<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aircraft: Aircraft</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/page/2/?d=1</link><description>Aircraft: Aircraft</description><language>en</language><item><title>Bell P-39 Airacobra</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bell-p-39-airacobra-r368/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1597122805_Bell-Airacobra-P-39-RAAF-A53-8.jpg" /></p>

<p>The Bell P-39 Airacobra was one of the principal American fighter aircraft in service when the United States entered World War II. The P-39 was used by the Soviet Air Force, and enabled individual Soviet pilots to collect the highest number of kills attributed to any U.S. fighter type flown by any air force in any conflict. Other major users of the type included the Free French, the Royal Air Force, the United States Army Air Forces, and the Italian Co-Belligerent Air Force.</p><p> </p><p>
Designed by Bell Aircraft, it had an innovative layout, with the engine installed in the center fuselage, behind the pilot, and driving a tractor propeller with a long shaft. It was also the first fighter fitted with a tricycle undercarriage. Although its mid-engine placement was innovative, the P-39 design was handicapped by the absence of an efficient turbo-supercharger, preventing it from performing high-altitude work. For this reason it was rejected by the RAF for use over western Europe but adopted by the USSR, where most air combat took place at medium and lower altitudes.</p><p> </p><p>
Together with the derivative P-63 Kingcobra, the P-39 was one of the most successful fixed-wing aircraft manufactured by Bell.</p><p> </p><p>
A total of 23 re-conditioned Airacobras, on loan from the U.S. Fifth Air Force (5 AF), were used by the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) as a stop-gap interceptor in rear areas. The aircraft were assigned the RAAF serial prefix A53.</p><p> </p><p>
In the early months of the Pacific War, the RAAF was able to obtain only enough Curtiss Kittyhawks to equip three squadrons, destined for front-line duties in New Guinea. and – in the face of increasing Japanese air raids on towns in northern Australia – was forced to rely on the P-40, P-39, and P-400 units of 5 AF for the defence of areas such as Darwin.</p><p> </p><p>
For more information on t he development,operational history and more than 50 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_P-39_Airacobra" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p> </p><p>
Specifications below are for the P-39Q variant.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39RAAFA53-8.jpg.5a319e78d251486cffe34a8fb75a6383.jpg" data-fileid="45298" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45298" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="BellAiracobraP-39RAAFA53-8.jpg_thumb.5a319e78d251486cffe34a8fb75a6383.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39RAAFA53-8.jpg_thumb.5a319e78d251486cffe34a8fb75a6383.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39RAAFA53-8.jpg_thumb.5a319e78d251486cffe34a8fb75a6383.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraRAAFT-GR.jpg.72a302bf56e7ccf6341be96a5a23213b.jpg" data-fileid="45299" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45299" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="BellAiracobraRAAFT-GR.jpg_thumb.72a302bf56e7ccf6341be96a5a23213b.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraRAAFT-GR.jpg_thumb.72a302bf56e7ccf6341be96a5a23213b.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraRAAFT-GR.jpg_thumb.72a302bf56e7ccf6341be96a5a23213b.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39USAF.jpg.3baace0ac8a6226c67064d806f0702f1.jpg" data-fileid="45300" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45300" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="BellAiracobraP-39USAF.jpg_thumb.3baace0ac8a6226c67064d806f0702f1.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39USAF.jpg_thumb.3baace0ac8a6226c67064d806f0702f1.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobraP-39USAF.jpg_thumb.3baace0ac8a6226c67064d806f0702f1.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobra-P-39QNX93QG-06.jpg.a89b4cbc37c0eca9ba3700a017eb93cb.jpg" data-fileid="45301" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45301" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="BellAiracobra-P-39QNX93QG-06.jpg_thumb.a89b4cbc37c0eca9ba3700a017eb93cb.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobra-P-39QNX93QG-06.jpg_thumb.a89b4cbc37c0eca9ba3700a017eb93cb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/BellAiracobra-P-39QNX93QG-06.jpg_thumb.a89b4cbc37c0eca9ba3700a017eb93cb.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">368</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bell YFM-1 Airacuda</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bell-yfm-1-airacuda-r1725/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda01.jpg.62efa28f6a93f750e3a50220c614e531.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bell YFM-1 Airacuda was an American heavy fighter aircraft, developed by the Bell Aircraft Corporation for the United States Army Air Corps during the mid-1930s. It was the first military aircraft produced by Bell. Originally designated the Bell Model 1, the Airacuda first flew on 1 September 1937. The Airacuda was marked by bold design advances and considerable flaws that eventually grounded the aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Airacuda was Bell Aircraft's answer for a "bomber destroyer" aircraft. Although it did see limited production, and one fully operational squadron was eventually formed, only one prototype and 12 production models were ultimately built, in three slightly different versions.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In an effort to break into the aviation business, Bell Aircraft created a unique fighter concept touted to be "a mobile anti-aircraft platform" as well as a "convoy fighter." Created to intercept enemy bombers at distances beyond the range of single-seat fighter interceptors, the YFM-1 (Y, service test; F, fighter; M, multiplace) was an innovative design incorporating many features never before seen in a military aircraft, as well as several never seen again. Using a streamlined, "futuristic" design, the Bell Airacuda appeared to be "unlike any other fighters up to that time." 
</p>

<p>
	According to Major Alexander De Seversky's 1942 book, Victory Through Air Power, the Bell Airacuda "represents a great engineering achievement. But its designation as ′convoy fighter′ is erroneous, since that requires different disposition of armament. With its maximum firepower directed forward, it really offers a preview of an effective long-range interceptor fighter."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A forward-firing 37 mm (1.46 in) M4 cannon with an accompanying gunner was mounted in a forward compartment of each of the two engine nacelles. Although capable of aiming the cannons, the gunners' primary purpose was simply to load them with the 110 rounds of ammunition stored in each nacelle.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The crew of five included the pilot and gunners; a copilot/navigator who doubled as a fire-control officer, using a Sperry Instruments "Thermionic" fire control system (originally developed for anti-aircraft cannon) combined with a gyro-stabilised and an optical sight to aim the weapons; and a radio operator/gunner armed with a pair of machine guns stationed at mid-fuselage waist blisters for defense against attack from the rear.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An unusual feature of the Airacuda was the main door for entry. The door was opened and pulled down and hinges folded in on three steps for the crew to climb into the aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of design flaws, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_YFM-1_Airacuda" rel="external nofollow">click here</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda02.jpg.748298b417b88495c58c36d8a0b28443.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61162" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda02.thumb.jpg.fae522656bf30f45c03309b4f6f54ebf.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell YFM-1 Airacuda 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda03.jpg.2a435d49f5c5e4276790781467326458.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61163" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda03.thumb.jpg.2519b5e3907ac3c3d995fc12c524a87b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell YFM-1 Airacuda 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda04.jpg.2e116aa7c28f5ab08e188e30a0d85f15.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61164" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda04.thumb.jpg.21ed69864d7ff09715752f95905f42c0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell YFM-1 Airacuda 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda05.jpg.fc3e65e634f9d1411ceb5e7a1cb4f5d1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61165" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/BellYFM-1Airacuda05.thumb.jpg.cdcf0852ed6be3c61fea4f78aa704d17.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell YFM-1 Airacuda 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1725</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Botha</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/blackburn-botha-r1482/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/146802994_BlackburnBotha01.jpg.e825933626032a87c7e198928a21df7f.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Blackburn B.26 Botha was a four-seat reconnaissance and torpedo bomber. It was produced by the British aviation company Blackburn Aircraft at its factories at Brough and Dumbarton.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Botha was developed during the mid 1930s in response to Air Ministry Specification M.15/35, and was ordered straight off the drawing board alongside the competing Bristol Beaufort. On 28 December 1938, the first production aircraft made the type's maiden flight; almost exactly one year later, it enter service with the RAF. During official evaluation testing of the Botha, stability issues were revealed, as well as the fact that it was underpowered. It was only briefly used in frontline operations before being withdrawn to secondary roles during 1941. It continued to be flown in secondary roles, largely being used for training and as a target tug, before the Botha was fully withdrawn during September 1944.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In terms of its basic configuration, the Blackburn Botha was a twin-engined cantilever monoplane; the high-mounted wing was a deliberate design decision as to provide the best possible downwards view for its occupants. The pilot, which was seated in a relatively spacious and well-instrumented cabin at the front of the aircraft, had an exceptionally unobstructed forward-facing field of view, although the rearwards view was impinged upon by the placement of the engines. The navigator and wireless operator's positions were within a separate central cabin reached via an entrance door with a built-in stepladder on the starboard side of the fuselage. Crewmembers could move between their positions via a narrow gangway; the observer had to used this same passage to reach the prone bombing position in the aircraft's nose. The final crew member, the gunner, was positioned to the rear of the wing in an egg-shaped power-assisted turret on the upper fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The forward fuselage was largely reminiscent of the Blackburn Skua, and had a flush-rivetted Alclad plated covering, while the rear portion of the fuselage was a metal skin over a tubular metal structure. Flight surfaces such as the rudder, elevator, and ailerons had fabric coverings. The center section of the wing housed the aircraft's three main fuel tanks, which normally had a combined maximum capacity of 435.75 gallons, but could be raised to 565.75 gallons for special operations. Hydraulically-actuated split flaps were present on the central section of the wing's trailing edge, while the balanced ailerons were fitted on the sharply-tapered outer wing panels. Both the fin and tailplane were unbraced cantilevers with stressed-skin construction.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The undercarriage consisted of two oleo-pneumatic legs that retracted rearwards into the nacelles, which were fitted with spring-loaded doors; hand-operated hydraulic brakes were fitted. As built, the Botha I was powered by a pair of Bristol Perseus X radial engines, which each drove a de Havilland Type 5/11 Hydromatic three-bladed constant-speed propeller. The engines, which were mounted onto the central section of the wing in wide-chord cowlings, were fitted with controllable cooling grills. There was a special cell in the fuselage could accommodate a single torpedo, a single 500lb bomb, or two 250lb bombs; additional bombs could be fitted on external bomb racks on the mainplane. Other armaments included the pilot's forward-firing .303-inch Vickers machine gun and the twin Lewis guns installed in the turret. Comprehensive marine gear, including a collapsible dingy, was also provided. A total of 580 Bothas were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development and operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Botha" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants<br />
	Botha Mk I</strong> : Four-seat reconnaissance, torpedo bomber aircraft.<br />
	<strong>Botha TT Mk I</strong> : Target tug aircraft.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/615106534_BlackburnBotha02.jpg.b284bd840ec3c7d413623e933b87a0e5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56370" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1668126824_BlackburnBotha02.thumb.jpg.ff1d9e0fb3ea610ae9ae088bd20ed3d5.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Botha 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1443412005_BlackburnBotha03.jpg.4447e118d0a41522d843bc6889a60387.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56371" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/705488990_BlackburnBotha03.thumb.jpg.5169448d2b70f9f3ffbb5fd7aaec2c28.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Botha 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/844736673_BlackburnBotha04.jpg.fdd8efc7cf0c0a96dc2ef15a39c1cf9d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56372" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1049284619_BlackburnBotha04.thumb.jpg.16665939d806940a691368a52a0de6c2.jpg" data-ratio="56.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Botha 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/954272638_BlackburnBotha05.jpg.325c118f8778e3516de3dc25dc8dfce4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56373" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/882918866_BlackburnBotha05.thumb.jpg.8c501ae02cf1ec85c03d7228f4680be7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Botha 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1482</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2023 10:32:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Firebrand</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/blackburn-firebrand-r1600/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand01.jpg.b26724057e3a6d85d5fc0cdb15880bac.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Blackburn Firebrand was a British single-engine strike fighter for the Fleet Air Arm of the Royal Navy designed during World War II by Blackburn Aircraft. Originally intended to serve as a pure fighter, its unimpressive performance and the allocation of its Napier Sabre piston engine by the Ministry of Aircraft Production for the Hawker Typhoon caused it to be redesigned as a strike fighter to take advantage of its load-carrying capability. Development was slow and the first production aircraft was not delivered until after the end of the war. Only a few hundred were built before it was withdrawn from front-line service in 1953.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Firebrand did not see action in World War II, as TF 4s were not issued to 813 Naval Air Squadron until 1 September 1945. The squadron was disbanded 30 September 1946 without deploying to sea. It was reformed with TF 5s on 1 May 1947 and flew them from the carrier HMS Implacable, later HMS Indomitable, until it was re-equipped with turboprop Westland Wyvern attack aircraft in February 1953. 827 Naval Air Squadron received their TF 5 and 5As on 13 December 1950 and flew them primarily off the carrier HMS Eagle until it disbanded on 19 November 1952. A variety of second-line squadrons were issued Firebrands of various marks for training or trials at one time or another.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In test pilot and naval aviator Captain Eric Brown's opinion the aircraft was "short of performance, sadly lacking in manoeuvrability, especially in rate of roll". The position of the cockpit even with the trailing edge of the wing gave the pilot a very poor view over the nose, inhibited his ability to view his target and to land his aircraft aboard a carrier, sufficient for Brown to call it "a disaster as a deck-landing aircraft".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Blackburn B-37</strong><br />
	Three prototypes ordered to meet Specification N.11/40, named Firebrand on 11 July 1941. Second prototype re-built as T.F. II prototype.[15]<br />
	<strong>Firebrand F. I</strong><br />
	Production variant of the Blackburn B.37 with an order for 50 aircraft to be built at Brough, most completed as T.F. II and T.F. III variants, first nine completed as F. Is.<br />
	<strong>Firebrand T.F. II</strong><br />
	Improved variant, 12 built from original production branch.<br />
	<strong>Firebrand T.F. III</strong><br />
	Blackburn B-45, a Centarus VII powered-variant, two prototypes to S.8/43[16] and 27 production aircraft for original production batch.<br />
	<strong>Firebrand T.F. IV </strong>(Specifications below)<br />
	Blackburn B-46, improved variant with 2,520 bhp (1,880 kW) Centaurus IX or Centaurus 57,[16] 250 ordered, but only 170 were completed, of which 124 were converted to T.F. 5 standard, some before delivery.[11] Six were modified and designated as T.F. IV(mod).<br />
	<strong>Firebrand T.F. 5</strong><br />
	Improved variant, 124 modified from T.F. IV, two conversions to T.F. 5A.<br />
	Firebrand T.F. 5A<br />
	One prototype modified from a T.F. 5 and six conversions from either T.F. IV or Vs
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand02.jpg.06d329148a8e858bceacb9e5ffceae45.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59227" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand02.thumb.jpg.d47f57c02530f8ff933791e55ed61a0c.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Firebrand 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand03.jpg.06101335b628301a5832957242ecb511.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59228" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand03.thumb.jpg.aae8bbf20f8fc9c7c478ed47ea2d718b.jpg" data-ratio="70.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Firebrand 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand04.jpg.d4ddadb516d72c8ed34caa2ce514cce2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59229" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand04.thumb.jpg.c57b1413dc83ddaa7a57440d5f086f5f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Firebrand 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand05.jpg.6a2a82b866e037ea041ae0206f15fb7a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59230" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnFirebrand05.thumb.jpg.bd765e3bfd2821bcf416c291d5174b84.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Firebrand 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1600</guid><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 12:11:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Kangaroo</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/blackburn-kangaroo-r1602/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo01.jpg.2f910b94dd31bc616e2918b69514069c.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Blackburn R.T.1 Kangaroo was a British twin-engine reconnaissance torpedo biplane of the First World War, built by Blackburn Aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1916, the Blackburn Aircraft Company designed and built two prototypes of an anti-submarine floatplane designated the Blackburn G.P. or Blackburn General Purpose. It was not ordered but Blackburn developed a landplane version as the Blackburn R.T.1 Kangaroo (Reconnaissance Torpedo Type 1), reflecting the Air Board's growing interest in using landplanes rather than floatplanes for convoy escort and anti-submarine patrol duties, with operations not being limited by poor sea conditions, and giving better performance than seaplanes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Kangaroo was a twin-engine tractor biplane of wood and fabric construction. It had four-bay wings with a large upper-wing overhang which could fold for ease of storage. The first aircraft was delivered to Martlesham Heath in January 1918. Test results were disappointing, with the rear fuselage being prone to twisting and the aircraft suffering control problems, which led to the order for 50 aircraft being cut to 20, most of which were already partly built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	From the sixth aircraft, they were powered by the more powerful Rolls-Royce Falcon III engine replacing the 250 hp (190 kW) Rolls-Royce Falcon II. The Kangaroo entered service later that year with No. 246 Squadron RAF based at Seaton Carew, County Durham which had six months of wartime operations, in which they sank one U-boat and damaged four others. UC-70, was spotted lying submerged on the sea bottom near Runswick Bay on 28 August 1918, by a Kangaroo flown by Lt E. F. Waring. The U-boat was badly damaged by the near miss of a 520 lb (240 kg) bomb and finished off by the destroyer HMS Ouse.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Post World War I</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1919, three surviving RAF Kangaroos were sold to the Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd, based at Hendon Aerodrome. Eight others were sold back to Blackburn Aircraft, three being converted with a glazed cabin for its subsidiary, North Sea Aerial Navigation Co Ltd, also based at Brough Aerodrome. Several different configurations were embodied for the civil market, for cargo, pilot training and/or the accommodation of up to eight passengers. In the first few months of 1919, most of these converted aircraft continued to fly (and sometimes crash) in military markings, then the survivors were repainted with civilian registrations and commercial titles. In May 1919, joy-riding, cargo and passenger charters took place at locations including Brough, Leeds, West Hartlepool, Gosport and Hounslow Heath. During August 1919, three Kangaroos flew to Amsterdam for the ELTA air traffic exhibition and spent several weeks giving flights to an estimated 1,400 passengers. On 30 September 1919, North Sea Aerial Navigation Co Ltd started a regular passenger service between Roundhay Park (Leeds) and Hounslow Heath. In 1920, the company was renamed North Sea Aerial &amp; General Transport Co Ltd and services were extended to Amsterdam.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1919 the Australian government offered a prize of £A10,000 for the first Australians in a British aircraft to fly from Great Britain to Australia within 30 consecutive days. A team with a Kangaroo (G-EAOW) selected Charles Kingsford Smith as navigator, but he withdrew. On 21 November 1919, the Kangaroo took off from Hounslow Heath in an attempt to win the prize. It was forced to make an emergency landing at Suda Bay, Crete with a suspected sabotaged engine and the aircraft was abandoned there. The race was won by a Vickers Vimy piloted by Captain Ross Macpherson Smith with his brother Lieutenant Keith Macpherson Smith as co-pilot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo02.jpg.9bd8fe9228292f8f6625e1748f495045.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59236" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo02.thumb.jpg.e4ebffe03e0a6dd3b5516d78ef73749c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Kangaroo 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo03.jpg.79d662dc8b2c1097ff357527422ef9fd.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59237" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo03.thumb.jpg.9c7858567871b4a44a7c378ca247f377.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Kangaroo 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo04.jpg.f92e50b68cade7a1c18530e8d437a62d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59238" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo04.thumb.jpg.3d3bb1c1d5c2bbd18c813bf0efd6cd8d.jpg" data-ratio="43.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Kangaroo 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo05.jpg.6f976852316619cf9bcde7ed5b613b3c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59239" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/BlackburnKangaroo05.thumb.jpg.95b0f171f5b360092dbd967840c5586c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Kangaroo 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1602</guid><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 02:09:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Shark</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/blackburn-shark-r2036/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark01.JPG.4350e920a02974ec8109b0cf2bd0bb49.JPG" /></p>
<p>
	The Blackburn Shark was a carrier-borne torpedo bomber designed and built by the British aviation manufacturer Blackburn Aircraft. It was originally known as the Blackburn T.S.R., standing for "torpedo-spotter-reconnaissance", in reference to its intended roles. The Shark was the last of Blackburn's biplane torpedo bombers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype Shark performed its maiden flight on 24 August 1933, the first production aircraft was introduced to service during the following year. It was operated by the Fleet Air Arm, Royal Canadian Air Force, Portuguese Navy, and the British Air Observers' School. During the leadup to the 1939 war began the more capable Blackburn Shark was more complex to build so increased production went to its earlier rival the Fairey Swordfish. Despite this, numerous aircraft continued to be operated during the Second World War, largely being confined to secondary roles away from the front lines, such as training and target tug duties. Despite this, Sharks were repeatedly deployed in frontline roles during events such as the Dunkirk Evacuation and the Japanese invasion of British Malaya. During 1945, the final Sharks were withdrawn from service.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Blackburn T.9 Shark has its origins within the early 1930s as a private venture by the company. Originally known as the Blackburn T.S.R., standing for torpedo-spotter-reconnaissance, it was designed in conformance with Air Ministry Specification S.15/33, which sought a combined torpedo-(naval artillery) spotter-reconnaissance aircraft for the Fleet Air Arm (FAA). Blackburn was not the only company that opted to pursue this requirement; Fairey Aviation designed the TSR 1, a forerunner to the highly successful Fairey Swordfish that was active during the Second World War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The T.S.R. represented a substantial departure from Blackburn's previous naval aircraft designs, as the design team had opted to eliminate almost all use of streamlined bracing wires in favour of slanted struts. Despite this change, the wings were still foldable to ease stowage; a hydraulic wing-locking mechanism was incorporated to speed up folding/unfolding actions. Further measures to improve deck handling included the adoption of a tracking tail and pneumatic wheel brakes. The design process had been aided by operational experienced gained from the Blackburn Baffin. Features, such as the camber-changing flaps and fuselage construction, were derived from earlier prototypes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Initially, the design of the T.S.R featured open cockpits, which were heated by an exhaust pipe muff.[4] It had a crew of three, with the pilot seated in the first cockpit while the observer/wireless operator and gunner sharing the second cockpit, although longer range missions would sometimes be flown with only a crew of two. A prone position for bombing missions was also provisioned for, which included a watertight hatch and a hinged course-setting bomb sight. The bomb fusing controls were placed within reach of both the pilot and observer positions; ammunition was stowed in ten ammunition pans within the gunner's cockpit. Armament consisted of one fixed, forward-firing .303 in (7.7 mm) Vickers machine gun, plus a .303 in (7.7 mm) Vickers K machine gun or Lewis Gun mounted on a Scarff ring in the rear cockpit, with provision for a 1,500 lb (680 kg) torpedo or equivalent bombload carried externally.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The fuselage was strengthened to withstand catapult launches and divided into watertight compartments. Structural elements included stainless steel tubular spars and light alloy ribs; similar materials were used for the entire tail section save for the Alclad-plated fin.[6] The majority of the flying surfaces had fabric coverings; the wing tips were detachable as to allow their easy replacement if damaged. The main fuel tanks were not integral to the structure; instead, two detachable tanks composed of duralumin were carried in separate watertight compartments forward of the pilot, housing up to 182.5 gallons of fuel. The aircraft had a range of 623 miles normally, but this could be extended to 1,130 miles via the use of a cylindrical tank, attached to the torpedo crutches, that was capable of holding up to 150 gallons of additional fuel.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of operational history and 6 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Shark" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark02.jpg.55d1020f83bf99ede2693ee7f09327b3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65470" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark02.thumb.jpg.72bcafb91dbb20b0fea5fa187d15ea67.jpg" data-ratio="56" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Shark 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark03.jpg.1478c4b1b5bbcf400b1a118d5f6db0b1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65471" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark03.thumb.jpg.38301b59805802adbc5dbe778f394920.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Shark 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark04.jpg.d8b6fe1f029aa881163aa185ecb8f13e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65472" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark04.thumb.jpg.3510ed61e5b8a9dcd4a8d89afe56f178.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Shark 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark05.jpg.33cd1612a8a777ef3223487db6d3db31.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65473" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BlackburnShark05.thumb.jpg.2be3982ea033c2fc2771e6f600fcc60c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Shark 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2036</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:10:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Skua</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/blackburn-skua-r1809/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua01.jpg.3e9f3fce495e866d23329cee13b4391b.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Blackburn B-24 Skua was a carrier-based low-wing, two-seater, single-radial engine aircraft by the British aviation company Blackburn Aircraft. It was the first Royal Navy carrier-borne all-metal cantilever monoplane aircraft, as well as the first dive bomber in Fleet Air Arm (FAA) service. The aircraft took its name from the sea bird which 'divebombs' any potential predators that come too close to its nest.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Skua was designed during the mid-1930s to Specification O.27/34, and was a radical design for the era, combining the functions of a dive bomber and fighter. Its enclosed cockpit and monoplane configuration were obvious shifts from preceding FAA aircraft such as the Hawker Nimrod and Hawker Osprey biplanes. On 9 February 1937, the first prototype performed its maiden flight; it was ordered straight off the drawing board to accelerate its development. In November 1938, the Skua was introduced to FAA service; 33 aircraft were operational by the outbreak of the Second World War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the early half of the conflict, the Skua was heavily involved in the Norwegian campaign and sank the German cruiser Königsberg, the first major warship sunk in war by air attack and by dive-bombers. It was present during the Battles of Narvik, the Dunkirk evacuation and also the early stages of the Mediterranean theatre. While a capable dive bomber, its poor top speed and rate of climb meant it was severely limited as a fighter aircraft. Despite this, Fleet Air Arm pilots achieved moderate success with the Skua, scoring numerous aerial victories during the Norwegian and Mediterranean campaigns, with at least one pilot making ace status with five victories. In 1941, the Skua was relegated from frontline operations, but continued to be operated in secondary roles, typically training and target tug duties, as late as March 1945.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Blackburn Skua was configured as a low-wing cantilever monoplane of all-metal construction Its fuselage drew on the design of the Blackburn Shark, an earlier biplane, making extensive use of flush-riveted Alclad. It was internally divided into two water-tight compartments beneath the pilot's and gunner's cockpits to provide sufficient buoyancy in the event of a forcing landing at sea For the same reason, the crew compartments were also watertight up to the edges of the cockpit. The fuselage was stressed to withstand catapult-assisted takeoffs and arrested landings aboard aircraft carriers; a hydraulic damping device was incorporated in the hook.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The mainplane, both the structure and covering of which was also composed of Alclad, was built as three separate units. The twin-spar heavy centre section was bolted beneath the fuselage to form the bottom of the watertight compartment. The outer wing panels, which tapered in both plan and thickness, ended in detachable upswept tips and were sealed between the main spars to form additional watertight compartments. Recesses in the lower surface of the wing accommodated modified Zap flaps that were used to shorten takeoff runs, steepen glides, and limit the aircraft's speed during steep dives. Balanced ailerons were fitted, which used inset hinges with mass balance assistance. The number built was 192.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For many more details, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Skua" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua02.jpg.73ab88e52f2e3c37034bed684b4a9baa.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62491" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua02.thumb.jpg.e2a4031727a12013f6df952e14b300b0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Skua 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua03.jpg.3879fafdd22ec613059644c4f8cbee0a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62492" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua03.thumb.jpg.480b4cd308fd3137f4e1232e248a6ea0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Skua 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua04.jpg.7720c778e89bc52f1b4ce33fa31b7b04.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62493" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua04.thumb.jpg.d09675d3a23323fcad778e50b020ca63.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Skua 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua05.jpg.5d38039e928da23245e9698de02d9fe1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62494" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlackburnSkua05.thumb.jpg.ae74228539b2519cdac5b25ddbf9ad87.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Skua 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1809</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 09:34:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bloch MB.150</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bloch-mb150-r1811/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15005.jpg.ce54397034872d711106980e7ee30d33.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bloch MB.150 (later MB.151 to MB.157) was a French fighter aircraft developed and produced by Société des Avions Marcel Bloch. It featured an all-metal construction, complete with a retractable undercarriage, low cantilever wing and a fully enclosed cockpit.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The MB.150 was originally developed to conform with the requirements of the 1934 French Air Ministry competition seeking a new fighter design. Despite the competition being won by the competing Morane-Saulnier M.S.406, it was decided to proceed with development. Initially proving unable to attain flight, the modified prototype conducted its maiden flight in October 1937. Service trials of the MB.150 determined the aircraft to hold sufficient promise to warrant further work, leading to the adoption of an expanded and strengthened wing and a more refined Gnome-Rhone 14N-7 engine. During spring 1938, following the completion of further proving trials, an order for a pre-production batch of 25 aircraft was placed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Redesigns of the MB.150 design led to the improved MB.151 and MB.152 which entered squadron service with the Armée de l'Air. By the outbreak of the Second World War, around 120 aircraft had been delivered to the Armée de l'Air but most were not sufficiently equipped to be considered operational. An improved MB.155 had greater range. Ordered into production in 1940, only ten aircraft had been completed by the Fall of France. The MB.157, a further improved model with a heavier and more powerful engine, was completed during the Vichy era. Though it demonstrated promising performance, it did not enter production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 13 July 1934, the Service Technique Aéronautique (Aeronautical Technical Service) of the French Air Force issued the "C1 design" requirement for a new and completely modern single-seat interceptor fighter. Envisioned to make use of a monoplane layout and a retractable undercarriage, the prospective fighter aircraft was to serve as a replacement for the French Air Force's existing inventory of Dewoitine D.371, Dewoitine D.500, and Loire 46 aircraft. Amongst the various aviation companies who took interest in the specification, to which the potential for a large production order was attached, was French aircraft manufacturer Société des Avions Marcel Bloch.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design team, headed by Maurice Roussel, was assembled at Bloch's Courbevoie facility in Paris. They designed an all-metal stressed skin monoplane, powered by a single 930 hp Gnome-Rhône 14Kfs radial engine and armed with a pair of wing-mounted Hispano-Suiza-built HS.404 cannon. During September 1935, construction of the type's first prototype, designated as the Bloch 150-01, commenced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although the C.1 competition was ultimately won by a rival design, the Morane-Saulnier M.S.406, it was decided to independently continue with the design's development. During 1936, these efforts culminated in the first attempted flight of the MB.150.01 prototype; unfortunately, the aircraft proved unable to leave the ground during the attempt. In the ensuing disappointment work on the design was temporarily halted, but development was resumed during early 1937. Following the implementation of various modifications, consisting of a strengthened wing of greater area, revised undercarriage arrangement and the installation of a 701 kW (940 hp) Gnome-Rhone 14N-0 radial engine with a three-blade constant speed propeller, on 29 September 1937, the MB.150 finally conducted its maiden flight. Approximately 663 were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details on development, operational history and 8 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloch_MB.150" rel="external nofollow">continue reading here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15001.jpg.232062e0ad09a98bda049bad00ee91d7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62507" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15001.thumb.jpg.601548a816a204eaa8cfa702d55ad359.jpg" data-ratio="55.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bloch MB.150 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15002.jpg.f1029ee2b971e930895b2ca01c9d8477.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62508" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15002.thumb.jpg.7465e9bc7dacf9bb4600c20831f84eee.jpg" data-ratio="56.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bloch MB.150 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15003.jpg.dcb207583f769abc77c2d34b863f105d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62509" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15003.thumb.jpg.c11253a893cf345df4a8b1c1f8e3b0f7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bloch MB.150 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15004.jpg.a0b8d4ca465c30b6bfef38f528d4de2e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62510" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BlochMB.15004.thumb.jpg.c7762783ae5ae99a2b983460dd972c27.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bloch MB.150 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1811</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2024 06:01:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boeing-b-17-flying-fortress-r658/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/2021694618_Flying-Fortressdrabbrown.jpg.b88627522309905b253c418304ef8140.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	Competing against Douglas and Martin for a contract to build 200 bombers, the Boeing entry (prototype Model 299/XB-17) outperformed both competitors and exceeded the air corps' performance specifications. Although Boeing lost the contract (to the Douglas B-18 Bolo) because the prototype crashed, the air corps ordered 13 more B-17s for further evaluation. From its introduction in 1938, the B-17 Flying Fortress evolved through numerous design advances, becoming the third-most produced bomber of all time, behind the four-engined Consolidated B-24 Liberator and the multirole, twin-engined Junkers Ju 88.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft went through several alterations in each of its design stages and variants. Of the 13 YB-17s ordered for service testing, 12 were used by the 2nd Bomb Group of Langley Field, Virginia, to develop heavy bombing techniques, and the 13th was used for flight testing at the Material Division at Wright Field, Ohio. Experiments on this aircraft led to the use of a quartet of General Electric turbo-superchargers which would become standard on the B-17 line. A 14th aircraft, the YB-17A, originally destined for ground testing only and upgraded with the turbochargers, was redesignated B-17A after testing had finished.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As the production line developed, Boeing engineers continued to improve upon the basic design. To enhance performance at slower speeds, the B-17B was altered to include larger rudders and flaps. The B-17C changed from three bulged, oval-shaped gun blisters to two flush, oval-shaped gun window openings, and on the lower fuselage, a single "bathtub" gun gondola housing, which resembled the similarly configured and located Bodenlafette/"Bola" ventral defensive emplacement on the German Heinkel He 111P-series medium bomber.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development, operational history and variants of the B-17, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-17_Flying_Fortress" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specifications below are for the B-17G.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1780253432_Flying-Fortress8543bombbayopen.jpg.1bb4a733f6e47f3af410520ba8a1bff0.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48176" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1240024174_Flying-Fortress8543bombbayopen.thumb.jpg.1c207f3a06f94ffc58f53f0dd9bd02b1.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Flying-Fortress 8543 bomb bay open.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/516528971_Flying-Fortress48543bombwithescort.jpg.3a8216a9a9e50f2e2ecb9d3aa9a400a7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48177" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/200038839_Flying-Fortress48543bombwithescort.thumb.jpg.296ff44e27353366126c5544040ab936.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Flying-Fortress 48543 bomb with escort.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1637663_Flying-Fortress48545.jpg.c220c3dd7b630f2537576658b3a47253.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48178" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/141101121_Flying-Fortress48545.thumb.jpg.f45f06b42ab350ff22698b6b8f8fbaff.jpg" data-ratio="52.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Flying-Fortress 48545.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1953650398_Flying-FortressLiberty_Belle_B-17G.jpg.507c4a2a836ddb95a6439f9c20a2a615.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48179" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/414096825_Flying-FortressLiberty_Belle_B-17G.thumb.jpg.77d58a9d3c5c7600bb344af6a17fd68e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Flying-Fortress Liberty_Belle_B-17G.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">658</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 04:10:11 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing B-29 Superfortress</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boeing-b-29-superfortress-r660/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1570734048_BoeingKB-50Jinflight.jpg.eba2cae9bcc1991cc5db243c2f1494b9.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	Named in allusion to its predecessor, the B-17 Flying Fortress, the Superfortress was designed for high-altitude strategic bombing but also excelled in low-altitude night incendiary bombing and in dropping naval mines to blockade Japan. B-29s also dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and became the only aircraft that has ever used nuclear weapons in combat.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	One of the largest aircraft of World War II, the B-29 had state-of-the-art technology, including a pressurized cabin, dual-wheeled, tricycle landing gear, and an analog computer-controlled fire-control system that allowed one gunner and a fire-control officer to direct four remote machine gun turrets. The $3 billion cost of design and production (equivalent to $43 billion today), far exceeding the $1.9 billion cost of the Manhattan Project, made the B-29 program the most expensive of the war.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The B-29's advanced design allowed it to remain in service in various roles throughout the 1950s. The type was retired in the early 1960s after 3,970 of them had been built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A few were used as flying television transmitters by the Stratovision company. The Royal Air Force flew the B-29 as the Washington until 1954. Twenty B-29s remain as static displays but only two, FIFI and Doc, still fly.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the development and design, operational history and variants of the B-29, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-29_Superfortress" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/803108137_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressCelestialPrincess.jpg.39db46dc77b63987d10989587dd71611.jpg" data-fileid="48185" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48185" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" alt="349481823_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressCelestialPrincess.thumb.jpg.5d52956a0d5da59c9dd95d9ef404f805.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/349481823_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressCelestialPrincess.thumb.jpg.5d52956a0d5da59c9dd95d9ef404f805.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/908373943_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressDoc.jpg.be6df8ffc67278818a979e122341a515.jpg" data-fileid="48186" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48186" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" alt="699513786_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressDoc.thumb.jpg.0d51df12819fa04b81078f8a96981581.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/699513786_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressDoc.thumb.jpg.0d51df12819fa04b81078f8a96981581.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1313466552_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressFifi.jpg.9ad5e1b31cf5d4430a79d38f0b595074.jpg" data-fileid="48187" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48187" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" alt="1101677697_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressFifi.thumb.jpg.f77320ff4396dfd417b0fdde9b355a08.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1101677697_Boeing-B-29-SuperfortressFifi.thumb.jpg.f77320ff4396dfd417b0fdde9b355a08.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1323158744_Boeing-B-29-Superfortress-FIFItaxy.jpg.fd44c11108e995f5e31c451cc26fa4e5.jpg" data-fileid="48188" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48188" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" alt="375183813_Boeing-B-29-Superfortress-FIFItaxy.thumb.jpg.74231b331d2ac58ea781fdc20bc829a4.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/375183813_Boeing-B-29-Superfortress-FIFItaxy.thumb.jpg.74231b331d2ac58ea781fdc20bc829a4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Flight Engineers Station
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/Boeing_B-29_Bockscar_cockpit_2_USAF.jpg.7c73faa5168b3c4de5214efa24ea4bf1.jpg" data-fileid="48189" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48189" data-ratio="149.63" width="401" alt="Boeing_B-29_Bockscar_cockpit_2_USAF.thumb.jpg.071c76d49d820fd0b6f7384c4315b5fe.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/Boeing_B-29_Bockscar_cockpit_2_USAF.thumb.jpg.071c76d49d820fd0b6f7384c4315b5fe.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">660</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 11:48:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing L-15 Scout</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boeing-l-15-scout-r1690/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout01.jpg.ae9113bed816a3b2c477fbd173d1adc1.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing L-15 Scout or YL-15 was a small, piston engine liaison aircraft built by Boeing in very small numbers after World War II. It was a short take-off and landing (STOL) aircraft powered by a 125 hp Lycoming engine. The L-15 was an attempt by Boeing to expand its product line as World War II drew to a close, and Boeing's production of combat aircraft declined. Boeing decided against marketing the L-15 as a general aviation aircraft, and the twelve that were produced went to the United States Army for testing, then were transferred to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service in Alaska for various duties.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The scout was a conventional geared aircraft that was also tested on ski and float gear. The unique fuselage tapered sharply behind the pilot similar to a helicopter fuselage, with a high-mounted boom supporting the tail surfaces. The original design included a single vertical stabilizer, but two small downward-mounted stabilizers were used on production models. Spoiler-ailerons were used for roll control, and full length flaps were mounted on the trailing edge of the wings. The rear fuselage was all-window, and the tandem co-pilot could swivel the chair rearward.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although its cruise speed was only 101 mph, the aircraft was rated to be towed by another aircraft at speeds up to 160 mph.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout02.jpg.203a17c65e15ee5703528c27c790e5ad.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60491" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout02.thumb.jpg.c1b7ea76940120cde706a14faf369955.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YL-15 Scout 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout03.jpg.d16fc4b9b7230491fca1f94fa0ffa400.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60492" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout03.thumb.jpg.35cdd7d143a86bd7d83c09661bbd3207.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YL-15 Scout 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout04.jpg.9048d2d2f74dd5a57a7255f469359cea.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60493" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout04.thumb.jpg.fd77d1537192c487071c66925e513442.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YL-15 Scout 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout05.jpg.81ff494cf5d036572ca511c8cd99115d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60494" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BoeingYL-15Scout05.thumb.jpg.9055d2f3b39dc31d781d56c9872eb958.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YL-15 Scout 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1690</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:08:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing P-26A Peashooter</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boeing-p-26a-peashooter-r1661/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter01.jpg.2bad6434f604403b1e74deebfa0b5edc.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing P-26 "Peashooter" was the first American production all-metal fighter aircraft and the first pursuit monoplane to enter squadron service with the United States Army Air Corps. Designed and built by Boeing, the prototype first flew in 1932, and the type was still in use with the U.S. Army Air Corps as late as 1941 in the Philippines. There are two surviving Peashooters, but there are three reproductions on display with two more under construction.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The project, funded by Boeing, to produce the Boeing Model 248 began in September 1931, with the US Army Air Corps supplying the engines and the instruments. The open cockpit, fixed landing gear, externally braced wing design was the last such design procured by the USAAC as a fighter. The Model 248 had a high landing speed, which caused a number of accidents. To remedy this, flaps were fitted to reduce the landing speed. The Army Air Corps ordered three prototypes, designated XP-936, which first flew on 20 March 1932.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Boeing XP-936's headrest offered little protection should it overturn on landing, risking injury to the pilot. As a result, production Model 266s (P-26As) had a taller headrest installed to provide protection.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Two fighters were completed as P-26Bs with fuel-injected Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1340-33 engines. These were followed by twenty-three P-26Cs, with carburated R-1340-27s and modified fuel systems. Both the Spanish Air Force (one aircraft) and the Republic of China Air Force (eleven aircraft) ordered examples of the Boeing Model 281, an export version comparable to the P-26C, in 1936.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The "Peashooter", as it was known by service pilots, was faster than previous American combat aircraft. Nonetheless, rapid progress in aviation led to it quickly becoming an anachronism, with wire-braced wings, fixed landing gear and an open cockpit. The cantilever-wing Dewoitine D.500 flew the same year as the P-26 and two years afterwards the Soviet I-16 with retractable landing gear was flying. By 1935, just three years after the P-26, the Curtiss P-36, Messerschmitt Bf 109 and Hawker Hurricane were flying, all with enclosed cockpits, retractable landing gear and cantilever wings. However, some P-26s remained in service until after the United States entered World War II in December 1941.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XP-936</strong><br />
	Model 248, prototypes powered by a 522 hp (389 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney SR-1340E Wasp radial engine, three built.<br />
	<strong>XP-26</strong><br />
	Designation assigned to the three XP-936 aircraft after acquisition by the USAAC on June 15, 1932. Other designations assigned to the aircraft included Y1P-26, XY1P-26, and eventually P-26.<br />
	<strong>P-26A</strong><br />
	Model 266, first production variant, powered by a 600 hp (450 kW) R-1340-27. Multiple modifications were made during the production run and afterward. 111 built. Surviving aircraft were redesignated RP-26A in October 1942 and then ZP-26A in December.<br />
	<strong>P-26B</strong><br />
	Model 266A, improved variant powered by a fuel-injected 600 hp (450 kW) R-1340-33. Two built, with 17 more being converted from P-26Cs.<br />
	<strong>P-26C</strong><br />
	Interim variant with a carbureted R-1340-27 and a modified fuel system. Flaps were factory installed. 23 built. All surviving P-26Cs were modified into P-26B standard in 1936.<br />
	<strong>Model 281</strong><br />
	Export version of the P-26C; 11 built for China and one for Spain.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter02.JPG.257f33205fac262afba6403eae09cab3.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59970" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter02.thumb.JPG.d4925f6c76a537c467da50c7d9241249.JPG" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing P-26A Peashooter 02.JPG"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter03.jpg.cb3a6d97eec486ae7528a2d31d8de51b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59971" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter03.thumb.jpg.9da6ed14858c31ae38d4bc2d495f8b7e.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing P-26A Peashooter 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter04.jpg.bf176afd006aab8251faddc3ad038c28.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59972" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter04.thumb.jpg.38f7751242198020448fd6b48243e134.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing P-26A Peashooter 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter05.jpg.fe209236d97ced852b3abab1e0d0b587.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59973" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/BoeingP-26APeashooter05.thumb.jpg.889ccb0ce5094419a8641464329eba86.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing P-26A Peashooter 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1661</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 03:32:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing YB-9</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boeing-yb-9-r1816/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-901.jpg.09ee9c48182402774bcc77c513a5bbf0.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing YB-9 was the first all-metal monoplane bomber aircraft designed for the United States Army Air Corps. The YB-9 was a much enlarged twin-engine development of Boeing's single-engine Model 200 Monomail commercial transport.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In May 1930, Boeing had flown its Model 200 Monomail single-engined mailplane. The Monomail was of radical design for the time, being a semi-monocoque, stressed skin cantilever monoplane with a retractable undercarriage. Air Corps bomber squadrons of the day were largely equipped with slow strut-braced biplanes built from steel-tube frames covered in doped fabric, such as the Keystone B-6, and Boeing decided to design and build a twin-engined bomber using the same techniques used in the Monomail to re-equip the Air Corps.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Boeing built two prototypes of a new bomber as a private venture, which differed in the engines used, with the Model 214 powered by two liquid-cooled Curtiss V-1570-29 Conqueror engines while the Model 215 had two Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1860 Hornet B radial engines. Both aircraft were low winged cantilever monoplanes with a slim, oval cross-section fuselage accommodating a crew of five. The pilot and co-pilot sat in separate open cockpits, with the co-pilot, who doubled as the bombardier sitting forward of the pilot. Two gunners, each armed with a single machine gun sat in nose and dorsal positions, while a radio operator sat inside the fuselage. Like the Monomail, a retractable tailwheel undercarriage was used.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first of the two prototypes to fly was the radial powered Model 215 which, carrying civil markings and the aircraft registration X-10633, made its first flight on 13 April 1931. It was leased to the Air Corps for testing under the designation XB-901, demonstrating a speed of 163 mph (262 km/h). Testing was successful, and both the XB-901 and the as-yet incomplete Model 214 were purchased as the YB-9 and Y1B-9 respectively on 13 August 1931, with an order for a further five for service testing following.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Y1B-9 (Y1 indicating funding outside normal fiscal year procurement), powered by two liquid-cooled Curtiss V-1570-29 'Conqueror' engines, first flew on 5 November 1931. The increased power from these engines, combined with improved streamlining of the engine nacelles, increased its top speed to 173 mph (278 km/h). The YB-9, meanwhile, had been re-engined with more powerful Hornet Bs, demonstrating slightly better performance than the Y1B-9, which was therefore also re-engined with Hornet Bs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The five Y1B-9A service test aircraft (Boeing Model 246) had the Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1860-11 Hornet B engines which powered the re-engined YB-9 and Y1B-9 and a redesigned vertical stabilizer modeled on the 247D transport. While enclosed canopies were considered and designed, the B-9 was never fitted with them. Although it equaled the speed of existing American fighter aircraft, no further aircraft were built, as the Glenn L. Martin Company had flown a prototype of a more advanced bomber, the XB-907, which was ordered into production as the Martin B-10.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first of the five Y1B-9As entered service with the 20th and 49th Bombardment Squadrons, 2nd Bomb Group on 14 September 1932, with all examples built being in service by the end of March 1933. The new bomber proved impossible to intercept during air exercises in May 1932, strengthening calls for improved air defense warning systems. Two B-9s were destroyed during crashes in 1933, one of the accidents being fatal, while the remaining aircraft were gradually phased out over the next two years, with the last being withdrawn on 26 April 1935.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-902.jpg.494aab83012fff405b63e495ae8dcd30.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62584" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-902.thumb.jpg.931583a52affdc10d1eb0281b05d1879.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YB-9 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-903.jpg.8b7921fe8db0c92026a7a59e251455b9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62585" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-903.thumb.jpg.9a407c672d9edf2a37f4d8ea84cd7d38.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YB-9 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-904.jpeg.fd7bdf3dbcbe0751eadb013d4c087bba.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62586" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-904.thumb.jpeg.19aa542db6b60105edc06375636194df.jpeg" data-ratio="41.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YB-9 04.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-905.jpeg.5247687ab5c1c133f9929035a6671aae.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62587" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoeingYB-905.thumb.jpeg.6599dc6be786a6607056e6793768d38c.jpeg" data-ratio="47.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing YB-9 05.jpeg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1816</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 02:17:48 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bolkhovitinov DB-A</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bolkhovitinov-db-a-r1693/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A01.jpg.5e9b73e0fd165cc4a71ef71ca4b0d098.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bolkhovitinov DB-A (Dal'niy Bombardirovshchik-Akademiya – long-range bomber, academy) was a heavy bomber aircraft designed and built in the USSR from 1934.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Bolkhovitinov became the head of the VVIA design group at the VVA Zhukovsky ( - VVS academy Zhukovsky ) tasked with the design of a replacement for the Tupolev TB-3 heavy bomber. The resulting DB-A was advanced for its day, with stressed skin aluminium alloy construction throughout with clean lines, neatly cowled engines and trousered main undercarriage legs, with fully retracting main-wheels and tail-wheel. The split flaps, undercarriage, nose turret and bomb-bay doors were all operated by a pneumatic system recharged by engine-driven compressors. Flight trials began on 2 May 1935 at Khodinka piloted by N.G. Kastanyev and Ya.N. Moseyev, factory tests were completed by April 1934 and NII testing was carried out in May and June 1935. The excellent performance demonstrated included, sustained flight at an altitude of 2,500 m (8,202 ft) with two engines shut down, and 4,500 km range.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A decision was made to fly nonstop from Moscow to the US, and the DB-A was modified to fly, at an overload weight of 34,700 kg (76,500 lb), carry enough fuel to fly 8,440 km (5,244 miles). The red-painted DB-A prototype under command of Sigizmund Levanevsky departed Moscow Shchyelkovo airport on 12 August 1937 on an attempt to fly to Fairbanks, Alaska. After 14 hours, 32 minutes, the crew sent a radio message that one engine had failed and gave a revised ETA for Fairbanks, but nothing further was heard from the DB-A, and the fate of the aircraft and crew remains a mystery.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A second aircraft with increased gross weight, improved airframe, re-designed nose and more power was completed and flown in March 1936 as the DB-2A. An order for 16 aircraft was placed late in 1937, with the designation DBA, but only twelve were completed due to the advent of the TB-7/Pe-8.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>DB-A</strong> – The initial prototype aircraft, with M-34RN engines, lost on a nonstop flight Moscow to Fairbanks, Alaska.<br />
	<strong>DB-2A</strong> – The second prototype with many detail improvements and M-34RNV engines.<br />
	<strong>DBA</strong> – Production aircraft ordered in 1937. Sixteen aircraft ordered, but only twelve completed, with M-34FRN engines plus turbo-chargers, rearwards retracting main undercarriage, gunners cockpits in the rear of the inner engine nacelles, and other modifications.<br />
	<strong>TK-1 TK </strong>( - heavy cruiser) – Projected escort bomber with 11 crew, 3xShVAK + 3,000 rounds, 5xShKAS + 11,000 rounds and underwing rockets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A02.jpg.0a47d133d71772b018982623251bfc15.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60514" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A02.thumb.jpg.0c65e14c18afbebc47983cfa7c8d720d.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bolkhovitinov DB-A 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A03.jpg.b4b435eb304325d76d0b450f7e74db86.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60515" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A03.thumb.jpg.2bacf1b5f0ffa4b17dcb4db004abb348.jpg" data-ratio="35.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bolkhovitinov DB-A 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A04.JPG.2a0bad9c0f2ea6734f5b2d76236a31fc.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60516" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_04/BolkhovitinovDB-A04.thumb.JPG.193aadeded61da1d52f4f3d0aad65c57.JPG" data-ratio="52.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bolkhovitinov DB-A 04.JPG"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1693</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 07:01:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boulton Paul Defiant</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boulton-paul-defiant-r876/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/368765688_BoultonPaulDefiantNightFighterscheme.JPG.7b06e54f2c39078fe050ad2d9405fac5.JPG" /></p>
<p>
	The Boulton Paul Defiant is a British interceptor aircraft that served with the Royal Air Force (RAF) during World War II. The Defiant was designed and built by Boulton Paul Aircraft as a "turret fighter", without any fixed forward-firing guns, also found in the Blackburn Roc of the Royal Navy.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In combat, the Defiant was found to be reasonably effective at destroying bombers but was vulnerable to the Luftwaffe's more manoeuvrable, single-seat Messerschmitt Bf 109 fighters. The lack of forward-firing armament proved to be a great weakness in daylight combat and its potential was realised only when it was converted to a night fighter. It eventually equipped thirteen squadrons in this role, compared to just two squadrons as a day-fighter. In mid-1942 it was replaced by better performing night-fighters, the Bristol Beaufighter and de Havilland Mosquito.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Defiant continued to find use in gunnery training, target towing, electronic countermeasures and air-sea rescue. Among RAF pilots it had the nickname "Daffy".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The gunner's hatch was in the rear of the turret, which had to be rotated to the side for entry and exit. There was not enough room in the turret for the gunner to wear a seat-type or back pack parachute so gunners were provided with a special all-in-one garment nicknamed the "rhino suit". Frederick "Gus" Platts, an air gunner who served in 230, 282 and 208 squadrons, stated: "The Rhino suit we had to wear on Defiants was a bear but I couldn't come up with an alternative, even though it killed dozens of us. I forget the details of it but we could not have sat on our chute or even keep it nearby as in other turrets, so you wore – all in one – an inner layer that fitted a little like a wetsuit of today. The chute fitted around this, and then the dinghy and the outer clothing. There was inner webbing and pockets that literally fell apart (I presume) when one bailed out".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A total of 1,064 Defiants were built. Twenty eight served with RAAF Squadron 456.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information omn the Defiant and its variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulton_Paul_Defiant" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1870269040_BoultonPaulDefiantno2.jpg.01fc8c92e2e2a6d0128f1ff5dc907ad4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50193" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1929887852_BoultonPaulDefiantno2.thumb.jpg.cb1946914371ddb98013a2966938c52f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Defiant no 2.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1204748989_BoultonPaulDefiantnose.jpg.5f60370db036493a6168ef960719c07f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50194" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/454143082_BoultonPaulDefiantnose.thumb.jpg.564474048d8025b9c4275553b6ff695f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Defiant nose.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Boulton_Paul_Defiant_2362L.jpg.4f9b1dd9c414dfa84be6187ec4d15eef.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50195" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Boulton_Paul_Defiant_2362L.thumb.jpg.661711f20448b3c415d356ea963debc4.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton_Paul_Defiant_2362L.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Boulton-Paul-Defiant-Prototype-P-82-K8310-England-04.jpg.5d7bd57b82427c0e58af608057fce6a1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50196" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Boulton-Paul-Defiant-Prototype-P-82-K8310-England-04.thumb.jpg.16707ee79238f5ebfc42ed6444e42900.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton-Paul-Defiant-Prototype-P-82-K8310-England-04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">876</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 13:53:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boulton Paul P-75 Overstrand</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boulton-paul-p-75-overstrand-r1822/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoultonPaulP-75Overstrand01.jpg.2568e58ec901758a28b9b76ce2f1e8e2.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boulton Paul P.75 Overstrand was a twin-engine biplane medium bomber designed and produced by the British aircraft manufacturer Boulton Paul. It was the final example of a series of biplane medium bombers that had served in the Royal Air Force since the First World War, starting with the likes of the Vickers Vimy and Handley Page Type O. The Overstrand was also the first aircraft to be fitted with a fully-enclosed power-operated turret.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	First flown in 1933, the Overstrand was essentially an improved model of the Boulton Paul Sidestrand of the 1920s, thus early references to the type referred to it as the Sidestrand Mk IV instead. It demonstrated a higher maximum speed than its predecessor and was procured for the RAF in limited numbers. As such, the type entered service during the mid 1930s, but became increasingly overshadowed by the new generation of monoplane medium bombers, such as the Vickers Wellington and Armstrong Whitworth Whitley. Nevertheless, the Overstrand remained operational during the early years of the Second World War, albeit only being flown by training units. The few surviving aircraft were withdrawn from service during 1941, having been rendered surplus to requirements.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Overstrand was a development of the Boulton Paul Sidestrand, which had first flown in 1928 and like the Sidestrand, it was named after a village in Norfolk, home also of Boulton Paul's Norwich factory. The earlier Sidestrand had been largely similar to its predecessors of the First World War, featuring open cockpits and hand-operated defensive machine guns. Unlike its predecessors, the Sidestrand could fly at speed of up to 140 mph (230 km/h), which made operating the guns in exposed positions difficult, particularly in the nose. To address this difficulty, the Overstrand was furnished with an alternative nose turret design, which was both enclosed and powered. At the time this was a relatively novel feature, the resulting aircraft being the first in the world to feature a fully-enclosed power-operated turret.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Overstrand's innovative turret was largely developed in-house by Bolton Paul's chief armament designer H. A. Hughes.[4] In terms of its basic design, the turret was a metal-framed cylinder with a domed upper and lower area; Perspex was used as glazing, in which there was a vertical slot for the single Lewis gun, which was covered by a canvas strip with a zip fastener to facilitate movement of the gun itself. Traverse motion of the turret was driven by pneumatic motors, powered by air bottles on board that were pressurised to 200 psi (1,400,000 Pa) using an engine-driven air compressor. The turret could move through a fully 360-degree circle if the gun was raised sufficiently, helping the turret to cover the widest area of any turret system. A geared spindle at the base of the turret was supported by a series of ball bearings. Elevation was achieved manually.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	n addition to the turret, various other revisions and improvements were also incorporated. It was decided that the cockpit ought to also be fully enclosed within a canopy of anti-glare Perspex, complete with a sliding hood. The airframe was strengthened considerably in many areas, which facilitated an increased bomb capacity of up to 1,500 lb (680 kg), up to two 500 lb (230 kg) bombs could be carried in the aircraft's recessed bomb cell in addition to two 250 lb (110 kg) bombs on external carriers. A new levered main undercarriage, complete with larger wheels, was also fitted, while the tailskid of the Sidestrand was replaced by a tailwheel. The wing design was also revised, a noticeable sweepback was added to the outer sections in order to compensate for the aircraft's heavier nose section.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details. including operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulton_Paul_Overstrand" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoultonPaulP-75Overstrand02.jpg.51f8bc2d0e056c02b41a200c6d9f708e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62648" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoultonPaulP-75Overstrand02.thumb.jpg.95d6f77a6c2053396fbdad169951cf94.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P-75 Overstrand 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoultonPaulP-75Overstrand03.jpg.03585ae0d4fc400bc21870c6986accaf.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62649" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_12/BoultonPaulP-75Overstrand03.thumb.jpg.d4340843c3e9fcd82908796a7e0a5507.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P-75 Overstrand 03.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1822</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boulton Paul P.108 Balliol</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/boulton-paul-p108-balliol-r2037/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol01.jpg.130eefbbdbab62e6808ed9c43faa858e.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boulton Paul Balliol and Sea Balliol are monoplane advanced trainer aircraft designed and produced by the British aircraft manufacturer Boulton Paul Aircraft. On 17 May 1948, it became the world's first single-engined turboprop aircraft to fly. The Balliol was operated primarily by both the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (FAA).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Developed during the late 1940s, the Balliol was designed to fulfil Air Ministry Specification T.7/45, replacing the wartime North American Harvard trainer. Unlike previous trainer aircraft, which were powered by piston engines, it was specified for the aircraft to use newly developed turboprop propulsion instead. On 30 May 1947, the Balliol performed its maiden flight; the first preproduction aircraft would fly during the following year. Production examples were powered by the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine, while various prototypes and pre-production aircraft featured alternative powerplants such as the Rolls-Royce Dart and Armstrong Siddeley Mamba turboprop engines.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Balliol entered service with the RAF in 1950 and proved to be a relatively trouble-free trainer. However, a shift in attitudes towards turbojet-powered trainer aircraft would see orders being curtailed for the type by 1952. Despite this, a navalised version of the aircraft, the Sea Balliol, was also introduced for deck landing training. The type also saw some use in other capacities, such as for experimental flights. Only a single export customer, the Royal Ceylon Air Force, would procure the type.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Origins</strong><br />
	During March 1945, the Air Ministry issued Specification T.7/45, which sought a new advanced trainer to succeed the Royal Air Force's (RAF) fleet of North American Harvards. Amongst the requirements specified was the use of the newly developed turboprop engine, as it was felt that the new generation of advanced trainers would better prepare pilots for flying jet-powered combat aircraft such as the newly emerged Gloster Meteor fighter aircraft. As a fallback measure in case of difficulties being encountered with engine development programmes, the envisioned trainer was also to readily accommodate a more conventional Bristol Perseus radial engine as well.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A further stipulation by the ministry was the fitting of a three-seat cockpit in a configuration roughly akin to the contemporary Percival Prentice basic trainer. The pilot and instructor were sat in a side-by-side arrangement, while a second student could be accommodated in a third seat to the rear, positioned as to enable them to closely observe the pilot and the instructions being issued. The trainer was to be configured to perform various forms of training, being suitable for both day and night operations, featuring both guns and bombs for armament training, a glider-towing capability, and a general design that would be compatible with navalisation measures, such as a strengthened undercarriage and the fitting of arrestor gear.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Within a month of the specification's issuing, Boulton Paul Aircraft had opted to produce multiple proposals in response, as large orders had been anticipated. Boulton Paul's P.108 proposal, which would become the Balliol, was that of a conventional low-wing monoplane, featuring retractable main undercarriage and a fixed tailwheel. Towards the end of August 1945, Boulton Paul received an order from the Air Ministry, calling for the production of a batch of four prototypes, which were to be powered by the Rolls-Royce Dart turboprop engine. During August 1946, this was followed by a larger order for 20 pre-production aircraft, with ten each to be powered by the Dart and the Armstrong Siddeley Mamba turboprop, with delays to development of the Dart meaning that the prototypes would now be fitted by the Mamba. Competing proposals from other manufacturers were also submitted, including Avro's Athena in particular.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of development, design, operational history and 4 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulton_Paul_Balliol" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol02.jpg.fe43325bc44762ac041a86965c73d7cb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65474" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol02.thumb.jpg.2b30ed8ecf91780de2d0b9bc341d4d7e.jpg" data-ratio="66.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P.108 Balliol 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol03.jpg.31e3a13ef61d6de63b68c44f4f435141.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65475" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol03.thumb.jpg.ee0bf3a5229c9109c19a54358781f7d3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P.108 Balliol 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol04.jpg.61b746e3c934e9a1be105541439ea93b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65476" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol04.thumb.jpg.2714d4faa7b6f6b359788f7cffc17a4a.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P.108 Balliol 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol05.jpg.f854312e13b4eb55d610251d184053b2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65477" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BoultonPaulP.108Balliol05.thumb.jpg.0291dc257ccdf9466f3e566075d51a31.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul P.108 Balliol 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2037</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:27:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Breda Ba.88 Lince</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/breda-ba88-lince-r2038/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince01.jpg.10e7e5b63d10544326d00f58bb937a34.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Breda Ba.88 Lince ("Lynx") was a ground-attack aircraft used by the Italian Regia Aeronautica during World War II. Its streamlined design and retractable undercarriage were advanced for the time, and after its debut in 1937 the aircraft established several world speed records. When military equipment was installed on production examples, problems of instability developed and the aeroplane's general performance deteriorated. Eventually its operational career was cut short, and the remaining Ba.88 airframes were used as fixed installations on airfields to mislead enemy reconnaissance. It represented, perhaps, the most remarkable failure of any operational aircraft to see service in World War II.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Breda Ba.88 was designed to fulfill a 1936 requirement by the Regia Aeronautica for a heavy fighter bomber capable of a maximum speed of 530 km/h (330 mph)—faster than any other aircraft existing or being planned at the time)—armament of 20 mm cannons and range of 2,000 km (1,200 mi). It first flew in October 1936. The project was derived from the aborted Ba.75 also designed by Giuseppe Panzeri and Antonio Parano.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Technical description</strong><br />
	The Ba.88 was an all-metal, twin-engine, two-crew monoplane, with a high-mounted wing. It employed a "concentric" fuselage design, with a framework of steel tubes and a metallic skin covering which was both streamlined (having a very small fuselage cross-section) and strong. However, this internal load-bearing structure was very complex and of outdated design, as monocoque designs were starting to be developed elsewhere. The internal struts resulted in excessive weight compounded by manufacturing delays. The narrow confines of the fuselage would require the Ba.88 to carry bombs in a semi-external structure - to the detriment of the aircraft's aerodynamics. The all-metal wings had two longerons, and housed the engine nacelles, undercarriage main elements, and the majority of the 12 self-sealing fuel tanks (the only protection in the aircraft), providing 1,586 L (419 US gal) total capacity. All three undercarriage units were retractable, which was unusual for the time.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was powered by two Piaggio P.XI air-cooled radial engines. They were of the same type as used in other projects such as the Re.2000, and drove two three-blade, constant-speed 3.2 m (10.4 ft) diameter Breda propellers. The engine nacelles also carried the two main undercarriage units. The aircraft had a twin tail to provide the dorsal 7.7 mm (0.303 in) Breda-SAFAT machine gun with a better field of fire.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft had three nose-mounted 12.7 mm (0.5 in) Breda-SAFAT machine guns with 400, 450 and 400 rounds of ammunition respectively. A 7.7 mm (0.303 in) Breda machine gun (500 rounds) with a high arc of fire, was fitted in the rear cockpit and controlled by a complex motorised electrical system. A modern "San Giorgio" reflector gunsight was fitted, and there was also provision to mount a 20 mm cannon instead of the central machine gun in the nose. The payload was three bombs of 50 kg (110 lb) or three of 100 kg (220 lb) or two of 250 kg (550 lb), or a Nardi dispenser for 119 2 kg (4.4 lb) bomblets. Together these weapons gave the Ba.88 impressive armament for its time.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The forward pilot's cockpit was fully instrumented, with an airspeed indicator capable of reading to 560 km/h (350 mph), gyroscope and an altimeter (useful to 8,000 m (26,000 ft).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of development, operational history and 4 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breda_Ba.88_Lince" rel="external nofollow">click here</a>.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince02.jpeg.2642c568a2abc55a57b096e8c525047c.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65478" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince02.thumb.jpeg.e01cae2a037ace889e6dae1b123cdae5.jpeg" data-ratio="55.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breda Ba.88 Lince 02.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince03.jpeg.051ee641ee47fc4d93df699dc3aeccf5.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65479" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince03.thumb.jpeg.963c32cd688b4763d2cc3ca72ae9a0e7.jpeg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breda Ba.88 Lince 03.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince04.jpg.bb63c86d64dae258d3937bc159841a27.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65480" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince04.thumb.jpg.ad1d44a5b651777d8c68b9fe6ffa1299.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breda Ba.88 Lince 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince05.jpg.430b62e1b1ca724cc4de75bf7df14653.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65481" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/BredaBa.88Lince05.thumb.jpg.a701e0461080d3341a903b4a65764c14.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breda Ba.88 Lince 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2038</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Br&#xE9;guet 460 Vultur</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/br%C3%A9guet-460-vultur-r1718/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur02.jpg.f529188387c643c5b73868696d937580.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bréguet 460 Vultur was a French bomber of the 1930s. Few of these twin-engined monoplanes and its variant, the Breguet 462 Bréguet , were built. At least one Breguet 460 was sold to the Spanish Republican Air Force during the Spanish Civil War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Bréguet 460 was a bomber, initially labelled as Multiplace de Combat, a multifunctional aircraft, by the French aviation authorities. Eventually the prototype was modified in 1934, departing from the parameters set for its predecessor, the Breguet 413, in order to meet the requirements of a high-speed bomber for the French Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The resulting aircraft was a monoplane fitted with two powerful radial Gnome et Rhône 14Kjrs engines, having a more aerodynamic appearance, although it kept the tail of the obsolete Breguet 413. Owing to technical difficulties, production was delayed and when the first prototype of the Bréguet 460 Vultur flew, it could not achieve the 400 km/h (250 mph) required for a high-speed bomber. Thus, the French Air Ministry lost interest in this unit and concentrated on projects by other companies, such as the Amiot 340 and the LeO 45. These aircraft, however, would not be ready until three years later.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The outbreak of the Spanish Civil War provided the French aircraft industry with a good opportunity both for getting rid of obsolete aircraft and for testing new developments. Therefore, it is in this context that the Bréguet 460 prototypes ended up in the Spanish Republican Air Force. One of the units seen in a picture of the Spanish conflict has an improved, more modern tail of the same type that would be used later for the Breguet 470 Fulgur airliner.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The number and the fate of the Bréguet 460 Vultur units in the Spanish Republican Air Force are obscure as is common with most of the flying units of the loyalist air arm during the conflict. It is known that one of these aircraft was based at the Celrà airfield towards the end of the conflict and that it belonged to the Night Flight Group no. 11, which comprised the Vultur and two Bloch MB.210. This particular Breguet 460 was hit by the nationalist cruiser "Canarias" and crashed in the sea near L'Escala and all the crew perished in the crash.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Bréguet Br 462 was a modernized version of the Bréguet 460, although still very similar, that made its first test flight towards the end of 1936. The front part of the fuselage was redesigned to look more aerodynamic and the aircraft was fitted with two Gnome-Rhône 14N-0/N-1 engines that allowed it to reach a speed of 402 km/h (250 mph). Flight described it as similar to the Bréguet 461 that was supplied to Japan in 1935. A planned installation of 1,350 hp (1,010 kW) engines was expected to give it a speed of around 300 mph (480 km/h). Bombload was 1076 kg. Defensive armament was a forward-firing 20 mm (0.79 in) cannon and two rear-firing machine guns.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Only three Bréguet 462s were built. Two of them served in the Vichy French Air Force where they did not see much action and were scrapped in 1942.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Bre 460</strong><br />
	Light bomber and strike aircraft with two Gnome-Rhône 14Kdrs1 radial engines. One prototype built.<br />
	<strong>Bre 460 M5</strong><br />
	1935 design. Light bomber and strike aircraft powered by two Gnome-Rhône 14Kdrs radial engines. <br />
	<strong>Br 462 B4</strong><br />
	A modernized version of the Bre 460. Only three built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur05.jpeg.aca8664262e01ca3db61e50fdade9cd0.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61034" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur05.thumb.jpeg.607b27c2d8369b30d1d7826dc08950a2.jpeg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bréguet 460 Vultur 05.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur01.jpeg.029f2d1dc4ef3f8c1bf0a91266de1f4e.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61035" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur01.thumb.jpeg.75e4baa9a127c5b8219a35ffc7c45142.jpeg" data-ratio="48.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bréguet 460 Vultur 01.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur03.jpeg.d4eaf0eccf7dccf0f523104f5e52c804.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61036" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur03.thumb.jpeg.861bd4777cac8e21d9ec692b23337ada.jpeg" data-ratio="55.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bréguet 460 Vultur 03.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur04.jpeg.f68f8473188016abf078a7cc90afde37.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61037" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/Brguet460Vultur04.thumb.jpeg.218972fd2513abc0dcfa512ada483fcd.jpeg" data-ratio="50.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bréguet 460 Vultur 04.jpeg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1718</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 02:22:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Brewster F2A Buffalo</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/brewster-f2a-buffalo-r602/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1578002027_BrewsterBuffaloreplica.jpg.c2a4b77b7895eef9a2e6a9612ce1e0ad.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	Designed and built by the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation, it was one of the first U.S. monoplanes with an arrestor hook and other modifications for aircraft carriers. The Buffalo won a competition against the Grumman F4F Wildcat in 1939 to become the U.S. Navy's first monoplane fighter aircraft. Although superior to the Grumman F3F biplane it replaced, and the early F4Fs, the Buffalo was largely obsolete when the United States entered the war, being unstable and overweight, especially when compared to the Japanese Mitsubishi A6M Zero.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Several nations, including Finland, Belgium, Britain and the Netherlands, ordered the Buffalo. The Finns were the most successful with their Buffalos, flying them in combat against early Soviet fighters with excellent results. During the Continuation War of 1941–1944, the B-239s (de-navalized F2A-1) operated by the Finnish Air Force proved capable of engaging and destroying most types of Soviet fighter aircraft operating against Finland at that time and achieving in the first phase of that conflict 32 Soviet aircraft shot down for every B-239 lost, and producing 36 Buffalo "aces".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>RAAF, RNZAF Service.</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Brewster F2A-1 was test-flown in January 1938, and was the first monoplane fighter used by the US Navy. Improved versions, including the F2A-2 and -3 were purchased as Buffaloes in 1940 by Finland, Belgium and England. The RAF found that the Buffalo, with its large, rotund fuselage and underpowered engine, had many operational limitations and was unsuitable for the European war theatre.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As a result, the Buffaloes were transferred to the Far East where a number of these aircraft were taken over by the two RAAF fighter units in Malaya – Nos 21 and 453 Squadrons. At the outbreak of Japanese hostilities, the RAAF, RAF, and RNZAF Buffaloes, supported by Dutch Buffaloes, fought gallantly but were out-classed and outnumbered by the Japanese Zeros.
</p>

<p>
	Meantime, Allied forces were grouping in Australia to halt the Japanese advance, and although fighter aircraft were at a premium, 17 Buffaloes (A51-1/17) were delivered to the RAAF for home defence. These aircraft were taken on strength between June and October 1942, and served with Nos 24, 25, 85, and 87 Squadrons. The RAAF Buffaloes were used for a period of 12 months in photo-reconnaissance and air defence roles. During this time, four aircraft were written off (A51-2, -4, -5 and -6) and the remaining 13 Buffaloes were progressively transferred to the US 5th Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Buffalo activities in Australia were limited, but in Malaya the Buffalo pilots of Nos 21 and 453 Squadrons left behind a record of heroism and sacrifice rarely surpassed in RAAF history.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For detailed histories of the RAAF Buffalos, <a href="http://www.adf-serials.com/2a51.htm" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specifications below from the RAAF Museum website are for the Buffalo Mk 1. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/928035871_BrewsterBuffaloUS.jpg.578614cd4e6882bb4a1efc9f2f9e64b8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47569" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1423608361_BrewsterBuffaloUS.thumb.jpg.de0ebb555a3747f5a3b9f939c8238429.jpg" data-ratio="50" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster Buffalo US.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/912801582_BrewsterBuffalo-33.jpg.4e2071212a3c73e05030c8e8891a1181.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47570" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/598022335_BrewsterBuffalo-33.thumb.jpg.5bd10866bfae9d7cd47cad5cdda059b0.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster Buffalo-33.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1811325734_BrewsterBuffalo-35.jpg.43128474664472831484c5c0d99ba78f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47571" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/824896653_BrewsterBuffalo-35.thumb.jpg.0900188d5a169383377fa6fa25c54da1.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster Buffalo-35.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Brewster_Buffalo_AN180_21_Squadron.jpg.1a0ff60cdf9b398d1bf5661d70428ab9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47572" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Brewster_Buffalo_AN180_21_Squadron.thumb.jpg.814806c7821707bdcf1a57b3c8ce0cde.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster_Buffalo_AN180_21_Squadron.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">602</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 02:12:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Brewster SB2A Buccaneer</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/brewster-sb2a-buccaneer-r1782/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer01.jpg.ea971164863deaf2a2e0c1173c093713.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Brewster SB2A Buccaneer (Brewster Model 340) is a single-engined mid-wing monoplane scout bomber aircraft built by the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation for the United States Navy between 1942 and 1944. It was also supplied to the Royal Air Force (RAF), United States Army Air Forces, and United States Marine Corps. The Buccaneer was overweight and lacked maneuverability, and has been described as a "classic failure." While designed as a scout bomber, none saw combat, although a number found use in noncombat roles.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The SB2A was developed for the US Navy, and also ordered in large quantities by the Dutch, French, and British Governments. The Dutch order was later taken over by the US Navy and the French order by Britain. An Australian order was cancelled before any of the types were delivered. The Buccaneer was underpowered and poorly constructed, and all of its operators considered it to be unsuitable for combat. SB2As were used as target tugs by the RAF and US Navy, trainers by the USMC, and "hacks" by the USAAF. Many of the completed aircraft were scrapped without entering service. The type is considered by historians to have been among the worst of World War II. The Brewster Corporation itself went out of business in 1946.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	In early 1939 the United States Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics launched a program to develop larger scout/bombers to operate from the Navy's aircraft carriers. In April that year the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation was selected to build a prototype of its Model 340 design to meet this requirement; this aircraft was to be designated the XSB2A-1.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Navy had ordered a prototype of the Model 340/SB2A in April 1939.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XSB2A-1's design was heavily based on the earlier Brewster SBA scout-bomber. It shared the single-engined, mid-winged monoplane layout of the earlier aircraft, but was larger and had a more powerful engine. The XSB2A-1 was powered by a single Wright R-2600 engine which drove a three-bladed propeller. It was armed with two forward-firing 0.50-inch calibre machine guns in the fuselage and two 0.30 machine guns in each wing. The type was initially intended to have an enclosed gun turret and could carry up to 1,000 pounds (450 kg) of bombs in an internal bomb bay.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first XSB2A-1 prototype commenced flying trials on 17 June 1941. The results of this testing and changing requirements led to significant changes to the design. These included the airframe being lengthened by 1 foot and two inches, the turret being replaced by a flexible mount in the rear of the cockpit for a pair of 0.30 machine guns, the addition of armour and self-sealing fuel tanks, and changes to the design of the fins and canopy. The combined effect of these changes resulted in the aircraft's weight increasing by almost 3,000 pounds (1,400 kg), which greatly reduced its speed, weapons load, and flying range.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details, including 6 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_SB2A_Buccaneer" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer02.jpg.02fa4921402f6f5e158d574928e81f9f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62004" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer02.thumb.jpg.ee9ed6e64428b8a79fb8c1b2d601c7a1.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster SB2A-3 Buccaneer 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer03.jpg.34c032ca869d04aadb1fd93a277bc711.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62005" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer03.thumb.jpg.ae9cd98e77bd1a90a45f3388a4603f73.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster SB2A-3 Buccaneer 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer04.jpg.7508cdd1623ad97fa2f23e955d6645d3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62006" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer04.thumb.jpg.1dafa92f3355cf13f018e6e1a509074e.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster SB2A-3 Buccaneer 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer05.jpg.54cd0d65334ad2a5b590d0423c95f906.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="62007" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/BrewsterSB2A-3Buccaneer05.thumb.jpg.9bf15e0ce1522462477b240761639297.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Brewster SB2A-3 Buccaneer 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1782</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 07:30:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bristol Beaufighter</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bristol-beaufighter-r601/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Beaufighter_A19_17.jpg.d3a61ace773b46e751d845c40e4c192a.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	It was originally conceived as a heavy fighter variant of the Bristol Beaufort torpedo bomber. The Beaufighter proved to be an effective night fighter, which came into service with the Royal Air Force (RAF) during the Battle of Britain, its large size allowing it to carry heavy armament and early airborne interception radar without major performance penalties.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Beaufighter was used in many roles; receiving the nicknames Rockbeau for its use as a rocket-armed ground attack aircraft and Torbeau as a torpedo bomber against Axis shipping, in which it replaced the Beaufort. In later operations, it served mainly as a maritime strike/ground attack aircraft, RAF Coastal Command having operated the largest number of Beaufighters amongst all other commands at one point. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) also made extensive use of the type as an anti-shipping aircraft, such as during the Battle of the Bismarck Sea.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although the RAAF number A7 was allocated through 1926–46 and the Beaufort became A9 in 1941, the prefix A8 was not used until 1944 when the Department of Aircraft Production (DAP) Beaufighter Mk 21 joined the RAAF. This anomaly came about when the numbers A8 to A12 were reserved in the late 1930s, because aircraft such as the Series 1 A11 Southampton and A12 Bulldog were still in service.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first DAP Beaufighter was flown on 26 May 1944 and, five days later, the aircraft was taken over by the RAAF. As production mounted in the Fishermens Bend and Mascot factories, the Australian A8 Beaufighter began to replace the British A19 Beaufighter. The smooth-running sleeve-valve engine and the devastating fire-power of cannon rockets and machine-guns had already earned the Beaufighter the nickname "Whispering Death" and the Australian version continued to wreak great havoc throughout New Guinea, the Celebes and the Philippines. The aircraft served with Nos 22, 30, 31, 92 and 93 Squadrons, and when production ceased at the end of 1945, a total of 364 DAP Beaufighters had been built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 For more details of the Beaufighter, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Beaufighter" rel="external nofollow">click here</a>, and for details of RAAF service, <a href="https://www.airforce.gov.au/sites/default/files/minisite/static/7522/RAAFmuseum/research/aircraft/series2/A8.htm" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Beaufighter_Mk_Ic_A19_53.jpg.797edfa88d583175e74d0a2ad1c3b64c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47542" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Beaufighter_Mk_Ic_A19_53.thumb.jpg.91e65828265281343e3bdab101070f8e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Beaufighter_Mk_Ic_A19_53.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Beaufighter_Mk_X_A19.jpg.fa4d0e50fe5856921a6fb11091748a36.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47543" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/Beaufighter_Mk_X_A19.thumb.jpg.cb219c183e82ffbabf33b2ee6f60df38.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Beaufighter_Mk_X_A19.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/96465441_BristolBeaufighterb-n-w.jpg.e3cc76fed429fc747ac43f901b4f4357.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47544" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1201492459_BristolBeaufighterb-n-w.thumb.jpg.08f6e439350dd276af4d0e8638bd98f7.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Beaufighter b-n-w.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/879062860_BristolBeaufighterflyingoverwater.jpg.1b1fca48c0191d4d45c9d652641595c3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47545" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/30358867_BristolBeaufighterflyingoverwater.thumb.jpg.9819be98b73f834bc90e3cebc3f7a18f.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Beaufighter flying over water.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1029344248_BristolBeaufighterRD253.jpg.37da35b27f3d2c6fbeff35fe0a563d9c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47546" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/2144900280_BristolBeaufighterRD253.thumb.jpg.f0baf73d58917f6c0c5c015d32c413ef.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Beaufighter RD253.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1692508188_BristolBeaufighterT5G49.jpg.36bd9923a7ea851bc9e73ba8e98f2c70.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47547" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1776436025_BristolBeaufighterT5G49.thumb.jpg.7c9a1293b7ea8c820680e5c703fac0a0.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Beaufighter T5G49.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">601</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 02:31:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bristol Blenheim</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bristol-blenheim-r604/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/206569338_BristolBlenheimMkIV.jpg.ad6ef6c54cc556a40f79be995f375d27.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The aircraft was developed as Type 142, a civil airliner, in response to a challenge from Lord Rothermere to produce the fastest commercial aircraft in Europe. The Type 142 first flew in April 1935, and the Air Ministry, impressed by its performance, ordered a modified design as the Type 142M for the Royal Air Force (RAF) as a bomber. Deliveries of the newly named Blenheim to RAF squadrons commenced on 10 March 1937.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A development of the Type 142M was the Type 149 which Bristol named the Bolingbroke, retrospectively changed by the Air Ministry to Blenheim Mk IV and the Type 142M to the Blenheim Mk I. Fairchild Canada built the Type 149 under licence as the Bolingbroke. Blenheims Mk I and the Mk IV were adapted as fighters by the addition of a gun pack of four Browning .303 machine guns in the bomb bay. The Mk IV was used as a long range fighter and as a maritime patrol aircraft; both aircraft were also used as bomber/gunnery trainers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Blenheim was one of the first British aircraft with an all-metal stressed-skin construction, retractable landing gear, flaps, a powered gun turret and variable-pitch propellers. The Mk I was faster than most fighters in the late 1930s but the advance in development of monoplane fighters made all bombers more vulnerable particularly if flown in daylight, though it proved successful as a night fighter. The Blenheim was effective as a bomber but many were shot down. Both Blenheim types were used by overseas operators, being licence built in Yugoslavia and Finland.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 10 March 1937, production deliveries to the RAF formally started; 114 Squadron became the first squadron to receive the Blenheim. On 13 January 1938, the Blenheim entered service with No. 30 Squadron, the first overseas squadron to receive the type; in early 1939, the first Blenheims arrived in India.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	From July 1936 onwards, various additional orders were placed for the Blenheim Mk I, including multiple orders for the export market. By the end of 1936, 1,568 aircraft were on order. In order to meet the demand, secondary assembly lines were established at Chadderton by Avro and at Speke by Rootes Securities. The aircraft was built under licence by overseas countries, including Finland, who completed a total of 55 aircraft, and Yugoslavia, which completed 16 aircraft with a further 24 in advanced stages of completion when Germany invaded Yugoslavia. Other countries also procured the Blenheim, including Romania, Greece and Turkey. By September 1939, orders for the Blenheim had risen to 2,088 aircraft. Total production of the Blenheim Mk I in England was 1,351 aircraft prior to the end of the production run in 1939; production had been terminated in favour of more advanced variants.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Formal work on an extended-range reconnaissance version started as the Blenheim Mk II, which increased tankage from 278 gal (1,264 L) to 468 gal (2,127 L). Only one Blenheim Mk II was completed, as flight tests revealed the increase in speed to be marginal and not warranting further development. Another modification resulted in the Blenheim Mk III, which lengthened the nose, dispensing with the "stepless cockpit" format of the Mk.I, introducing a true windscreen in front of the pilot, to provide more room for the bomb aimer. This required the nose to be "scooped out" in front of the pilot to maintain visibility during takeoff and landing. Both modifications were combined, along with a newer version of the Mercury engine with 905 hp (675 kW). The turret acquired a pair of Brownings in place of the original single Vickers K gun, creating the Blenheim Mk IV.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Bristol Blenheim MkI, IV &amp; V aircraft served with three RAAF article XV Squadrons (454, 456 &amp; 459) with RAF serials.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of thedevelopment, design, operational history, and variants of the Blenheim, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Blenheim" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Blenheim Mk I</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47582" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1789916240_BristolBlenheimL6739taxying.jpg.be75498f953aecbd861ab500e6fae5ae.jpg" rel=""><img alt="674244766_BristolBlenheimL6739taxying.thumb.jpg.f5e9a38546478b546563c22f6564a7f9.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47582" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/674244766_BristolBlenheimL6739taxying.thumb.jpg.f5e9a38546478b546563c22f6564a7f9.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47583" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1189059174_BristolBlenheimL6739.jpg.8ab7f16a8210e540afae2d02eee41e66.jpg" rel=""><img alt="2145989524_BristolBlenheimL6739.thumb.jpg.a75709bf238f044744e89fa67eee1fdd.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47583" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/2145989524_BristolBlenheimL6739.thumb.jpg.a75709bf238f044744e89fa67eee1fdd.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47584" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1285687981_BristolBlenheimMk.IL6739G-BPIV.jpg.02e694b5937070406702c1b091f795e4.jpg" rel=""><img alt="1737421135_BristolBlenheimMk.IL6739G-BPIV.thumb.jpg.b438831eeca6341f746ff0411c720c65.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47584" data-ratio="42.83" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1737421135_BristolBlenheimMk.IL6739G-BPIV.thumb.jpg.b438831eeca6341f746ff0411c720c65.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Blenheim Mk IV</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47579" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1667257653_BristolBleinheimlongnosevariant.jpg.29706279ac1a2ecbfa3a2544200533cd.jpg" rel=""><img alt="783814476_BristolBleinheimlongnosevariant.thumb.jpg.24536632f3414c2e366f4ac039e7a5d3.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47579" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/783814476_BristolBleinheimlongnosevariant.thumb.jpg.24536632f3414c2e366f4ac039e7a5d3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47580" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1867151140_BristolBleinheimR3821.jpg.7b6f208d3cf67d6410e95b2e3774fde4.jpg" rel=""><img alt="1444124390_BristolBleinheimR3821.thumb.jpg.2725bd857b65e57808e3fe1e26be9fdb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47580" data-ratio="74.83" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1444124390_BristolBleinheimR3821.thumb.jpg.2725bd857b65e57808e3fe1e26be9fdb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="47581" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1828351933_BristolBlenheimBL-200.jpg.85f431a972f1cd44cb3b6bcd7841470a.jpg" rel=""><img alt="2048895890_BristolBlenheimBL-200.thumb.jpg.c4b5d22c38d189a424da5db886ffb8eb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="47581" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/2048895890_BristolBlenheimBL-200.thumb.jpg.c4b5d22c38d189a424da5db886ffb8eb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	(Note: The Finnish Air Force used a blue swastika as its emblem until 2000.)
</p>

<p>
	  
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">604</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 10:01:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bristol Bolingbroke</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/bristol-bolingbroke-r1584/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke01.jpg.5f412d4b5e204f5ce81f821000a2e135.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bristol Fairchild Bolingbroke is a maritime patrol aircraft and trainer used by the Royal Canadian Air Force during the Second World War. Produced by Fairchild-Canada, it was a license-built version of the Bristol Blenheim Mk IV bomber.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1935, the British Air Ministry issued Specification G.24/35 to procure a coastal reconnaissance/light bomber to replace the Avro Anson. Bristol proposed the Type 149, based on its Blenheim Mk I, with Bristol Aquila engines to give greater range. While the Air Ministry rejected this proposal, a Blenheim Mk I, retaining its Mercury VIII engines, was converted as a Type 149 (Blenheim Mk III) for the general reconnaissance role. The nose was lengthened to provide more room for the bombardier, with the upper left surface of the nose being scooped out to maintain pilot visibility during takeoff and landing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The longer range also fulfilled a Canadian requirement for a maritime patrol aircraft. Consequently, Fairchild Aircraft Ltd. (Canada) of Quebec started production of the Blenheim Mk IV as the Bolingbroke (the originally intended name for the Blenheim IV). This type was nicknamed the "Bolly". After a small run of aircraft constructed to British specifications, as the Bolingbroke Mk I, Fairchild switched production to the Bolingbroke Mk IV with Canadian and American instruments and equipment. These versions also included anti-icing boots and a dinghy. One of the early Mk IV variants was the Bolingbroke Mk IVW which was powered by two 825 hp (615 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney SB4G Twin Wasp Junior engines. Incapable of maintaining altitude on one engine, the normal bomb load was reduced to 500 pounds on these aircraft to compensate for the low engine power. The most-produced variant was the Bolingbroke Mk IVT trainer, of which 457 were completed. A total of 626 Bolingbrokes were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk I</strong><br />
	Twin-engine maritime patrol bomber aircraft, powered by two Bristol Mercury VIII radial piston engines, with British equipment. 18 built.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk II</strong><br />
	Conversion of fifth Mk I with US equipment - prototype of Mk IV.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk III</strong><br />
	Floatplane conversion of sixteenth Bolingbroke Mk I, with two Edo floats.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk IV </strong>(Specifications below)<br />
	Twin-engine maritime patrol bomber aircraft, equipped with anti-icing boots and a dinghy, also fitted with American and Canadian instruments and equipment, powered by two Bristol Mercury XV radial piston engines, 134 built.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk IVW</strong><br />
	Sub-version of Mk IV powered by two 825 hp (615 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney SB4G Twin Wasp Junior radial piston engines as contingency against possible shortages of Mercury engines. The Mk IVW's performance was below that of the Mk IV and the supply of the British engines was maintained so production returned to the Mk IV after only 15 aircraft were built.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk IVC</strong><br />
	Version of Mk IV with 900 hp (671 kW) Wright R-1820 Cyclone engines not requiring high octane fuel. One built.<br />
	<strong>Bolingbroke Mk IVT</strong><br />
	Multi-purpose trainer aircraft. A total of 350 built powered by Mercury XV engines, followed by a further 107 powered by the low-octane fuel Mercury XX* engine, giving a total of 457 built, with a further 51 cancelled. Six Mk IVT were converted to dual controls. A further 89 were converted to Mk IVTT Target Tug with the addition of winching gear in the rear cabin and target drogue storage in the bomb bay.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke02.jpg.d8a31de317f99c2ed33c5bbb83ef4cd9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59020" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke02.thumb.jpg.d267e236829234298eebaa025ee423e7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Bolingbroke 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke03.jpg.318f41891d75b6c393221c23cc624670.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59021" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke03.thumb.jpg.78beede807112caf5fee6e61db298197.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Bolingbroke 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke04.jpg.ac4978482096a1f96b74921a673f407d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59022" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke04.thumb.jpg.93f6775f958d1206323df97032348bbd.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Bolingbroke 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke05.jpg.cc8c3965351cc0f83a53f7780ec07592.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59023" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BristolBolingbroke05.thumb.jpg.9f057c8b0b936d6c4398ec3c9da281ef.jpg" data-ratio="56.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Bolingbroke 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1584</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 09:56:32 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
