Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, facthunter said:

It seemed more near the front of the Plane to Me.   Nev

Agree, full video of push back taxi etc will be interesting.  No pax so no chance to get a heads-up from cabin side unfortunately.  There have been engine fires in recent times.

Edited by Blueadventures
  • Agree 1
Posted

I think it's the port engine on fire.  The flames are blowing back over the wing because of the AoA which may make it look like it's further forward.

  • Agree 1
Posted

Ground fires from impact look pretty severe. Was it working time when it hit the industrial area. A lot of buildings seem damaged.

  • Informative 1
Posted

Local time was 17:15 at the time of the crash. ASN reports that the left engine departed the wing just prior to the end of the runway. 4 fatalities on the ground, there will likely be more.

 

AVIATION-SAFETY.NET

UPS flight UPS2967, a McDonnell Douglas MD-11(F), N259UP, was destroyed when it crashed shortly after takeoff from 17R at the Louisville-Muhammad Ali International Airport (SDF/KSDF), Lou...

 

  • Informative 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

Saw this other angle on the news. Murphy's Law certainly kicked in to create the maximum amount of carnage 😞

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

They have been using forklifts to remove engines Lately, causing a bit of concern as the Structures get strained. It was previously done in two steps. Pod and engine. Nev

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

the chicago crash is well written up in Air Disasters 2 (Macarthur Job)

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 2
Posted

My bet on this one is an Uncontained Catastrophic engine failure and separation. Nev

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Do cargo planes have less stringent maintenance / age requirements than RPT? 

Just imagining how much worse this would have been with 200 pax in it.

Posted

They get no exemptions for being dedicated Cargo, Charter (non Regular.PT) does accept reduced standards, for route endorsements and Maybe a few other things.   Nev

  • Informative 1
Posted
4 hours ago, facthunter said:

My bet on this one is an Uncontained Catastrophic engine failure and separation. Nev

Juan Brown is starting to think that as well on reviewing more footage 

 

 

 

  • Informative 1
Posted

It has been reported that the crew were originally meant to be on another aircraft, and this one had recently been grounded due to a leak in the fuel tank.

  • Informative 1
Posted

Could be a defect (crack) in the pylon. They have the 2 Boxes. Fuel and hydraulic lines are to the front of the Wings.  Lot's of fuel. Fierce fire not visible from the cockpit. Nev

Posted

First minor insight into voice recorder mentioned (warning bell chiming). Also a number of different angles of crash in a video and drone footage of crash site. That footage is quite telling, it shows how extensive the damage was on the ground.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/repeating-bell-heard-in-ups-plane-s-cockpit-as-drone-footage-reveals-crash-devastation-20251108-p5n8pu.html

  • Like 1
Posted

Another update from Juan Brown,  illustrating what 37 seconds looks like in a fully loaded MD 11. Also more discussion of the engine failure itself.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...