Jump to content

rodgerc

Members
  • Posts

    228
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by rodgerc

  1. Spot on Skippy….

    I built and flew a 2300 cc AeroVee (upgraded from 2180cc Nikasil) powered Waiex that was a ton on fun and as strong as an ox, but the lack of a 912-ULS Rotax option (at the time) dictated that our relationship would not be long-term.

    The good news for existing owners is that they are so simple, that anything short of a destroyed spar cap is easily repaired or replaced. 
    If (when) a new owner emerges, they would be well advised to relaunch with a decent Rotax mount….I’m not convinced the high wing variant was going to set the world on fire. IMG_0031.thumb.jpeg.03b831ec7bbb3427c45c9d8db5d5d977.jpeg

    • Informative 1
  2. Over the years a number of fellow pilots have told me they wouldn’t be comfortable flying an aircraft that they personally built…My counter comment these days is, I’m not comfortable flying a plane I didn’t build.

     

    I’m exceedingly comfortable having my build quality and standard of finish measured against anything coming out of a “factory”.

    • Like 2
    • Agree 1
    • Informative 1
    • Winner 1
  3. I’m trying to determine how “RAA” (RA-Aus) became implicated in this post, given the accident occurred in the UK as a likely result of a component made and purchased in the USA 🤔….

     

    In any event, I was informed by my CASA Authorised Person that it was not their job to determine the airworthiness of any experimental aircraft, nor could they deny a Special CoA, even if the aircraft was built out of Clag, paddle pop sticks and Bunnings bolts. 
     

    CASA will issue a AC21-4 Special Certificate of Airworthiness (Experimental) but the restrictions placed upon the aircraft as a result of their risk assessment (Test area, Phase 1 duration etc) may make it impractical. 

     

    • Like 3
    • Informative 1
×
×
  • Create New...