facthunter Posted Thursday at 10:39 PM Posted Thursday at 10:39 PM How would you store and move that? Nev
Moneybox Posted Friday at 12:12 AM Posted Friday at 12:12 AM 1 hour ago, facthunter said: How would you store and move that? Nev In a hangar, fly it there?
FlyBoy1960 Posted Friday at 01:59 AM Posted Friday at 01:59 AM It is way bigger than your average LSA aircraft. He would need a significant hangar based on the scale of the persons around the aircraft. Imagine if it had a seat or 2 ! Imagine the call at your local airfield.. 747 1234 on one mile final for landing at xxx. That would bring everybody running out of the aeroclub! 1 2
facthunter Posted Friday at 02:00 AM Posted Friday at 02:00 AM There's strict rules about where you can fly these things. Nev
T510 Posted Friday at 04:35 AM Posted Friday at 04:35 AM 2 hours ago, FlyBoy1960 said: It is way bigger than your average LSA aircraft. He would need a significant hangar based on the scale of the persons around the aircraft. Imagine if it had a seat or 2 ! Imagine the call at your local airfield.. 747 1234 on one mile final for landing at xxx. That would bring everybody running out of the aeroclub! Under Australian laws model aircraft are limited to 150kg MTOW. Anything over 7kg needs a MAAA airworthiness inspection and a Permit to fly. The pilot also needs to meet a proficiency requirement. 3
danny_galaga Posted Saturday at 01:43 AM Posted Saturday at 01:43 AM On 23/10/2026 at 8:39 AM, facthunter said: How would you store and move that? Nev Kill two birds with one stone and live in it 😁
facthunter Posted Saturday at 02:39 AM Posted Saturday at 02:39 AM You wouldn't want to run out of signal. Nev
danny_galaga Posted Saturday at 10:33 AM Posted Saturday at 10:33 AM 7 hours ago, facthunter said: You wouldn't want to run out of signal. Nev Modern radios are fully digital and are very fail safe. I'm sure it's possible to go wrong, but very unlikely. For instance one of the basic fail-safe aspects is that if the RX doesn't get a signal within a certain time, it will go to a preset mode, eg throttle back and fly orbits.
440032 Posted Saturday at 09:46 PM Posted Saturday at 09:46 PM (edited) Enormous 747 model? Jingowa you people are gullible. The crown for world’s biggest Aircraft now goes to this amazing Boeing 747-400 Air Canada airliner. It’s also the most authentic and accurate RC airliner in history. A film by Aristomenis Tsirbas Tools used: iMac Pro Davinci Resolve Veo 3 ElevenLabs Suno c2026 Menithings Productions, Inc. Aristomenis Tsirbas - Wikipedia Video | Facebook Edited Saturday at 09:47 PM by 440032
danny_galaga Posted Saturday at 10:53 PM Posted Saturday at 10:53 PM 1 hour ago, 440032 said: Enormous 747 model? Jingowa you people are gullible. The crown for world’s biggest Aircraft now goes to this amazing Boeing 747-400 Air Canada airliner. It’s also the most authentic and accurate RC airliner in history. A film by Aristomenis Tsirbas Tools used: iMac Pro Davinci Resolve Veo 3 ElevenLabs Suno c2026 Menithings Productions, Inc. Aristomenis Tsirbas - Wikipedia Video | Facebook Huh?
Marty_d Posted Sunday at 04:41 AM Posted Sunday at 04:41 AM Thought so. Ramy RC has made a massive A380 but it's nowhere as big as that. AI gives the length of his as 29ft, wingspan 32ft and weight 362kg. Can't be bothered watching his video to confirm.
onetrack Posted yesterday at 12:27 AM Posted yesterday at 12:27 AM I thought the bloke in W.A. held the world record for the biggest model B747. His has a longer wingspan and overall length than the reported "record holder", but it's 3 kgs lighter. I would've thought the wingspan and overall length would've been the requirement for the "world record", not the weight. https://www.perthnow.com.au/wa/worlds-biggest-remote-controlled-jumbo-jet-replica-meets-full-sized-qantas-747-ng-b88969614z
facthunter Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM Posted yesterday at 12:59 AM Wing Sweepback is not helpful at lower speeds ( dutch roll and structurally Twisting.). It would probably need Gyroscopic stabilisation. Nev
danny_galaga Posted yesterday at 02:35 AM Posted yesterday at 02:35 AM 1 hour ago, facthunter said: Wing Sweepback is not helpful at lower speeds ( dutch roll and structurally Twisting.). It would probably need Gyroscopic stabilisation. Nev That's a cinch nowadays. Even $100 toy planes have gyro stabilisation. Which makes me a bit sad. Are you even flying a model anymore with that level of handholding? 2
facthunter Posted yesterday at 05:26 AM Posted yesterday at 05:26 AM The real ones have Yaw dampers.. In my opinion some of the Models would be uncontrollable without them. I'd be Picking planes with relatively big straight wings to base a model on.. Nev 1
danny_galaga Posted yesterday at 06:06 AM Posted yesterday at 06:06 AM 38 minutes ago, facthunter said: The real ones have Yaw dampers.. In my opinion some of the Models would be uncontrollable without them. I'd be Picking planes with relatively big straight wings to base a model on.. Nev For sure. Far be it for me to criticise a man's hobby choices, but these gigantic models seem to be the opposite of what I'm looking for in a hobby. I bet you could buy a small ultralight for the price of some of these things!
facthunter Posted yesterday at 06:11 AM Posted yesterday at 06:11 AM Yes, It has to meet the"Bang for a Buck" test. Nev
BrendAn Posted yesterday at 06:20 AM Posted yesterday at 06:20 AM On 25/10/2026 at 3:41 PM, Marty_d said: Thought so. Ramy RC has made a massive A380 but it's nowhere as big as that. AI gives the length of his as 29ft, wingspan 32ft and weight 362kg. Can't be bothered watching his video to confirm. 🙄
Marty_d Posted yesterday at 06:22 AM Posted yesterday at 06:22 AM I used to enjoy designing and building r/c models. Only ever single glow engine, straight constant chord wing. But it did tend to bear out the old saying " If it looks right, it'll fly right" 2
danny_galaga Posted yesterday at 07:04 AM Posted yesterday at 07:04 AM 40 minutes ago, Marty_d said: I used to enjoy designing and building r/c models. Only ever single glow engine, straight constant chord wing. But it did tend to bear out the old saying " If it looks right, it'll fly right" That's why.ive gravitated back towards control line 🙂 1
charlotteevans Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago The "if it looks right, it'll fly right" point is interesting to me as someone outside the hobby. Scale models like a 747 or that A380 must be a different problem entirely, since the proportions are fixed by the original and you can't just tweak them until they look right. I'd imagine that makes the engineering side much less forgiving, which is probably part of the appeal for the builders. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now