Jump to content

danny_galaga

Members
  • Posts

    2,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by danny_galaga

  1. 27 minutes ago, rgmwa said:

    The ASI is an important instrument, so you might as well get the right one for the job. If you can't get yours converted professionally, I'd sell it or just ditch it and put it down to experience.

     

     

    It's true it's important, but I'm starting to tilt towards keeping it. It's no less accurate than the KNTS version in operation after all. When I stick on the operating range decals, that's what I'll be looking at. I guess it's true what Einstein said- "It's all relative" 😄

     

    Also heard back from the instructor, he is fine with flying navs in my plane in MPH.

     

    As part of the deal I got, I have some superfluous instruments so I will gauge interest in the classified section. If I get enough for them, maybe I'll still get a KNTS ASI 

     

  2. 7 minutes ago, facthunter said:

    There are set standards used in various countries. Why not just stick to them? There's enough confusion as it is.. Nev

    Oh I agree. But I've got lemons to fix other lemons. I have this ASI and its too much hassle to exchange, and who would buy it in Australia? That's why I'm thinking of just using it and being done.

     

    Time to make some lemonade!

  3. 7 hours ago, AndyPickles said:

    I'm a tightwad.  ASI are spendy. Nail polish is cheap. Unless you are mixing it up with fast and busy airplanes, no need. Formation flying? Even in loose gaggle flying, our group would be pissed if someone was looking at an ASI than at the planes around them. I'd put a dot of Green nail polish Every 10 knots in the zone you actually operate, and save some money.

    I'm starting to lean this way. Just one more thing to decide it for me. I haven't done my navs yet and I was thinking of doing them in my own plane (Ra aus) . Would that matter much? Would it just be up to individual instructors? From memory the ol Jeppesen has ALL the units of measurements used in aviation around the planet didn't it?

  4. On a related note, a couple of bolts for my door latch were too short so I went to my local bolt shop to get something a little longer. They are 8.8 and rather small (maybe 4mm shaft) . I asked if they had some longer ones. They had trouble finding something so asked me what it was off. I told them an ultralight and they ummed and ahhed a bit. They eventually found some Allen head bolts. Maybe 9.8 or summink, and told me theyre not keen to sell if it's an aircraft. But they did anyway. I was going to tell them since it's in the experimental category of aircraft I could make it from rolls of old newspaper and no one would be liable but me. But instead, I've decided from now on I'll just say it's a kit CAR instead 🙂

    • Like 1
  5. Heard the CEO of Boost mobile on the radio the other day. He lives in the US now and also flies helicopters. He said there may be a problem in the US but that the term 5g is a broad definition (after all, it just means 5th generation). In particular, the system in Australia and Japan are quite different to the US system so there shouldn't be any problems here. 

  6. 17 hours ago, Ian said:

     

    Nuclear ships may make a comeback. It's not as if it a new idea and shipping generates more CO2 than the entire aviation industry.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2020/11/09/international-marine-shipping-industry-considers-nuclear-propulsion/?sh=4bf84fcf562c

    Was just thinking about SS savannah yesterday. You have to put aside cost of nuclear and remember why the world is turning away from fossil fuels. Then it could be a viable proposition. Whatever we do, things will get more expensive. Those things only seem relatively cheap now because we aren't counting the cost of damaging the planet. 

  7. 5 minutes ago, Yenn said:

    I went to India in 1984 and saw the Taj Mahal by moonlight, except that I didn't really see it due to the airborn pollution. That pollution was not caused by coal, but by the burning of cow dung by every family in India.

    It's coal particulates that causes asthma and death, not cow dung. 1984 is a long time ago.

  8. 1 minute ago, BrendAn said:

    Nuclear is the way forward. Probably never happen though.

    It would take the government to build it as a utility  service not privatised. I don't think any private company would do it because of the time it would take to recoup the cost.  And if they did all they care about is profit.  I believe power and  Water should cover costs only. Get rid of all the grubs feeding off us 

    Rolls Royce are developing compact nuclear power stations. They will be roughly the size of two football fields in total. They have actually said they would love to build in Australia. Nuclear is not perfect, but Australia had to be about the BEST place in the world to build a nuclear power station.

    • Like 3
    • Agree 1
  9. 1 hour ago, onetrack said:

    The true cost of coal needs to be measured in the vast areas of good farmland it destroys, and the lives it takes, and has taken in the past. Coal mining is one of the most destructive styles of mining on the planet, because it doesn't rip up a relatively small area for a lot of intensely valuable product - as we do with gold and lithium and nickel and cobalt.

    Coal mining has taken hundreds of thousands of lives in the past, directly in underground mining (and millions more in deaths from air pollution) - now to make it safer, the coal companies only take the relatively shallow coal, which is spread over vast areas.

    Yes, soil rehabilitation from coal mining takes place - but the soil structure is so disturbed by mining and replacement, it can never return to its original, valuable and productive structure. Open-cast coal mining destroys and pollutes major water aquifers. There are underground coal fires causing major destruction and pollution. The levels of methane gas released by simply mining the coal, never seems to get a mention.

    The major beneficiaries of open-cast coal mining are the huge mining machine manufacturers of America, and the Global Oil corporations. Caterpillar used to make machines for agriculture, now it makes more money out of machines for coal mining, and it produces very little agricultural machinery. 

    I've been a gold miner, a mining contractor, and a farmer, and I think I have a reasonably balanced view. But way too many politicians are still beholden to Big Coal and Big Oil to see the way forward is not increasing the worlds reliance on coal, but on reducing it - and making sure we utilise that massive amount of free energy that falls on us daily from that big golden orb in the sky.

    I detest being held to ransom perpetually by Big Oil and Big Coal. The diversification of our energy sources makes the same sense as the diversification of your income sources.

    The Economist reports that in India roughly 112,000 people die each year because of coal pollution.

    • Informative 1
  10. Mods have fixed the voting now. Those of you with several Ra-aus registered aircraft- one with and one without just vote yes AND no 🙂

     

    If you have MORE than two Ra-aus aircraft well damn! 😄 If none have transponders just vote no, if they all have transponders just vote yes. If some do some don't vote yes AND no.

     

    Derek Liston, I think your vote counts as it's an aircraft that is often registered Ra-aus 🙂

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...