BrendAn Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 10 minutes ago, facthunter said: So you think a Nuclear power Plant would be appropriate for that Purpose? Nev What else can provide enough power to keep a huge electric fleet going. I know solar is good but how many thousands acres would they need to be of any use. 1
kgwilson Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Fortescue Rio Tinto & BHP are all installing solar farms and batteries. 50 megawatts of solar panels requires only about 80-90 hectares. The desert has plenty of empty space & Batteries can be swapped out in a few minutes, less time than it takes to refuel with diesel. In the Janus initial trials in 2022 a fully loaded B-Double easily got to Coffs Harbour on a single charge & the battery was swapped out in 15 minutes. The driver though had a compulsory minimum 2 hour layover before he could continue to Brisbane or go back to Melbourne. Rooftop solar already produces more energy than all of the power stations in Australia including Hydro. The spot price often goes negative in the middle of the day as the grid is awash with power. The problem is storage. Massive battery systems resolve this. 1 1
facthunter Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Australia is Probably the Most suited country to use solar, Tidal, Wind and Pump Hydro. Remote inland places could be a Virtual independent Oasis off grid and entirely Airconditioned with solar and batteries. Big tides near Broome etc could be harnessed. We could have it ALL with a bit of foresight. Electric..... Silent non polluting and vibrationless Instant starting no warm up and regenerative,. When in all of history has such things been Possible and so available.? Nev
Thruster88 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago EV batteries require a cooling system so swap systems are not likely to be the answer. Max Verstappen had to retire from the Chinese GP last weekend because the cooling system for the 1.1 kwh battery failed in the hybrid power unit.
facthunter Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Are you saying that Because some failure on a complex F1 race car happened, EVs are Not any good.. I really can't see the Logic of that. Nev
Siso Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 hours ago, facthunter said: So you think a Nuclear power Plant would be appropriate for that Purpose? Nev Yes- Micro reactors are coming and it is a no brainer. Being developed for remote community's and mines in Canada. The main problem is that they need their 20 years worth of fuel from new. 1
Moneybox Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Siso said: Yes- Micro reactors are coming and it is a no brainer. Being developed for remote community's and mines in Canada. The main problem is that they need their 20 years worth of fuel from new. They might be good when they eventually get here but the reports I saw meant that most of us will be pushing up daisies before they are installed.
BrendAn Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 25 minutes ago, facthunter said: Australia is Probably the Most suited country to use solar, Tidal, Wind and Pump Hydro. Remote inland places could be a Virtual independent Oasis off grid and entirely Airconditioned with solar and batteries. Big tides near Broome etc could be harnessed. We could have it ALL with a bit of foresight. Electric..... Silent non polluting and vibrationless Instant starting no warm up and regenerative,. When in all of history has such things been Possible and so available.? Nev I agree about tidal generation. I don't know why there isn't more of it.
Thruster88 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 28 minutes ago, facthunter said: Are you saying that Because some failure on a complex F1 race car happened, EVs are Not any good.. I really can't see the Logic of that. Nev No not at all, I am all for green energy and EV's. Just saying without the battery cooling system the car could not continue. Battery cooling systems are required for both fast charge and high discharge like a truck or performance vehicle would encounter.
skippydiesel Posted 28 minutes ago Posted 28 minutes ago 53 minutes ago, Siso said: Yes- Micro reactors are coming and it is a no brainer. Being developed for remote community's and mines in Canada. The main problem is that they need their 20 years worth of fuel from new. To the best of my understanding (low bar) we ( human species) do not have a safe (as in never pollute/ irradiate, current or future generations) method of disposing of the spent fuel. Should this be correct (??)- all we are doing, is polluting our one & only home (sh..ing in our back yard) to the detriment of generations to come. ".. no brainer" might just be the way to describe advocates of atomic power stations/ weapons. 😈
facthunter Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago That's a tiny battery doing a big Job in the F1 car where every Ounce counts. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now