I was under the impression that canard wing setups were abandoned about the same time as wing warping, because a better design was thought up.
If canards were such fantastic, award-winning designs, perhaps we'd have see more on regular commercial aircraft?
Unsurprisingly, they only turn up on odd occasions, when someone advertises that they've thought of a new brilliant idea in aircraft design, and have produced a prototype or experimental model.
A number of decades ago, there was a father-and-son team in W.A. (Deryck and Neil Graham), who were in business as "Composite Technology", who were convinced their Eagle 150 canard aircraft design was the dux nutz, and proceeded to manufacture a number of them.
This was in the late 1980's, but by the late 1990's, with very few orders for their exotic machine forthcoming, they sold the design and manufacturing rights to the Eagle 150, to the Malaysians.
The Malaysians poured multiple tens of millions more into the design, and they only ever sold a few more of the aircraft to their "captive" customer, the Malaysian Air Force - thus proving that the design is not world-beating, nor is it in demand.
Composites Technology Research Malaysia has now become CTRM Holdings and provides a composites manufacturing facility for a few of the global aircraft manufacturers, manufacturing some of the composite components that go into the likes of Airbus and Boeing commercial aircraft. Canard aircraft production hardly rates a mention in Malaysia now.
https://ctrm.com.my/our-offerings/
There are three military fighters that do use the canard design to a certain extent - the Saab Gripen, the Eurofighter Typhoon, and the Dassault Rafale.
However, I suspect the addition of the canard to these three fighters, has little to do with any anti-stall characteristics of the canard, but more to do with assisting the delta wing with better control and lift, especially at low speeds.