Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 It's been ruled out by a lot also. It's NOT cheap  and it's a bigger security Risk.  This discussion? is an exercise in futility. Nev

Posted

I keep looking, don't worry.  You don't answer any propositions I put to you. Quoting yourself is Just LAZY and an insult to who you are addressing. Nev

Posted
2 minutes ago, facthunter said:

 It's been ruled out by a lot also. It's NOT cheap  and it's a bigger security Risk.  This discussion? is an exercise in futility. Nev

I don't think we will agree . It is a devisive subject. Think of an American aircraft carrier which is basically a mobile town with a population bigger than where I live.

Those people are living and working around a nuclear reactor 24/7..

Never heard about any accidents or problems.

Posted

Doesn't prove anything, does it really.?  Plenty of Russian stuff leaking at the Bottom of the Ocean. Nev

Posted

Has anyone here know how much Nuclear Waste Australia would produce each year if all of Australia was powered by nuclear power?  So little would be at the bottom of the ocean from a Nuclear Sub.  Does anyone know how much is stored an Lucas Heights?

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, BrendAn said:

Australia is the perfect place to set up a nuclear waste facility.

Would add a lot of money to the economy too. We sell it to other countries so we should be able to take it back for disposal too. Well storage I should say.

 

Nowhere in the World can nuclear waste be safely disposed of.

 

You condemn, the generations to come, to radiation sickness - talk about short term gain / long term pain😈

  • Haha 1
Posted

Never mind, there's enough fossil fuel to turn it around in years to come. Remember the 70's when we were in panic mode because we were running out of fossil fuel? The whole thing is a gigantic political stunt.

  • Informative 1
Posted

This is developing into political perspectives.  Having working in Dallas for a company that designed and built systems for Nuclear and just how little waste is produced and how safe the systems in the western world are, Long Island killed no one and the general station is still operating.  So much ignorance and political views are given without knowledge.  I am backing out of this discussion.

  • Caution 1
Posted

What has all this to do with experimental and one off aircraft. I started this topic as an adjunct to the aircraft profiles to let you see unique aircraft that did not warrant a full profile. Take your other discussion somewhere else.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, BrendAn said:

We have an abundance of natural gas that could be powering vehicles here instead of being sold offshore for next to nothing

There's certainly an abundance round here on occasions...................)

  • Like 1
Posted

No further off topic posts or I will lock the thread.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

 This a great place lately. for not  being able to have serious discussions like we used to. Jump on thread drift if you must But Be consistent. Don't just use it when it suites you.   We should be able to handle widely different  views. I've been almost 20 years on this forum Ian Baker Provides.. Also address the subject and do not try to Make "Gotcha" moments for those you don't like.  Peter this is not in response to your Post as it was originally posted at the same time yours was. Nev

Edited by facthunter
expand

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...