BurnieM

Yes, if the device can use it. I have seen a lot of so called QC3 chargers that will only put out 2.4 amps.

Yes, but... Pretty much all USB chargers are made in China. Quality control varies enormously. Some even put out what they claim 🙂 I would assume a hot charger is working closer to its capacity and will have a shorter life. I am yet to see a charger that damages the device when it fails but others have seen this.

I understand the cross wind complication but I am seeing an 8000ft sealed runway at Mt Isa.

I believe all modes of USB negoiate between the charger and the device. Just because your charger can put out 2.4 amps does not mean this is what the device is pulling. Get one of the cheap USB amp/voltage meters and see. From pmccarthy comments is seems you can charge it on the go but it only pulls enough to maintain to its state. This is a design decision by the manufacturer.

Do you need ro raise the flaps and turn off the secondary fuel pump while still on the runway ? If it is non-important would it not be a good idea to leave it until you are more relaxed taxiing back.

I understand 2.4 amps is the max output on a standard USB-A socket. Not sure why Guardian Avionics is not being specific unless this is the max total output across both sockets. I have seen this vagueness on cheaper mains/12v USB supplies. I have an Anker Powerport 6 (A2123) mains to 6 port USB-A power supply and they clearly state that each port can put out 2.4 amps but the unit can only support 5 (of the 6 ports) pulling 2.4 amps each. I also have SCOSCHE USBC242M cig lighter plug with dual USB-A that states that both USB-A ports will put out 2.4 amps when used together by two devices. There are a few reasonably priced USB-A to USB-A meters that will tell you amps used and voltage.

Looks like Cue used to have a dirt cross wind runway (from the sat photos). Oh and a dirt north/south runway. Replaced by a single sealed SW/NE runway.

A PLB is waterproof but is not required to float and has a battery life of 24 hours. An EPIRB is waterproof and floats with a battery life of 48 hours. ELTs transmit for 24 hours. Not sure what their other requirements are. All transmit on 406.025 Mhz and the signal is relayed by satellites to rescue centres. They also transmit on 121.5 Mhz for VHF homing. You can purchase them with or without GPS receivers. GPS receiver models give a more accurate fix and save search time and are a little more expensive. You need to register all of them with AMSA and keep your details updated.

Nope. Have a look at FlightRadar - https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/vh-tel#3c420ba2

His height seems to indicate that he was setting up for the Nowra VFR lane (which starts on the coast at Ulladulla) at 2000ft but he was too far inland with lots of 2500-3500 peaks.

All Sydney metro airspace becomes group D (it is being described as D+) or C. You will need to be on a VFR flight plan going north or south or anywhere in the Sydney basin or make a big detour out west. I am guessing the controlled airspace endorsement will be 5? hours and "The number of instructors is such, that they will take two years to train all who want the endorsement" We are down to 14 months left if the airspace changes do not occur till December 2026. Most likely they will occur earlier.

A group representing 10,000 pilots should be able to have a discussion with one of CASAs 800 staff at any time, particularly when they are doing work that really should be done by CASA. The controlled airspace is only an issue because of Western Sydneys proposed opening in December 2026. I estimate that the current instructors in Newcastle, Sydney metro and the Illawarra would take 2 years to train up pilots wanting this endorsement. Yes, we already have a problem.

Yes, group G was about 2 years too late to make a difference. RAAus spent a lot of time doing group G paperwork/manuals and med class 5 took the main driver away from pilots. Would really like to hear what RAAus are doing to drive the Controlled Airspace endorsement. Waiting for CASA sounds hollow. They are in the same city, drive 20 minutes to their office and talk to them, every day. Drive it.

What happens if you land without $35M hull insurance ? What happens if you take off again ? Seems only a civil court action would resolve this and the aerodrome manager would have to show a loss (or potential loss) by you breaching their conditions. A court may decide that the potential loss was very low (say $5) and not award costs to the aerodrome manager. A decent lawyer may advise of the potential outcome and recommend again a civil action. I could not find any examples of action so I presume these aerodrome managers are already aware of this. All conjucture of course until we see a court action.

While you need this for your RAAus cross country (or a RPL Nav) will you use it after you have the endorsement ? Most likely you will only use a EFB as most (with an internet connection) can get the winds and if you setup your plane profile correctly will also give you likely fuel consumption. Plus an iPad with a GPS can also give you updated times to next waypoint etc. I have an ASA E6-B which I used to calculate heading/speed. For everything else I used the calculator on my phone.

I did not say availability and yes how do you know what the rescue time will be ? I think you need to do some research.

Pan Pan is an urgency call not an emergency. Mayday is when your aircraft is in grave and imminent danger (in the judgement of the PIC). What is grave ? whatever the PIC thinks it is. What is imminent ? It is actually the time it would take a rescue resource to reach you. In the Sydney metro area this would probably be 2-5 minutes. So legally to make a Mayday call a grave danger would need to be likely to occur (in the judgement of the PIC) in the next 2-5 minutes. If it is already occurring then you are covered. The idea is you do not wait until it occurs and what is a reasonable time ahead to call. In Central Australia this may be 6-8 hours.

It is not about a life being at risk. Mayday is used when your aircraft/vessel is in grave and imminent danger. In most urgent situations Pan Pan (x 3) is correct. If, for example, you see a mid air collision between other aircraft the correct call would be Mayday Relay (x 3). However... .... a lot of people do not understand Pan Pan or Mayday Relay so I would probably use Mayday in most situations.

And you dont have to run ADS-B either but maybe both of these are a good idea if you want to stay alive.

Yep, thats not bad but it only gives the vendor declared prices at 6am today and 6am tomorrow. NSW Fuelcheck app (government owned) gives realtime pricing updates and I have seen updates appear less that a minute after the price changes. Then again NSW servos can change their pricing at the drop of a hat. Looks like WA has regs saying only daily changes.

Anybody have a fuel pricing app for SA and WA like Fuelcheck NSW ?

I good way to see how the world judges Chinese quality control would be to list non-Chinese companies and countries who have purchased Chinese aircraft and miltary equipment. Please also include whether those companies/countries are using Chinese finance for these purchases. Yes, China will get there but they are not there yet.

I believe many (most?) Chinese goods are of high quality. However, except for the most simple products, all products use components from multiple suppliers. All you need is a single sub-supplier trying to save 1 cent on a 50 cent component and you destroy the reliability and reputation of a $30,000 product. While some Chinese manufacturers understand this, a significant number do not. An engine gets a bad rep and 5 years later nobody wants to buy it. Rebrand it, make small changes to its appearance and you are good for another 5 years. Chinese motorcycles have a poor reputation in the Australian market but they are cheap so some still sell. I would really like the Rotax clone to succeed but it comes from a high volume engine/motorcycle manufacturer. Their product may be good but I do not know. My western mind says if they do not want to prove it in Australia then there is probably something that they know that I do not. Like I said, China will eventually get there. I was in China in 2012 and I thought China will be a force in 20 years when they sort out their quality control. Now I am thinking 50 years. Undoubtedly others are thinking this also. Probably why nobody seems too fussed about the buildup of Chinese warships who have not been tested in any battle. This is not to say that you cannot inflict a lot of damage with a large number of men and warships. I would not like to be Taiwan.

PS How are those Rotax clones going ? and why do they not understand they need to prove them in a western (read transparent) environment ?

Yes, I have been to China and ridden on a bullet train. Also stayed in a 5 year old 20 story hotel that had major plumbing problems (leaks inside the walls) and needed to be pulled down. Custom king sized beds and decor was great. Structural integrity not so much. China will get there but there is still way too much 'copying' of western goods without really understanding what needs to go into them.