Jump to content

spacesailor

Members
  • Posts

    4,456
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by spacesailor

  1. Or you could try a little 1/2"baffle" attached to the exhaust top to deflect the gases down. (just like a water-hose, when putting finger at the tip,) Wouldn't need much.

     

    or a small half moon filed into the bottom of the exhaust end, will have a similar effect.

     

    Every other option is "after the event" procedure.

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  2. I saw a video on "missing rivets" It could have been the Zenith planes, but didn't take much notice of the make. So I googled "missing rivets" & it came with what I posted.

     

    Their answer was to replace some of the pull rivets with solid.

     

    The rivets were only in the one area being affected, & Hummel aircraft forums have said beware of pull rivets working with vibration.

     

    I have noted that some larger pull rivets (not on my aircraft) didn't quite pull tight enough, and could turn in their hole. ( when drilling out pull rivets they sometimes spin with your drill-bit).

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  3. Are you "hard riveting" or pull rivets ?

     

    I saw something about the "pull-rivets" working & falling out near the tail end of the fuselage.

     

    Zenith Aircraft Co, site, " Nevertheless, I feel impelled to warn some experimental designers that the shear values given by the blind rivet manufacturers in catalogues are to be looked at with some common sense as well. The manufacturer is not a liar, but he does present his product in the best possible way. For example, when they make tests they use very thin sheets so that the stem is long enough to fill the rivet (see figure 4), which is the reason why the individual shear strength is higher than an aircraft solid rivet (the steel stem participates). But on our aircraft, this is relatively seldom the case. As a rule of thumb, a reliable shear value should be 1/2 the catalog specification. But again, the designer should make tests. (Just as an example, when I do blind rivet tests, I knock the stem out before the test, just to be on the safe side!) " (article by "Riveted Joints By Chris Heintz, P. Eng)

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  4. "Even with cars, it is cheaper to replace with new than keep forking out for expensive mechanics and spare parts."

     

    Another Government interference,

     

    BackYard mechanics, under fire. Modified vehicles under scrutiny, and only certain mods allowed.

     

    When my Pajero Mass Air Flow Sensor, failed, my favorite B,Y, mechanic took a couple of minutes to find the problem, And a day to replace with a cheaper (than Mitsi) part.

     

    Touch a new car's anatomy & kiss away your so-called (expensive) warranty.

     

    spacesailor (the would be Mechanic In the fifty's)

     

     

  5. \\\\\not all are happy with Diesels !.

     

    I met a farmer (between Dubbo & Burk ) that absolutely hates them, Only because, if he has a problem with a ( brand spanking new) diesel machine, it take's three days for the mechanic to get to him & look at the problem,

     

    Then goes back to the shop (Dealer ) & report problem, second mechanic arrives ( at least one week later ) with a Few tools to remove offending part, & returns home.

     

    Two Three even four weeks later. ! . third mechanic arrives with (supposedly ) the new part. and repairs said machine . ( has known wrong part more than once )

     

    All in the heat of his harvest.

     

    Now, new machine arrives, He rings neighbour to come & remove that new diesel, & replace it with an OLD second-hand Holden V8.

     

    Never seen so many shiny diesels left in paddocks anywhere !.

     

    At $5 million a crop a couple of weeks waiting can be disastrous.

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  6. Just a mo, I read this & assumed the writer was correct.

     

    " "Every engine must be totally disassembled and the wear and tear of each part evaluated separately" (Source: Sapling.com)".

     

    Each part"evaluated" If spending tens of thousands of dollars. I would expect NEW parts. Not IT'LL be allright,!.

     

    I don't know "Sapling . com".

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  7. "By now there should not be a sheep, goat, or cow which is non-compliant."

     

    There's a growing band of "Huntsmen" who are making a living (subsistence), out west, off the grow number of "Farrel" cattle, the aren't economically viable, ( possibly because of the Bureaucacy).

     

    As well as the Pigs,Goats, & Roo's. They (ferrels) are destroying the meager grazing land, just like the camels did or do out back, and horses on the alpine slopes.

     

    spacesailor

     

     

    • Agree 1
  8. Doesn't make sense to me. The cost of labour to strip an engine, AND NOT replace All wearable parts, is a waiting game, as it Will need those parts replaced at a later date. !.

     

    O K if owner is doing the work & not counting their hours of labour.

     

    Who on the old Ford / Holden motor's never put new "valve stem seals" in their motor as the old ones never gave trouble,?.

     

    spacesailor

     

     

  9. RGMWA

     

    The OLD venturi depicted only needs a T piece near the hull-skin to connect your Peee-tube to, An off-tap could be prudent, (just in case of excess suction). (please don't put venturi on back to front( may cause "blow-back))

     

    BUT

     

    If worried use RED750 's bag,

     

    All come in kits.

     

     

    • Like 1
  10. " Getting rid of it is where the innovation is needed. "

     

    No Problem,!.

     

    Medical, "condom shaped" male incontinence product is on the market,

     

    Don it before takeoff, hose comes out of trouser leg, then out to the heavens.

     

    (cloud seeding ?.)

     

    image.png.38323b4429ee6ad75e4e92bba4fbec17.png

     

    spacesailor

     

     

    • Haha 1
  11. " This VW type engine is the perfect example of what "simplicity" gets you. Low power, poor economy, poor tbo and heavy weights."

     

    Well it is a 1930 design !

     

    LIGHT weight,

     

    Great power to weight,

     

    61 U.S. MPG = 3.86 Liters per 100 km, at 100 mph

     

    Runs forever,

     

    Remove the "Flywheel.

     

    61mpg.jpg.1a2931edc6a45d5c9fa29edb3586ba4c.jpg

     

     

    • More 1
×
×
  • Create New...