Jump to content

stevron

Members
  • Posts

    320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by stevron

  1. Food for thought

     

    RAAus membership / authority to fly $245

     

    Craft registration $155

     

    Total $400

     

    Gliding after primary costs

     

    GFA memberships $300

     

    Club membership $250

     

    Annual flight review $100 not biennial

     

    Tug fee between $20 to $50 per launch

     

    Total $650 I do not know the cost of reg

     

    GA

     

    After the primary costs

     

    Lic nil cost

     

    Reg Nil cost

     

    Plus government free funding support

     

    Through CASA

     

    Just saying , interesting though

     

     

    • Like 1
  2. could office bearers please post their flyin and Bbq etc in the calendar so New chums can plan to go to such events.

     

    Our club has had a change office bearers and they to do not know what to advise our members. You never know you might get a few more attendees

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. My last comment on this matter, I pay and contribute to my local air facility , I am involved with our local flying club , I am a member of an other flying club , keeping this in mind , I am contributing to the maintenance and financial operation of these air facilities. My piont is, I am paying at my home airport facilities either by cash support or my free labour , payments like the local council for hangar rates and ground lease fees which appears to rise and rise yearly and an annual airport landing fee ,not to mention Air services fees.

     

    Now it’s expected that I pay for someone else’s facility ,that’s double dipping.

     

    I simply say ; You pay for yours and I pay for mine we are even .

     

     

    • Like 1
  4. I have had a thought , a revaluation really . Let’s have all VH planes pay a yearly Reg fee, license fee and share this money around the needy airport operators.that would solve the problem . VH plane operators currently save money by not paying registration fees like we do in RA , so let’s collect $ 280 a year licence fee and say another $150 registration fee , hell , what a great idea. Correct me if I am wrong , but fuel companies own petrol pumping equipment. Well the do around here anyway

     

     

  5. Can anyone offer light on how many aircraft land at these out field airports per period of time. Not resident aircraft but air craft landing for a stop over. Just an average , I think people would be surprised at the small number. So all this wind blowing is likely to be over a insignificant amount of money. As I have said before, planes have to take off from some where and they are most likely are contributing to that site , so do we need to pay twice? I see it maybe different to some, airport facilities are for everyone, car clubs, flying doctors, fire, ambos, and the small amount of money returned after spending time tracking down payments is ludicrous

     

     

  6. Not being fully conversed with the workings of flying organisations like RA , SAAA or AOPA. It seems to me that these organisations are hunting and gathering members in a race to be the biggest . At the end of the day the pressures from compliance , aircraft running expenses, governance ,landing fees , airport fees , air craft housing costs ,will keep a large number of potential flyers away from this exciting past time.

     

    Organisations such as above should be fighting for our rights to use airports that are alread owned by the community , Airports like Shepparton and Maryborough these communities received government money to build the air ports , our money , why do we need to pay again or if payment is necessary to run these leisure/business centres then council should start charging push bike riders for using the roads and cycle tracks they do not contribute to. Landing fees could be considered discriminatory against one group of the community.

     

    If these organisations as Listed are for pilots and flying they would start to pursue cost reduction in areas such landing fees or the flying community Will not the attract younger people.

     

    It Is ok for older folk to spend their leisure time and money in pursuit of flying pleasures and aircraft ownership but the young people have more options to spend their hard earned cash and flying is see as cost prohibitive.

     

    So inclusion make it easy , make it affordable and stop this erosion of our rights to visit cities/towns at minimal expense.

     

    Landing fees, airport fees, air services fees, fight reviews , association fees , medicals and aircraft hire or ownership costs are just too great for the next generation of flyers and I have not mentioned fuel costs .

     

    Flying associations please put more effort into the above or watch this flying pleasure fade away and die.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Agree 7
  7. So do you have the Brumby yet or is it still coming,? mine took almost 2 years to get .

     

    Though I am happy with the plane ,you might be advised to be selective with the information the factory might forward.

     

    Will you receive a Chinese build or a cowra unit? What are your build details ?

     

     

  8. Ooops. Sorry. I thought I’d replied... Since my initial post last year I’ve ordered a Brumby 610. Waiting (impatiently) for delivery in late-March.I’ve had access to a 610 through the Cowra aero club and enjoyed developing my piloting skills and local ventures immensely.The flight performance and behaviours of the aircraft - hlghlighed on the manufacturer’s website and numerous other reviews - are spot-on in my still novice flyer’s opinion.

     

    I’ve been looking for a comfortable (high wing) touring aircraft. I’m 6’3” with long leg-length. Finding a LSA cockpit with ease of entry/exit and comfortable seated position for x-cty transits has been a challenge. The 610 ticks the right boxes.

     

    I gained my RPC in a Lightplanes FK9 and continued my skills development in an A22 Foxbat for most of last year. Both great aircraft and I probably have a sentiment bias for the FK9. The Foxbat is an equally great aircraft to fly but I felt less comfortable in the reclined seated position due to my stature. I much perfer the conventional seated position in the Brumby than the sports car position of the Foxbat (for me).

     

    Payload isn’t a major consideration. I’ll be flying solo for a greater amount of time.

     

    The final and very important factor - for me - was supporting Australian design and manufacturing. Although my aircraft is part of of the new generation of Brumby aircraft initially manufactuted in their China-based factory. It remains Australian-designed for Australian conditions, and the final assembly, internal fit out and modifications will be done at their Cowra factory by local employees. As will all after sales requirements. So I feel I’m still contributing to the local economy as best I can.

     

    Cheers, Graeme

  9. Friday 27 July my self and a friend flew into Wangaratta airport, we were met by friendly people who offered us a drink and light conversation about the Wangaratta aero. We also had the pleasure to meet Steve Hobby a local lame who lent us a car, which was very gracious of if him. On our return, an offer from Steve and his wife plus the Bill Hall and his wife to join them for a bbq , Bill is the president of the Wangaratta Aero Club. If you call into YWGT they will make you free welcome .

     

     

    • Like 8
  10. Landing fees are objectionable as they penalise only pilots. Bike riders , disable vehicles etc , do not pay anything and are a greater risk for the council, not to mention use more council infrastructure than the flying family.

     

    People who are bleating about being charged or volunteering around their hangars , your not on your own, every pilot is paying or working around their hangar . Do you want visiting pilots who spend money in your town to pay twice. You pay for yours , I pay for mine and it’s even . Come and land with me and wait for me to come out and bend your ear about all things aeronautical , then we will have cup of tea together. Flyers are fantastic people

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
  11. Do you have any performance figures. I learned to fly in a Foxbat and I like the plane, however I do want to travel and l’m interested in the brumby, it has nice lines and looks good, to me anyway. I think the Foxbat is a bit slow for long trips.

    Do you have any performance figures. I learned to fly in a Foxbat and I like the plane, however I do want to travel and l’m interested in the brumby, it has nice lines and looks good, to me anyway. I think the Foxbat is a bit slow for long trips.

    Brumby’s do not climb that well compared to a Fox bat, cruise about 90kts and have about 5 hours useable duration .

    Wide cabs , good vision , stable, good under carriage.

     

     

  12. An Air Master inflight adjustable pitch prop was fitted to a Brumby powered by a 912 and OKed by factory with spectacular results. Better climb rate and a 15 knts increase in cruise speed . The owner is very happy

    I ask the NZ company air master about a constant speed and they returned Approx $14000. And that’s not in my budget.
  13. Good try on the bolt heads but that is/ was not the problem ,the problem was / is the front support did not fit properly and allowed the spinner to move through the torque of the engine and then the spinner was out of balance and that’s why it split the backing plate as well , yes the spinner was fitted with washers and it’s a spun metallic spinner

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...