facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago It's been ruled out by a lot also. It's NOT cheap and it's a bigger security Risk. This discussion? is an exercise in futility. Nev
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I keep looking, don't worry. You don't answer any propositions I put to you. Quoting yourself is Just LAZY and an insult to who you are addressing. Nev
BrendAn Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, facthunter said: It's been ruled out by a lot also. It's NOT cheap and it's a bigger security Risk. This discussion? is an exercise in futility. Nev I don't think we will agree . It is a devisive subject. Think of an American aircraft carrier which is basically a mobile town with a population bigger than where I live. Those people are living and working around a nuclear reactor 24/7.. Never heard about any accidents or problems.
facthunter Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Doesn't prove anything, does it really.? Plenty of Russian stuff leaking at the Bottom of the Ocean. Nev
Geoff_H Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Has anyone here know how much Nuclear Waste Australia would produce each year if all of Australia was powered by nuclear power? So little would be at the bottom of the ocean from a Nuclear Sub. Does anyone know how much is stored an Lucas Heights?
skippydiesel Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 37 minutes ago, BrendAn said: Australia is the perfect place to set up a nuclear waste facility. Would add a lot of money to the economy too. We sell it to other countries so we should be able to take it back for disposal too. Well storage I should say. Nowhere in the World can nuclear waste be safely disposed of. You condemn, the generations to come, to radiation sickness - talk about short term gain / long term pain😈 1
Moneybox Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Never mind, there's enough fossil fuel to turn it around in years to come. Remember the 70's when we were in panic mode because we were running out of fossil fuel? The whole thing is a gigantic political stunt. 1
Geoff_H Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago This is developing into political perspectives. Having working in Dallas for a company that designed and built systems for Nuclear and just how little waste is produced and how safe the systems in the western world are, Long Island killed no one and the general station is still operating. So much ignorance and political views are given without knowledge. I am backing out of this discussion. 1
red750 Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago What has all this to do with experimental and one off aircraft. I started this topic as an adjunct to the aircraft profiles to let you see unique aircraft that did not warrant a full profile. Take your other discussion somewhere else. 1 1
IBob Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, BrendAn said: We have an abundance of natural gas that could be powering vehicles here instead of being sold offshore for next to nothing There's certainly an abundance round here on occasions...................) 1
red750 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago No further off topic posts or I will lock the thread. 1
facthunter Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) This a great place lately. for not being able to have serious discussions like we used to. Jump on thread drift if you must But Be consistent. Don't just use it when it suites you. We should be able to handle widely different views. I've been almost 20 years on this forum Ian Baker Provides.. Also address the subject and do not try to Make "Gotcha" moments for those you don't like. Peter this is not in response to your Post as it was originally posted at the same time yours was. Nev Edited 56 minutes ago by facthunter expand
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now