Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. facthunter

    facthunter

    First Class Member


    • Points

      15

    • Posts

      33,835


  2. Cyrano

    Cyrano

    Members


    • Points

      7

    • Posts

      63


  3. johnm

    johnm

    Members


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      1,108


  4. Marty_d

    Marty_d

    First Class Member


    • Points

      6

    • Posts

      4,978


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 30/11/24 in Aircraft Comments

  1. To expand on my previous: Undaunted by aerodynamic reality, the design team at Pilatus/Britten-Norman has announced plans for the BN2-XL (Extra Loud), promising more noise, reduced payload, a lower cruise speed, and increased pilot workload. We spoke to Mr. Fred Gribble, former British Rail boilermaker and now Chief Project Engineer. Fred was responsible for developing many original and creative design flaws in the service of his former employer, and assures he will be incorporating these in the new BN2-XL technology under a licensing agreement. Fred reassured BN-2 pilots however that all fundamental design flaws of the original model had been retained. Further good news is that the XL version is available as a retrofit. Among the new measures is that of locking the ailerons in the central position, following airborne and simulator tests which showed that whilst pilots of average strength were able to achieve up to 30° of control wheel deflection, this produced no appreciable variation in the net flight path of the aircraft. Thus the removal of costly and unnecessary linkages has been possible, and the rudder has been nominated as the primary directional control. In keeping with this new philosophy, but to retain commonality for crews transitioning to the XL, additional resistance to foot pressure has been built into the rudder pedals to prevent overcontrolling in gusty conditions (defined as those in which wind velocity exceeds 3 knots). An outstanding feature of Islander technology has always been the adaptation of the 0-540 engine, which mounted in any other aircraft in the free world (except the Trislander) is known for its low vibration levels, so as to cause it to shake and batter the airframe, gradually crystallise the main spar, desynchronise the accompanying engine, and simulate the sound of fifty skeletons fornicating in an aluminium dustbin. Britten-Norman will not disclose the technology they applied in enhancing this effect in the XL, but Mr. Gribble assures us it will be perpetuated in later models and sees it as a strong selling point; "After all, the Concorde makes a lot of noise," he said, "and look how fast it goes." However, design documents clandestinely recovered from the Britten-Norman shredder have solved a question that has puzzled aerodynamicists and pilots for many years, disclosing that it is actually noise which causes the BN-2 to fly. The vibration set up by the engines and amplified by the airframe, in turn causes the air molecules above the wing to oscillate at atomic frequency, reducing their density and causing lift. This can be demonstrated by sudden closure of the throttles, which causes the aircraft to fall from the sky. As a result, lift is proportional to noise rather than speed, explaining amongst other things the aircraft's remarkable takeoff performance. In the driver's cab (as Gribble describes it), ergonomic measures will ensure that long-term PBN pilots' deafness does not cause inflight dozing. Orthopaedic surgeons have designed a cockpit layout and seat to maximise backache, enroute insomnia, chronic irritability, and terminal (post-flight) lethargy. Redesigned 'bullworker' elastic aileron cables, now disconnected from the control surfaces, increase pilot workload and fitness. Special noise retention cabin lining is an innovation on the XL, and it is hoped in later models to develop cabin noise to a level which will enable pilots to relate ear pain directly to engine power, eliminating the need for engine instruments altogether. We were offered an opportunity to fly the XL at Britten-Normans' developmental facility, adjacent to the Britrail tea rooms at Little Chortling. (The flight was originally to have been conducted at the Pilatus plant, but aircraft of Britten-Norman design are now prohibited from operating in Swiss airspace during the avalanche season). For our mission profile, the XL was loaded with fossil fuel for a standard 100 nm with Britrail reserves, carrying one pilot and nine passengers to maximise discomfort. Passenger loading is unchanged, the normal under-wing protrusions inflicting serious lacerations on 71% of boarding passengers, and there was the usual entertaining confusion in selecting a door appropriate to the allocated seat. The facility for the clothing of embarking passengers to remove oil slicks from engine cowls during loading has also been thoughtfully retained. Startup is standard, and taxying, as in the BN-2, is accomplished by brute force. Takeoff calculations called for a 250 decibel power setting, and the rotation force for the (neutral) C of G was calculated as 180ft/lbs of back pressure. Initial warning of an engine failure during takeoff is provided by a reduction in flight instrument panel vibration. Complete seizure of one engine is indicated by the momentary illusion that the engines have suddenly and inexplicably become synchronised. Otherwise, identification of the failed engine is achieved by comparing the vibration levels of the windows on either side of the cabin. (Relative passenger pallor has been found to be an unreliable guide on many BN-2 routes because of ethnic considerations). Shortly after takeoff the XL's chief test pilot, Capt. "Muscles" Mulligan, demonstrated the extent to which modem aeronautical design has left the BN-2 untouched; he simulated pilot incapacitation by slumping forward onto the control column, simultaneously applying full right rudder and bleeding from the ears. The XL, like its predecessor, demonstrated total control rigidity and continued undisturbed. Power was then reduced to 249 decibels for cruise, and we carried out some comparisons of actual flight performance with graph predictions. At 5000' and ISA, we achieved a vibration amplitude of 500 CPS and 240 decibels, for a fuel flow of 210 lb/hr, making the BN-2 XL the most efficient converter of fuel to noise since the Titan rocket. Exploring the constant noise-variable speed and constant speed-variable noise concepts, we found that in a VNE dive, vibration reached its design maximum at 1000 CPS, at which point the limiting factor is the emulsification of human tissue. The catatonic condition of long term BN-2 pilots is attributed to this syndrome, which commences in the cerebral cortex and spreads outwards. We asked Capt. Mulligan what he considered the outstanding features of the XL. He cupped his hand behind his car and shouted. "Whazzat?" We returned to Britten-Norman field convinced that the XL model retains the marque's most memorable features, while showing some significant and worthwhile regressions. Pilatus/Britten-Norman are however not resting on their laurels. Plans are already advanced for the three-engined Trislander XL, and noise tunnel testing has commenced. The basis of preliminary design and performance specifications is that lift increases as the square of noise, and as the principle of acoustic lift is further developed, a later five-engined vertical takeoff model is another possibility.
    5 points
  2. EJJ is the Cavalier that flew from NZ and was based at Heck field , the owner built it in NZ he was a German guy Gunter it ws in the same hangar as our aircraft
    3 points
  3. I suspect the Jodel in the third pic is unrelated
    3 points
  4. I scratch built one of these as a scale control line model with a third line throttle control many years ago. Sadly, it never flew but I still have the now very much worse for wear relic that I can't bring myself to part with. All the numbers and decals were hand painted. It's hardly a competition winner but not bad for a 16 year old. Never thought that one day I'd have a pilot's licence and build a real aircraft.
    3 points
  5. Mr Google says top of range is US $ 350k which computes to OZ $ 540,000 .................. I think 20:1 glide ratio looks real good (price not so good)
    2 points
  6. the flat roof version looks like something fell on it in the hangar
    2 points
  7. The Pipistrel Taurus Electra is an electric powered version of the Pipistrel Taurus self launching glider. Refer Gliders section.
    2 points
  8. Thank you Red 750, My R80 (BushCaddy kit number 105) was to my knowledge the second one to fly in Australia, now over 19 years ago. It still serves me very well.
    2 points
  9. always an imposter mingles Red - a bit like this likely lot
    2 points
  10. 2 points
  11. You can't be serious. What about the TRIslander tail Mounted engine? How'd you Like to SPIN one of those Babies? Nev
    1 point
  12. It does a Job and gets up Hours.. I think the Caribou is the Noisiest . P&W R-2000's with exhaust augmenters. You can hear them 20miles away .,Nev
    1 point
  13. The most efficient fuel to noise converter in modern history.
    1 point
  14. Echo Juliet Juliet shown above could be the one that I mentioned.
    1 point
  15. The LATER ones. The entirely FLAT roofline had to go. Nev
    1 point
  16. There's one based at Wedderburn. Has tip tanks, all that I know about it. Looks good.
    1 point
  17. 320kts...would not get out of bed for it.
    1 point
  18. Damn web image searches. You put in a search criteria, and they find images with only one word of the criteria. Error removed.
    1 point
  19. this was the development version of the aircraft that has gone on to become the first certified electric aircraft in the world, the Pipistrel ALPHA Electro. The 2nd photo you have above is a military variant which is not electric so I am not sure why the photo is there of that aircraft ?
    1 point
  20. Good upon them. Might also be a good Powered Glider concept. Nev
    1 point
  21. It uses the NOTAR (NO TAil Rotor system, pioneered by McDonnell Douglas, forcing air out through a rotating duct which can be positioned to exert the required pressure in the required direction. The duct can be seen in the middle photo. M-D used it with jet engines, I don't know what supplies the air pressure in this instance.
    1 point
  22. The aircraft shown is a Luciole LC30. Well known in the microlite class in Europe. A lovely aircraft and all wood, a oversized model aircraft almost. Empty weight is 120 kg plus fuel, pilot. Most often using a single two stroke or a converted V Twin mower mower motor. Some electric versions are in the works. 25 HP is considered adequate but more is better. Given the great advances in electrics and the new BYD blade cells at 500watt/kg, a good endurance of two plus hours may be possible. These are weight as a complete battery package ie. With cell management and casing. They are specifically designed for aviation use to meet the new air taxi/ quad copter/ aircraft market. That's a massive boost in energy compared to older cells at 250w/kg max, and most are sub 200w/kg. Small efficient aircraft like the MC 30 and similar SD1. Are excellent candidates for electric and costs would be not much greater then a new fully setup petrol engine.
    1 point
  23. The German Consul in W.A., imported 2 Klemm monoplanes in late 1929 and early 1930. The Consul, a Mr H.C. Ittershagen, ran a company called the Aerial Commerce Co., and tried to sell the Klemm aircraft with barnstorming sessions, and much advertising and visitations by the aircraft, and giving joyrides, in many rural regions of W.A. H.C. Ittershagen was also the local dealer for German Lanz tractors, and he was intent on selling the Klemm aircraft to wealthy farmers. However, it was the height of the Great Depression, and most peoples thoughts were on survival, not purchasing aeroplanes. The farming community was under stress as commodity prices had collapsed below the cost of production. As a result, sales of the Klemm aircraft failed to eventuate, and I believe the company was wound up before the Great Depression was over (1934). The two seater Klemm apparently survived until the early 1950's, and was apparently flown unregistered and secretly during the War by an unlicenced pilot. https://encore.slwa.wa.gov.au/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1920207?lang=eng&ivts=x9%2FQXzsNh%2Bv1jvs6BeSDUg%3D%3D&casts=xs0LRgWFEu0M%2B8o995kfRA%3D%3D https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/33345002 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/244479910?searchTerm="Aerial Commerce Co" https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/33346529 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/32309256 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/264201167 https://www.airhistory.net/photo/564927/VH-ULU
    1 point
  24. Nice aeroplane. I met John Isaacs and saw the prototype when I was in the UK back then.
    1 point
  25. It wiped out the Hopes and lifestyle of many People. Started in the in 1929 in the USA. Some people actually Profit at such times. The stock Market is a Gambling House. Shareholders are the suckers if they don't have Inside Knowledge. US politicians are Buying or Unloading stock that they are passing Laws on.. It's a stacked Deck. Nev
    1 point
  26. That motor properly used is not any more or less efficient than any other . It also has good CS props available. It's a known oil burner though. It's nearly 1/2 of a DC3's engine. R-1830. and it's moving along fast enough to justify it..Nev
    1 point
  27. 180 Kn cruise and a low 49 Kn stall ............. nice
    1 point
  28. Yes, that information is correct, 8 Culver Dart GW's were built, powered by the 90HP Warner-Scarab Junior 5 cyl radial. https://1000aircraftphotos.com/Contributions/Braas/13545.htm https://planeandpilotmag.com/culver-dart-model-g/
    1 point
  29. Yes, it's O-320 Lycoming powered. The article says, "A round cowling covers the engine to appear like a radial engine installation". This is correct. The name is spelt "Nugget". https://generalaviationnews.com/2022/06/15/25-years-of-fly-in-success/
    1 point
  30. Video of Stratolaunch carrying and dropping the TA 2 hypersonic test aircraft. Worth a watch! https://youtu.be/9xTvKx5uCKg?si=Vwxt_w2JfTLPdVhQ
    1 point
  31. and the data says (numbers rounded) * 70 c dents per 100 miles (fuel) * 40 miles per gallon (fuel) * means that fuel was 28 cents per gallon ? * cigarettes and ashtrays were probably a minimal cost to the body back then
    1 point
  32. They Had them in the C-150. They had them in each door. Nev
    1 point
  33. Sharp eyes, there, Nev. You're correct, the Packard diesel was long ago scrapped and a buyer from Argentina fitted a Wright Whirlwind. That engine was lost along the way and the engineless airframe sold back to a buyer in the U.S. in 1989. That owner passed away before any restoration work could be carried out, and the sad remains of the aircraft only just escaped being dumped. Another American purchaser bought the remains and rebuilt the aircraft completely and fitted a Wright R-975. I have seen photos of complete Packard DR-980 aircraft diesel radials, some have survived, but it appears none are fitted to aircraft. https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/packard-dr-980-radial-9-engine/nasm_A19710893000
    1 point
  34. Winkle Brown’s helmet at the Yeovilton museum.
    1 point
  35. They all look "Ripley believe it or not". Stainless also fatigues. Nev
    1 point
  36. Hard to weld thin SS sheet without it buckling. Nev
    1 point
  37. Get the REAL thing. Many were totally rebuilt at Luskintyre near West Maitland. They have a steel tube fuselage and many have brakes and radio. Aerobatic as well. Nev
    1 point
  38. I think I'm in love.
    1 point
  39. An interesting aside on this aircraft. The American actor Michael Dorn, who played Leiutenant Worf on Startrek Next Generation and Startrek Deep Space Nine, was an airforce pilot and has owned a number of ex-miliary jets including the F86 Sabre and one of these aircraft. For more on Michael Dorns aviation connection, click here.
    1 point
  40. From late 60s to 70s the RAAF flew Mystere Fanjet Falcons (Dassault) as VIP transport. Nice little units they were. I had a short flight on one but it was not my normal mode of transport.
    1 point
  41. The Renault would be noisy with short exhaust stubs. Upright carbs are normal for inverted in line motors. Mixtures seem even. Nev
    1 point
  42. Bugger all similarity to a Mooney in any way.. Typical wooden Business plane of the 30's. Like a Percival Proctor.. Powered by a DH Gypsy 6. Nev
    1 point
  43. An O-235 is 115 HP. Why the T tail?. Suss structurally. Nev
    1 point
  44. 1 point
  45. Looks very short. Wonder if it was twitchy in pitch.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...