440032

Consult FAA AC 43.13-1B Chapter 3 fiberglass and plastics. Section 3. Transparent Plastics. 3-24 Repair of plastics.

Curious why has it taken five months from CofA issue to first flight????

And I guarantee the pilots of each of those would be looking across at the other and thinking "WOW! I'd love to have a fly of that!"

I was at "day one" of Doncaster Aeromodellers Club, (1973-4) two locations prior to the current long held location. That's where Doncaster name came in, that's where it was.

14 years later, now it's happening to mine. No battery, just the power adapter, 5A fuse. Radio will randomly squeal then shut off. Sometimes will restart itself, sometimes not, then it will go for a while or quite a while before doing it again. My spare A6 with battery does it also when battery is depleted, so I believe it's a low-no voltage problem. If I unplug the power from the first one in flight, no squeal, instant off. Will have to test the volts coming from the power adapter I guess. Stupid 9volt radios........ Had a DELCOM (12v) originally, great radio, til it wasn't.

That first guy in the video looked like the 2024 Cooper's Hill Cheese Rolling champion.

OMG, what an absolute FLOG "expert" - he's living 40 years in the past! ("I'm just really glad to be on TV again!") Someone get me a bucket, QUICK.

Airservices ADS-B coverage maps (5 years old) show no coverage below 5000 feet in TAS. Don't know the status of TASWAM these days. Many years ago, TASWAM had been operationally live for about a year before Melbourne ATC's using it found out that the simulator crew never heard of it, didn't have it, and couldn't replicate it (easily)! That was a rather hilarious conversation at the time, coz I was in on it: Can the simulator do TASWAM? TAS what? TASWAM. What WAM? TASWAM. What What?

an ex CASA guy, I'm reliably told. Many years ago (30?) a Taylor Monoplane went MIA from Barwon Heads on a flight to Latrobe Valley (maybe?) He was found the next day, alive, trapped in the wreckage in the saltbush about 2 miles east of Barwon Heads. Didn't get far.

WHY is the LAME using CASA SCH 5 and not the manufacturer's service info as required by LSA rules?

Registered and in use are two totally different things, nowhere does it mention anything about "in use". Registered it says. As there is nearly two years to go, there would seem to be no rush today. Other than the price of the gear heading north towards Santa.

According to the application your aircraft must be "shown in an approved registration database." VH, RAAus, ASRA or whatever they're called this week, etc. REGISTERED, not Reserved. You must supply an Australian tax invoice with your name on it. So no, you can't buy overseas. Supply the "installer declaration" (not nesse-celery a LAME) VH kit builders supply proof that they were the aircraft manufacturer, equipment installer and maintainer. I know a few who got it - quickly. Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Rebate Program – Round 2 | business.gov.au Closes 31 May 2027. And once again, yet again, the rebate has nothing to do with CASA.

TEMU warehouse was totally destroyed by fire. Losses are estimated at $57.31.

Reminder about the difference between aircraft AN fittings and similar looking automotive or industrial fittings. Aviation are 37 degree angle while generic industrial are 45 degree angle. They are not compatible if you get it wrong. You can't eyeball which is which and they are difficult to angle measure accurately without some good gear. Do your research, consult rotax manuals etc. Buy the correct parts, not what you think or hope are the correct parts.

Yessir. (not my first rodeo!)

"Nope". Same wood bearers. I wanted the exhaust out underneath so model stays clean, and it does.

51st year of flying control line. Aeroflyte Kittyhawk with modified engine position.

Well good to know John that I'm not the only one seeing the finish line - for aero clubs doing GA training. My aero club is going great at present. If we were to lose the 141 operation it will leave a big hole. We are almost "last club standing" doing 141 training in hundreds of km. And turbs - roadies..... I worked in a RWC shop until not so long ago (just a helper, not a mechanic). Owner had the apprentices do the roadies, a total NO NO - he was never out on the shop floor. Even wanted me to check some basics, I said NUP, nothing to do with me DH. Yes, each fault had to have a photo taken and uploaded to Vicroads. Even photos of INOP horns! Then another photo of the horn working again when resolved! Hilarious.

I can speak with great experience to this topic. I have been in a local aero club 25 years or thereabouts. In that time it has become very clear that CASA do not want traditional Aero Clubs involved in flight training. Years ago, every small town with an airfield had an aero club, a 172 and an instructor (sole operator) but the aero club held the AOC. I gather that getting an AOC for that was not too difficult. My club had such a structure since the sixties. Our operations manual came from a mob who did that sort of thing. Then following a CASA audit, our approved manual was suddenly no longer approved and we had to change things. The manual mob though still existing then (and today) totally blew us off with radio silence. So I stepped up to fix things, the club had no other viable plan. CASA requirements were becoming far beyond the capabilities of the people of a small town aero club. Many chucked flying training in. Some clubs folded. Along comes Part 141 and all the requirements and it got ten times worse. I can say with great authority that the current requirements for Aero Club people in CASA approved positions and manuals and forms is well beyond the capabilities of ordinary aviators to be involved with, then not to mention the responsibility those positions hold, usually voluntarily (other than paid instructors). It is the Aero Club that holds the 141 Certificate, not the instructors or any other person. Yes there is a CASA standard operations manual draft which we have used, but I can tell you with great certainty that there are many traps in there that could bring you undone at audit. We (I) amended/deleted those traps. (quick example - our manual said we would use the CASA Maintenance Release for the plane. Then our LAME innocently used the other RACWA one. drum roll ....... PING!) Our current approved manuals are only good to the next CASA audit, where overnight they could suddenly now become not acceptable. We (I) do manage to do updates to match regulation changes. Oh, then WE have to PAY to get those changes approved. Let me repeat that one, WE HAVE TO PAY TO GET OUR MANUALS RE-APPROVED AFTER CASA CHANGES REGULATIONS. We've had audits claiming faults and when investigated, some were totally shot down by their own regulations. The auditors were BSing. Some even claimed fault against regulations that did not even exist. All these audit findings were to do with paperwork, nothing to do with flying an aeroplane. Sad, that's what it's all come to. I had a friend in the trucking industry. He once told me the industry was now only about compliance, and if there was any time left over they might do a few deliveries. I believe there will come the day soon (inside 5 years) when our flight training via the aero club cannot survive the paperwork. We could transition to the Part 141 sole operator approval thing that does suit an owner/operator of a 172 trainer. They are the master/mistress of their domain totally, they wear all the responsibility. But that can have problems also if trying to exist in an aero club environment. Perhaps not so if they had their own premises (hangar/classroom) to operate out of. Well that's my take on the Aero Club vs Part 141 GA flying training scene. It's a race to the finish line. Current VH plane utilisation is good, worthwhile holding on to. While we can. Oh also, my club also got an RAAus plane and instructor and that is going really well for us. The club owns the plane. I play NO PART in the paperwork for that part of our operation! As far as I can tell, the operation follows the RAAUs standard manuals, there are no surprises, no variations, no specifics for us. IT WORKS. The RAAus operation HAS attracted many new young members and their family members to the club.

brown rhomboid/diamond wing 1932, propeller at the back. So ugly, when it completed and rolled out, the designer was slapped silly.

It's perhaps probable that some places just don't want to get involved with RPC to RPL conversions - at all.

Class 5 only exists via CASA Exemption EX01/24 Flight Crew Medical Status (Class 5 Medical Self-declaration) Exemption 2024 Para 3 Application of this instrument This instrument applies, according to its terms, to and in respect of the following persons, when they are engaged in certain private operations or permitted class 5 training: (a) student pilots conducting solo flights in an aircraft (b) applicants for a recreational pilot licence (c) holders of a private pilot licence or a recreational pilot licence who are exercising the privileges of the licence Go fly. Case closed.

In winter, I start in mornings down to about 5C with no problems at all, even with an Odyssey battery 8 years old. I have a small solar charge panel plugged in sitting on the wing, under the crappy old, discolored hangar roof skylight panel. My theory is the solar panel doesn't really charge the battery, it just stops it depleting. In 20 winters, I have never "not started" - not once.

and "the Cessna's engine stalled"