Jump to content

Student Pilot

Members
  • Posts

    1,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Student Pilot

  1. Don't rush a forced landing........pretty hard to think clearly. Nobody knows how they are going to react in an emergency situation till it happens.
  2. All too hard........just give up
  3. The first solo has changed a lot over the years, olden days it wasn't unheard of to solo with 3 hours. When I learnt about 10 hours was the norm, now 20? When I learnt the instructors were hour building for airlines and not interested in in the students progress, one of mine used to read a book and smoke most of my training. It's also common now to milk the student all you can, 40 or 50 hours before solo is also common. As usual there has to be a middle road, find a career instructor who cares about the job rather than just adding hours and maximizing the flight school income. Are they still around? Solo is a step in many towards gaining a license, an important one yes but just another step.
  4. Watch a person who flies a tailwheel aircraft for a living, they always wheel them on. A tail low wheeler doesn't use anymore runway than a three pointer. Yes a good three pointer on a grass runway feels pretty good. Every landing I do try, I might just be a bit slow at learning 😁 I try to land on centreline, on the spot where I'll roll through to taxi off without braking. Last of all I try to get a smooth touchdown at the slowest possible speed, a tailwheel low wheeler. At a guess I'd say maybe 175,000 landings, maybe six what I'd call perfect landings. Maybe I need some dual with you Nev? 🤓
  5. Right again Nev, the Sabre wuzza bewdy engine too! H pattern 24 cyl sleeve valve. With all those moving parts what could possibly go wrong?
  6. I have run Lyc's, Continentals and PW engines on mogas, I dislike it intensely. It was a few years ago now, the fuel was always variable and not consistent from lots of suppliers. Hot weather made for problems, there was always a stink from the fuel. At one stage I was using 1000 litres a day and I still used avgas, I was prepared to pay more for decent fuel.
  7. That last sentence is the truth of CASA Ian......................things will never change until CASA makes flying safe, that is no aircraft flying.
  8. Agreed unless it's a Napier Sabre diesel 😜
  9. Yes but no soul.........☹️
  10. Has the rest of the world changed hemispherical cruising levels?
  11. It makes too much sense for everybody to use the same system. In reality it makes no difference if your speed is knots, MPH or K's. The Yanks have a hatred for anything metric, using furlongs, bushels, rods, ounces, acres, chains makes so much more sense 😁 Makes hard work and room for error in the likes of Canada where they are supposed to work with the metric system but the rednecks want to be Amerrycarn and have a mixture of US and imperial measurements and the products like fuel and chemical are supplied as metric recommendations. I wouldn't have any problem with using K's for speed, metres for height.
  12. What a great machine, a true minimum aircraft. A delight to fly.......
  13. Colt for under 20K? Surely you jest?
  14. A -67 PT 6 is worth a lot just for the core.
  15. VERY expensive toy!!!!
  16. Agreed Nev, I have never heard anybody call an Airtuck handsome. An Ag Cat with a 985 and the hopper converted to a couple of seats would make a good Sunday afternoon cruiser. Except maintenance and the 100 litres an hour fuel flow might be a bit spensive!
  17. A bloke called Neil (ex navy pilot with a grey beard,) used to fly for Transavia and demonstrate the Airtruck, his party piece was to put 2 passengers in the rear seat and do aerobatics. The Airtruck was a nice machine to fly, light harmonised controls and pretty efficient with a 300 HP. They came with all sorts of engines from Continental 250ish HP, also 540 Lyc's. There are a few still flying I think they are 720's.
  18. They used to fly the Airtruks from there
  19. A design from the 80's was the Kitten, Jessie Anglin designed it as an ultralight. There are a few flying in Oz, the design was copied given a turtle deck then called the Pup. Both of those originally had triangulated undercarriage and reasonably small wheels that worked well.
  20. Light aircraft have been using triangulated steel tube for undercarriages since the 1920's. Depends on the welding process and the welders skill as to any need for heat treating/stress relieving after welding. Chromemoly tube is very strong 1.2 mm would be ok, what thickness do the plans call for?
  21. Everything said is spot on. That's the reason why nobody bothers to make submissions, CASA will not listen.
  22. It's easy to get discouraged with CASA, they won't listen to experienced people. You only have to look at what they have done to businesses over the last 40 years. Doesn't matter who you are or what you say, they will not listen they know better. That's why people will not make submissions, waste of time. Admittedly CASA are just part of the problem, Federal gov, local councils, sacred military airspace have all contributed to the elimination of GA. It's just getting too hard, too expensive.
  23. Wasn't a big fan of mogas in Beavers, fuel used to have trouble feeding the carb. Mainly ground handling and part throttle, in hot weather there would be vaporisation pulling the fuel up from the low tanks. Mogas stinking stuff compared to avgas. 985 in a Stearman is a wonderful thing Nev 😁 Admittedly I have only flown a Stearman with a 985 but is was a very nice machine to fly, fast at around 110 in cruise. Docile yet responsive, ground handling a delight, aero's gentle. The stories about how hard a Stearman is to fly are wildly exaggerated. The machine I flew was a rebuilt Ag aircraft, in the hot weather you could still smell malathion wafting 🤓
×
×
  • Create New...