CASA definition of the PIC is not that great or useful. In multi crew cockpits it's PF and PNF when defining duties. The co-pilot will fly some legs but when push comes to shove the PIC doesn't change.
One ship, One Captain. The conduct of a flight is not just Moving flight Controls. It's about management of the whole process. . When the Co Pilot fly's the Leg He/She DOESN'T log it as "in command". Nev
Skip, You are just repeating what YOUR BELIEF is. To stay in business, the Organisation decides to Insure things. The next thing is how that cost is applied and who should PAY what. IF you (The Client) don't like the deal then go elsewhere.. Nev
That's how you LOG it in your Logbook. In Command. No If's or But's. It doesn't mean you can just buzz off and do your own thing. THAT comes when you have your PPL (unrestricted)
Instructors can't train on their own in RAAus. They have to operate in conjunction with an approved training Organisation. I also Have never Instructed VH outside an organisation. Another form of training is ICUS . In Command Under Instruction .You get this on line and even when you are carrying Pax. Junior Instructors don't send students solo till they have a certain Level of experience. To be a CFI needs even more and you must do the PMI exam.. I don't quite Know which statement you refer to specifically but the Instructor authorising you should take into account your experience and recency for the routine you are going to do and the weather conditions forecast. I have NEVER had radio contact prior arranged for any solo aerial work. I'm a great Believer in briefings before flights. . The subject of Aircraft Insurance never came Up. I know Aircraft have been damaged ( fortunately None I've been involved with). I've never known of any person made to pay money for aircraft Damage.. The most worrying legal actions involve Members of injured or Killed Pax families taking action against the Pilot as far as I'm Concerned. That's where the BIG figure$$$'s action is.. Be wary who you carry. Nev
LAWYERS are there to work out these matters. A flying school won't be around long if it doesn't cover it's costs. You rent a car and Prang it and you pay the excess or Pay extra to cover it before hand. when solo you are the PIC and you log it that way. Supervised solo is specific to the nature of THAT flight. You do what you were authorised (and trained) to do which will be broader as you progress. Example Solo spinning when permitted and your SOLO X- Country. . IF say the engine failed I wouldn't see making the excess payment warranted unless your handling caused the failure. Schools don't like having tailwheelers on Line and Insurance Companies want evidence of experience before they will Insure you. It's an Actuarial assessment. The More risk the greater the fee. The "Student Licence" is an ICAO recognised/conforming document. Nev
That quote was COMPLETELY out of Context. Nearly 8 Months ago on a completely DIFFERENT subject. You are not fair dinkum and we are off topic to boot.
The wheels on water trick is probably more of a quick reaction type of thing. A motor cross bike can be ridden on CALM water if it's going fast enough. Nev
Depends on how much your ego drives you to look clever. A good/safe/clever pilot is one who never gets himself into such a situation as requires an extremely good and also lucky Pilot. Nev
I'd be surprised if it flew well on one engine with the other not feathered. Lots of drag and mass on one ULS with a fair bit of rudder input. It's at tiger moth speed . Plenty to see at low level. Unequalled vision. Nev