skippydiesel Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 58 minutes ago, BrendAn said: 912is does away with all this drama The origional carby one will do me nicely. As I understand, the injected varient of the 912 has two advantageous over the same carburettor engine; Better fuel econamy Greater (total?) resistance to inlet ice. The disadvantages are significant; Much more expensive to purchase. Greater complexity - almost impossible for the average home mechanic to do anything with the fuel delivery throttle system. Potential to be very costly if goes wrong. Repeating what I have read- The 912is fuel savings; Could take the average owner/ pilot near 20 years to equal the greater purchase cost. Are possibly attractive to flight schools/hire operators (fast hour accumulation), assuming the sale of high time engine is attractive to 2nd hand purchasers. 😈 1
Blueadventures Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, BrendAn said: 912is does away with all this drama I'm happy with carbs, don't want the expense of 'is' diagnostic gear, programs and the headache of chasing fault codes. UL & ULS; the parts, maintenance and associated costs suit me and I pretty much know the critters inside out. I'd be happy still with cars of the 70's and 80's with the upgrade of points to electronic ignition, and stop there. (Don't miss bonnet up in the rain attending to the needs of the points. It was character building.) Edited 8 hours ago by Blueadventures 1
skippydiesel Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Hi Blueadventures - Second attempt to get a bit more information The above statement, (now a few back) mentions mechanical carby balance, what of the pneumatic balance???😈
FlyBoy1960 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago whatever happened to the lever system that was being developed by Kyle Communications ? you would set up this system once and it would seem to me to be able to stay in balance for just about forever, then you don't have any issues with cables because there is only one cable going from his system to the pilot hands. Using pushrods or hard connections for the throttle seems a no-brainer to me because there is nothing to stretch or go out of adjustment 1 1
facthunter Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago "Pneumatic" DOES throw me off. Do you Mean EVEN MP? A MANY times bigger area will improve that But I've presented adverse Possibilities that Only ONE person acknowledged that SHOULD be considered.. Nev
FlyBoy1960 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago the pneumatic ones made by Carbtune are really good, they used brass rods and didn't bounce around like gauges. I have also used a digital balancer from Aircraft Spruce called the carb mate https://www.aircraftspruce.com.au/catalog/eppages/ts111kitcarbmate.php it seemed to work really well also 1 1
skippydiesel Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 44 minutes ago, FlyBoy1960 said: the pneumatic ones made by Carbtune are really good, they used brass rods and didn't bounce around like gauges. I have also used a digital balancer from Aircraft Spruce called the carb mate https://www.aircraftspruce.com.au/catalog/eppages/ts111kitcarbmate.php it seemed to work really well also I have used a pair of cheap (Asian made) twin carb motorcycle vacuum gauges, for about 15 years now. They are excellent! Come with a little adjustable valve for each tube, so that the needle pulse fliker/bounce, can be "removed". The "face"/ needle, can be zeroed if needs be. I had to purchase longer vacuum hose, so that I can have the gauges in the cockpit, while engine running. I always swop tubes, to assess consistence of reading - so far no discrepancy. Can't understand why people go and purchase expensive digital/electronic stuff ($500++?) when something like this is all the owner maintainer will need. ($21-$51) 😈 Edited 6 hours ago by skippydiesel 1
BrendAn Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Blueadventures said: I'm happy with carbs, don't want the expense of 'is' diagnostic gear, programs and the headache of chasing fault codes. UL & ULS; the parts, maintenance and associated costs suit me and I pretty much know the critters inside out. I'd be happy still with cars of the 70's and 80's with the upgrade of points to electronic ignition, and stop there. (Don't miss bonnet up in the rain attending to the needs of the points. It was character building.) It's pretty rare for efi to give much trouble these days. In saying that, if you seen the Birdsnest of wiring and crap on my hks engine you would never put it on an aircraft. 1
skippydiesel Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Hi Blueadventures - Third attempt to get a bit more information The above statement, (now further back) mentions mechanical carby balance, what of the pneumatic balance??? Common Mate what's the big secret? Do you follow, as per Rotax advice, your mechanical carby balance, with a pneumatic balance? If not, why not?😈
Blueadventures Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago 59 minutes ago, facthunter said: "Pneumatic" DOES throw me off. Do you Mean EVEN MP? A MANY times bigger area will improve that But I've presented adverse Possibilities that Only ONE person acknowledged that SHOULD be considered.. Nev I have the Synchromate and also a tube unit.
facthunter Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Problems are often Hard to diagnose. Sometimes only done by swapping items till the faut is corrected.. Self testing built into the system can be done. Nev 1
Blueadventures Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, BrendAn said: It's pretty rare for efi to give much trouble these days. In saying that, if you seen the Birdsnest of wiring and crap on my hks engine you would never put it on an aircraft. Agree, however I'm happy with life on my little Carby island surrounded by water. Have to be careful of the crocs, sharks and 'R is' gremlins (on the rare occasion they show their heads) and associated costs.🙃 1
facthunter Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago A U tube connected to both sides would do that or a simple flow indicator that works in both directions. The thing you need is for the settings to remain where they are when set. Nev 1
skippydiesel Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Hi Blueadventures, "I have the Synchromate and also a tube unit." Is this, a sort of answer to my "Do you follow, as per Rotax advice, your mechanical carby balance, with a pneumatic balance?" ie you have the gear, so am I to assume, you have used it? I Googled Synchromate carburettor balancer to try & get a handle on the equipment you may be using to do a pneumatic carby balance - nothing! Well not nothing, Google always gives something; Synchromate refers to a veterinary injectable medication containing the synthetic hormone cloprostenol, primarily used in livestock (cattle, horses, sheep) for reproductive management like synchronizing heat cycles, inducing ovulation, terminating pregnancies, or inducing labour. There is a more likly contender; TecMate SynchroMate (TS-101), for synchronizing carburetors or throttle bodies - is this it? There was also something called a SynchroKing, which may be similar to your TecMate - all pretty pricey. For what its worth; The Rotax Owners Forum technical advisors have opined, that the above type devises, are not as good as a simple vacuum gauge, for balancing carburettors.😈 1
Kiwi Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I use a twin-engine manifold pressure gauge. I first connect it to one manifold to make sure they read the same, then connect the left to the left and right to right and sit in the aircraft and check at various rpm's 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now