Sport Pilot ISSUE 112
Aside from the the regular homilies delivered by our long suffering RAA staff (always worth a brows) it seems the main contributor to SP is the editor.
The SP editor has now reported on his thirds trans Australia trip. The latest self promotion uses approximately 13% of the available SP space (front back covers & advertising included) and delivers less than 1% quality reporting :
AIRCRAFT
The RV 7 used, is not RAA registered.
Possibly could be under the latest regulations but unlikly.
Even if RAA registered, is NOT representative of the majority of RAA aircraft, being far more powerful, Faster, Greater Range, Avgas guzzling and likly higher load capacity.
The pilot of an aircraft of this type, is very unlikly to encounter the sort of trip challenges most RAA pilots/aircraft would encounter.
PILOT
Mr Heath is a GA licensed pilot - as we all know this confers entry to controlled airspace (CTA). As yet ,RAA pilots are not so privileged, thus limiting their (rout & landing) options when traveling.
Mr Heaths budget (fuel/accommodation/food/etc) would seem to be quit lavish, again not likly to be representative of many RAA pilots.
Trip Budget
It may be a perc of the job that Mr Heaths travel activities (journalistic research?) are tax deductable, in whole or part. May also be covered by in whole or part by SP? (RAA?).
I find Mr Heaths travel stories entertaining, if a tad gushy!.
I also find that they have little relevance to what I or my RAA pilot friends might aspire to - something as simple as 95/98 RON ULP availabity is not addressed,.
Three trans Australian trips (published in consecutive SP's) of little relevance to RAA pilots, is truly excessive
Who is approving these irrelevant jaunts?
Who is funding them?
Why are we getting travelogues that have little relevance to the sort of flying RAA pilots might aspire to?
"TECH TALK"
"THE BORE, THE STROKE, AND THE GLORY....."
Yea Gads!
If it was just Mr heath showing his ignorance I would not be concerned however SP is supposed to be representing RAA & it pilots.
This article, in keeping with previous "fluff" from Mr Heath BORDERS ON MISLEADING, CERTAINLY DOES LITTLE TO INFORME, the reader.
How long are we going to be subjected to this SP editors incompetence?π