johnm

.......... I thought so ?? you can carry a pushbike in a plane ................ BUT ........... these push bike lights - when turned on (a switch) - emit a pulse of light that could / might / maybe detract nesting birds - at night

you could try ? .................. the LED lights that go on push bikes cheap as chips - got 4 for $ 15 from ebay - red - probably get white (if that's not being racist) - charge from a USB I reckon ? they would last a day or 2 without charge good pulse of light at night

I'll assume a couple of the following things - purely in the interest of thread chatter - 24 registered planes and their engines - what happens when the engine becomes time expired * its becoming relevant if you entertain buying a 24 registered plane * or perhaps some other type No registered plane - the MARAP process creates paperwork and a fee - (apart from the cost) ............ the intent is then recorded & probably is a good thing in that everyone can see what the 'go' is - a paperwork trail - MARAP is at least doing the job currently (and I hope in the future) - in the case of the 912 - if Rotax are saying 'no going past engine life' .............. then that must clear Rotax of liability - because of MARAP ..........................who is then now seen as taking this liability - if it's RAA - how can they accept that liability - RAA are not engine manufacturers (or is MARAP comparable to GA 'on condition' and therefore acceptable) ................ And - I don't understand why RAA does not clear the air on this subject - its straight rule interpretation - best to hear it from the horses mouth (irrespective of what the rules may say ......... or not say or whoever says it) - RAA to clarify for all to hear - clearly - loud and clear

originally (I don't know how far back) RAA gleefully accepted all those aircraft registrations and fees ................. guessing engine life was never really considered BUT now its been placed out front and is an issue for aircraft owners MARAP is the mechanism and am not to sure who collects that fee. $ 330 for the MARAP fee seems disproportionate compared to an annual rego fee of say $ 235 ........... ?

apologies skip - I thought the 2 'nn' were in the flight safety thread -........................ I now see it in your subject title ! ..............

'n' lives right next door to 'm' ............ it may not be dyslexia

.............. wierd

a noisy neighbourhood .................... @ + time 3.24

`looks like th green suffered no damage ............................. I wonder if golf continued that day

quiet a low stall spped for suck a big bird - 70 knots (................ no offence you Xair people)

apologies if you have heard this one ............... no joke though Onetracks post above reminds me of the NZ topdressing DC 3's that could take a Bambina or a Mini in the back - also by ramp - for transport of pilot and crew - pilot got off one speeding ticket in the North Island ................. BUT, presumably had to pay the South Island ticket ! (post form NZ web-site below) Was it Gerry Kluck that got two speeding tickets in a day (within the hour I think), one between Blenheim and Woodbourne followed by one from Paraparaumu Airport to the Railway Station. (so engineer could catch train to Palmy)? Magistrate through it out of court as it was thought impossible to get two tickets within three hours in two islands in the same car.

interesting one - tried to message picture to Red - electric - freight over NZ cook straight ?

what height above sea level is that strip ? ..................... perect conditions that day (I am not taking anything away for the skill in landing) ...................... I'd like to see a goo around - touch down and then over the top .................. looks possible ?

................... very ? eloquently put

AI with a big dribble - ME 109 manufacture

I can rember flying aroung Maryborough Qld and a RAAF Hurcules was flying around and landing there ? - they stated Hurcules - positon and intention at at the end said 'caution wake turbulence' ............ a reminder to the unwary

Bl**dy incredible ................ good to hear from an engineer that works on those big birds thats 4500 hours per year for HL 7413 - no pilot could ever clock up those hours (per year) Mr google reckons a 747 burns 14000 ltrs / hour - based on 149000 hours that 2 trillion litres of fuel

all to true - but they got this bird to 92000 hours - there must be something more to this ................ if you got the plane to 92000 hours there must have been an expectation that she was safe to say 95 - 100000 hours which begs the question - what flying aircraft has the most flying hours (might not be something an owner (assuming an airline)) may wish NOT to reveal)

to add ? to the discussion - my point was 92000 hours equates to 10.50 years flying 24 hours a day / 365 days a year thats a sound recomendation for that planes maintenance regime .......... and I'm guessing for that the manufacturer or does the manufacturer have no say in it after a period a plane that takes it's final flight to a museum .......... also must be a product of sound maintenance (be it temporary maintenance) so if you owned a Lancaster or a B17 - if you have the money - that plane could fly for another 100 years ? why not ? or is there something else that determines a planes life

be interesting to know what airframe life should be on these big birds - assuming if they are maintained in accordance with manufacturers regimes (and you have deep pockets) .......... they can fly indefinitely WW2 B17's and Avro Lancasters are examples of that ............ assuming these are still maintained to manufacturers regimes ?

I read somewhere there was an ag pilot and he tied his boot to the cockpit roof - as a plumb bob - for a required horizon one day (could be a tall story) Your idea is better refined MBrooks - good idea if it can be applied to a basic aviation license and aircraft As to if Bureaucracy will stick their nose in ................ (I hope they don't ............ cause just a visual aid ?)

Interesting FH - is that still the rule - an L2 can't refuse to work on a plane ? (irrespective of conditon or history)

Ask Council if you can put some tables and chairs out front of house - that's pretty harmless and no doubt they'l say yes

yes - a fair majority of IT service providers need to take up an activity that occupies their fingers & time ............. I always suggest knitting ......... if I ever give then feed back

Not a bad idea Ian - BUT I'd say Avdata would have their hooks in pretty deep (as all parasites must)