Jump to content

storchy neil

Members
  • Posts

    1,277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by storchy neil

  1. yes went well good news is that it has been confirmed in writing and verbely that

     

    lame l2 l3 can make an aeroplane air worthy with these defects

     

    bent undercarriage

     

    cracked windscreen

     

    egt not working

     

    flap indercator not working

     

    replace motor not to rotax installation manual

     

    does not have to have repair manual for said plane or tec data

     

    bent engine frame

     

    bent rudder peddles

     

    no weight and balance done

     

    so all off you that that have bent over and been scewed because no weight and balance

     

    the court says you don't have to abide by rules so just chuck it to gether its air worthy

     

    ra aus cant have it they have broken our rules and reg as well as air law by condoning the findings

     

    now at the meeting it was stated that we need to get more members we as body need to sell recflying more as a safe sport

     

    no bloody way as to what has been done to me neil

     

     

    • Helpful 1
    • Informative 2
  2. don some think it was easy for you to leave the board getting out saved your house and your sanity

     

    as far as I am concerned you have voiced you opinion in a very constructive manner

     

    for some to criticise and not look at the big pitcher when you have brought to their attension thing that are wrong and should be addressed now not latter

     

    after talking to you at Temora I feel that if you just walked away and not give a shit about anyone your passion for raa to succeed not just bumble its way along would still be there

     

    after all is this site for discussion off flying and related incidents including our board that was once just there for glory put there by puppets and manipulation but when a person comes along and has the balls to not be gerked around by idiots that ran an organization witch was in my words corrupt

     

    example 14000 members plus insurance planes that did not comply lack off communication no accountability

     

    to some that criticise with out knowing facts are in my oppion puppets neil

     

    l

     

     

    • Agree 1
  3. The vehicle’s headlights were intended to illuminate the upwind end of the strip, facing the oncoming aircraft.

     

    please show me where it says gps waypoint was mentioned

     

    What happened

     

    On 27 June 2013, a Cirrus SR22 aircraft, registered VH-CKS, collided with a tree that was adjacent to the private airstrip at Boxwood, Victoria. The pilot of the aircraft was attempting to land on the unlit airstrip after last light. As a result of the collision, the pilot lost control and the aircraft continued for a short distance before impacting terrain inverted. The pilot was fatally injured and the aircraft destroyed

     

    What the ATSB found

     

    The pilot was appropriately licensed to operate the visual flight rules category aircraft at night and had passed a number of airports in the vicinity, all of which were appropriate for a night landing. However, consistent with a degree of self-imposed pressure to get home after a series of business commitments and prior to a1-month period away from home, the pilot bypassed these airports and continued to their property airstrip. This airstrip did not meet the physical, lighting and obstacle clearance requirements for night operations.

     

    The final approach to land was made after last light, with a family member positioned in a motor vehicle ‘at the end of the strip’. The vehicle’s headlights were intended to illuminate the upwind end of the strip, facing the oncoming aircraft. However, this lighting was inadequate and provided insufficient guidance for the approach and landing. This increased the risk of a collision with terrain.

     

    Safety message

     

    Night landings at inadequately lit airstrips are inherently dangerous and increase the risk of a collision with terrain. The requirements for the conduct of operations at night, including lighting, pilot qualifications, aircraft equipment and systems and aerodrome equipment are intended to reduce this risk.

     

    It is likely that, had these risk controls been given effect, this accident would not have happened.

     

    you cannot land straight at head lights off a single car without a reference point as to the end off strip for touch down that is why in my case up north five cars were used the end was marked with a cars hazard light all cars at touch down were using hazard lights and head lights

     

    nullarbore was the same but using truck lights now that is a lot off day light

     

     

    • Informative 1
  4. so turbs his hrs and qualification excuse him from being totally to blame for stupid behaviour

     

    so landing into head lights of a car I how cool you are totally wrong

     

    having been at a night landing of a flying doc plane up north at an unlit strip no lights were in the direction of the plane all lights were shone in direction of travel of plane

     

    also on the nullabore

     

    as I said in a previous thread this pilot needed an inoculation for get home ites but its to late now the people he leaves behind are paying for his stupidity

     

    the linking together off planes that are off different flight envelopes is ridiculous neil

     

     

  5. twice now I have had my motor shut down on late final once at shep and once at loocksley cant say why here might up set some one

     

    now it is totally different with a dead motor so why cant it be taught I feel that it should be

     

    up around toc I have encountered thermals many times and pulled the power off and sailed like an bird neil

     

     

  6. I personally recommend after a person has done about 8 to 10 hrs get a second instructor to show them how he would handle the situation

     

    as I have had three top instructors that drilled in to me the value of fly the bloody plane

     

    practice all you can but if your instructor has taught you wrong in the first place it will not change

     

    like one aspiring pilot I went for a flight with no pre landing checks what so ever flew on final 30 to 45 degrees had to turn at under 100 feet to line up strip

     

    when question on why he did it that way replied no one is here to see it i aint been back

     

    or this one pilot learning could not get flare right took him for a flight in right hand seat and told him just shut up and watch his instructor latter on asked what I had taught him quote "not allowed to teach him but there is no rule to say I cant show him" unquote

     

    there is an old saying monkey do as monkey see neil

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...