Jump to content

Old Koreelah

Moderators
  • Posts

    6,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Posts posted by Old Koreelah

  1. Some good advice on here, Rob. You might just have acquired a few thousand dollars worth of wisdom. Good deal.

     

    If you're stuck with your purchase, fret not. Your backyard (or front garden) won't be boring like all the others. Your kids will have a real live aeroplane to play in!

     

     

  2. Politics. Every nation wants to have an aerospace industry, and every politician is trying to boost employment in his constituency. When the major purchase deals are being done, concessions are made to the customer. "We'll buy your airliner if you employ some of our people to build the rudder trim tabs in our country..." The US is no different to the EU in subsidising employment in depressed localities for politician reasons.

     

     

  3. Sounds good Geoff. Quite a good idea: have containers for filtered fuel only. Do the filtering well away from your aircraft, then insert the spout directly into the tank to reduce static buildup. I might adopt this idea and buy an extra jerry can.

     

    This doesn't help when refuelling while away from home, unless you can carry containers. I'd like to get hold of a filter which will wrap around a bowser nozzle and fit into the tank filler hole.

     

     

    • Informative 1
  4. I'm currently enjoying 30 degree days in Darwin. We're near the airport and there's a lot of traffic; lighties (including plenty of turboprops) shuttling out to communities, mining camps and islands. Jets take off early in the morning to get into the big southern cities just after curfew.

     

     

  5. What was that slogan by the mob in Boston over 200 years ago: "no taxation without representation".

     

    Our situation is a little different, but there might be many who will refuse to obey rules if they were denied the opportunity to have any input.

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  6. That would have got your attention Zibi!

     

    After reading an article in the Magazine recently on static caused by fuel turbulence in funnels, I fitted a clear plastic skirt to the top of my Mr. Funnel. I'd like to think it will contain petrol fumes and keep out enough fresh air that vapour pressure remains above flash point.

     

    We seem to be stuck between ensuring clean fuel and preventing a fire.

     

    I'd prefer a filter that fits into the tank opening, so I can stick the spout in there away from all that oxygen outside.

     

     

  7. One piece of info needed is the rig name. With this it would be possible to find its position and work out its horizon at 44,000'...

    You'd think each sighting would have been thoroughly investigated. There have been quite a few, some which sound as if they were reported before news of the disappearance broke- yet each has been dismissed by the authorities. I thought a couple of eyewitness reports would be worth as much as some vague pings on a sonar.

     

     

    • Agree 2
  8. I am interested in a Jodel D9.My dear departed dad used to take me flying in his Jodel D120 in the UK.To buy one is a first preference .I am also considering building one although all my skills are in metalworking I think a wood project would be good thereapy after a lifetime with metal.Any info at all would be appreciated.

    Kind regards

     

    John

    Good to hear from such a discerning person, John!

    The Jodels are particularly impressive aircraft, and after seven decades their performance compares well to more recent designs. Most people on the Jodel forum (https://m.mg.mail.yahoo.com/hg/?.rand=322599045&cleolblock=1) suggest that people build the newer D18 design rather than a D9. Two seats and not a lot heavier.

     

    There are often semi-finished projects or even whole aircraft for sale. For many years a nice Druine Turbulent was for sale at Cessnock. The fuselage is very similar to a D9, but it lacks the wonderful Jodel wing. It may still be there.

     

     

  9. ... Whether the plane glides better or worse with the prop not rotating is knowledge any pilot should have about the plane he/she flys. Nev

    Some convincing posts on both sides of this argument. Perhaps the problem is that bureaucracies paint with a broad brush. What's damned dangerous behaviour at Moorabin may be pretty safe at many quiet country strips.

    I hope that safety-conscious pilots aren't denied the chance to fully experience the performance limitations of their single-seaters in a fairly safe setting.

     

     

    • Agree 2
  10. ...If I want to glide I get in a glider

    If I want to do aeros , I go fly an aerobatic aircraft

     

    If I want to get somewhere fast and on time( well mostly) I catch the kero burner.

     

    If I want to fly a defined "power driven aeroplane as defined in the CAR's then so be it.

     

    Sounds like a lot of freedom to me.

    I used to be taken in by this sort of creeping paternalism. Do we need to have our freedoms defined so rigidly?

     

    Bureaucracies are increasingly inhabited by people with narrowly-defined qualifications, little industry experience, even less imagination, and no incentive to adopt innovation- even safety improvements.

     

    Are these proposed rule changes based an actual evidence of a need? How many accidents have been attributed to engine-off flying? On the roads our attention is too often taken up trying not to be booked, rather than focussing on safety. Do we want flying to go the same way?

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 7
  11. with half a wing (or 2/3 in this case) it will fly for 1km with a lot of rudder input...in fact several usaaf and raaf pilots rammed japs in P-40's off horn island and returned with half a wing, 200 miles out

    Amazing! The aircraft in the first pic is benefitting from a bit of extra leading edge... Maybe that confirms the old saying that the back of the wing is only streamlining for the spar...

     

     

  12. It really looks as if this engine-off rule needs to be clarified. Rule should be simple to follow for the average person. If there are mixed messages and different interpretations, it is time to re-write the intention of the rule in plain English.

    Actually, 80kt perhaps we've gone far enough down that path. The more we try to clarify the rules, the more prescriptive they become and the less freedom we have. Let's leave this one a bit woolie.

     

     

    • Agree 3
    • Winner 2
  13. ...On another note I just noticed that a former Vietnamese refugee has been appointed SA Governor, he is 60 years old and arrived here 36 years ago at the age of 24.I immediately thought of this thread and it makes me wonder if it's a good choice when he can't possibly have the deeper cultural knowledge that one can only gain by growing up in a country from birth, which we are discussing here, and that influences your attitudes and personalities and ultimately your decision making. I have been in China for 10 years and still make cultural blunders or simply disagree and don't wish to follow them sometimes.

     

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-26/hieu-van-le-appointed-sa-governor/5552004

    Interesting topic Bex, and I couldn't improve on Marty's response.

     

    The Chinese themselves (or was it the Manchus) appointed foreigners as governors in the past, when their leaders valued innovation and diversity. Many Australians strongly resisted the appointment of our first native-born Governor General only 70-odd years ago- probably for similar reason to those you raised.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...