danny_galaga Posted July 21 Posted July 21 I didn't know anything about this accident. Apparently the aftermath lead to standardised pre flight briefings for passengers. It seems most people would likely have survived in a more modern setting. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kiro7.com/news/trending/pan-am-clipper-endeavor-found-plane-missing-74-years/WT4EDEASSZAPBEQK32CE2ULPFQ/%3foutputType=amp
red750 Posted July 22 Posted July 22 It tells me access to that site is not available outside the USA. 1
red750 Posted July 22 Posted July 22 Wreckage of Pan Am plane found 74 years after it crashed off Puerto Rico | CNN EDITION.CNN.COM Seventy-four years after a Pan Am flight crashed into the water off Puerto Rico, killing 52 people and prompting sweeping reforms including preflight passenger safety briefings, an aviation search team... 4
facthunter Posted July 25 Posted July 25 That Must have been one of the last DC-4 Production as the earlier types had square windows. The Aircraft was to planned to eventually be pressurised but that only happened with the Introduction of the Douglas DC-6 with the More Powerful P&W R-2800 engines, and higher flying Capability. Nev 1
ClintonB Posted July 26 Posted July 26 Show about wreckage Search is going to be on Discovery channel soon. 1 1
facthunter Posted July 26 Posted July 26 Losing two on one side together, is usually fuel management. They have a very complex fuel feed layout. Nev
danny_galaga Posted July 26 Author Posted July 26 6 hours ago, facthunter said: Losing two on one side together, is usually fuel management. They have a very complex fuel feed layout. Nev The write up on the crash had it as poor maintenance. Apparently that airline had a string of issues with shoddy maintenance practices 1
facthunter Posted July 26 Posted July 26 How would they Know the Cause since the Plane has only just been found.? It was also not very Old. Pan Am was a pretty large show, flying long Routes . Years Later their reputation degraded when they flew B 747's that were never washed. and Qantas Crews refused to deadhead on them because their accident record was poor. They eventually went out of Business..Nev 1
danny_galaga Posted July 27 Author Posted July 27 1 hour ago, facthunter said: How would they Know the Cause since the Plane has only just been found.? It was also not very Old. Pan Am was a pretty large show, flying long Routes . Years Later their reputation degraded when they flew B 747's that were never washed. and Qantas Crews refused to deadhead on them because their accident record was poor. They eventually went out of Business..Nev https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_526A 1
facthunter Posted July 28 Posted July 28 Pan Am was an Enormous Enterprise for a long time.. It's worth spending a bit of time Looking over it's History, which ended about 1991. Airlines are often not a good investment and the Best performers have government contracts to support them. Flying near empty Planes is a quick way to go broke . I'd NEVER recommend investing in a Airline. Piston Engined Planes operated nowhere near the safety level that Jet engines provided even though they were derated from the Military spec in RPT ops. One Nickname for the 3 tailed Lockheed was Super Consternation. The Boeing Strato Cruiser often lost Multiple engines on Long flights. Nev
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now