.
  4. (nev beat mne to it) The problem with a rear counterweight is that the whole system now has a higher (rotational) moment of inertia. IE just because you balanced it on a set of scales doesnt mean you put it the way it was.. IE take longer to recover from a spin. You've given a rotating object more rotational inertia. This would be , IMO , a hazardous change for an aerobatic aircraft that (was) permitted to do spins. The moment of inertia is proportional to weight times the distance to the centre of mass squared. Because it is radius squared, two bodies opposing do not cancel out because the square of anything is a positive number
  5. I'm assuming it weighs the same as a Lycoming+ a CS. Otherwise all flying quality and test data etc etc are all invalid But, it's experimental- " it is what it is "
  6. what people ask for an airplane and what they actually get are of course two different things.
  7. IMO you want to keep the exit coolant temp at least 10% below the boiling point of the coolant at the operating pressure. Bubbling, gassing will upset the flow and lead to coolant being ejected into the expansion bottle (bad ish) . Vapour spots 'hot spots' have a higher potential heat removal capability than liquid water conduction regions, depending on flow.. It's hard to know how big the hotspots would be because they would vary with flow and viscosity which beleive it or not, varies quite a bit for common coolants. Remember , Ally Alloy has a fairly high thermal conductivity so hot spots are unlikely because they'll just conduct the heat to the cooler spot. **Plenty up for chance and speculation without accurate physical modelling !** so just keep the coolant 10-15 deg below the boiling pt I'd keep the temps below boiling pt for an atmospheric pressure of 50/50. IE below 106C. Anyway, I dont think you have coolant temp issues, you need to get the oil temp down. 80-90 deg C hottest.
  8. Sounds like you need to change the balance of oil cooler airflow and coolant airflow. Skip what size ID hoses did you end up running between tank and oil cooler and engine ? I'd keep the coolant below 110C, despite being an anti boil mix. rates of corrosion increase at higher temperatures. If you can measure coolant rise across the radiator or across the engine, that will give you lots of extra info.
  9. My Kluger.. on my OBD in hot summer, never seen the oil go higher than 90 deg C. and i have never seen my Lycoming above 85C, sits a round 80-82C But, yeah I agree 90C-110C is probably fine, my point is that you are leaving some cooling on the table - that oil cooling is the low hanging fruit to cool stuff in your engine.
  10. that's all crap about oil having to be 100deg C. water doesnt suddenly start vapourizing at 100C. rapid evap is well and truly underway at 80 deg C. It does take a little more to evap water out of suspension/solution but not that much. Atmo pressure also falls with altitude, makes evap water easier...
  11. Skip, in my opinion, that oil is still too hot. by about 10 deg C.... but, getting there. water temps seems OK, something is wrong with your oil cooling... or biased too much one way., IMO.
  12. this is the easiest https://www.flightstore.com.au/aviation-headsets/plugs-jacks or, buy from clearprop, ozpilot, or mobileone .. I get mine from Mouser but you need to know all the cryptic Switchcraft numbers.
  13. BTW yesterday I installed a FUNKE ZATR833S in a friend's aircraft. It is superb ! easy to setup, everything is controllable, adjustable from the panel, wiring it is highly adaptable, real nice kit . good ext audio input options, adjustable sidetone level s indpenendent of mic gains etc dont forget to set it to 25k channel spacing once installed. sounds good on air, also. https://www.ozpilot.com.au/product/funke-zatr833s-vhf-transceiver/?utm_source=Google Shopping&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Ozpilot Products&gclid=CjwKCAiA1fqrBhA1EiwAMU5m_0bZoX14nmGoZrjP0sMxGlTzcim12-uPIdLPcLhAhz692YI7X07znhoCq1MQAvD_BwE
  14. I have already made my conclusion. And it is harsh ! Pilot became unconscious. Passengers were not sufficiently briefed on activating the CAPS system (shutdown engine, activate CAPS). Should have been with so many souls on board. It is a terrible ending to a what should have been survivable situation. Pilot only accumulated 800 hours in 38 years which for me is a question mark. For whatever reason he failed to provide duty of care to that family through his own errors.
  15. This concept is covered regularly in science fiction.
  16. mmm a couple of things 1) on points of fault / incident reporting. seems the biggest reason for not getting fault/ error reporting is people thinking someone will get in trouble or it will adversely affect them for whatever reason. Need to figure out a way to change that mindset to the right sort of no blame/ no fault. Of course- no blame no fault cant be unbounded - so that's the sticky bit. I've heard of two Jabiru oil filters splitting, (could be the high pulsing PRV or could be mfr defect or steel too light or ????? ----but they have not heard of this- this is an example of owner/operator reporting defficiencies. 2) With regards to the meat of the discussion, my concerns with a certain manufacturer's behaviour - there has been an ownership change , and broadly issues I have raised as a company culture problem will get addressed, but it wont be overnight. -glen
  17. back on topic. skippy please dont bring yout sonex and soneri talk into the Van's forum. We're tired of it. Van's will be fine, YES VERY TRUE - they make a NICHE and HIGHLY SOUGHT AFTER product- which is a good commercial recipe to be able to put your prices up (as necessary) . I doubt a 30% extra cost of kit would change anyone's buying habits...
  18. SKippy, I do not beleive you will acheive those numbers. given that the sonex with the 3300 jab will only make about 155 kn T at 6k feet at 7 gph) . (source : sourcebuilders website ) You migth do it for the same fuel consumption though, make the rotax work harder . fixed prop of course.
  19. yep, Lycoming can lean aggressively. also try Litres/nm that's easier to calculate. the piper will do about 244mL/nm at 90 kts at sea level, or about 260mL/nm at 120 kts at 10k feet fully loaded J230 will do about 230mL/nm at sea level, 115k. 212mL/nm at 6kfeet ~ 125k... The J160 15/100 = 150mL/nm Your RV at 25 lph at 140 tas = IE 178mL/nm..... (really ?????) gather at 12k feet ?
  20. Had a useful and constructive meeting with RAaus today.
  21. There's also a 100% cover kit from Punkinhead at Yarrawonga. It's comprehensive. I have one for when I've had to occassionaly live outside for a few weeks. A quote I heard recently : You are paying for the cost of a hanger whether you are in a hangar or not. IE extra maintenance if you are not. But a full cover can go a long way.
  22. Just was on the phone to a litigator friend of mine. next steps 1) thoroughly understand what the relationship is between RAAus and CASA, and how it works, understand the legislation first. and then choose a small number of items that , where in my opinion RAAUS are not fulling their obligations under the act. and / or 2) and consider making it a civil complaint against the aviation company I am complaining about (that , IMO, RAAus are turning a blind eye to, or are simply not sufficiently competent to do meet the requirements under the act.) . Incompetence leads to negligence, however whether they knew it was substandard or did not know, that's the messy bit. A bit can be drawn from the previous action. I'll take a look at exactly how and why CASA got involved. It's generally accepted that CASA's previous involvement was rather clumsy .
  23. The RAAUS staff and board just does not take safety seriously, it's all a big front.
  24. Yes SKippy, that is right- must go with some solutions, otherwise I will just be a whiner. ahh well they've blown me off for tomorrow. disappointing. I wrote to them detailing my concerns about the number of Jabiru fires a month ago, got NO reply, zero..... So I wrote to them again, they set a meeting date, which I arranged to be in town for, and they've blown me off and 'will listen to my concerns by telephone'. Not good enough. Time to go to talk to CASA and bust their arses.
  25. I have a face to face meeting at RAaus tomorrow. anyone want any questions asked ? PM me directly.
×
×
  • Create New...