<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aircraft: Aircraft</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/page/9/?d=1</link><description>Aircraft: Aircraft</description><language>en</language><item><title>Messerschmitt Bf 110</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/messerschmitt-bf-110-r1487/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1554186512_MesserschmittBf11001.jpg.effee288b4c5366fedafc3721bf25cd2.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Messerschmitt Bf 110, often known unofficially as the Me 110, is a twin-engine Zerstörer (Destroyer, heavy fighter), fighter-bomber (Jagdbomber or Jabo), and night fighter (Nachtjäger) developed in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and used by the Luftwaffe during World War II. Hermann Göring was a proponent of the Bf 110, believing its heavy armament, speed, and range would make the Bf 110 the Luftwaffe’s premier offensive fighter. Early variants were armed with two MG FF 20 mm cannon, four 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 17 machine guns, and one 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine gun for defence (later variants would replace the MG FFs with MG 151s and the rear gunner station would be armed with the twin-barreled MG 81Z). Development work on an improved type to replace the Bf 110 - the Messerschmitt Me 210 - began before the war started, but its teething troubles resulted in the Bf 110 soldiering on until the end of the war in various roles. Its intended replacements, the aforementioned Me 210 and the significantly improved Me 410 Hornisse, never fully replaced the Bf 110.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Bf 110 served with considerable success in the early campaigns in Poland, Norway and France. The primary weakness of the Bf 110 was its lack of maneuverability, although this could be mitigated with better tactics. This weakness was exploited by the RAF when Bf 110s were flown as close escort to German bombers during the Battle of Britain. When British bombers began targeting German territory with nightly raids, some Bf 110-equipped units were converted to night fighters, a role to which the aircraft was well suited. After the Battle of Britain the Bf 110 enjoyed a successful period as an air superiority fighter and strike aircraft in other theatres and defended Germany from strategic air attack by day against the USAAF's 8th Air Force, until an American change in fighter tactics rendered them increasingly vulnerable to developing American air supremacy over the Reich as 1944 began.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the Balkans and North African campaigns and on the Eastern Front, it rendered valuable ground support to the German Army as a potent fighter-bomber. Later in the war, it was developed into a formidable radar-equipped night fighter, becoming the main night-fighting aircraft of the Luftwaffe. Most of the German night fighter aces flew the Bf 110 at some point during their combat careers and the top night fighter ace, Major Heinz-Wolfgang Schnaufer, flew it exclusively and claimed 121 victories in 164 sorties.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Throughout the 1930s, the air forces of the major military powers were engaged in a transition from biplane to monoplane designs. Most concentrated on the single-engine fighter aircraft, but the problem of range arose. The Ministry of Aviation (RLM, for Reichsluftfahrtministerium), pushed by Hermann Göring, issued a request for a new multipurpose fighter called the Kampfzerstörer (battle destroyer) with long range and an internal bomb bay. The request called for a twin-engine, three-seat, all-metal monoplane that was armed with cannon as well as a bomb bay. Of the original seven companies, only Bayerische Flugzeugwerke (Messerschmitt), Focke-Wulf and Henschel responded to the request.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Messerschmitt defeated Focke-Wulf, Henschel, and Arado, and was given the funds to build several prototype aircraft. The Focke-Wulf design, the Focke-Wulf Fw 57, had a wing span of 25.6 m (84 ft) and was powered by two DB 600 engines. It was armed with two 20 mm MG FF cannons in the nose, while a third was positioned in a dorsal turret. The Fw 57 V1 flew in 1936 but its performance was poor and the machine crashed. The Henschel Hs 124 was similar in construction layout to the Fw 57, equipped with two Jumo 210C for the V1. The V2 used the BMW 132Dc radial engines generating 870 PS compared with the 640 PS Jumo. The armament consisted of a single rearward-firing 7.92 mm (.312 in) MG 15 machine gun and a single forward-firing 20 mm MG FF cannon.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Messerschmitt omitted the internal bomb load requirement from the Ministry of Aviation directive to increase the armament element of the Ministry of Aviation's specification. The Bf 110 was far superior to its rivals in providing the speed, range and firepower to meet its role requirements.[5] By the end of 1935, the Bf 110 had evolved into an all-metal, low-wing cantilever monoplane of semi-monocoque design featuring twin vertical stabilizers and powered by two DB 600A engines. The design was also fitted with Handley-Page wing slots[5](actually, leading-edge slats).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For further details on design and development, plus 31 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_110" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> Specifications of Bf 110C-1 variant below.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/301393118_MesserschmittBf11002.jpg.b02ad409b872ce4e28d6a4405103f736.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56429" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/522121094_MesserschmittBf11002.thumb.jpg.d3a815ea031d8006e0443ed825d6265b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Bf 110 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/2047589964_MesserschmittBf11003.jpg.503e84b59ce25b83ce906656da3309fe.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56430" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1484063867_MesserschmittBf11003.thumb.jpg.2096e45308216b08b19ddaf16cb4e3ec.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Bf 110 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/76108498_MesserschmittBf11004.jpg.197448e6505bc8da68f83749c54cdaa2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56431" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/977492265_MesserschmittBf11004.thumb.jpg.e573443d2cfbfd9d386bf6e110fe2d4a.jpg" data-ratio="48.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Bf 110 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/2010316584_MesserschmittBf11005.jpg.ab6b75fe6288286852b1c856eed9cabf.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56432" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/642736632_MesserschmittBf11005.thumb.jpg.5275343c9e780f146a62fc6ad6ac5b90.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Bf 110 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1487</guid><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 02:39:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/messerschmitt-me-163-komet-r1629/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet03.jpg.3707351d916b5cee0ea8de3b669450e0.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet is a rocket-powered interceptor aircraft primarily designed and produced by the German aircraft manufacturer Messerschmitt. It is the only operational rocket-powered fighter aircraft in history as well as the first piloted aircraft of any type to exceed 1,000 kilometres per hour (620 mph) in level flight. Aproximately 370 units were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Development of what would become the Me 163 can be traced back to 1937 and the work of the German aeronautical engineer Alexander Lippisch and the Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Segelflug (DFS). Initially an experimental programme that drew upon traditional glider designs while integrating various new innovations such as the rocket engine, the development ran into organisational issues until Lippisch and his team were transferred to Messerschmitt in January 1939. Plans for a propeller-powered intermediary aircraft were quickly dropped in favour of proceeding directly to rocket propulsion. On 1 September 1941, the prototype performed its maiden flight, quickly demonstrating its unprecedented performance and the qualities of its design. Having been suitably impressed, Nazi officials quickly enacted plans that aimed for the widespread introduction of Me 163 point-defence interceptors across Germany. During December 1941, work began on the upgraded Me 163B, which was optimized for large-scale production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During early July 1944, German test pilot Heini Dittmar reached 1,130 km/h (700 mph), an unofficial flight airspeed record that remained unmatched by turbojet-powered aircraft until 1953. That same year, the Me 163 began flying operational missions, being typically used to defend against incoming enemy bombing raids. As part of their alliance with Empire of Japan, Germany provided design schematics and a single Me 163 to the country; this led to the development of the Mitsubishi J8M. By the end of the conflict, roughly 370 Komets had been completed, most of which were being used operationally. Some of the aircraft's shortcomings were never addressed, and was less effective in combat than predicted. Capable of a maximum of 7.5 minutes of powered flight, its range fell short of projections and greatly limited its potential. Efforts to improve the aircraft were made (most notably the development of the Messerschmitt Me 263), but many of these did not see actual combat due to the sustained advancement of the Allied powers into Germany in 1945.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For a dedicated interceptor aircraft that achieved operational status, the track record of the Me 163 is somewhat underwhelming, having been credited with the destruction of between nine and 18 Allied aircraft against ten losses. Aside from the actual combat losses incurred, numerous Me 163 pilots had been killed during testing and training flights. This high loss rate was, at least partially, a result of the later models' use of rocket propellant, which was not only highly volatile but also corrosive and hazardous to humans. One noteworthy fatality was that of Josef Pöhs, a German fighter ace and Oberleutnant in the Luftwaffe, who was killed in 1943 through exposure to T-Stoff in combination with injuries sustained during a failed takeoff that ruptured a fuel line. Besides Nazi Germany, no nation has ever made operational use of either the Me 163 specifically, or rocket planes in general. A few captured Me 163s were flown for evaluation and research purposes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Australia</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Me 163B, Werknummer 191907 was part of JG 400, captured at Husum and was shipped to the RAE. It was allocated the RAF Air Ministry number of AM222 and was dispatched from Farnborough to No. 6 MU, RAF Brize Norton, on 8 August 1945. On 21 March 1946, it was recorded in the Census of No. 6 MU, and allocated to No. 76 MU (Wroughton) on 30 April 1946 for shipment to Australia. For many years this aircraft was displayed at <strong>RAAF Williams Point Cook</strong>, but in 1986, the Me 163 was transferred to <strong>The Australian War Memorial</strong> for refurbishment. It was stored at the AWM Treloar Technology Annex Mitchell, refurbished and reassembled, and was later put up for display together with a Messerschmitt Me 262A-2a, Werknummer 500200 (AM81).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the development, operational history and models of the Me-163, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_163_Komet" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet01.jpg.7a4803c74de8d1f9f89550fbad05c761.jpg" data-fileid="59437" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59437" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet01.thumb.jpg.18f5de2ddb5495694d1db89f70e0f3d8.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet02.jpg.05bf7db08196d421e195745c7cfbbf22.jpg" data-fileid="59438" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59438" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet02.thumb.jpg.45b3d799f6c640a674ed6653830a92d4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet04.JPG.612ec76572314f59070ec68819eacc3d.JPG" data-fileid="59440" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img alt="Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet 04.JPG" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59440" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet04.thumb.JPG.05ef1444bfbb55af492dadbcbc32adc0.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet05.jpg.21459684091671c87e6ba344f4b4137a.jpg" data-fileid="59441" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59441" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/MesserschmittMe163Komet05.thumb.jpg.d265ef57617a88d94d2f8a2a8a0168d4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1629</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 03:46:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Messerschmitt Me 262</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/messerschmitt-me-262-r1022/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1890903603_Me26201.jpg.0cb5e0e5e605049718a8c4f358b4e052.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Messerschmitt Me 262, nicknamed Schwalbe (German: "Swallow") in fighter versions, or Sturmvogel (German: "Storm Bird") in fighter-bomber versions, was the world's first operational jet-powered fighter aircraft. Design work started before World War II began, but problems with engines, metallurgy and top-level interference kept the aircraft from operational status with the Luftwaffe until mid-1944. The Me 262 was faster and more heavily armed than any Allied fighter, including the British jet-powered Gloster Meteor. One of the most advanced aviation designs in operational use during World War II, the Me 262's roles included light bomber, reconnaissance and experimental night fighter versions.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Me 262 pilots claimed a total of 542 Allied aircraft shot down, although higher claims are sometimes made. The Allies countered its effectiveness in the air by attacking the aircraft on the ground and during takeoff and landing. Strategic materials shortages and design compromises on the Junkers Jumo 004 axial-flow turbojet engines led to reliability problems. Attacks by Allied forces on fuel supplies during the deteriorating late-war situation also reduced the effectiveness of the aircraft as a fighting force. Armament production within Germany was focused on more easily manufactured aircraft. In the end, the Me 262 had a negligible impact on the course of the war as a result of its late introduction and the consequently small numbers put in operational service.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While German use of the aircraft ended with the close of World War II, a small number were operated by the Czechoslovak Air Force until 1951. It also heavily influenced several designs, such as the Sukhoi Su-9 (1946) and Nakajima Kikka. Captured Me 262s were studied and flight-tested by the major powers, and ultimately influenced the designs of post-war aircraft such as the North American F-86 Sabre, MiG-15 and Boeing B-47 Stratojet. Several aircraft survive on static display in museums, and there are several privately built flying reproductions that use modern General Electric J85 engines.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the origins, operational history and 32 variants of the Me 262, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_262" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1652764299_Me26202.jpg.0aa8718c0e05710eded82f6a06596e9a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51368" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/256594754_Me26202.thumb.jpg.71cf2edd0b361729da9408faa74362f3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Me 262 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1520313963_Me26203.jpg.07a85bd4b54126d8e0c33c52855d2857.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51369" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/948471616_Me26203.thumb.jpg.ce7e496797b93a490d69ec0d96f8d3f6.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Me 262 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/35999854_Me26204.jpg.db78d7c8a8263024bb2e8b40fef31230.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51370" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1175771709_Me26204.thumb.jpg.041bfcf0bdaa32865bd432ed6d21a972.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Me 262 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/312262391_Me26205.jpg.8d9e8f93452a10a1832a7c5b475c31af.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51371" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/6718226_Me26205.thumb.jpg.613e8cff570069347eabd910025b5ba9.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Me 262 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1022</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2021 10:36:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/messerschmitt-me-323-gigant-r1903/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant05.jpg.4094074f7958520d6cb998ca16c47fc8.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant ("Giant") was a German military transport aircraft of World War II. It was a powered variant of the Me 321 military glider and was the largest land-based transport aircraft to fly during the war. In total, 213 were made, with 15 being converted from the Me 321.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Me 323 was the result of a 1940 German requirement for a large assault glider in preparation for Operation Sea Lion, the projected invasion of Great Britain. The DFS 230 light glider had already proven its worth in the Battle of Fort Eben-Emael in Belgium (the first ever assault by gliderborne troops), and would later be used in the invasion of Crete in 1941.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	However, in order to mount an invasion across the English Channel, the Germans would need to be able to airlift vehicles and other heavy equipment as part of an initial assault wave. Although Operation Sea Lion was cancelled, the requirement for a heavy air transport capability remained, with the focus shifting to the forthcoming Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Early in 1941, as a result of feedback from Transport Command pilots in Russia, the decision was taken to produce a motorized variant of the Me 321, to be designated Me 323. French Gnome et Rhône GR14N radial engines, rated at 1,180 PS (1,164 hp, 868 kW) for take-off as used in the Bloch MB.175 aircraft were chosen for use. This would reduce the burden on Germany's strained industry.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Like the Me 321, the Me 323 had massive, semicantilever, high-mounted wings, which were braced from the fuselage out to the middle of the wing. To reduce weight and save aluminium, much of the wing was made of plywood and fabric, while the fuselage was of metal-tube construction with wooden spars and covered with doped fabric, with heavy bracing in the floor to support the payload.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The "D" series had a crew of five - two pilots, two flight engineers, and a radio operator. Two gunners could also be carried. The flight engineers occupied two small cabins, one in each wing between the inboard and centre engines. The engineers were intended to monitor engine synchronisation and allow the pilot to fly without worrying about engine status, although the pilot could override the engineers' decisions on engine and propeller control.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of development, design, operational history and 18 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_323_Gigant" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant01.jpg.d31c9416858bb11faaf25c9218c45ec2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64105" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant01.thumb.jpg.b2a9cc418d57b3a2ffabeffeed38b79f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant02.jpg.45d40406f0b5c51a890440dad966abd8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64106" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant02.thumb.jpg.7173c0f2c575db1032e0e0aab2419569.jpg" data-ratio="47.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant03.jpg.ce6200cd4496064c7b0b4b42a0736dc8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64107" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant03.thumb.jpg.965215046b007b01cf346afe33c8655d.jpg" data-ratio="52.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant04.jpg.060e2af807db9f2ed8ff3cf9aed6bf25.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64108" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/MesserschmittMe323Gigant04.thumb.jpg.a0b1a891a7557a25713f050ae63bb433.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Messerschmitt Me 323 Gigant 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1903</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:27:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mikoyan-gurevich-mig-15-r411/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1598061028_MiG-15-single-seat-airborne.jpg" /></p>

<p>The MiG-15 (Russian: Микоян и Гуревич МиГ-15; USAF/DoD designation: Type 14; NATO reporting name: Fagot) was one of the first successful jet fighters to incorporate swept wings to achieve high transonic speeds. In combat over Korea, it outclassed straight-winged jet day fighters, which were largely relegated to ground-attack roles, and was quickly countered by the similar American swept-wing North American F-86 Sabre.</p><p> </p><p>
The MiG-15 is believed to have been one of the most produced jet aircraft; in excess of 13,000 were manufactured. Licensed foreign production may have raised the production total to almost 18,000.  The MiG-15 remains in service with the Korean People's Army Air Force as an advanced trainer.</p><p> </p><p>
For an extensive history of the desugn and development, and the 21 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-15" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p> </p><p>
Specifications below are for the MiG-15<em>bis</em> single seat fighter version.</p><p> </p><p>
<strong>Single seat version</strong></p><p> </p><p>
<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15singleseatairborne.jpg.80fc18d86bcabbac55e04237cd97a7e2.jpg" data-fileid="45527" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45527" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MiG15singleseatairborne.jpg_thumb.80fc18d86bcabbac55e04237cd97a7e2.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15singleseatairborne.jpg_thumb.80fc18d86bcabbac55e04237cd97a7e2.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15singleseatairborne.jpg_thumb.80fc18d86bcabbac55e04237cd97a7e2.jpg"></a> <a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15takeoff.jpg.e0c1dd7ba7b5d61b6cc845a57b37456f.jpg" data-fileid="45528" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45528" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MiG15takeoff.jpg_thumb.e0c1dd7ba7b5d61b6cc845a57b37456f.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15takeoff.jpg_thumb.e0c1dd7ba7b5d61b6cc845a57b37456f.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15takeoff.jpg_thumb.e0c1dd7ba7b5d61b6cc845a57b37456f.jpg"></a> <a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG-15,taxy.jpg.e92324135b95e0fdab06d13e3a20f0bc.jpg" data-fileid="45529" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45529" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MiG-15,taxy.jpg_thumb.e92324135b95e0fdab06d13e3a20f0bc.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG-15,taxy.jpg_thumb.e92324135b95e0fdab06d13e3a20f0bc.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG-15,taxy.jpg_thumb.e92324135b95e0fdab06d13e3a20f0bc.jpg"></a></p><p> </p><p>
<strong>Two seat version</strong></p><p> </p><p>
 <a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15.jpg.623281674f97f8bdd07bebed9cc3b1ba.jpg" data-fileid="45530" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45530" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MiG15.jpg_thumb.623281674f97f8bdd07bebed9cc3b1ba.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15.jpg_thumb.623281674f97f8bdd07bebed9cc3b1ba.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MiG15.jpg_thumb.623281674f97f8bdd07bebed9cc3b1ba.jpg"></a> <a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MIG15landing.jpg.7a214c9b0852ede5e2c918e2895d3f62.jpg" data-fileid="45531" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45531" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MIG15landing.jpg_thumb.7a214c9b0852ede5e2c918e2895d3f62.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MIG15landing.jpg_thumb.7a214c9b0852ede5e2c918e2895d3f62.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MIG15landing.jpg_thumb.7a214c9b0852ede5e2c918e2895d3f62.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">411</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mikoyan-gurevich-mig-25-r1814/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2501.jpg.0dcb27463ad5d1f817b7661daa250af6.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 (Russian: Микоян и Гуревич МиГ-25; NATO reporting name: Foxbat) is a supersonic interceptor and reconnaissance aircraft that is among the fastest military aircraft to enter service. Designed by the Soviet Union's Mikoyan-Gurevich bureau, it is an aircraft built primarily using stainless steel. It was to be the last plane designed by Mikhail Gurevich, before his retirement.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first prototype flew in 1964 and the aircraft entered service in 1970. Although its thrust was sufficient to reach Mach 3.2+, its speed was limited to prevent engines from overheating at higher air speeds and possibly seriously damaging them, and therefore the operational top speed was limited to Mach 2.83. The MiG-25 features a powerful radar and four air-to-air missiles, and it still has the world record for reached altitude of 38 km (125,000 ft).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The appearance of the MiG-25 sparked concern in the West and prompted increases in performance requirements for the McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle, then already under development in the late 1960s. The capabilities of the MiG-25 were better understood by the West in 1976 when Soviet pilot Viktor Belenko defected in a MiG-25 to the United States via Japan.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production of the MiG-25 series ended in 1984 after completion of 1,186 aircraft. A symbol of the Cold War, the MiG-25 flew with Soviet allies and former Soviet republics, remaining in limited service in several export customers. It is one of the highest-flying military aircraft,[6] one of the fastest serially produced interceptor aircraft, and the second-fastest serially produced aircraft after the SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft, which was built in very small numbers compared to the MiG-25.[8] As of 2018, the MiG-25 remains the fastest manned serially produced aircraft in operational use and the fastest plane that was offered for supersonic flights and edge-of-space flights to civilian customers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Because of the thermal stresses incurred in flight above Mach 2, the Mikoyan-Gurevich OKB had difficulties choosing what materials to use for the aircraft. They had to use E-2 heat-resistant Plexiglas for the canopy and high-strength stainless steel for the wings and fuselage. Using titanium rather than steel would have been ideal, but it was expensive and difficult to work with. The problem of cracks in welded titanium structures with thin walls could not be solved, so the heavier nickel steel was used instead. It cost far less than titanium and allowed for welding, along with heat-resistant seals. The MiG-25 was constructed from 80% nickel-steel alloy, 11% aluminium, and 9% titanium. The steel components were formed by a combination of spot welding, automatic machine welding, and hand arc welding methods.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The MiG-25 was theoretically capable of a maximum speed exceeding Mach 3 and a ceiling of 27 km (89,000 ft). Its high speed was problematic: Although sufficient thrust was available to reach Mach 3.2, a limit of Mach 2.83 had to be imposed as the engines tended to overspeed and overheat at higher airspeeds, possibly damaging them beyond repair.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For extensive details on background, development, operational history and 25 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-25" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2502.jpg.ce93e6b22f7e088fcf7e8cf238482053.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62574" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2502.thumb.jpg.445107db595064a4cc1c2b369658d1d1.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2503.jpg.0476f5fdd13b0283874746579678a039.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62575" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2503.thumb.jpg.ad41f6b4a60b0f5e176cb17bf24604c0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2504.jpg.ec9bda936baa7bea3057367e7c5452e0.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62576" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2504.thumb.jpg.bcd66ac05e865980776dd6c6009d9e44.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2505.jpg.2b6737ed00da89587a77066d148caa61.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62577" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-2505.thumb.jpg.39bdc7ec537dcd10697458ad7a96504f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1814</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mikoyan-gurevich-mig-3-r1083/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1181310513_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-303.jpg.afeadbcefbe1a911dcbb937ee1390f7b.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 (Russian: Микоян и Гуревич МиГ-3) was a Soviet fighter and interceptor aircraft used during World War II. It was a development of the MiG-1 by the OKO (opytno-konstruktorskij otdel — Experimental Design Department) of Zavod (Factory) No. 1 to remedy problems found during the MiG-1's development and operations. It replaced the MiG-1 on the production line at Factory No. 1 on 20 December 1940 and was built in large numbers during 1941 before Factory No. 1 was converted to build the Ilyushin Il-2.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 22 June 1941, at the beginning of Operation Barbarossa, some 981 were in service with the Soviet Air Forces (VVS), the Soviet Air Defence Forces (PVO) and Soviet Naval Aviation. The MiG-3 was difficult to fly in peacetime and much more so in combat. Originally designed as a high-altitude fighter-interceptor, combat over the Eastern Front was generally at lower altitudes, where it was inferior to the German Messerschmitt Bf 109 as well as most of its Soviet contemporaries. It was also pressed into service as a fighter-bomber during the autumn of 1941 but it was equally unsuited for this. The losses suffered in combat were very high, in percentage the highest among all the VVS fighters, with 1,432 shot down planes. Over time, the survivors were concentrated in the PVO, where its disadvantages mattered less, the last being withdrawn from service before the end of the war.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The large number of defects noted during flight testing of the MiG-1 forced Mikoyan and Gurevich to make a number of modifications to the design. Testing was done on a full-size aircraft in the T-1 wind tunnel belonging to the Central Aero and Hydrodynamics Institute (TsAGI) to evaluate the problems and their proposed solutions. The first aircraft to see all of these changes applied was the fourth prototype of the I-200. It first flew on 29 October 1940 and was approved for production after passing its State acceptance trials. The first MiG-3, as the improved aircraft was named on 9 December, was completed on 20 December 1940 and another 20 were delivered by the end of the year.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A number of reports had been received about poor quality aircraft received by the regiments which pointed directly at the NII VVS as it was responsible for monitoring the quality of the aircraft delivered to the VVS. On 31 May 1941 the People's Commissariat of Defense decreed that the NII VVS had been negligent. A number of senior managers were demoted and the head of the Institute, Major General A. I. Filin was summarily executed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The number of aircraft built was 3,422.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the design, including the cahanges required to the MiG-1, plus operational history and variants,
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-3" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2050252114_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-301.jpg.cf6db02dfb73b5a93bb18390ffb398ac.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51886" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1017756542_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-301.thumb.jpg.729d960252d06150ef703b93ae9d8fc2.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2009573153_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-302.jpg.3e753693835c8b7fb3a2394509beaeaf.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51887" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1314312798_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-302.thumb.jpg.38bce42f173dacccf9b23aaa913900f8.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/738704113_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-304.jpg.91388b502130ab9a7c2286738113b05e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51888" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1174909717_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-304.thumb.jpg.2d16241b686076e4607f14a52775c9c6.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/128298596_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-305.jpg.7edf72dffe52b2f554bbe085b9d915fc.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51889" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/589446436_Mikoyan-GurevichMiG-305.thumb.jpg.f2c8b195b3e6e471e39bf3059090875b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1083</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 01:13:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Miles M.9 Master</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/miles-m9-master-r1026/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1040760642_MilesM.9Master01.jpg.cadf8a5bf624ce0e32b26cef11b17242.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Miles M.9 Master was a British two-seat monoplane advanced trainer designed and built by aviation company Miles Aircraft Ltd. It was inducted in large numbers into both the Royal Air Force (RAF) and Fleet Air Arm (FAA) during the Second World War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Master can trace its origins back to the earlier M.9 Kestrel demonstrator aircraft. Following the failure of the rival de Havilland Don as a satisfactory trainer aircraft, the RAF ordered 500 M9A Master advancer trainers to meet its needs. Once in service, it provided a fast, strong and fully aerobatic aircraft that functioned as an excellent introduction to the high performance British fighter aircraft of the day: the Spitfire and Hurricane. Throughout its production life, thousands of aircraft and various variants of the Master were produced, the latter being largely influenced by engine availability. Numerous Masters were modified to enable their use as glider tows. The Master also served as the basis for the Miles Martinet, a dedicated target tug adopted by the RAF.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Perhaps the most radical use of the aircraft was the M.24 Master Fighter. Armed with six .303 in machine guns, it was intended to function as an emergency fighter during the Battle of Britain; this model did not ultimately see combat. Ordinary trainer models could also be fitted with armaments, including a single .303 in Vickers machine gun and eight bombs, albeit intended for training purposes only. Beyond the British air services, other nations also chose to adopt the Master, including the South African Air Force, United States Army Air Force (USAAF), Irish Air Corps, Royal Egyptian Air Force, Turkish Air Force, and the Portuguese Air Force. While thousands of Masters were manufactured, no complete examples have been preserved.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Miles Master was a tandem-seat low-wing cantilever monoplane, powered by a single reciprocating engine. Initial models used the Kestrel XXX engine; capable of providing up to 745 hp (555 kW), this powerplant enabled the aircraft to achieve a maximum speed of 296 mph (477 km/h), which reportedly made the Master as fast as the single-seat biplane fighters of 1935. The inverted gull-shaped wing of the Master was a major distinguishing factor of the aircraft and was adopted, despite higher production costs, due to its performance benefits, permitting the stowage of both the retractable undercarriage and fuel tanks; aside from this shaping, the wing's design largely conformed with traditional approaches. It features hydraulically-actuated split flaps along its trailing edge, their position being indicated electronically on the cockpit's instrumentation planel. The wing's center-section also accommodates a machine gun.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While the Master had incorporated relatively advanced aerodynamic characteristics (intended to mimic frontline fighters) for a contemporary trainer aircraft, it used a conventional structure, comprising an oval-section fuselage covered by a plywood skin, featuring a semi-monocoque approach. Forward of the tandem cockpits, the nose is strengthened by a metal former that provides protection against nose-overs, a common occurrence amongst trainee pilots when flying aircraft with a 'taildragger' undercarriage. The tail section had an orthodox cantilever structure, the tailplane being mounted directly on top of the fuselage; according to Flight, the tailplane's aerodynamics were designed to facilitate easy spin recovery. The Kestrel engine is mounted on tubular steel bearings which was designed to facilitate engine removal for ease of maintenance via the undoing of only four main bolts along with the connecting leads. Further maintenance savings were made via the engine's derating, allowing for a longer interval between overhauls.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The cockpit of the Master was designed with considerable attention to best facilitate its use as a trainer aircraft, including for ease of use and comfort. The positions of the two flying crew, the student in front and the instructor behind, was staggered; the rear position is 12-inches higher to provide the instructor with greater visibility. Mid-flight, an instructor was able to disconnect several of the student pilot's controls, such as the brakes, using various cut-outs provided. The forward windscreen is composed of molded Perspex and is furnished with a reflector-type gun sight, providing an optically-perfect view of a target. Two small panels can be opened to aid visibility while flying in poor weather conditions, sun blinds are also incorporated. Catches on either side of the sliding canopy allow for the panels to be rapidly detached, facilitating faster bailing-out during an emergency. Other emergency equipment included a Graviner fire extinguisher mounted behind the rear seat and emergency hydraulic controls set into the floor on the cockpit.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The number built  was  3,249, with 453 operated by the South African Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development, desig, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Master" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1243730559_MilesM.9Master02.jpg.3a2b070f28b7d052557ef2f20fe94de5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51415" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1799613550_MilesM.9Master02.thumb.jpg.cbc31c5ba876c4648e3b7604d441192d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles M.9 Master 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/2039286877_MilesM.9Master03.jpg.e4f8e73d24d5534e806437c3ddd372d2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51416" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/591490817_MilesM.9Master03.thumb.jpg.955de18c0a0799342f3d285d5b0fe235.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles M.9 Master 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1989023400_MilesM.9Master04.jpg.c990be46c7d469c8e6e08b64f0699770.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51417" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1582880333_MilesM.9Master04.thumb.jpg.50460eb65342e36df6f23db88cc2aa05.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles M.9 Master 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/6700309_MilesM.9Master05.jpg.bb831c5b09d64527903ecae7a280b7b4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51418" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/197024012_MilesM.9Master05.thumb.jpg.a69d9dcc7b223c298c60295395858151.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles M.9 Master 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1026</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:34:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Miles Magister</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/miles-magister-r1490/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1688656343_MilesMagister02.jpg.a61941e3913b017e33d3fcc147fa53e2.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Miles M.14 Magister is a two-seat monoplane basic trainer aircraft designed and built by the British aircraft manufacturer Miles Aircraft. It was affectionately known as the Maggie. It was authorised to perform aerobatics.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Magister was developed during the 1930s to Specification T.40/36, itself derived from the existing Miles Hawk Trainer which had been ordered in small numbers. The first prototype's maiden flight was on 20 March 1937. It quickly became praised for its handling qualities, increasing the safety and ease of pilot training, while also delivering comparable performance to contemporary monoplane frontline fighters of the era. The Magister was ordered into quantity production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Entering service barely a year prior to the start of the Second World War, the Magister became a key training aircraft. It was the first monoplane designed as a trainer to be inducted by the Royal Air Force (RAF). During the war it was purchased in large numbers for the RAF, Fleet Air Arm (FAA) and various overseas military operators. It proved an ideal introduction to the Spitfire and Hurricane for new pilots. A total of 1303 Magisters were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the postwar years, surplus Magisters were exported in large numbers, with many converted for civilian use.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Magister is a low wing cantilever monoplane designed for military training. Its design is largely derived from Miles' Hawk Trainer, although there are some noticeable differences, such as the significant enlargement of the cockpit. A more spacious cockpit was required to reasonably accommodate the presence of parachutes and various training aids, which included the provision of blind-flying apparatus. For convenience, the open cockpits are furnished with forward windscreens made of Perspex, while baggage and unused equipment may be stored in a sizable bay aft of the rear cockpit via an exterior door. Pilots are required to enter and exit the aircraft via a wingroot walkway on the starboard side.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Magister is largely built of wood, the fuselage consisting of a spruce structure with a plywood covering; similar materials were used for the three-piece wing and the tail unit. The wing centre section has no dihedral and is of constant section with outer sections having dihedral and tapering towards the tip. It has split flaps as standard; it was the first RAF trainer to have flaps. It has a fixed tailwheel undercarriage with drag-reducing spats on the main wheels; to reduce the landing distance, the undercarriage was fitted with Bendix drum brakes. Power is provided by the 130 hp de Havilland Gipsy Major engine and the fuel is contained in a pair of tanks in the centre section.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The flying characteristics and performance of the Magister lent themselves well to the trainer role; according to Brown, the Magister possessed superior performance to any contemporary elementary trainer. It readily enabled trainee pilots to safely learn the handling techniques of modern frontline fighter aircraft. Its ease of handling and safety were attributes that were vigorously demonstrated by Frederick Miles by performing stunts such as hands-free landings and formation flight with other aircraft while inverted. The flight controls are cable-actuated; some of the controls, such as the rudder pedals, can be adjusted to suit the individual pilot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of background and operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_Magister" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants<br />
	Miles M.14 Magister / Hawk Trainer III</strong><br />
	Initial production version.<br />
	<strong>Miles M.14A Magister I / Hawk Trainer III</strong><br />
	Improved variant. (Specifications below)<br />
	<strong>Miles M.14B Magister II / Hawk Trainer II</strong><br />
	Improved variant with a 135 hp (100 kW) Blackburn Cirrus II engine
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1429873812_MilesMagister01.jpg.337cc986163049c02c03ed3988ed35bb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56444" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1080684037_MilesMagister01.thumb.jpg.55da826194c1c11c456628b7a1ebb67a.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles Magister 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/839139583_MilesMagister03.jpg.a36be5e32ff9f2910cbd9480eaa4380c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56446" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1256251649_MilesMagister03.thumb.jpg.bebd133a8bfd4d40f9731f915649a9a1.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles Magister 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/854728109_MilesMagister04.jpg.677ef0f3dcf5552784db5a79f4fb31bc.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56447" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/194877743_MilesMagister04.thumb.jpg.f15b5bf3cb6bd87e1b55d99d86e93336.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles Magister 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/852808155_MilesMagister05.jpg.bb9a2203a88be410112382d3667c4c1d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56448" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/542363779_MilesMagister05.thumb.jpg.d615628c6eed725301e9b34327e76972.jpg" data-ratio="52.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Miles Magister 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1490</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:00:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mitsubishi A6M Zero</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mitsubishi-a6m-zero-r444/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1599138101_Mitsubishi-A6M-Replica.jpg" /></p>

<p>The A6M was designated as the Mitsubishi Navy Type 0 carrier fighter (零式艦上戦闘機, rei-shiki-kanjō-sentōki), or the Mitsubishi A6M Rei-sen. The A6M was usually referred to by its pilots as the Reisen (零戦, zero fighter), "0" being the last digit of the imperial year 2600 (1940) when it entered service with the Imperial Navy. The official Allied reporting name was "Zeke", although the name "Zero" (from Type 0) was used colloquially by the Allies as well.</p><p> </p><p>
The Zero is considered to have been the most capable carrier-based fighter in the world when it was introduced early in World War II, combining excellent maneuverability and very long range. The Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service (IJNAS) also frequently used it as a land-based fighter.</p><p> </p><p>
With its low-wing cantilever monoplane layout, retractable, wide-set conventional landing gear and enclosed cockpit, the Zero was one of the most modern carrier-based aircraft in the world at the time of its introduction. It had a fairly high-lift, low-speed wing with very low wing loading. This, combined with its light weight, resulted in a very low stalling speed of well below 60 kn (110 km/h; 69 mph). This was the main reason for its phenomenal maneuverability, allowing it to out-turn any Allied fighter of the time. Early models were fitted with servo tabs on the ailerons after pilots complained that control forces became too heavy at speeds above 300 kilometres per hour (190 mph). They were discontinued on later models after it was found that the lightened control forces were causing pilots to overstress the wings during vigorous maneuvers.</p><p> </p><p>
For mre details of the development, design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_A6M_Zero" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p> </p><p>
Specificaions below are for the A6M2 (Type 0 Model 21) variant.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MReplica.jpg.3dec97dd92802aa358171d842c215cbc.jpg" data-fileid="45705" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45705" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MitsubishiA6MReplica.jpg_thumb.3dec97dd92802aa358171d842c215cbc.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MReplica.jpg_thumb.3dec97dd92802aa358171d842c215cbc.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MReplica.jpg_thumb.3dec97dd92802aa358171d842c215cbc.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZero(AIII29).jpg.4464206d899f26bbd1d2b503c6557da3.jpg" data-fileid="45706" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45706" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MitsubishiA6MZero(AIII29).jpg_thumb.4464206d899f26bbd1d2b503c6557da3.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZero(AIII29).jpg_thumb.4464206d899f26bbd1d2b503c6557da3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZero(AIII29).jpg_thumb.4464206d899f26bbd1d2b503c6557da3.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZeroAircraftX-133.jpg.0eebaea11d5f8c1f005e8a750d15cb7c.jpg" data-fileid="45707" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45707" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MitsubishiA6MZeroAircraftX-133.jpg_thumb.0eebaea11d5f8c1f005e8a750d15cb7c.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZeroAircraftX-133.jpg_thumb.0eebaea11d5f8c1f005e8a750d15cb7c.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiA6MZeroAircraftX-133.jpg_thumb.0eebaea11d5f8c1f005e8a750d15cb7c.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120taxy.jpg.db3a622d5b86be809fc3fe13594ac1df.jpg" data-fileid="45708" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45708" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MitsubishiZero61-120taxy.jpg_thumb.db3a622d5b86be809fc3fe13594ac1df.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120taxy.jpg_thumb.db3a622d5b86be809fc3fe13594ac1df.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120taxy.jpg_thumb.db3a622d5b86be809fc3fe13594ac1df.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120.jpg.5c21fe9eb1f4e013beefe615085d29ae.jpg" data-fileid="45709" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45709" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MitsubishiZero61-120.jpg_thumb.5c21fe9eb1f4e013beefe615085d29ae.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120.jpg_thumb.5c21fe9eb1f4e013beefe615085d29ae.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MitsubishiZero61-120.jpg_thumb.5c21fe9eb1f4e013beefe615085d29ae.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">444</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mitsubishi Ki-21</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mitsubishi-ki-21-r1764/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2101.jpg.2a23863afb6108e68704ae403922c408.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Mitsubishi Ki-21, formal designation "Type 97 Heavy Bomber" (九七式重爆撃機, Kyūnana-shiki jūbakugekiki) was a Japanese heavy bomber during World War II. It began operations during the Second Sino-Japanese War participating in the Nomonhan Incident, and in the first stages of the Pacific War, including the Malayan, Burmese, Dutch East Indies and New Guinea Campaigns. It was also used to attack targets as far-flung as western China, India and northern Australia. The Allies designated it under the reporting names "Sally" /"Gwen".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1936, the Imperial Japanese Army Air Service issued a requirement for a new heavy bomber to replace both the Ki-20 (Army Type 92 Heavy Bomber) and the Ki-1 (Army Type 93 Heavy Bomber). The design called for a crew of at least four, top speed of 400 km/h (250 mph), endurance of at least five hours, and a bombload of 750 kg (1,650 lb). The design parameters were very ambitious for the mid-1930's; few twin-engine bombers anywhere in the world could exceed such performance at that time.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Both Mitsubishi and Nakajima were asked to build two prototypes each, a further proposal from Kawasaki was rejected. The Mitsubishi design was an all-metal mid-wing cantilever monoplane with retractable landing gear, ventral bomb bay and two radial engines. The first prototype flew on 18 December 1936, with the second prototype, which differed in replacing the dorsal turret of the first prototype with a long greenhouse canopy, following later in the month. In the resulting competition, Mitsubishi's Ki-21 and Nakajima's Ki-19 were found to be similar, with the Ki-21 having better performance, while the Nakajima design was a better bombing platform and had more reliable engines. In order to make a final decision, two further prototypes were ordered from both Mitsubishi and Nakajima, with Mitsubishi instructed to change its own 615 kW (825 hp) Mitsubishi Ha-6 radial engines for the Nakajima Ha-5 engines used by the Nakajima design and vice versa, while the Ki-21 gained a revised glazed nose similar to that of the Ki-19 and revised tail surfaces. Thus modified, the Ki-21 proved superior and was ordered into production in November 1937 as the "Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber Model 1A".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production aircraft began to enter service in August 1938, supplementing and then replacing the Fiat BR.20 bombers which had been purchased as an interim measure.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Several improved versions followed before the production of the type ended in September 1944. A total of 2,064 aircraft were built, 1,713 by Mitsubishi and 351 by Nakajima.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Ki-21</strong><br />
	Prototype models with various engines and armament combinations for evaluation. Final version with Nakajima Ha-5 engine. 8 built<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-Ia</strong> (Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber, Model IA)<br />
	First production model, with 634 kW (850 hp) Nakajima Ha-5-kai engines. Most were built by Mitsubishi, 143 manufactured by Nakajima<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-Ib</strong> (Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber, Model IB)<br />
	Improved version with additional 7.7 mm (0.303 in) machine guns, larger bomb compartment and flaps, redesigned tail. 120 built by Mitsubishi, 351 (including Ki-21 Ib and Ic) by Nakajima<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-Ic</strong> (Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber, Model IC)<br />
	Improved type with one additional 7.7 mm (0.303 in) machine gun, increased fuel capacity, 160 built by Mitsubishi<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-II</strong><br />
	Evaluation model with more powerful engines, 4 built<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-IIa</strong> (Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber, Model IIA)<br />
	Production model based on Ki-21-II, 590 built<br />
	<strong>Ki-21-IIb</strong> (Army Type 97 Heavy Bomber, Model IIB)<br />
	Final production version based on Ki-21-IIa with modified canopy, clear upper cabin replaced by rotating turret, 688 built.<br />
	<strong>MC-20-I</strong> (Army Type 100 Transport, Model I)<br />
	Unarmed civilian transport version, converted from Ki-21-Ia; approximately 100 aircraft were converted.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2102.jpg.0db2b4c3cb91870f7ee0e5fea19512be.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61681" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2102.thumb.jpg.741d116b29eede5137c1a43c127177c6.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-21 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2103.jpg.043aedcf16ce491e298fa2a057e9f7c3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61682" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2103.thumb.jpg.0a247adecf9cd217e554eef6cff2f3ba.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-21 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2104.jpg.bade5e560f0d05dffda4c15f86ec5013.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61683" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2104.thumb.jpg.2d5c70ab3744c584157d39df8f6525ad.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-21 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2105.jpg.4d15175adc25c27959b07b2fb75c74e3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61684" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/MitsubishiKi-2105.thumb.jpg.852edd1c9070a776e15cff3b5c20b35a.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-21 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1764</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 03:02:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mitsubishi Ki-46</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/mitsubishi-ki-46-r1856/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4602.jpg.ac0461007d7401769836f499c0b91ba2.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Mitsubishi Ki-46 was a twin-engine reconnaissance aircraft that was used by the Imperial Japanese Army in World War II. Its Army Shiki designation was Type 100 Command Reconnaissance Aircraft (一〇〇式司令部偵察機); the Allied brevity code name was "Dinah".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 12 December 1937, the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force issued a specification to Mitsubishi for a long-range strategic reconnaissance aircraft to replace the Mitsubishi Ki-15. The specification demanded an endurance of six hours and sufficient speed to evade interception by any fighter in existence or development, but otherwise did not constrain the design by a team led by Tomio Kubo and Jojo Hattori.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The resulting design was a twin-engined, low-winged monoplane with a retractable tailwheel undercarriage. It had a small diameter oval fuselage which accommodated a crew of two, with the pilot and observer situated in individual cockpits separated by a large fuel tank. Further fuel tanks were situated in the thin wings both inboard and outboard of the engines, giving a total fuel capacity of 1,490 L (328 imperial gallons). The engines, two Mitsubishi Ha-26s, were housed in close fitting cowlings developed by the Aeronautical Research Institute of the Tokyo Imperial University to reduce drag and improve pilot view.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first prototype aircraft, with the designation Ki-46, flew in November 1939 from the Mitsubishi factory at Kakamigahara, Gifu, north of Nagoya.[3] Tests showed that the Ki-46 was underpowered, and slower than required, only reaching 540 km/h (336 mph) rather than the specified 600 km/h (373 mph). Otherwise, the aircraft tests were successful. As the type was still faster than the Army's latest fighter, the Nakajima Ki-43, as well as the Navy's new A6M2, an initial production batch was ordered as the Army Type 100 Command Reconnaissance Plane Model 1 (Ki-41-I).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	To solve the performance problems, Mitsubishi fitted Ha-102 engines, which were Ha-26s fitted with a two-speed supercharger, while increasing fuel capacity and reducing empty weight. This version, designated Ki-46-II, first flew in March 1941. It met the speed requirements of the original specification, and was ordered into full-scale production, with deliveries starting in July.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although at first the Ki-46 proved almost immune from interception, the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force realised that improved Allied fighters such as the Supermarine Spitfire and P-38 Lightning could challenge this superiority, and in July 1942, it instructed Mitsubishi to produce a further improved version, the Ki-46-III. This had more powerful, fuel-injected Mitsubishi Ha-112 engines, and a redesigned nose, with a fuel tank ahead of the pilot and a new canopy, smoothly faired from the extreme nose of the aircraft, eliminating the "step" of the earlier versions. The single defensive machine gun of the earlier aircraft was omitted not long into the production run.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The new version first flew in December 1942, demonstrating significantly higher speed 630 km/h (391 mph) at 6,000 m (19,700 ft). The performance of the Ki-46-III even proved superior to that of the aircraft intended to replace it (the Tachikawa Ki-70), which as a result did not enter production.[8] During operational testing in March 1944, it was discovered that replacing the engines' single exhaust collector ring with individual pipes provided extra thrust and an increase in top speed to 642 km/h (399 mph).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In an attempt to yet further improve the altitude performance of the Ki-46, two prototypes were fitted with exhaust driven turbosupercharged Ha-112-II-Ru engines. This version first flew in February 1944, but only two prototypes were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Mitsubishi factories made a total of 1,742 examples of all versions (34 x Ki-46-I, 1093 x Ki-46-II, 613 x Ki-46-III, 4 x Ki-46-IV) from 1941 to 1944.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of operational history and 18 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_Ki-46" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4601.jpg.25129db6d4d40af063ceb542289c635a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63496" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4601.thumb.jpg.7e819db96467ccb780070a8fb6bd38f1.jpg" data-ratio="52.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-46 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4603.jpg.3d92c62e0f62582ca71b4b2d792b3919.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63498" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4603.thumb.jpg.df0dd30c5a6cacd103c50b5de49a9754.jpg" data-ratio="58.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-46 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4604.jpg.53cbdb7a4ca5e5253d0bba962987b4d5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63499" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4604.jpg.53cbdb7a4ca5e5253d0bba962987b4d5.jpg" data-ratio="44.09" width="474" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-46 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4605.jpg.f32edc5c473a63f19c815a115728209e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63500" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/MitsubishiKi-4605.thumb.jpg.8720a337bf94318aafc125e37805c050.jpg" data-ratio="73" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitsubishi Ki-46 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1856</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:46:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Morane-Saulnier M.S.406</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/morane-saulnier-ms406-r1030/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/604391798_Morane-SaulnierMS40603.jpg.94c8507986afb03aebffefe9ed024358.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Morane-Saulnier M.S.406 is a French fighter aircraft developed and manufactured by Morane-Saulnier starting in 1938. It was France's most numerous fighter during the Second World War and one of only two French designs to exceed 1,000 in number. At the beginning of the war, it was one of only two French-built aircraft capable of 400 km/h (250 mph) – the other being the Potez 630.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In response to a requirement for a fighter issued by the French Air Force in 1934, Morane-Saulnier built a prototype, designated MS.405, of mixed materials. This had the distinction of being the company's first low-wing monoplane, as well as the first to feature an enclosed cockpit, and the first design with a retracting undercarriage. The entry to service of the M.S.406 to the French Air Force in early 1939 represented the first modern fighter aircraft to be adopted by the service. Although a sturdy and highly manoeuvrable fighter aircraft, it was considered underpowered and weakly armed when compared to its contemporaries and the M.S.406 was outperformed by the Messerschmitt Bf 109E during the Battle of France.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The type was capable of holding its own during the so-called Phoney War from September 1939 to 10 May 1940. Upon the invasion of France in May 1940, approximately 400 Moranes were lost. Out of these, around 150 were lost to enemy fighters and ground fire, while another 100 aircraft were destroyed on the ground during enemy air raids; the remainder were deliberately destroyed by French military personnel to prevent the fighters from falling into German hands. French M.S.406 squadrons had achieved 191 confirmed victories, along with another 83 probable victories. Limited production of the type continued in France for sometime after the Armistice of 22 June 1940 under German supervision.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The M.S.406 was exported to a range of customers. Out of 160 aeroplanes ordered by Poland, none had reached Polish territory before the outbreak of war, with the first consignment sent on 29 August 1939. Of particular note was its service in the hands of Finnish and Swiss air forces; both operators chose to develop indigenous models, such as the Finnish Mörkö-Morane). By the end of the war, the majority of M.S.406s and its derivatives were out of service, having been rendered obsolete by rapid advances in fighter aircraft technology. Its final use was as an advanced trainer aircraft in Finland, prior to the last examples of the type being scrapped during 1952.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Total Number built <span>:</span>   1,176
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of designand development, operational history, and French and foreign variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morane-Saulnier_M.S.406" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1573551606_Morane-SaulnierMS40601.jpg.9f1bc3502a136e254eac0caa15151284.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51538" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1741904453_Morane-SaulnierMS40601.thumb.jpg.155efa55d2cb83c4503b7588b666d77f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Morane - Saulnier MS 406 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1910813592_Morane-SaulnierMS40602.jpg.c5d558b08e17deb325bcf1d6ba7fb60e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51539" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/573533486_Morane-SaulnierMS40602.thumb.jpg.07edad5eec2fb6bcd97dee75e96ab5f3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Morane - Saulnier MS 406 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1791434343_Morane-SaulnierMS40604.jpg.a1d4c26f18ef0fa436292b7b4c5fc9e8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51540" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1936066490_Morane-SaulnierMS40604.thumb.jpg.4f65a465f36809296b394d62faf21685.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Morane - Saulnier MS 406 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/52885934_Morane-SaulnierMS40605.jpg.e08412e815c4d4b8de8c4881464ed3a8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51541" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1874840327_Morane-SaulnierMS40605.thumb.jpg.251aa554e4cc68f42a0bc99c1eaeda0f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Morane - Saulnier MS 406 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1030</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2021 04:10:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Myasishchev M-4</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/myasishchev-m-4-r1737/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_01.jpg.0585be86f9862aaf1a2175c374dc3465.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Myasishchev M-4 Molot (Russian: Молот (Hammer), USAF/DoD reporting name "Type 37", ASCC reporting name Bison) was a four-engined strategic bomber designed by Vladimir Mikhailovich Myasishchev and manufactured by the Soviet Union in the 1950s to provide a Long Range Aviation bomber capable of attacking targets in North America.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft fell well short of its intended range and was not fully capable of attacking the most valuable targets in the United States. As this became clear, production was shut down. In spite of the failure to produce a capable strategic design and the resulting small numbers, the M-4 nevertheless sparked fears of a "bomber gap" when 18 of the aircraft were flown in a public demonstration on May Day in 1954. The US responded by building hundreds of Boeing B-47s and B-52s to counter this perceived threat.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design was updated with more efficient engines, inflight refuelling (IFR) support and the removal of the glass nose for optical bombing and moving the radar to this location. With these changes, production restarted as the 3M. Even with these modifications the design was not truly effective in the nuclear bomber role, and only 125 aircraft, both M-4s and 3Ms, were produced before the production line was shut down for good in 1963. Only 19 of these served on nuclear alert.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	M-4s and 3Ms were primarily used as long-range maritime reconnaissance and strike aircraft and other supporting roles. Most were converted in the 1970s and 80s to tanker aircraft, especially as the Tupolev Tu-22M took over the maritime missions. The tanker conversions remained in service until 1994. Most surviving examples were broken up as part of post-Cold War arms limitations agreements.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The M-4 was the first four-engine jet bomber deployed operationally by the Soviet Union.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The M-4 was made mostly of aircraft aluminum alloys with some steel and magnesium components. It had wings swept at 35-degrees and powered initially by four Mikulin AM-3A engines with a maximum thrust of 85.8 kN (8,750 kgp; 19,290 lbf), but later upgraded to RD-3M-500 turbojets with a maximum thrust of 93.2 kN (9,500 kgp; 20,940 lbf). There were 18 bladder fuel tanks in the fuselage and wings, providing a total fuel capacity of 123,600 liters (32,610 US gallons); this gave the aircraft a range of 9,500 km (5,900 mi), although this fell short of the 12,000 km (7,500 mi) range initially specified. It had a payload of 24 tonnes (26.4 tons) in various configurations. Defensive armament consisted of six AM-23 23 mm cannons with a rate of fire of 1,250 rpm each in a manned twin tail turret with 400 rounds per gun and two twin remote controlled turrets in the top and bottom fuselage with 300 rounds per gun each. The aircraft had a crew of eight: a navigator/bombardier in the nose; pilot and copilot in the cockpit; radar operator/navigator, flight engineer/gunner, radio operator/gunner, and dorsal turret gunner in a compartment behind the cockpit; and a tail gunner.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The M-4 was first displayed to the public in Red Square, on May Day, 1954. The aircraft was a surprise to the United States, which had not known that the Soviets had built a jet bomber. However, it soon became clear that the bomber had an insufficient range to attack the United States and still return to the Soviet Union. Only a few of the original production M-4s were actually put into service. To remedy this problem, the Myasishchev design bureau introduced the 3M, known to the West as the 'Bison-B', which was considerably more powerful than the previous version. This new model first flew in 1955. Among other things, two of the five original gun barbettes were removed to lighten the aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myasishchev_M-4" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_02.jpg.f42c4459d94425a006c47c0d506bac45.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61258" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_02.thumb.jpg.fe27d20a240bba07e192e2199f300e89.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="myasishchev-m-4.02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_03.jpg.4811b5d36ac50013ebbe0637cb77e701.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61259" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_03.thumb.jpg.ec4633ec11e2317c03bb21d08d585539.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="myasishchev-m-4.03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_04.jpg.145b865132b0e5d701f81777f6f79d19.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61260" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_04.thumb.jpg.415a76875681e4e16bacef4a18c38ac0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="myasishchev-m-4.04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_05.jpg.62bd8cbff45a91cc1cce5ad75ba37808.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61261" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/myasishchev-m-4_05.thumb.jpg.e9a315eeedb42b3e840fa48f5bb84ce2.jpg" data-ratio="67.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="myasishchev-m-4.05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1737</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Nakajima B6N Tenzan</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/nakajima-b6n-tenzan-r1667/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan03.jpg.30d210f094d453273bab466b26dac25e.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Nakajima B6N Tenzan (Japanese: 中島 B6N 天山, "Heavenly Mountain", Allied reporting name: "Jill") was the Imperial Japanese Navy's standard carrier-borne torpedo bomber during the final years of World War II and the successor to the B5N "Kate". Due to its protracted development, a shortage of experienced pilots and the United States Navy's achievement of air superiority by the time of its introduction, the B6N was never able to fully demonstrate its combat potential.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The B5N carrier torpedo-bomber's weaknesses had shown themselves early in the Second Sino-Japanese War and, as well as updating that aircraft, the Imperial Japanese Navy began seeking a faster longer-ranged replacement. In December 1939 it issued a specification to Nakajima for a Navy Experimental 14-Shi Carrier Attack Aircraft capable of carrying the same external weapons load as the B5N. The new plane was to carry a crew of three (pilot, navigator/bombardier and radio operator/gunner) and be of low wing, cantilevered, all-metal construction (though control surfaces were fabric-covered). Further requirements included a top speed of 250 knots (460 km/h; 290 mph), a cruising speed of 200 knots (370 km/h; 230 mph) and a range of 1,000 nmi (1,900 km; 1,200 mi) with an 800 kg (1,800 lb) bomb load or 2,072 nmi (3,837 km; 2,384 mi) without external armament.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Navy had requested installation of the proven Mitsubishi Kasei engine as the B6N's powerplant but Engineer Kenichi Matsumara insisted on using Nakajima's new 1,870 hp (1,390 kW) Mamoru 11 14-cylinder air-cooled radial due to its lower fuel consumption and greater adaptability. This became an unfortunate choice as the Mamoru engine was plagued with mechanical defects and never achieved its expected power rating.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Constrained by the standard-sized aircraft elevators then in use on most Japanese carriers, designer Matsumara was obliged to use a wing similar in span and area as that of the B5N and to limit the aircraft's overall length to 11 m (36 ft). This latter restriction accounted for the B6N's distinctive swept-forward tail fin and rudder. The outer wing panels folded upward hydraulically, reducing the B6N's overall span from 14.9 m (49 ft) to approximately 6.3 m (21 ft) for minimal carrier stowage. In order to lessen increased wingloading due to the heavier powerplant, Fowler flaps were installed which could be extended beyond the wing's trailing edge. These were normally lowered to an angle of 20 degrees during take-off and 38 degrees when landing. Despite the use of these flaps, however, the B6N had a much higher stall speed than its predecessor.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype B6N1 made its maiden flight on 14 March 1941. Following continued testing, however, several problems became evident. In particular, the aircraft exhibited an alarming tendency to roll while in flight, the cause of which was traced to the extreme torque developed by the four-bladed propeller. To compensate, the aircraft's tail fin was thinned down and moved 2 degrees ten minutes to port. This modification greatly improved the plane's handling characteristics. A total of 1268 units were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of design annd developmennt, and operational history annd variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_B6N" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan01.jpg.324c45a60005438452f8d2bc479eee11.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60046" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan01.thumb.jpg.551d073f355dbabc3032bcd05201aeb8.jpg" data-ratio="51.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima B6N Tenzan 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan02.jpg.622247640226fb7627c8e155ee9077e5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60047" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan02.thumb.jpg.ad25a326f5729ea509df2dde241fd4fa.jpg" data-ratio="44.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima B6N Tenzan 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan04.jpg.ce33e1d8207561a242ff295437a0715e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60049" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan04.thumb.jpg.5e8912393482b87bd19ee4dde363a06e.jpg" data-ratio="49.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima B6N Tenzan 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan05.jpg.0a426789f52b014cde5cdfd295607191.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60050" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/NakajimaB6NTenzan05.thumb.jpg.0827ccbf4f5571a93bb4465dce15cd62.jpg" data-ratio="46" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima B6N Tenzan 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1667</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Nakajima Ki-84</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/nakajima-ki-84-r1769/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8401.jpg.5b0c8d9df25f756876cb12db849b9fc6.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate (キ84 疾風, lit. "Gale") is a single-seat fighter flown by the Imperial Japanese Army Air Service in the last two years of World War II. The Allied reporting name was "Frank"; the Japanese Army designation was Army Type 4 Fighter (四式戦闘機, yon-shiki-sentō-ki). The Ki-84 is generally considered the best Japanese fighter to operate in large numbers during the conflict. The aircraft boasted high speed and excellent maneuverability with an armament (up to two 30 mm and two 20 mm cannon) that gave it formidable firepower. The Ki-84's performance matched that of any single-engine Allied fighter it faced, and its operational ceiling enabled it to intercept high-flying B-29 Superfortress bombers. Pilots and crews in the field learned to take care with the plane's high-maintenance Nakajima Homare engine and landing gear prone to buckling. The difficulties of Japan's situation late in the war took a toll on the aircraft's field performance as manufacturing defects multiplied, good quality fuel proved difficult to procure, and experienced pilots grew scarce. Nevertheless, a well-maintained Ki-84 was Japan's fastest fighter. A total of 3,514 aircraft were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Design of the Ki-84 commenced in early 1942 to meet an Imperial Japanese Army Air Service requirement for a replacement to Nakajima's own, earlier Ki-43 fighter, then just entering service. The specification recognized the need to combine the maneuverability of the Ki-43 with performance to match the best western fighters, and heavy firepower. The Ki-84 first flew in March 1943[6] and deliveries from Nakajima's Ota factory commenced the following month. Although the design was itself solid, growing difficulties in securing skilled pilots, proper fuel and construction materials, and adequate manufacture often prevented the aircraft from reaching its full potential in the field.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design of the Ki-84 addressed the most common complaints about the popular and highly maneuverable Ki-43: insufficient firepower, poor defensive armor, and lack of climbing speed. The Ki-84 was a cantilever low-wing monoplane of all-metal construction, except for the fabric-covered control surfaces, with conventional landing gear.[8] Armament comprised two fuselage-mounted, synchronized 12.7 mm (.50 in) machine guns — these proved challenging to synchronize properly with the Hayate's four-blade propeller — and two wing-mounted 20 mm cannon, a considerable improvement over the two 12.7 mm (.50 in) machine guns used in the Ki-43 Hayabusa. Defensive armor offered Hayate pilots better protection than the unsealed wing tanks and light-alloy airframe of the Ki-43. In addition, the Ki-84 used a 65 mm (2.56 in) armor-glass canopy, 13 mm (.51 in) of head and back armor, and multiple bulkheads in the fuselage, which protected both the methanol-water tank (used to increase the effectiveness of the supercharger) and the centrally located fuel tank.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It was the Nakajima firm's own-designed 35.8-litre (2,180 cu in) displacement, Ha-45 Homare ("Praise" or "Honor") air-cooled eighteen-cylinder radial engine, first accepted for military use in 1941, that gave the Hayate its high speed and prowess in combat. Derived from the Nakajima Homare engines common to many Japanese aircraft, the Hayate used several versions of the Homare engine, including the carbureted model 21 and the fuel-injected model 23 versions of the engine. Most Homare engines used water injection to aid the supercharger in giving the Ki-84 a rated 1,491 kW (2,000 hp) at takeoff. This combination theoretically gave it a climb rate and top speed roughly competitive with the top Allied fighters. Initial Hayate testing at Tachikawa in early summer 1943 saw test pilot Lieutenant Funabashi reach a maximum level airspeed of 624 km/h (387 mph) in the second prototype. In 1946, US Technical Intelligence bench-tested a Homare 45, Model 21 engine and verified the engine's maximum horsepower output using 96 octane AvGas, plus methanol injection.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first major operational involvement was during the battle of Leyte at the end of 1944, and from that moment until the end of the Pacific war the Ki-84 was deployed wherever the action was intense. The 22nd Sentai re-equipped with production Hayates. Though it lacked sufficient high-altitude performance, it performed well at medium and low levels. Seeing action against the USAAF 14th Air Force, it quickly gained a reputation as a combat aircraft to be reckoned with. Fighter-bomber models also entered service. On April 15, 1945, 11 Hayates attacked US airfields on Okinawa, destroying many aircraft on the ground. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the final year of the war the Ki-84, the Ki-100 (essentially a radial-engined version of the inline-powered Kawasaki Ki-61) and Kawanishi's N1K2-J were the three Japanese fighters best suited to combat the newer Allied fighters.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the 18 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Ki-84" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>  A total of 3,413 units were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8402.jpg.52cd4dcf70cd536d378dacf9cc860e78.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61826" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8402.thumb.jpg.c0f00b3848b5ff99648d8151fcdd2443.jpg" data-ratio="66.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima Ki-84 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8403.jpg.94bc70b4101318b6701b9f7b7f9c4408.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61827" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8403.thumb.jpg.ac792b2ed27ffb063aebf399e5b7cb9f.jpg" data-ratio="68.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima Ki-84 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8404.jpg.0cd6e2cee2454b54838be4eb46b880e5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61828" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8404.thumb.jpg.47e3f0c3fb72c33149150b1fe03d0933.jpg" data-ratio="55.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima Ki-84 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8405.jpg.2ce157d7720c56ca1aea290f462d52d8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61829" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/NakajimaKi-8405.thumb.jpg.55c75ebecb1411bde4125179df43b464.jpg" data-ratio="67.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nakajima Ki-84 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1769</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 04:07:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Nanchang CJ-6</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/nanchang-cj-6-r596/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1017170599_NanchangCJ-6inflight.jpg.14c91230b444bc08a6d839c086f065c3.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The CJ-6 is an all-original Chinese design that is commonly mistaken for a Yak 18A. Its predecessor, the Nanchang
</p>

<p>
	CJ-5, was a licence-built version of the Yak-18. However, advancements in pilot training brought a need for a new aircraft with improved performance and a tricycle landing gear. When the Soviet Union developed the Yak-18A, PLAAF engineers decided that its performance and design would not suit China's needs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During late 1957 Aeronautical Engineers Cheng Bushi and Lin Jiahua began work in Shenyang on a trainer design that addressed the shortcomings of the Yak-18A. The design they delivered featured an aluminum semi-monocoque fuselage, flush-riveted throughout, and introduced a modified Clark airfoil wing design with pronounced dihedral in the outer sections. The dihedral and an angular vertical tail distinguish it externally from the otherwise rather similar Yak-18A. Wind tunnel testing validated the design, and in May 1958 the program was transferred to the Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing factory where Chief Engineer Gao Zhenning initiated production of the CJ-6. The first flight of the CJ-6 was completed on August 27, 1958 by Lu Maofan and He Yinxi.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Power for the prototype was provided by a Czech-built horizontally-opposed piston engine, but flight testing revealed the need for more power, so a locally manufactured version of the Soviet AI-14P 260 hp radial, the Housai HS-6, was substituted along with a matching propeller, and with that change the CJ-6 was approved for mass production. In 1965 the HS-6 engine was upgraded to 285 hp and redesignated the HS-6A, and the aircraft equipped with the new power plant were designated the CJ-6A.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A total production run estimated at more than 3,000 aircraft supplied CJ-6 aircraft for PLAAF training, as well as for export (as the PT-6) to countries including Albania, Bangladesh, Cambodia, North Korea, Tanzania, and Sri Lanka.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specfications below are for the improved and more powerful CJ-6A variant.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1119326938_NanchangCJ-661563.jpg.310eef5b73a96cbcdaedb57bb7b26fba.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47425" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/882413175_NanchangCJ-661563.thumb.jpg.b945bcd4b6881bc924b70869c3c62833.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nanchang  CJ-6 61563.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/172143640_NanchangCJ-62132018.jpg.e538e8fd71515a394cf24c7796627558.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47426" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1312361790_NanchangCJ-62132018.thumb.jpg.6999fdb0454140bb6814c04694a46970.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nanchang  CJ-6 2132018.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1590706437_NanchangCJ-6N147M.jpg.c5b122e5abcd83e210e3d0380fb914b2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47428" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1681561483_NanchangCJ-6N147M.thumb.jpg.4627c3016856648294ecef695010abe1.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nanchang  CJ-6 N147M.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1048921910_NanchangCJ-6VH-LNMYMAV20150301.JPG.280743382927bb87d441c85658b564f6.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47429" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1906217327_NanchangCJ-6VH-LNMYMAV20150301.thumb.JPG.b1be4fa0609fb54c7b14782705847f73.JPG" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nanchang CJ-6 VH-LNM YMAV 20150301.JPG"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Nanchang.JPG.10e5565a345f62583235ec8abdd5a260.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47430" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Nanchang.thumb.JPG.83ce6f4901d885a186cec4eb43b2b5d7.JPG" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Nanchang.JPG"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">596</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 12:19:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Naval Aircraft Factory N3N</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/naval-aircraft-factory-n3n-r1798/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-301.jpg.66bce7167b7245dab009587aed2aeaee.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Naval Aircraft Factory N3N is an American tandem-seat, open cockpit, primary training biplane aircraft built by the Naval Aircraft Factory (NAF) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during the 1930s and early 1940s.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Built to replace the Consolidated NY-2 and NY-3, the N3N was successfully tested as both a conventional airplane and a seaplane. The seaplane used a single large float under the fuselage and two smaller floats under the outer tips of the lower wings. The conventional airplane used a fixed landing gear. The prototype XN3N-1 was powered by a Wright J-5 radial engine. An order for 179 production aircraft was received. Near the end of the first production run the engine was replaced with the Wright R-760-2 Whirlwind radial. The aircraft is constructed using Alcoa's extruded aluminum, with bolts and rivets, rather than the more common welded steel tubing fuselages. Early production models used aluminum stringers formed for cancelled airship construction orders.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The N.A.F. built 997 N3N aircraft beginning in 1935. They included 179 N3N-1s and 816 N3N-3s, plus their prototypes. Production ended in 1942, but the type remained in use through the rest of World War II. The N3N was the last biplane in US military service - the last (used by the U.S. Naval Academy for aviation familiarization) were retired in 1959. The N3N was also unique in that it was an aircraft designed and manufactured by an aviation firm wholly owned and operated by the U.S. government (the Navy, in this case) as opposed to private industry. For this purpose, the U.S. Navy bought the rights and the tooling for the Wright R-760 series engine and produced their own engines. These Navy-built engines were installed on Navy-built airframes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	According to Trimble, "The N3N-3, sometimes known as the Yellow Bird for its distinctive, high-visibility paint scheme, or less kindly, Yellow Peril for the jeopardy in which student aviators often found themselves, showed itself to be rugged, reliable, and generally forgiving to student pilots."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Four N3N-3s were delivered to the United States Coast Guard in 1941.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Postwar, many surviving aircraft were sold on the US civil aircraft market and bought for operation by agricultural aerial spraying firms and private pilot owners. According to Robinet, "The front cockpit had been replaced with a huge metal hopper that loaded from the top and discharged dust from the bottom through a simple venturi type spreader. The airplane was originally powered by a 235 h.p. Wright Radial engine but for their purposes, these were replaced by 450 h.p. Pratt &amp; Whitney radial engines. The engine, wheels and instruments were obtained from the Army BT-13 which was purchased for less that $350.00 each."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A number are still (as of 2014) active in the USA.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Vartants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XN3N-1</strong><br />
	First prototype aircraft, Bureau of Aeronautics number 9991.<br />
	<strong>N3N-1</strong><br />
	Two-seat primary trainer biplane, powered by a 220 hp (160 kW) Wright R-790 Whirlwind (J-5) radial piston engine. 179 were built.<br />
	<strong>XN3N-2</strong><br />
	One prototype only (Bureau number 0265) powered by a 240 hp (180 kW) Wright R-760-96 Whirlwind (J-6-7) radial piston engine.<br />
	<strong>XN3N-3</strong><br />
	One production N3N-1 (0020) converted into a 'dash three' prototype.<br />
	<strong>N3N-3</strong><br />
	Two-seat primary trainer biplane, powered by a 235 hp (175 kW) Wright R-760-2 Whirlwind (J-6-7) radial piston engine. 816 built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-302.jpg.fffd74f89407322f4b5083df1db3dc3e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62322" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-302.thumb.jpg.a23a6b33c11c835124c3c36ec71199b1.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="N3N-3 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-303.jpeg.411bd935fd0be26919013cd74e67ce9b.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62323" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-303.thumb.jpeg.538cff8b8e63c48c2f37268f1e89a214.jpeg" data-ratio="59.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="N3N-3 03.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-304.jpg.3000a0f5abef4580457a6a0f8a626661.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62324" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-304.thumb.jpg.bf32b9deaebbced70187183d5fedc00a.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="N3N-3 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-305.jpg.7164baf236d34d2796778eb60366e0d5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62325" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_11/N3N-305.thumb.jpg.10fc839090c7bac6f641a5f167edf18f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="N3N-3 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1798</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:41:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Neiva Universal</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/neiva-universal-r1195/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1332369566_NeivaUniversal04.jpg.a92572c07b95d05c94439424289558f0.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Neiva N621 Universal is a Brazilian propeller-driven basic trainer and ground attack aircraft manufactured by Indústria Aeronáutica Neiva. It is a cantilever, low-wing monoplane of all-metal construction, with retractable undercarriage and side-by-side seating.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Universal was designed in 1963 as a new primary trainer for the Brazilian Air Force, as a replacement for the T-6 Texan and Fokker S-11/S-12 types then in use. The prototype (Registration PP-ZTW) first flew on 29 April 1966. The Brazilian Air Force ordered 150 aircraft as the T-25 Universal, and increased this order in 1978 by an additional 28 aircraft. A further developed version (designated the YT-25B Universal II) first flew on 22 October 1978 but was not put into production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Universal was also adopted as a counter-insurgency aircraft. It was later replaced by the Tucano in both the advanced training and attack roles, but it is still used as a primary and basic trainer at the Academia da Força Aérea Brasileira (Brazilian Air Force Academy).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Ten aircraft were ordered by the Chilean Army. These aircraft were later transferred to the Chilean Air Force. In 1983 five FACh T-25s were donated to the Paraguayan Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 2005, the Brazilian Air Force donated six T-25s to the Fuerza Aérea Paraguaya and another six to the Fuerza Aérea Boliviana.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1562174884_NeivaUniversal01.jpg.7c4afe7545758b65a9346ca0e9a342d5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52809" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/377989124_NeivaUniversal01.thumb.jpg.d5401e268d8d4b7732c713ae80f5e975.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Neiva Universal 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/755308829_NeivaUniversal02.jpg.8b4d7b2521c558464d3e2cd2e173f971.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52810" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/853578114_NeivaUniversal02.thumb.jpg.1374f5d39946a1955b774342a0842637.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Neiva Universal 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/498523035_NeivaUniversal03.jpg.8a4d1c790c3900c1d4840cd5a1443638.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52811" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1230310488_NeivaUniversal03.thumb.jpg.666aa829cb2c402b7dea20616e56ea3c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Neiva Universal 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1556771519_NeivaUniversal05.jpg.0e7daa69f17266718267552ccbbbf45e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52812" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/623087295_NeivaUniversal05.thumb.jpg.e52430ad51ff73a546dcc59e24a8bf79.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Neiva Universal 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1195</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American AJ Savage</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-aj-savage-r1728/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage01.jpg.99bfd70c2262f03c460f4bd5c777bb8f.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The North American AJ Savage (later A-2 Savage) is an American carrier-based medium bomber built for the United States Navy by North American Aviation. The aircraft was designed shortly after World War II to carry atomic bombs and this meant that the bomber was the heaviest aircraft thus far designed to operate from an aircraft carrier. It was powered by two piston engines and a turbojet buried in the rear fuselage. The AJ-1 first became operational in 1950 and several were based in South Korea during 1953 as a deterrent against North Korea. Of the 140 built, plus three prototypes, 30 were reconnaissance aircraft. Inflight-refueling equipment was deployed on the Savage in the mid-1950s. The bomber was replaced by the Douglas A3D Skywarrior beginning in 1957. The type was used after its military service for some additional experiments including microgravity test flights and to test a new jet engine in the 1960s and 70s.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	At the end of World War II, the U.S. Navy began a design competition on 13 August 1945 for a carrier-based bomber which could carry a 10,000-pound (4,536 kg) bomb that was won by North American Aviation. Later that year, the Navy decided that it needed to be able to deliver atomic bombs and that the AJ Savage design would be adapted to accommodate the latest Mark 4 nuclear bomb, the next step in development from the more sophisticated imploding-plutonium-sphere design Fat Man Mk3 used on Nagasaki. A contract for three XAJ-1 prototypes and a static test airframe was awarded on 24 June 1946. The first prototype made its maiden flight two years later on 3 July 1948. That same year the US Navy began an interim capability program employing the Lockheed P-2 Neptune carrying a crash-program reproduction of the smaller, simpler all-uranium 'gun' design Little Boy nuclear bomb as its first carrier-launched nuclear bomber aircraft until the Savage was in service. The Neptune launched using JATO assist but could not land on existing carriers; if launched they had to either ditch at sea after the mission or land at a friendly airbase.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The AJ-1 was a three-seat, high-wing monoplane with tricycle landing gear. To facilitate carrier operations, the outer wing panels and the tailfin could be manually folded. It was fitted with two 2,300-brake-horsepower (1,700 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney R-2800-44W Double Wasp piston engines, mounted in nacelles under each wing with a large turbocharger fitted inside each engine nacelle, and a 4,600-pound-force (20,000 N) Allison J33-A-10 turbojet was fitted in the rear fuselage. The jet engine was only intended for takeoff and maximum speed near the target, and was fed by an air inlet on top of the fuselage that was normally kept closed to reduce drag.[6] To simplify the fuel system, the jet engine used piston engine avgas rather than jet fuel. One 201-US-gallon (760 L; 167 imp gal) self-sealing fuel tank was housed in the fuselage, and another 508-US-gallon (1,920 L; 423 imp gal) tank was located in each wing. The aircraft usually carried 300-US-gallon (1,100 L; 250 imp gal) tip tanks and it could house three fuel tanks in the bomb bay with a total capacity of 1,640 US gallons (6,200 L; 1,370 imp gal). Other than its 12,000-pound (5,400 kg) bombload, the bomber was unarmed.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Two of the three prototypes crashed during testing, but their loss did not materially affect the development of the aircraft as the first batch of Savages had been ordered on 6 October 1947. The most significant difference between the XAJ-1 and the production aircraft was the revision of the cockpit to accommodate a third crewman in a separate compartment. The first flight by a production aircraft occurred in May 1949 and Fleet Composite Squadron 5 (VC-5) became the first squadron to receive a Savage in September. The squadron participated in testing and evaluating the aircraft together with the Naval Air Test Center (NATC) in order to expedite the Savage's introduction into the fleet. The first carrier takeoff and landing made by the bomber took place from the USS Coral Sea on 21 April and 31 August 1950, respectively. Many, if not most, surviving AJ-1s had their tails upgraded to the improved AJ-2 configuration.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A photo-reconnaissance version of the Savage, initially known as the AJ-1P, but later designated as the AJ-2P, was ordered on 18 August 1950. It had improved R-2800-48 piston engines and the tail was redesigned to add 1 foot (30 cm) of height to the tailfin. The 12° dihedral of the tail stabilizers was eliminated and the rudder enlarged which slightly lengthened the aircraft. Early AJ-2Ps retained the three-man crew, but late-model aircraft added a fourth aft-facing crewman to the upper cockpit. The Savage's internal fuel capacity was also increased. The nose of the aircraft was remodeled with a prominent "chin" to accommodate a forward-looking oblique camera and a variety of oblique and vertical cameras could be fitted in the bomb bay. Photoflash bombs could be carried for night photography missions.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The AJ-2 incorporated all of the changes made to the late model AJ-2P and 55 aircraft were ordered on 14 February 1951. The AJ-2 deleted the separate compartment for the third crewman, but retained the third seat in the cockpit from the AJ-2P.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of operational history an the 13 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_AJ_Savage" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> All up, a total of 143 were built.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage02.jpg.606d0c0601ea1d6e9fb7befbb01656b6.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61178" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage02.thumb.jpg.c3da533c5a463bac65f246c3649c591e.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American AJ Savage 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage03.jpg.ce9939915c803cae90c612f69cd2d705.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61179" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage03.thumb.jpg.d9d38307abf777bfe407b82177bc1afc.jpg" data-ratio="48" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American AJ Savage 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage04.JPG.497cb83b910eb8197041122b6d380384.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61180" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage04.thumb.JPG.563b5e9831af08ad45b9a9d2095c511b.JPG" data-ratio="52.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American AJ Savage 04.JPG"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage05.jpg.ae579ecc15463a5922090b507a0ef5e8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61181" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthAmericanAJSavage05.thumb.jpg.96e994cee73ebc21156d89f4ff9ca994.jpg" data-ratio="47" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American AJ Savage 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1728</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:08:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American B-25 Mitchell</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-b-25-mitchell-r608/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1344521175_NorthAmericanB-25MitchellA47-31KO-P.jpg.ae3e99a7f0b79ed2b8415abcaeed2d7f.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	Used by many Allied air forces, the B-25 served in every theatre of World War II, and after the war ended, many remained in service, operating across four decades. Produced in numerous variants, nearly 10,000 B-25s were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The North American NA-62 was one of the best twin-engined medium bombers of World War II. The first aircraft flew on 19 August 1940 and, subsequently, almost 11,000 versions operated with Allied air forces throughout the world.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Officially designated B-25, the bomber was later named the Mitchell in honour of General Mitchell who had been court-martialled in 1925 for his outspoken views on air power. Other Generals associated with the aircraft included General Doolittle, who led 16 B-25Bs from the aircraft carrier USS Hornet in the historic Tokyo raid on 18 April 1942, and General Kenny, under whose command B-25C/Ds (Mitchell IIs) were converted at RAAF Townsville for ground strafing. These field modifications culminated in the B-25J (Mitchell III), which was the most effective version of this famous bomber.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1942, the RAAF accepted a number of Mitchells on behalf of the Dutch Government. These aircraft equipped No 18 (Dutch East Indies) Squadron and, by 1945, 150 Mitchells of various marks had been received.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In April 1944, No 2 Squadron replaced its Beauforts with Mitchells and the first 39 aircraft (A47-1/39) were transferred from No 18 Dutch East Indies Squadron. A total of 50 Mitchells were operated by No 2 Squadron including 30 Mitchell IIs (A47-1/25, 33/37) and 20 Mitchell IIIs (A47-26/32, 38/50). The Mitchells of Nos 2 and 18 Dutch East Indies Squadrons formed No 79 Wing, and these aircraft carried out many successful strikes against enemy targets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	At the end of the war, the Mitchells of No 2 Squadron helped evacuate and return many prisoners of war, and the aircraft were finally phased out of service in 1946.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the development and design, operational history and the 29 variants of the B-25, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_B-25_Mitchell" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1761066335_MitchellB-25232511.jpg.8f69ced5174765e452bf3aeb37745393.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47605" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1880572204_MitchellB-25232511.thumb.jpg.7f85b72e3d1743b68db291ec962f1ae0.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitchell B-25 232 511.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/608016717_MitchellB-2502344.jpg.0d22a3e45e9bc330985041c53ad6b74b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47606" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/645305793_MitchellB-2502344.thumb.jpg.eb9275d87262b9908b3ee43f1dd7517e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitchell B-25 02344.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1633163762_MitchellB-25bomberPanchito.jpg.e15f690ce83b50e414b8ec8a8ca7954a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47607" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1045154241_MitchellB-25bomberPanchito.thumb.jpg.4f617ec02bf4e8bb503323564d68e866.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitchell B-25 bomber Panchito.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1383110758_MitchellB-25JHotGen.jpg.21025b51b26da19ed7cd23222e9c862a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47608" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/39947130_MitchellB-25JHotGen.thumb.jpg.29862dbc5b1a678a5ef3a34cf3b319bd.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitchell B-25J Hot Gen.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1790967897_Mitchell-B-25PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.jpg.ef91366c67bbf2f60fed78268811985b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47609" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1233721894_Mitchell-B-25PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.thumb.jpg.50ec8c8718049bb30f348ea4307505f2.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Mitchell-B-25  Photo by Edwin van Apstal.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">608</guid><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American B-45 Tornado</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-b-45-tornado-r1921/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado01.jpg.79fb8250fca86a3c162a98aae4d1cbdd.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The North American B-45 Tornado is an early American jet bomber designed and manufactured by aircraft company North American Aviation. It has the distinction of being the first operational jet bomber to enter service with the United States Air Force (USAF), as well as the first multiengine jet bomber to be refueled in midair.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The B-45 originated from a wartime initiative launched by the U.S. War Department, which sought a company to develop a jet-propelled bomber to equal those being fielded by Nazi Germany, such as the Arado Ar 234. Following a competitive review of the submissions, the War Department issued a contract to North American to develop its NA-130 proposal; on 8 September 1944, work commenced on the assembly of three prototypes. Progress on the program was stalled by post-war cutbacks in defense expenditure but regained importance due to growing tensions between America and the Soviet Union. On 2 January 1947, North American received a production contract for the bomber, designated B-45A, from the USAF. On 24 February 1947, the prototype performed its maiden flight.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Soon after its entry to service on 22 April 1948, B-45 operations were troubled by technical problems, in particular poor engine reliability. The USAF found the plane to be useful during the Korean War performing both conventional bombing and aerial reconnaissance missions. On 4 December 1950, the first successful interception of a jet bomber by a jet fighter occurred when a B-45 was shot down by a Soviet-built MiG-15 inside Chinese airspace. During the early 1950s, 40 B-45s were extensively modified so that they could be equipped with nuclear weapons. Improvements were made to their defensive systems and the fuel tankage was expanded to increase their survivability and range.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In its heyday, the B-45 was important to United States defense strategy, performing the strategically critical deterrence mission for several years during the early 1950s, after which the Tornado was superseded by the larger and more capable Boeing B-47 Stratojet. Both B-45 bombers and reconnaissance RB-45s served in the USAF's Strategic Air Command from 1950 until 1959, when the USAF withdrew the last ones in favor of the Convair B-58 Hustler, an early supersonic bomber. The Tornado was also adopted by the Royal Air Force (RAF) and operated from bases in United Kingdom, where it was used to overfly the Soviet Union on intelligence-related missions. Despite being painted with RAF markings and flown by RAF crew, they did not belong to the RAF; the RAF merely operated them on behalf of the United States.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_B-45_Tornado" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado02.jpg.82a914c8d34522d200f720b086c74466.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64195" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado02.thumb.jpg.acde4f61b2b215fc2cc135932322f10b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American B-45 Tornado 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado03.jpg.c6ee401ec20f328b580f7f4984a49c67.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64196" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado03.thumb.jpg.7b02f289d6134698636fee87a999f17d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American B-45 Tornado 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado04.jpg.7b3faaae0aef3f3aba3b29a7f8bcfad0.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64197" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanB-45Tornado04.thumb.jpg.c1d319fcf5504799e509417a6377c0cb.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American B-45 Tornado 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1921</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 07:18:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American F-100 Super Sabre</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-f-100-super-sabre-r732/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/291659357_north-american-f100-super-sabre63040.jpg.67bf62d5191fe738607264b9cfb352d6.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The first of the Century Series of USAF jet fighters, it was the first USAF fighter capable of supersonic speed in level flight. The F‑100 was designed by North American Aviation as a higher performance follow-on to the F-86 Sabre air superiority fighter.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Adapted as a fighter-bomber, the F-100 was superseded by the high speed F‑105 Thunderchief for strike missions over North Vietnam. The F‑100 flew extensively over South Vietnam as the air force's primary close air support jet until being replaced by the more efficient subsonic LTV A-7 Corsair II. The F‑100 also served in other NATO air forces and with other U.S. allies. In its later life, it was often referred to as the Hun, a shortened version of "one hundred".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development and design, operational history and 19 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-100_Super_Sabre" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1032270537_North_American_F-100D_Super_SabreThunderbird.jpg.34087da284899897ecbeecbea1b9f6f1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48902" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/163733327_North_American_F-100D_Super_SabreThunderbird.thumb.jpg.50f2d5b4f010e2030461205e777e2fd2.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North_American_F-100D_Super_Sabre Thunderbird.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1138195437_north-american-f100-super-sabre63208.jpg.5677f9c898c7a44b9d3fda76831e7c95.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48903" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1895693856_north-american-f100-super-sabre63208.thumb.jpg.5eec304b1ec7fef3b91f704d48696f67.jpg" data-ratio="44" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="north-american-f100-super-sabre 63208.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1312699915_north-american-f100-super-sabre63943.jpg.e9acfdb176fe71e7a1346c7969c47896.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48904" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/139626005_north-american-f100-super-sabre63943.thumb.jpg.927c8f92533f65af465e66aa5ef96813.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="north-american-f100-super-sabre 63943.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1923436923_north-american-f100-super-sabre63948.jpg.885a06ea6bf1676e627b87abf657e953.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48905" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/2002998126_north-american-f100-super-sabre63948.thumb.jpg.362b03db87b26393c49b2f24d36ef9ff.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="north-american-f100-super-sabre 63948.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">732</guid><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 06:08:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American F-82 Twin Mustang</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-f-82-twin-mustang-r794/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/North_American_XP-82_Twin_Mustang.jpg.1beb29e83a37769235c153c8b04bc34f.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The North American F-82 Twin Mustang is the last American piston-engined fighter ordered into production by the United States Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Based on the North American P-51 Mustang, the F-82 was originally designed as a long-range escort fighter for the Boeing B-29 Superfortress in World War II. The war ended well before the first production units were operational.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In the postwar era, Strategic Air Command used the planes as a long-range escort fighter. Radar-equipped F-82s were used extensively by the Air Defense Command as replacements for the Northrop P-61 Black Widow as all-weather day/night interceptors. During the Korean War, Japan-based F-82s were among the first USAF aircraft to operate over Korea. The first three North Korean aircraft destroyed by U.S. forces were shot down by F-82s, the first being a North-Korean Yak-11 downed over Gimpo Airfield by the USAF 68th Fighter Squadron.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Initially intended as a very long-range (VLR) escort fighter, the F-82 was designed to escort Boeing B-29 Superfortress bombers on missions exceeding 2,000 mi (3,200 km) from the Solomon Islands or Philippines to Tokyo, missions beyond the range of the Lockheed P-38 Lightning and conventional P-51 Mustangs. Such missions were part of the planned U.S. invasion of the Japanese home islands, which was forestalled by the surrender of Japan after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the opening of Soviet attacks on Japanese-held territory in Manchuria.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XP-82 prototypes, and production P-82Bs and P-82Es, retained both fully equipped cockpits so that pilots could fly the aircraft from either position, alternating control on long flights, while later night fighter versions kept the cockpit on the left side only, placing the radar operator in the right position.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 27 February 1947, P-82B, named <em>Betty Jo</em> and flown by Colonel Robert E. Thacker, made history when it flew nonstop from Hawaii to New York without refueling, a distance of 5,051 mi (8,129 km) in 14 hr 32 min. It averaged 347.5 mph (559.2 km/h). This flight tested the P-82's range. The aircraft carried a full internal fuel tank of 576 US gal (2,180 l; 480 imp gal), augmented by four 310 US gal (1,200 l; 260 imp gal) tanks for a total of 1,816 US gal (6,870 l; 1,512 imp gal). Colonel Thacker forgot to drop three external tanks when their fuel was expended, landing with them in New York.[4] It was reported that the three tanks were not forgotten, but rather they were stuck due to a mechanical glitch. .
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It remains the longest nonstop flight ever made by a propeller-driven fighter, and the fastest such a distance has ever been covered in a piston-engine aircraft. The aircraft chosen was an earlier "B" model powered by Rolls-Royce Merlin engines. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the development, operational history and seven variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-82_Twin_Mustang" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F82_twin_mustang-2.jpg.3b437190bc9ad1334b36a11c22ad3bf2.jpg" data-fileid="49682" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="F82_twin_mustang-2.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="49682" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F82_twin_mustang-2.thumb.jpg.2fd5f9a7e1208ffe9b59412d97999f3f.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F-82F_Twin_Mustang_46-415.jpg.e91e7882cba13dc145430156716cce96.jpg" data-fileid="49683" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="F-82F_Twin_Mustang_46-415.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="49683" data-ratio="49.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F-82F_Twin_Mustang_46-415.thumb.jpg.998df84410641f589603b7114d8e4e53.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/f82-twin_mustang_1.jpg.d0cdbd377f91610dc59c183a90372348.jpg" data-fileid="49684" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="f82-twin_mustang_1.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="49684" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/f82-twin_mustang_1.thumb.jpg.5aeb7fa86e9097a4f8b903df86bcfde0.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F-82-Twin-Mustang-3.jpg.08bcb0d7db5f35805a7b6a9d9870b1d7.jpg" data-fileid="49685" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="F-82-Twin-Mustang-3.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="49685" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/F-82-Twin-Mustang-3.thumb.jpg.08fd8a70b0a32935cca52f308b9260a8.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">794</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 04:21:05 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
