Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is this real scenario?

 

It seem inconceivable that  an international ATC could be so incompetent 😈

  • Agree 3
  • 4 months later...
Posted

Oui, oui, we have problem weeth pee-lots wanting toi-luts!!

Sacre blue, do these Europeans not understand English?? 😄

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, facthunter said:

The GPWS says "don't think, don't think".  Nev 

 I always thought it was saying  "Think mate!  Think mate!"

 

 

Anyway, I reckon your skepticism is in order regarding this video.  It has all the hallmarks of a hoax.

 

Still, the prank points to real problems with aero/nautical language. 

 

I only discovered recently (on YouTube, as it happens) that navies introduced the term 'port' in place of 'larboard'  in 1840 due to the danger of its sounding so much like its opposite.   Likewise, later, airfarers dumped 'affirmative' in favour of 'affirm' for the very same reason.  

 

  • Informative 1
Posted

The only alarming thing about that is viewers unable to detect slop or as it should be called shit. Slop can be feed to pigs.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...