Jump to content

danny_galaga

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,033

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

 Content Type 

Everything posted by danny_galaga

  1. danny_galaga
    I doubt that any B 17 has done 92,000 hours though. And it wasn't pressurised. Obviously you'd still have to watch for things like corrosion of course but in the grand scheme of things there's a lot less to catastrophically go wrong.
  2. danny_galaga
    I think the gist of it is that it's better those parts fail, than the whole wing snaps in half. Clearly, in this case it still ended in disaster but in general the idea makes sense. There's only so much you can plan for
  3. danny_galaga
    Totally. How many litres a minute would it be pumping? It's going to be an instant fireball with no damage to the tank.
  4. danny_galaga
    https://www.reuters.com/world/china/cargo-plane-engine-accelerated-before-fatal-hong-kong-crash-investigators-say-2025-11-19/ One thrust reverser not working, which apparently is allowed. But on landing, that engine accelerated. A question for all you big boy pilots, how much of the reverse thruster aspect is automated? From the view of an ignorant like me, it sounds like that engine was just doing its job, just that it didn't 'know' that the reverse thrust mechanisms weren't in play
  5. danny_galaga
    A brief video from Juan Brown, who coincidentally flew C130s in the National Guard. He points out it looks like the #2 engines propeller seems to be missing.
  6. danny_galaga
    I particularly love the 'fast forward ' feature that projects where they will land 🙂
  7. danny_galaga
    Analog nav computer for Soyuz missions. This is just fantastic 😊 Ken Shiriff does great write ups of interesting tech. I can't follow most of this, but I know some of you will. Follow it or not, this is EM porn 😊 https://www.righto.com/2023/03/reverse-engineering-globus-ink-soviet.html
  8. danny_galaga
    Exactly. In fact, we are slipping it into the SIDE the wind is coming from 🙂
  9. danny_galaga
    I don't know what that means. Like I say, the mnemonic works for me 🙂
  10. danny_galaga
    Another update from Juan Brown, illustrating what 37 seconds looks like in a fully loaded MD 11. Also more discussion of the engine failure itself.
  11. danny_galaga
    The quick and dirty mnemonic I use (remember they don't necessarily have to make logical sense) is that a forward slip is for going forward, and a side slip is going sideways (into a crosswind)
  12. danny_galaga
    After going down a rabbit hole 😄 Of my landings, he would often say "That was solid, but safe." 😁 He flew Canberras in the Vietnam War.
  13. danny_galaga
    Side slip? Or forward slip?
  14. danny_galaga
    First minor insight into voice recorder mentioned (warning bell chiming). Also a number of different angles of crash in a video and drone footage of crash site. That footage is quite telling, it shows how extensive the damage was on the ground. https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/repeating-bell-heard-in-ups-plane-s-cockpit-as-drone-footage-reveals-crash-devastation-20251108-p5n8pu.html
  15. danny_galaga
    Juan Brown is starting to think that as well on reviewing more footage
  16. danny_galaga
    Whatever. Once again I have to unfollow my own post. Thanks.
  17. danny_galaga
    Update from Juan Brown. Mentions it's reminiscent of the crash in Chicago in 1979
  18. danny_galaga
    I'm sorry I hurt your feelings but you think it's nice to constantly hear how something isn't great in your view, even though that's not part of the discussion? Do you not like ANYTHING in the world, even though realistically nothing can be perfect? Can you not just sit back appreciate something, warts and all? It's quite tiring. I mean, this all started on a thread about an emergency landing of a Spitfire, but then you felt you had to tell everyone what a crappy engine it has blah blah blah. The engine out wasn't because it has a crappy engine, but because of a lack of maintenance, particularly of the fuel pump. I think every thread that involves engines you've got to point out why you would have designed it better, and they must have all been dolts, what were they thinking etc etc. Maybe you could start a thread on all major engines ever designed, and explain how you would have done it better. Start with the Merlin 😇
  19. danny_galaga
    Skippy gets it. Relax, we can still be friends. I just know that whatever we talk about, to expect that you will know exactly what's wrong with the thing, and that you wouldn't do it that way, and get the hell offa my lawn! I'm just glad you weren't on the NASA team in the sixties, because the commies would have put a man on Mars before NASA even got a chimp into space 😄
  20. danny_galaga
    Saw this other angle on the news. Murphy's Law certainly kicked in to create the maximum amount of carnage 😞
  21. danny_galaga
    Woops! Wrong link!
  22. danny_galaga
    You still seem to be saying it's eyes are too close together, so I guess you just don't get it 🤷‍♂️
  23. danny_galaga
    Some footage. Very tragic. Is that an engine on fire on the port side?
  24. danny_galaga
    3 pob. https://www.whathifi.com/hi-fi/vinyl/vinyl-records-will-be-around-forever-the-tiny-vinyl-founders-on-the-black-discs-enduring-appeal
  25. danny_galaga
    Yes, was a real eye opener for me years ago when I first did my ppl training. Did the two hours basic IFR. When the instructor gives you the frosted glasses and starts doing steep turns and climbs and descents for several minutes. Then it's "what attitude are we now?" "We are in a steep left turn" Then it's off with the glasses and damned if we aren't flying straight and level 😲 Years later, and now I've gone the ultralight route with ra-aus, and unless I missed it somehow, they don't seem to do that demonstration. I think there's no better way to tell you to stay out of the clouds than that one lesson.
×
×
  • Create New...