Jump to content

turboplanner

Members
  • Posts

    24,360
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    159

Posts posted by turboplanner

  1. Nothing at all within the CASA stuff for Aircraft Weight Control.Some years ago I recall there was an Australian equivalent to

     

    BS 185-1:1969, Glossary of aeronautical and astronautical termsGeneral

     

    from http://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000000126461

     

    This book may do you http://www.asa2fly.com/Dictionary-of-Aeronautical-Terms-P1763C58.aspx but I don't know if it is in there.

     

    AUW can be greater than MTOW (may not be legal - or it could be legal). Words have specific meanings and AUW is simply an abbreviation for All Up Weight as you stated - no definition required - it is what those words state it is. Weight, all up.

     

    Feel free to quote me.

    I agree, All Up Weight or Gross Weight or All Up Mass or Gross Mass is what the unit weighs when you weigh it. It's a weight you could use to compare with, for example Gross Mass Rating, or MTOW, both of which have conditions/specifications which have to be met.

     

    So you would get an AUW figure from overheads scales/weighbridge etc., and PROVIDED the specification meat that required for MTOW, then you could see whether you were legal, or overweight.

     

    Because the authorities are only interested in whether a machine meets the critical specifications they require they only need to publish the critical acronyms.

     

     

  2. Constable Doubtfire.

     

    It was all because Constable Doubtfire hadn't given the secret signal which says "I'm Constable or I'm a fairy fiary" (full details will be posted on the members portal in a month or so)

     

    Lox had made the move and.......

     

     

  3. We run GA and RAAus schools 'back-to-back'. There is an imperative here to have the same SMS for both.happy days,

    There are different safety factors so the SMS procedures would not be the same for both, however a common base document covering the 90% which is the same with GA and RA subsections would make a lot of sense.

     

    However the most serious issue at present is that you are operating without ANY safety management system and there are huge legal implications in that.

     

     

  4. Yes, I agree, but one must vent their spleen. I've been on the other side of the fence many times. I am however a little confused, is not this entire debacle a result of RAAus NOT doing their job properly in the first place or have I been mislead? I rang today and politely asked what's going on. I was told I might get my rego before the weekend. That would be nice.

    It was probably the imbeciles who did beat ups of caravan parks, beaches and boats, flew into wires, hit trees, ran out of fuel and generally drew attention to themselves, and were then found to have had no markings, substituted components hopeless paperwork, and specifications which were illegal.

     

    They in turn put pressure on one or two employees of RAA, who, instead of grounding the aircraft until they became compliant, tried to be helpful by re-registering the aircraft.

     

    Over many years, many hundreds of aircraft became non-compliant; you only have to read the threads on this site to see some of the attitudes which led to that.

     

    CASA was forced to establish a procedure which, when completed, will ensure every single aircraft is identifiable, and conforms to legal specifications.

     

    If the members had been less apathetic and made sure their board members actually stopped the imbeciles doing what they did, you would not have any delay; look on it as a bit of rough justice.

     

     

    • Agree 4
    • Winner 3
    • Caution 1
  5. Yes, cool Mike, thank you, that is the one. Would be fun to get in touch with the owner. And I got more excited about the move of the plane, when someone told me, that I would be allowed to fly it with the Dutch registration (PH-CBO). Even if that is only temporarily, it would give me heaps of time for paperwork.I could try and fill the tanks with applestroop, or do you think the customs would find out?

    You'd have to get around the applestroop dog at the airport, and we'd have to restrain Ian so he didn't cry out and give the game away.

     

     

  6. '.....I'm about to slur another wuddled murd"

     

    "GEEZ" said Turbo in the rush for the door. "You dropped a live one that time!"

     

    As they all stood out in the freezing cold waiting for the room to hear, there was the familiar sound overhead of an engine with terminal knocking..........

     

     

  7. Well that's not exactly what you were saying Herm, you were suggesting that because Jabiru had the greatest volume it follows that they should have the most problems.

     

    In terms of general problems that is correct, logical, and will show up in statistics. However when a product has a specific issue, such as through bolt failures, and the statistics clearly show that competitive products do not have that issue, the argument doesn't work and it's time to buckle down and get the issue fixed.

     

    You can make a similar argument that because RA allows self maintenance, and many owners couldn't find a dipstick then this could be causing many of the failures, but the statistics show that with an even number of amateurs maintaining their aircraft on both Jabiru and Rotax, the Rotax engines don't have the same specific problems.

     

    With my design and manufacturing background I have no axe to grind with a particular manufacturer because design faults and service failures are not something which might or might not occur, they WILL occur, and solving them is part of the job specification.

     

    The automotive industry has learnt (with the recent exception of a European manufacturer) that there are no sales losses when they issue a recall to fix a fault; my Nissan had five new mag wheels, a new tow bar and a chassis modification because something has happened on one or two vehicles and MIGHT happen on mine.

     

    We need to be objective rather than like barrackers for football teams.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...