Jump to content

KRviator

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,197

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by KRviator

  1. KRviator
    I can somewhat relate to @Bosi72 and the 'cruiser sale. I brought a new Cruiser in 2020, decked it out, drove it for a year and promptly sold it after being thoroughly unimpressed with pretty much everything about it, except its' performance off-road. Didn't make a killing, but we did break even on it. Put the $$ on the mortgage and used the balance to buy the KRviatrix a new Prado, and that's a keeper... From what I've seen with these aircraft listings, there's little-to-no improvements in any panels or maintenance, with the exception of the Commander - that has had ADS-B fitted between sales so I can understand the $$ difference there. The Comanche's have had nothing done from what I can see. I just can't get my head around buying something so expensive before finding it doesn't suit your mission.
  2. KRviator
    So I'm still actively hunting for a decent family 4-seater, and in my time I've noticed several aircraft that have been purchased, and then 6 months, maybe 12 months later, are re-advertised for from their new owners... VH-PJO, a Rockwell Commander is one, now sold 4 times in 24 months, VH-PKZ, a Comanche 260 is another, she was sold last year and has now popped up again, and also in the Comanche lineup is Howard Reiss' beautiful Twinkie, that was sold for $160,000 at the beginning of this year, and is now for sale again, initially listed for $175K (PLUS GST!) and has now been dropped to $160K - still plus GST though! Is it the interest rate rises, or are people buying these and finding they're a lot more work than they first thought? In -HPR's case, she looks well cared for, but desperately needs a diet, but for a few others, I'm genuinely curious as to why someone would buy a well-over-6-figure airplane, and then sell it again less than a year later. Any suggestions?
  3. KRviator
    I'd rather keep living beside the Council airport and let those buggers maintain it! Looks like that runway needs resurfacing too, so that won't be a cheap endeavour if you want to do it right!
  4. KRviator
    All fun and games until BN CTR replies to your calls of "Brisbane Center, Good morning, RV Eighty-Five Nineteen" with "ARMY Eighty Five Nineteen Good morning Center?" After the umpteenth time of that I resorted to using Romeo 85-19 as that's what they saw on TAAATS from my ADS-B squawk. Not strictly in compliance with the AIP true, but after spending several years in Army Aviation, I know they used callsigns prefixed with Army. Army 16, 24 and 26 for their Kingairs for example... Of course, now the RV's VH- it's not a problem, but something to be aware of for other RAAus RVators out there if you want to routinely talk to ATC.
  5. KRviator
    Based solely on my experience with FlightAware and logging my flights, when I do submit a plan, it will capture and display that on FlightAware, showing among other things, the aircraft type and planned route. None of VH-EHM's recent tracked flights show that, suggesting, to me at least, no plans were filed for any of these flights, including the incident flight, though they have previously done so.
  6. KRviator
    190Kts at 500AGL? Must have bloody good speedbrakes! Or they were going to go missed. Makes me wonder if one of 'em was under the hood then?
  7. KRviator
    Not me. Rostered to work that weekend. If I am off, I might nip over on the Saturday with Mini-Me II, but I'll be winging it if we can go. Pardon the pun...😛
  8. KRviator
    I agree that "sounds" high for a Jab - I routinely use 25/H in the RV, with the O-340 and scooting along at 2,400RPM & 140KTAS. The -160 and -120 share the same fundamental engine so the fuel burn shouldn't be significantly (50-75%) greater, though aircraft performance may be for the same power setting. Which leads to the question - what prop did you have on the -120 and what RPM did you cruise at, vs the -160? Could it be it is pitched quite differently, giving a different cruise power setting and an inability to compare apples with Malus domestica?
  9. KRviator
    Doesn't look like it...To me it reads like a MIL-specific program. From Ronny's PR spiel:
  10. KRviator
    I live adjacent to a Council-owned airfield and pay an annual "access fee" for through-the-back-gate access. I'm also entitled to an annual landing fee, but the Council billing system doesn't seem to recognise that so they continue to bill me for each landing. Which I continue to ignore.
  11. KRviator
    From the UK version of the NRMA I give you their average fuel prices: Unleaded Super Unleaded Diesel LPG 190.81 p/L 201 p/L 198.58 p/L 84.98 p/L That's $3.34 / $3.526 & $3.483 AUD a litre! Good thing there's not too far to fly in the UK - you'd run out of money before you run out of fuel, flamin' eck!
  12. KRviator
    There was a 206 in a wirestrike up towards Hawkesbury River / Wisemans Ferry way the same day - though the WSPS served its' purpose and they landed safely with little to no damage beyond the pilot seat cushion. But of the two clips I've seen from the Maroota accident, I didn't see any wires or towers in either of them.. Not to say he didn't hit wires, but just that I didn't see any.
  13. KRviator
    Typically the runway is preferred as should you drop in from more than a foot or two onto grass, there is a better-than-even chance of the fiberglass or sheet metal cowling folding up and allowing the firewall to act as a plough, scooping up dirt and bringing you to an uncomfortably rapid stop. Landing on the runway avoids that, giving you a greater distance in which to decelerate - rendering the gear-up landing that much more survivable.
  14. KRviator
    Not even remotely similar to flying but to answer your questions: 1: Do I plan a road trip beyond, say, 50NM? Yes. Even if it is as simple as "Do I need to refuel first, or will the available fuel get me there and back?" Closely followed by "Which servo enroute has the cheapest fuel in FuelCheck?". Even at work, we are required to do a Journey Assessment for any road trip at night, or any trip beyond 50NM by day. 2: Yes. I'm going long-distance, or without the KRviatrix, I'll plan my trip on Google Maps for real-time delays and diversions, and then share that trip so she can track me and have a real-time ETA. If she's coming, then we'll usually call our rellies and give them an updated ETA when we're on the road. Insofar as tracking, incidentally, so does my employer on almost every vehicle in their fleet. I got a txt from my Supervisor just last week saying "KR, the tracker shows you stopped for over an hour, are you ok?" - I wasn't stopped, and hadn't stopped, but "the system" thought I had for some reason and he was checking on me. 3: If there's a chance of inclement weather, yes - I do check NSW LiveTraffic for weather-related issues, and enroute I use Google Maps for reeal-time traffic info.
  15. KRviator
    I want your luck. I've had two in 200 hours with the RV. Both on the NLG, thankfully.
  16. KRviator
    Not quite - It's one with a few formulas whereby you can enter things like FPT, distance and the winds, and it calculates ETI, HDG and the rest, along with fuel burn, TO & ZFWCG position and can give you warnings about fuel reserves or CG out-of-limits. I discussed it a little in THIS post and you can download the spreadsheet HERE
  17. KRviator
    In order of precedence: SkyVector's online flight planner the night before for the initial routing SkyVector's NavLog printed the morning of the flight to take with me to scribble on. OzRunways NavLog to crosscheck SV & allow the upload to the Dynon. My own Excel Navlog when I am told I can't use OzR or SV - such as in training or a flight review.
  18. KRviator
    Permanently in the aircraft is only my Rescue Swag first aid kit. That's clipped to two eye-bolts on the baggage bulkhead and is only ever removed for the annual, or to put something bulky in the baggage area. But if I'm going anywhere beyond the circuit, even just an after-school local scenic with Mini-Me, I wear my survival vest, that's loaded with similar goodies to what you've listed.
  19. KRviator
    That's cool to watch.
  20. KRviator
    Strewth I hope I don't pull up behind you at the bowser! 😁 There's no flight suit, but I do wear a tactical style vest loaded with survival goodies. The usual explanation for anyone curious enough to ask about it is "I'm flying in a plane that I built in my back shed! And I'd like to tip the odds in my favour if it goes to shit..."
  21. KRviator
    Wouldn't mind putting a bid on the Cardinal, but I'm on shift so couldn't get it off-site in time... And it has 2,600TSO and a prop that needs an overhaul in less than 100 hours too. No mention of the spar inspection either, for what is a fairly high-time airframe. If that doesn't pass, you've got a 2,000lb paperweight - replacements are rarer than unicorns!
  22. KRviator
    @MattP how'd your mate go with this Deb? Still listed so I'm guessing he has passed on it as well, or did he dig deep enough that he found why she won't sell?
  23. KRviator
    Question for those at Murwillumbah - VH-CDD a Comanche, looks to have been kept there, at one time or another last year. Anyone know of her up that way, and if she went for a swim? I think this is the one that has just been listed for sale and I'm thinking about making some enquiries about her, but this photo - and Murwillumbah's recent history concerns me... Image courtesy or AustAirData.com.au and was taken 26/3/21.
  24. KRviator
    And the dates are out for 2024...I've already checked my roster and I'm on RDO's - who else is going?
  25. KRviator
    I thought anyone could maintain an Experimental, you just couldn't sign off the 100-hourly? Will go check the latest CAsA Instrument and report back! EDIT: Nope, T88 is correct as things stand now - unless I welded the downlocks in place and turned it into a fixed-gear, you need to meet one of the clauses in Instrument 18/22 to maintain it - so long as the aircraft are essentially similar, being defined as "not" essentially similar if: if they are made of different materials; or if 1 has retractable landing gear and the other has fixed landing gear; or if 1 has electrically-powered landing gear and the other has hydraulically-powered landing gear; or if 1 has electrically-powered flaps and the other has hydraulically-powered flaps. But that looks like it'll change with CAsA proposing the following:
×
×
  • Create New...