storchy neil

hey frank what the betting price on total number of votes to be counted less than 5000 so that will mean that 5000 don't give a xxxxxxxx neil

aero bearing service for steering rod for storch s neil

accountability as far as I can see when it was okay for raa to pay for another air craft that got repaired through a mishap but the so called experts could not and would not look into the repair that was done and was completely against the repair manual the repairer did not have said manual for aircraft when it was available to him

his claim that I as owner of said aircraft did not supply it to him he was at that time an l4 and a cassa lame

no a well known l2 did fly to were the aircraft was and did an inspection off said aircraft and was appalled at what he witnessed yet raa tec did not even bother to inspect parts remove from repaired at a fly in

don I have a feeling that you are being fed a heap of bull

specific question don take a look into storch s 24 4524 that was owned by neil t Bradley and the blatant disregard for rules and regulation by raa and you tell me its okay

when I informed raa about the rotax return line to the tank nothing has been done about it I have this gut feeling that this may have contributed to 3 accidents if not more why has this not been addressed as it has been in the rotax since 1997 on all 912 motors and 912 s motors

can you produce a document from rotax saying that a return line is not required on all 912 rotax motors as the tec has refused to supply me with it

don so an aircraft that requires a new engine frame, new windscreen, new legs, new under carriage, new legs,new firwall , new rudder peddles ,new gasculator ,repair to wing tip cracked leading edge ,re rigged as the rigging was 20 degrees out 2 l2 would not pass this aircraft as airworthy

trust raa to be transparent bull

I would hate to go flying with some take off and he hands me a shifter and says tighten the wheel nut will yah repairs on the run sound familure neil

bull xxxx raa are not interested in the way my plane was repaired I have that in writing from bloody raa can produce any time want to take my statement to court that is from the currant ceo and the currant tec lets bring this out in the open ask and you will receive

raa have not been any where near me tec has photos off said repair bloody crap what some have written

this thread has made up my mind I will be taking the parts removed from my plane after it was repaired to Canberra on the 14 th you don't believe me you will be able to inspect them for your self neil

hi sandman sorry here is a question for all

a fuel pump that has a by pass on the pressure side will it vaporize fuel ? neil

I don't think there is a potential Clive Palmer-sized hole in Board appointments...or vic liberal party to please his wife neil

trust is what is lacking one little 5 letter word but in my humble opinion is what this it is all about

the shit I personally when through with getting some one to listen at raa about the state off repair off my aircraft only two at the top called me personally and they where tossed out

accountability is not on the top of the list you do as I say or piss off

what is wrong with change nothing as long as it does not bring us undone can we as members trust three blokes to do the changes the way that I am reading apparently not

trust is needed new ideas needed input from all is needed and most off all a new constitution that we as members can trust the persons at the top to abide by it neil

yes don that is why I have used the word collusion It came about, I was told, because the Board leaked like a sieve and a certain person didn't like it let it RIP neil

admin david don I have agreed and disagreed how come some are just learning off the bloody up hill battle to get change apparently they just take its their given right to fly never mine the logistics behind what is their organization

we as an organization need more up to date information from everybody none off the bloody whispering behind the sxxxhouse door I am hopefull

david I am quite aware of the amount work that don and others have done to bring our organization up to 2016 I am aware of what ian and john tried to do back in 2010 neil

Is this written into the proposed constitution or is it an assumption?

not an assumption as ian was very up set that when he was on the board he had to sign that order and was bitterly opposed to it to not sign it ment he heard nothing in camera or not

so now since 2010 6 bloody years later going down the same path thanks ian neil

are so the old persons are still at it tell only a few that bull dust xxx has to stop this is way the old board fooled us as members stop that now through every one on the board out cassa will employ em neil

ft get the minutes of meeting I when there were you when all this was brought to head now the old so called experts cost me thousands so until you can produce the evidence of what you are saying who in the hell wants to listen

advancement off aviation in our book off rules needs to get a head its 2016 not 1985

some just went along with what they thought was right and proper as the leader of our organization said so how wrong he was when cassa done the audits we all paid a heavy price for following foolish advice

how could you question foolish advice you couldn't because of collusion was rampant

what has been very interesting is that now all off the question and answers are the same we all want the same a new constitution come hell or high water it has to be done

accountability by all that means members to take more off an interest in who you vote for is he or she only want the job for glory or are they going to follow shit advice or are they all for the advancement off aviation

what a pity that all members of raa arnt reading the discussions here it is very enlightening neil

them there yanks do have a nack of getting out off bad situations neil

when a group off persons called a meeting on this very matter I did jump at the chance to demand that the then constitution needed to be up dated and the board made accountable that it had to made public and all members that is the so called over 12000 members to be involved yes apparently we as an organization of over 12000 members now there was collusion and now way that you could get the truth out of them I was threatened to shut up or I would be banned thrown out

now don't shoot our selves in the foot by just laying down and not having your say as it is our fun time your organization as members it is your right to say want you would like how it is to be written after all its about us the members

in my opinion it need just 100 members to demand a meeting of the board to make changes to the new constitution

what I would like is a written letter of confirmation that the first general meeting will be for changes if needed and I feel it will to this constitution if it is passed

yes bruce admin did get a great deal off shit and threats personal attacks on him and his family I thank him and his family for continueing to make this site what it is a venue for aviation to be discussed

the good the bad and the ugly me neil

how many off you have been involved in rewriting a constitution it is not easy

when I was told that I was brining raa into disrepute that I would thrown out and he didn't care who I was or what I owned he was the top guy {is this going to happen again }

when a letter off complaint to another on the board to hard for them to handle just keep flying {can this happen again }

is my opinion on something going get me banned

so now it is that at the end of three years you are off the board for one year this should stop the board from collusion

so we will have a new board every three years opp that aint going to work

at 6 months a general meeting should be called so as any mistakes and holes can be addressed (why not )

now why is there only one board member on this site willing to take a lot off flake

why was this site not adopted by raa because the the so called experts were to stupid not to take up the offer (idiots)

some off us sceptical as to the what has happened in the past off the members don't need to know attitude by the board

their are some bloody good ideas been put up by some keep it up neil

I assumed that PLB was to be able to be activated both manual and auto am I wrong again neil

well I put up my hand for some changes to the con so as to the shit that was going on could be stopped the accountability that was none applictable to some and the underhanded state off afairs that was going on

why in the hell are we trying to change the set up what will work provided that all decisions made are out in the open and complied with by all neil

what I have heard is this plane took a while to find no PLB on board why in the hell was it not 500 hundred dollars to save a life bull shit not carrying one

if its used at the start off an engine out and you get on the ground okay all that is needed is a phone call to cancel at leased the searching persons wont have to cover half of aust neil

looks like engine failure may day put out four on board no serious injuries landed in paddock neil

The ideas are not stringent enough to get compliance. Remember the is yelling about governance.

yes keith as I bloody well found out board members full of don't bother with that attitude to hard for them first hand facts I have

their were only two on the old board that took an interest in my plane and they were sacked one of the old board broke so many rules

compliance now that's a dirty word KP some here wont know what your on about no I don't want a nanny just comply with what we have neil

light air craft down yea neil

didn't know it was missing wondered why there was a draft neil

come on you two you are both on the same boat with a hole in it we all want a workable con and members charter all the discusions are about the con and mem charter will lead all to disagree at some stage

the doc as it is sighed now as written ready for a vote 51% say yes its through 51% say no it goes back to the drawing board

read it very carefully neil

get the constitution right time is running out and the members charter because the old one cost me a bloody plane loss of sleep and thousands of dollars

acountabilty is the issue when you are informed don't bother us fix the plane and move on nobody wants to see this happen

the cost to fix the limp later don will be great cause the doctors will say nothing I can do move on

so the costs of getting it write have blown out so be it what is wrong with spending 100,000 to get it write spend 20,000 could cost 500,000 when a hole is found

since 2010 any person that wanted to or cared enough should have been reading and taking notice putting in submissions neil

after landing at an airport I was leaving to go and doing my walk around when I was approached by a person who wanted to know why I did a complete magi check on shut down and shut down on one magi and why I pushed down on the tail of my aircraft and moved the rudder through its full movement

my answer was why don't you do it

his reply you don't have to do that

to witch I replied so things only break while you are flying

he walked away

when I and others were building the wallaby at temora he came up to me and asked did I remember him and that he now understood why I did what I did

some times what is a stupid reply will make you take notice neil