<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aircraft: Aircraft</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/page/11/?d=1</link><description>Aircraft: Aircraft</description><language>en</language><item><title>Republic P-43 Lancer</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/republic-p-43-lancer-r1098/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/640116186_RepublicP-43Lancer02.png.0a34ea8cde6d615b39bd19b8ffb401f5.png" /></p>
<p>
	The Republic P-43 Lancer was a single-engine, all-metal, low-wing monoplane fighter aircraft built by Republic, first delivered to the United States Army Air Corps in 1940.[1] A proposed development was the P-44 Rocket. While not a particularly outstanding fighter, the P-43A had a very good high-altitude performance coupled with an effective oxygen system. Fast and well-armed with excellent long-range capabilities, until the arrival of the Lockheed P-38 Lightning, the Lancer was the only American fighter capable of catching a Japanese Mitsubishi Ki-46 "Dinah" reconnaissance plane at the speeds and heights at which they flew. In addition, the P-43 flew many long-range, high-altitude photo recon missions until replaced by F-4/F-5 Lightnings (P-38 variants) in both the USAAF and RAAF.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Seversky Aircraft Company, which in 1939 changed its name to Republic, constructed a range of private venture, one-off variants of its P-35 design, featuring different powerplants and enhancements, designated AP-2, AP-7, AP-4 (which flew after the AP-7), AP-9, and XP-41. The series included a carrier-based version designated the NF-1 (Naval Fighter 1) that was also built. The most significant of these was the AP-4, which served as the basis for future Seversky/Republic aircraft. It featured fully retractable landing gear, flush riveting, and most significantly a Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1830-SC2G engine with a belly-mounted turbo-supercharger, producing 1,200 hp (890 kW) and good high-altitude performance. The turbo-supercharger had been refined by Boeing as part of the development program for the B-17 Flying Fortress, and the improved performance it offered was of great interest to other aircraft manufacturers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XP-41 and sole AP-4 were nearly identical, although the AP-4 was initially fitted with a large prop spinner and a tight-fitting engine cowling, as a testbed to evaluate means of improving the aerodynamics of radial-engined fighters, following similar experiments with the first production P-35. The AP-4's big spinner was later removed and a new tight cowling fitted. Unsurprisingly, these measures led to overheating problems. On 22 March 1939, the engine caught fire in flight, the pilot had to bail out, and the AP-4 was lost. Despite the loss of the prototype, the USAAC liked the turbo-supercharged AP-4 demonstrator enough to order 13 more in May 1939, designating them YP-43.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the YP-43 prototype, Operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_P-43_Lancer" rel="external nofollow">click here,</a> and for information on the Lancer's service in the RAAF, <a href="http://www.adf-serials.com.au/2a56.htm" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1319918326_RepublicP-43Lancer01.jpg.be203444f0fc976f98e32b2dca7542b8.jpg" data-fileid="51986" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Republic P-43 Lancer 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51986" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1045414293_RepublicP-43Lancer01.thumb.jpg.c917e0e17d18ff5195a45048fd2492b7.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1825935074_RepublicP-43Lancer03.jpg.1cd2197003f69a98652c9b2853655e55.jpg" data-fileid="51987" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Republic P-43 Lancer 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51987" data-ratio="52.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/721030717_RepublicP-43Lancer03.thumb.jpg.27531bd6002300f96d3955b993124e5a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2032499559_RepublicP-43Lancer04.jpg.aebacb7ee22220017a6795f8f36b46b9.jpg" data-fileid="51988" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Republic P-43 Lancer 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51988" data-ratio="54.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/906964794_RepublicP-43Lancer04.thumb.jpg.e376a9de63e7955b39e9816dd876d8e4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Republic P-43-1 Lancer A56-6, 1 A.P.U., Laverton, Sept 1943.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1736778816_RepublicP-43Lancer05.jpg.8c86f8e162746dc3f1db0ff14b4aa698.jpg" data-fileid="51989" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Republic P-43 Lancer 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51989" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/534536113_RepublicP-43Lancer05.thumb.jpg.ad434def2ecd2758b8a14c5a5f2a9a6d.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1098</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:05:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Republic P-47 Thunderbolt</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/republic-p-47-thunderbolt-r930/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1890383305_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt490460.jpg.cd27df25f46f7738ad2c0582e9053a0e.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Republic P-47 Thunderbolt is a World War II-era fighter aircraft produced by the American aerospace company Republic Aviation from 1941 through 1945. Its primary armament was eight .50-caliber machine guns, and in the fighter-bomber ground-attack role it could carry five-inch rockets or a bomb load of 2,500 lb (1,100 kg). When fully loaded, the P-47 weighed up to eight tons, making it one of the heaviest fighters of the war.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Thunderbolt was effective as a short-to medium-range escort fighter in high-altitude air-to-air combat and ground attack in both the European and Pacific theaters. The P-47 was designed around the powerful Pratt &amp; Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp 18-cylinder radial engine which also powered two U.S. Navy/U.S. Marine Corps fighters, the Grumman F6F Hellcat and the Vought F4U Corsair. An advanced turbo-supercharger system ensured the aircraft's eventual dominance at high-altitude, while also influencing its size and design.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The P-47 was one of the main United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) fighters of World War II, and also served with other Allied air forces, including those of France, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union. Mexican and Brazilian squadrons fighting alongside the USAAF also flew the P-47.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The armored cockpit was relatively roomy and comfortable and the bubble canopy introduced on the P-47D offered good visibility. Nicknamed the "Jug" owing to its appearance if stood on its nose, the P-47 was noted for its firepower, as well as its ability to resist battle damage and remain airworthy. A present-day U.S. ground-attack aircraft, the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II, takes its name from the P-47.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development and operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_P-47_Thunderbolt" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	There are so many variants, they have a section of their own. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_P-47_Thunderbolt_variants" rel="external nofollow">Click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/581383015_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt225068.jpg.0e9093b4d90ff19ed98bd5579436fd53.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50577" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1476728970_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt225068.thumb.jpg.30b72c9ff3dab895ef0ceddbf4e3acca.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic P-47 Thunderbolt 225068.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1066371924_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt226641.jpg.6e08ae97fe495124411c8e9c3debaa8b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50578" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/874533174_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt226641.thumb.jpg.3a61fcd86e9ff24886c724b1074a6c88.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic P-47 Thunderbolt 226641.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/803988719_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt226671.jpg.699455751b402a5cc4a5b31fe291cda5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50579" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1018920410_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt226671.thumb.jpg.bdeea0b385202071c155d0b88e16037d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic P-47 Thunderbolt 226671.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1524965681_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt433240.jpg.1b3acbc3facafca1225f0f63f7972690.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50580" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1006819630_RepublicP-47Thunderbolt433240.thumb.jpg.bd66d6605350c0146961ef57a1404975.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic P-47 Thunderbolt 433240.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">930</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:32:05 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ryan FR Fireball</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/ryan-fr-fireball-r1630/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball01.jpg.cb7f576094fa9a57121c3ff3c38eb7e4.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Ryan FR Fireball was an American mixed-power (piston and jet-powered) fighter aircraft designed by Ryan Aeronautical for the United States Navy during World War II. It was the Navy's first aircraft with a jet engine. Only 66 aircraft were built before Japan surrendered in August 1945. The FR-1 Fireball equipped a single squadron before the war's end, but did not see combat. The aircraft ultimately proved to lack the structural strength required for operations aboard aircraft carriers and was withdrawn in mid-1947.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Design of the FR-1 began in 1943 to a proposal instigated by Admiral John S. McCain Sr. for a mixed-powered fighter because early jet engines had sluggish acceleration that was considered unsafe and unsuitable for carrier operations. Ryan received a contract for three XFR-1 prototypes and one static test airframe on 11 February 1943 with the first two prototypes delivered in 14 months. Another contract was placed for 100 aircraft on 2 December 1943 and a later contract on 31 January 1945 increased the total of FR-1s on order to 700.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XFR-1 was a single-seat, low-wing monoplane with tricycle landing gear. A 1,350-horsepower (1,010 kW) Wright R-1820-72W Cyclone radial engine was mounted in the fighter's nose while a 1,600 lbf (7,100 N) General Electric I-16 (later redesignated as the J-31) turbojet was mounted in the rear fuselage. It was fed by ducts in each wing root which meant that the wing had to be relatively thick to house the ducts and the outward-retracting main landing gear. To simplify the fuel system, both engines used the same grade of avgas. Two self-sealing fuel tanks were housed in the fuselage, one of 130 US gallons (490 L; 110 imp gal) and the other of 50 US gallons (190 L; 42 imp gal). The cockpit was positioned just forward of the leading edge of the wing and the pilot was provided with a bubble canopy which gave him excellent visibility. The XFR-1 had the first laminar flow airfoil in a navy carrier aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Fireball was armed with four .50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns with 300 rounds per gun. They were mounted in the center section of the wing, immediately outboard of the air intakes for the jet engine. Four 5-inch (127 mm) rockets could be carried under each outer wing panel and two hardpoints were provided under the center section for 1,000 lb (454 kg) bombs or 100 US gal (380 L; 83 imp gal) drop tanks. Armor plates were provided in front and behind the pilot's seat and for the oil cooler.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of design, development and operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_FR_Fireball" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XFR-1</strong><br />
	Military designation of the prototype Model 28 aircraft, three built.<br />
	<strong>FR-1 Fireball</strong><br />
	Single-seat fighter aircraft, 66 built. (Specifications below)<br />
	<strong>FR-2</strong><br />
	Conversion with a Wright R-1820-74W replacing earlier piston engine, one aircraft modified.<br />
	<strong>FR-3</strong><br />
	Proposed variant with a General Electric I-20 replacing earlier jet engine; never built.<br />
	<strong>XFR-4</strong><br />
	Variant with Westinghouse J34; one built.[7]J34-WE-12.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball02.jpg.1ee8d406411a047d7fb67f2b2b7bf5b8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59457" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball02.thumb.jpg.bd30357bd5f24fc2c3267ea9f0a5bc7b.jpg" data-ratio="52.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Ryan FR Fireball 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball03.jpg.7e9f946feda000ed22f8a133e37648d9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59458" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball03.thumb.jpg.7e132bb909c387e98071ddfdd9799b6d.jpg" data-ratio="60.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Ryan FR Fireball 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball04.jpg.c1fe906d3f0332e8bd79075881119922.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59459" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball04.thumb.jpg.405d8933df9e875bffd4f930eabc4f77.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Ryan FR Fireball 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball05.jpg.88f4729ab15dee5e2ae3c93b695f2561.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59460" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/RyanFRFireball05.thumb.jpg.cac27ee9a33810bdb9a2ffa86c7fd98d.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Ryan FR Fireball 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1630</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:18:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ryan ST</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/ryan-st-r947/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/250140118_RyanSTMVH-AWGYMEL20100320.jpg.493a0adb1fa78cc3f4c4edee69f3fcd6.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Ryan STs were a series of two seat, low-wing monoplane aircraft built in the United States by the Ryan Aeronautical Company. They were used as sport aircraft, as well as trainers by flying schools and the militaries of several countries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	T. Claude Ryan was the founder of the Ryan Aeronautical Company, the second incarnation of a company with this name, and the fourth company with which he had been involved to bear his name[1] (the first, Ryan Airlines, was the manufacturer of the Ryan NYP, more famously known as the Spirit of St. Louis). He began the development of the ST (for "Sport Trainer", and also known as S-T),[2] the first design of the company, in 1933.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The ST featured two open cockpits in tandem in a semi-monocoque metal fuselage of two main frames – one steel, the other half of steel and half of aluminium alloy (alclad) – to take the loads from the wing spars and six more alclad frames; and alclad skin. It had wings in three sections of hybrid construction; the center section integral with the fuselage had tubular steel spars, the front spar a simple tube with an external brace to the upper fuselage, and the rear spar in the form of a parallel chord truss. The two outer wing panels had wooden spars and alclad ribs, with diagonal rods bracing the wings internally. Alclad sheet was used to form the leading edges, and fabric covered the whole structure. When attached, the outer wings were braced with flying wires to the fixed conventional landing gear and landing wires to the upper fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A large number of STMs were exported in the 1930s and early 1940s (prior to the entry of the United States into World War II) to various air forces, with the biggest customer being the military of the Netherlands East Indies, now Indonesia. The Netherlands East Indies Army and Navy took delivery of 84 STM-2s and 24 STM-S2s in 1940 and early 1941.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	After the Japanese invasion of the Netherlands East Indies many Ryans in that country were pressed into combat, especially in reconnaissance roles, and large numbers were shot down or destroyed on the ground. Surviving STM-2s and STM-S2s that were not captured by the Japanese were shipped to Australia, where 34 entered service in the Royal Australian Air Force as trainers. Many of those that survived until the end of World War II were then placed on the civil register in Australia and elsewhere, and some are still flying more than 70 years after they were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the development, operational history and numreous variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_ST" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/943889324_RyanSTMS23rear.jpg.1378bdf9924f0c73d3505d8835d19b01.jpg" data-fileid="50700" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Ryan STM S23 rear.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="50700" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/43308459_RyanSTMS23rear.thumb.jpg.cd38d4951c4c2479e804690207620d5a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-2-NX466WA-S-30.jpg.ee027d6712c8aac750bf2bc4a0d08689.jpg" data-fileid="50701" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Ryan-STM-2-NX466WA-S-30.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="50701" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-2-NX466WA-S-30.thumb.jpg.346afc7a14812075184f6f0b74051c57.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-NC17343.jpg.1eb99fe29e3ef2e9f645df12bd5bdb0a.jpg" data-fileid="50702" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Ryan-STM-NC17343.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="50702" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-NC17343.thumb.jpg.1dec2074a819ec18324ebdcca6e1a951.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-ZK-ABC.jpg.278f3128215056905c12dd410ec8e95f.jpg" data-fileid="50703" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Ryan-STM-ZK-ABC.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="50703" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/Ryan-STM-ZK-ABC.thumb.jpg.8872a2cfe69c2cb7f7f0d4528b424fd7.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">947</guid><pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:48:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Saab 17</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/saab-17-r1582/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1704.jpg.caa4a5d08e515ef61328d9b8b6d13e39.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Saab 17 is a Swedish single-engine monoplane reconnaissance dive-bomber aircraft of the 1940s originally developed by ASJA prior to its merger into Saab. It was the first all-metal stressed skin aircraft developed in Sweden.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The project was initiated in response to a 1938 request from the Flygvapnet (Swedish Air Force) for a reconnaissance aircraft to replace the obsolete Fokker S 6 (C.Ve) sesquiplane. Design work began at the end of the 1930s as the L 10 by ASJA, but once accepted by the Flygvapnet it was assigned the designations B 17 and S 17 for the bomber and reconnaissance versions respectively, and it became better known as the Saab 17.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design chosen was a conventional mid-wing cantilever monoplane with a long greenhouse canopy and a single radial engine in the nose. Control surfaces were covered in fabric but the remainder was stressed-skin duraluminum. It could be fitted with wheels or skiis, both of which retracted straight to the rear along the underside of the wing, leaving prominent fairings, and when fitted with wheels the undercarriage doors could be used as dive brakes. A retractable tailwheel was provided. A floatplane version was built in small numbers for coastal reconnaissance to replace the obsolete Svenska S 5, with massive fairings joining the floats to the wings where the wheels would have been. To maintain stability small vertical fins were added to the horizontal stabilizer. The wings were reinforced so that it could be used as a dive bomber and bomb racks were provided under the wings, along with a small bomb bay below the cockpit, although some examples used a conventional rack on the centreline, while on the bomber versions, a crutch was fitted to swing the bomb clear of the aircraft in vertical diving attacks, when the bomb could otherwise have passed through the propeller. The reconnaissance versions lacked the crutch. Split flaps broken into four segments were fitted to the underside trailing edge of the wing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Two L 10 prototypes were ordered, the first being powered by a 880 hp (660 kW) Bristol Mercury XII radial engine built by Nohab in Sweden, and the second with an imported 1,065 hp (794 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1830 Twin Wasp C radial.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Supplies of suitable engines remained a major problem, and resulted in the aircraft being built in three versions with different engines. The definitive B 17A used the Swedish-built STWC-3 (Swedish Twin Wasp C-3), an unlicenced copy of the R-1830. The B 17B used a Bristol Mercury XXIV built by Svenska Flygmotor AB (SFA) in Sweden, and the B 17C used an imported 1,060 hp (790 kW) Piaggio P.XI radial from Italy. The United States government denied a request to purchase a licence to build the Twin Wasp, so an unlicensed, reverse engineered copy was built instead as the STWC-3 (Swedish Twin Wasp C-3) to supplement and replace the lower powered Mercury radials already being built under licence. Until production caught up to demand, the earliest aircraft being delivered were flown to their destinations, the engines were removed and shipped back, to be used on the next aircraft to be delivered.Number built    326 (including 2 prototypes)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Company designations</strong><br />
	<strong>L 10</strong><br />
	internal ASJA/Saab designation; two produced
</p>

<p>
	Saab S 17BS mounted on floats<br />
	<strong>L 10A</strong><br />
	internal ASJA/Saab designation for 17A, B, and C<br />
	<strong>L 10BL</strong><br />
	internal ASJA/Saab designation for S17BL<br />
	<strong>L 10BS</strong><br />
	internal ASJA/Saab designation for S17BS<br />
	<strong>Flygvapnet designations<br />
	P 7</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong>     </strong>L 10 development prototypes<br />
	<strong>B 8</strong><br />
	Preliminary designation for bomber version of L 10, not used
</p>

<p>
	<strong>B 17A</strong><br />
	Bomber with 1,065 hp (794 kW) Svenska Flygmotor Aktiebolaget (SFA)-built STWC-3 (Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1830-S1C3G Twin Wasp) radial engine; 132 built<br />
	<strong>B 17B</strong><br />
	Bomber with 980 hp (730 kW) SFA-built Bristol Mercury XXIV radial engine; 55 built<br />
	<strong>B 17C</strong><br />
	Bomber with 1,060 hp (790 kW) Piaggio P.XIbis R.C.40D radial engine; 77 built<br />
	<strong>S 15</strong><br />
	Preliminary designation for reconnaissance version of the L 10, not used<br />
	<strong>S 17BL</strong><br />
	Reconnaissance version of B 17B with wheeled or ski landing gear; 21 built<br />
	<strong>S 17BS</strong><br />
	Reconnaissance version of B 17B with floats, powered by a Bristol Mercury XXIV engine; 38 built
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1701.jpg.0e9068e26b7f094b1c5308b4b54e4bb5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58973" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1701.thumb.jpg.6f38c4c0f76daea195fc468db2c3c120.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab 17 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1702.jpg.68e8d2fda1dfa848d50a42508784604d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58974" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1702.thumb.jpg.db13250e9aaca0bfb1dfbf79f66ebc1d.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab 17 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1703.jpg.9f57e25b530ce03a88497cde9adb12a6.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58975" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1703.thumb.jpg.079330cfabed48e9c38a6f5141236461.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab 17 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1705.jpg.100c98814b2dedc7ee96cb3e84f094e0.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58977" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/Saab1705.thumb.jpg.75645962669200a79d6aa8081bd1cdcf.jpg" data-ratio="68.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab 17 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1582</guid><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 02:49:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Saab J 21R</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/saab-j-21r-r1716/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R01.jpg.bbbc462fc4692fe808a0c9c5def6bfd4.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Saab 21R was a Swedish fighter/attack aircraft developed and produced by Svenska Aeroplan AB (SAAB). It was a jet-powered development of the piston-engined SAAB 21 and was the first jet aircraft to be produced by Saab. The R-suffix stands for reaktion (reaction), referencing reaktionsdrift (jet power) or reaktionsmotor (jet engine). Along with the Soviet Yakovlev Yak-15, the 21R was one of only two jet fighters to have been successfully converted from piston-powered aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Sweden was under threat during the Second World War, and ordered SAAB to develop an advanced fighter. The result was an unorthodox twin-boom pusher, with a low wing, tricycle landing gear, and a heavy forward-firing armament. Several options were then explored to improve its performance, leading to a jet-powered version.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During 1947, SAAB began converting the piston-engined J 21s to jet propulsion, which required extensive modifications. 124 aircraft were planned, however this was reduced to 64 and they were instead mainly used as fighter-bombers. It saw service in the late 1940s and early 1950s before it was replaced by a new generation of fighters designed from the onset with jet propulsion, such as the de Havilland Vampire and the Saab 29 Tunnan.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the early stages of the Second World War, Sweden was concerned that its neutrality and its independence could be threatened by one of the belligerent powers, and so enacted a series of emergency measures to increase its military's preparedness and deterrence value against potential aggressors. Between 1939 and 1941, the Swedish Air Force committed itself to a major expansion programme, which included the procurement of large numbers of foreign and locally developed fighters. As a consequence of the conflict, few nations possessed available production capacity or a willingness to supply modern fighters to Sweden, being a relatively small neutral country. While Sweden's own domestic production capability would be insufficient until at least 1943, Sweden would have to develop its own first-rate designs to meet its needs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1941, in response to Swedish Air Force requirements, the Swedish aviation company SAAB commenced work on a radical new fighter.The company envisioned an unorthodox twin-boom pusher configuration fighter aircraft, featuring a low wing, a tricycle landing gear, and with a heavy forward-firing armament. It was powered by a licensed version of the new German Daimler-Benz DB 605B inline piston engine, which was refined and built by Svenska Flygmotor AB. The Swedish Air Force designated it the J 21, and a prototype was flown on 30 July 1943.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	By 1945, options were being explored to improve its performance. Many of these involved the substitution of the 605B engine with a more powerful powerplant. During the first half of the year, a variant was planned with a 2,000 hp (1,500 kW) Rolls-Royce Griffon engine which would have raised the top speed to 416 mph (669 km/h). Other projects, such as the SAAB 27, were intended to use the Griffon as well, but by the end of the year, all work on the piston-engine design was abandoned.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In parallel with the piston-engine studies, SAAB and other Swedish companies had been evaluating a new type of engine - the jet engine. Two early studies, RX 1 and RX 2, had been studied, both of which being twin-boom aircraft similar to the 21. Recognising the Swedish Air Force's enthusiasm for a jet-powered aircraft for late 1945, SAAB decided to produce a version of the 21 harnessing jet propulsion. A design study was initiated for converting the J 21A to jet power. It was recognized that Sweden would otherwise be left behind while nations such as the United Kingdom already had the Gloster Meteor and de Havilland Vampire in production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design study was proceeding in late 1945 despite no specific engine having been chosen, but the opportunity came up to purchase a license to manufacture the "Goblin 2" turbojet engine in Sweden. This was the first jet engine to be used by the Swedish Air Force, who designated it as the RM1. The first flight of Saab's first jet aircraft, a converted J 21, was on 10 March 1947, powered with a single Goblin 2 engine. The results of the flight test programme were largely satisfactory.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During 1947, SAAB began to receive piston-engined J 21s to convert them to jet propulsion. This requiring each aircraft to be extensively modified. In all, in over 50 per cent of the airframe, tailplane and wing was changed and, each of them was equipped with a single British-sourced de Havilland Goblin turbojet engine, which replaced the DB 605B and propeller unit. It became the Swedish Air Force's first jet aircraft. In light of the extensive changes, rebuilt 21s were redesignated J 21R.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>J 21RA</strong> – First production series, intended as fighters, powered by British-built de Havilland Goblin II engines, 34 built in 1950 (including four prototypes)
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>A 21RA</strong> – J 21RA redesignated as attackers in 1951 and modified to carry external attack ordnance, retired in 1953
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	<strong>J 21RB</strong> – Second production series, intended as fighters, powered by Swedish-built de Havilland Goblin III engines, 30 built between 1950 and 1952
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		<strong>A 21RB</strong> – J 21RB redesignated as attackers in 1951 and modified to carry external attack ordnance, retired in 1956
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	For more details of development and operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_21R" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R02.jpg.761617d985b456296aa84d407f979eb7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60998" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R02.thumb.jpg.deb5dae08af502ae557ee93f127ceb9c.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab J 21R 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R03.jpg.38bd570e508aeec89adc73142ca79a78.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60999" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R03.thumb.jpg.7543f3cdd6f2c6ab66bd8986dbe46fb5.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab J 21R 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R04.jpg.df18bbffc5a6275497699477b23dae5a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61000" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R04.thumb.jpg.16bfb3dea9777c323b90b6a2fcef735b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab J 21R 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R065.jpg.5117e336d05a3e1ec9662833e21559b9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61001" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/SaabJ21R065.thumb.jpg.f90f3027868178f9da57ad6fa8df2790.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Saab J 21R 065.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1716</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SAI KZ VII</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/sai-kz-vii-r63/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1583405908_SAI-KZ-VII-Laerke-OY-AAD.jpg" /></p>
<p>Based on the SAI KZ III air ambulance, the KZ VII was a strut-braced, high-wing monoplane of conventional design with an enclosed cabin for four seats. Fifty-six aircraft were built, and another 22 partially completed aircraft were destroyed in a factory fire in 1947. The Danish Air Force operated 10 of the type as trainers between 1950 and 1977.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeOY-AAD.jpg.973bd2e7bde498651ecd567e6611370a.jpg" data-fileid="43795" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43795" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="SAIKZVIILaerkeOY-AAD.jpg_thumb.973bd2e7bde498651ecd567e6611370a.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeOY-AAD.jpg_thumb.973bd2e7bde498651ecd567e6611370a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeD-EFIF.jpg.695bfe4ed26ef3712973fea2a7a44fc9.jpg" data-fileid="43796" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43796" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="SAIKZVIILaerkeD-EFIF.jpg_thumb.695bfe4ed26ef3712973fea2a7a44fc9.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeD-EFIF.jpg_thumb.695bfe4ed26ef3712973fea2a7a44fc9.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeO-620.jpg.b6c27e28feb240c35d0a8364365bb380.jpg" data-fileid="43797" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43797" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="SAIKZVIILaerkeO-620.jpg_thumb.b6c27e28feb240c35d0a8364365bb380.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeO-620.jpg_thumb.b6c27e28feb240c35d0a8364365bb380.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeO-622.jpg.fad17cbb8d4fab9aa07c1c4815668fb3.jpg" data-fileid="43798" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43798" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="SAIKZVIILaerkeO-622.jpg_thumb.fad17cbb8d4fab9aa07c1c4815668fb3.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SAIKZVIILaerkeO-622.jpg_thumb.fad17cbb8d4fab9aa07c1c4815668fb3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">63</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Seversky SEV-3</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/seversky-sev-3-r1773/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-301.jpg.271ce5864c2d1baefeb9c701c3d25142.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Seversky SEV-3 was an American three-seat amphibian monoplane, the first aircraft designed and built by the Seversky Aircraft Corporation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The SEV-3 was an all-metal cantilever low-wing monoplane powered by a nose-mounted 420 hp (313 kW) Wright J-6 Whirlwind radial engine. It had two cockpits in tandem, a forward cockpit for the pilot and a rear cockpit for two passengers, both with sliding canopies. It could either be fitted with twin amphibious floats which had main wheels fitted in the floats to allow it to operate from land, or with a fixed tailwheel undercarriage with the mainwheels enclosed in large fairings.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The SEV-3 first flew as a floatplane in June 1933, demonstrating excellent performance as both an amphibian and a landplane. It was built in small numbers mainly for export.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An SEV-3 established a world speed record for piston-engined amphibians in 1933, and on 15 September 1935, a Wright Cyclone-powered SEV-3 set a record of 230 mph (370.8 km/h) which stood for 49 years. A landplane version was also developed with conventional landing gear.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design influenced a long line of Seversky and later Republic aircraft, eventually leading to the development of the P-47 Thunderbolt. A landplane version was used by the United States Army Air Corps as a basic trainer with the designation BT-8, 30 of which were ordered in 1935. This proved grossly underpowered and was quickly replaced by the North American BT-9.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	One BT-8 was delivered to Bolling Field, on 11 June 1936, for use by Chief of the Air Corps Major General Oscar Westover, and assigned to the 14th Bombardment Squadron, GHQ Air Force. It replaced an O-38F, which was reassigned to the 21st Observation Squadron, GHQ Air Force, for general flying.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>SEV-3XAR</strong><br />
	Landplane trainer
</p>

<p>
	<strong>SEV-3XLR</strong><br />
	Landplane<br />
	<strong>SEV-3M-WW</strong><br />
	Amphibian for the Colombian Air Force, six built (only delivered four to Colombia), with Wright Whirlwind engines.<br />
	<strong>BT-8</strong>            (Specifications below)<br />
	Landplane basic-trainer for the United States Army Air Corps, developed from SEV-3XAR. 30 built.<br />
	<strong>SEV-X-BT</strong><br />
	multi-discipline trainer version of the BT-8 with retractable undercarriage. The sole SEV-X-BT lost in competition to the North American BT-9 and was reportedly scrapped for spares to service the Seversky 2PA.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-302.jpg.2586b9cd58b8508759edbac16c52798b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61842" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-302.thumb.jpg.7b972ea7b8f67a9274c0440dcd1c7f20.jpg" data-ratio="52.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Seversky SEV-3 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-303.jpg.032016e903297f1440ae86a1b11ffa00.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61843" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-303.thumb.jpg.3d4fb0f473824fe2eb4ac762a59df74b.jpg" data-ratio="55" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Seversky SEV-3 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-304.jpg.cf07ad79471aee6bf75fcb917f6c0e04.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61844" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-304.thumb.jpg.4d1fa05e56081c8571dc4c2a9ecd928a.jpg" data-ratio="45.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Seversky SEV-3 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-305.jpg.5fc682d5f2ec041266aa1bdb44d52f3e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61845" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/SeverskySEV-305.thumb.jpg.49e3f944ecd5f895a702ab82bb9839bb.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Seversky SEV-3 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1773</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:13:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Short Seamew</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/short-seamew-r1609/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew01.jpg.13b6372567981bfbf4cd68fb8836c883.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	<em>Not to be confused with the 1928 Supermarine Seamew or 1940 Curtiss SO3C Seamew.</em>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Short SB.6 Seamew was a British aircraft designed in 1951 by David Keith-Lucas of Shorts as a lightweight anti-submarine platform to replace the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (FAA)'s Grumman Avenger AS 4 with the Reserve branch of the service. It first flew on 23 August 1953, but, due to poor performance coupled with shifting defence doctrine, it never reached service and only 24 production aircraft had flown before the project was cancelled. It has been described as a "camel amongst race-horses".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Short Seamew was selected to fulfill Admiralty Specification M.123D for a simple, lightweight anti-submarine aircraft capable of unassisted operation from any of the Royal Navy's aircraft carriers in all but the worst of conditions, in particular escort carriers which the UK still had in considerable numbers from the Second World War. Although specifically designed for naval operations, the Seamew was also intended for land-based use by the RAF. It was to be suitable for mass production and operation by the Air Branch of the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve (RNVR). This specification was in response to the alarming increase in capabilities of the Soviet submarine forces following the Second World War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Three prototypes were ordered in April 1952 and the first flight (XA209), piloted by test pilot Sqn. Ldr. Walter J. "Wally" Runciman, took place on 23 August 1953. This same aircraft, also piloted by Runciman, took part in the 1953 Farnborough Airshow three weeks later. In 1954 both XA209 and the second prototype XA213 took part at Farnborough, where the following year both prototypes and two production AS Mk 1 models (XE171 and XE172) gave a formation display.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The pilot and observer were located in tandem cockpits located high up in the front of the deep, narrow fuselage, creating a decidedly "curious" profile. They sat atop the Armstrong Siddeley Mamba turboprop in front and the weapons bay to the rear of them. The design had originally called for the tried and tested Rolls-Royce Merlin piston engine but the Royal Navy had made it policy to phase out piston engines, in order that supplies of highly flammable high octane aviation fuel need not be carried in large quantities on ships. The turboprop engine also caused less airframe vibration so that the pilot could be sat directly over it with the absence of a piston engine ignition system which would have interfered with the radar scanner mounted below the engine housing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For simplicity, and so that a nosewheel would not obscure the forward field of the radar scanner, a fixed tailwheel undercarriage was used. The long stroke necessary on the main undercarriage to allow for heavy deck landings while giving the radar scanner and propeller adequate clearance from the ground resulted in an alarming attitude on the ground and the cockpits mounted at a seemingly perilous height. For landing the tailwheel extended so it could land at a more level attitude.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The pilot and observer sat very far forward in order for the pilot to have a reasonable field of downward vision for takeoff and landing and so that both he and the observer had a good field of view for spotting surface vessels even when in level flight. A total of 26 Seamew were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants.</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>SB.6 Seamew</strong><br />
	Three prototype anti-submarine aircraft, one completed as a structural test rig.<br />
	<strong>SB.6 Seamew AS.1</strong>   (Specifications below)<br />
	Production anti-submarine aircraft for the Royal Navy, 60 aircraft ordered later amended to 30 but only 24 completed.<br />
	<strong>SC.2 Seamew MR.2</strong><br />
	Production aircraft for the Royal Air Force Coastal Command, larger wheels with low-pressure tyres, manual wing-folding and no deck handling gear, 30 aircraft ordered but only 4-built that were converted or completed to AS.1 standard.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew02.jpg.524861cbb9500dc2760b9c704f08bf80.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59284" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew02.thumb.jpg.35e97cbb54bea90ffafea1da1a25665c.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Seamew 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew03.jpg.6c88fea2036b8f85bf7c76e0c3f1e947.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59285" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew03.thumb.jpg.06095639e68ec4a4b4f982f4efbee1b5.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Seamew 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew04.jpg.2dd220a4168c3fc62b0527432a271daa.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59286" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew04.thumb.jpg.56ab5134b40c01e56ad215f235158b6c.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Seamew 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew05.jpg.09812ac1e859cdba287d481f69dc216f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59287" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/ShortSeamew05.thumb.jpg.8e2d5e10f273aba4f4a40614646a6abf.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Seamew 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1609</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 04:56:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Short Stirling</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/short-stirling-r663/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1797456390_ShortSterlingbnw.jpg.5a903f887a517efbc63ec75e4009cf5e.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	It has the distinction of being the first four-engined bomber to be introduced into service with the Royal Air Force (RAF).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Stirling was designed during the late 1930s by Short Brothers to conform with the requirements laid out in Air Ministry Specification B.12/36. Prior to this, the RAF had been primarily interested in developing increasingly capable twin-engined bombers but had been persuaded to investigate a prospective four-engined bomber as a result of promising foreign developments in the field. Out of the submissions made to the specification Supermarine proposed the Type 317, which was viewed as the favourite, whereas Short's submission, named the S.29, was selected as an alternative. When the preferred Type 317 had to be abandoned the S.29, which later received the name Stirling, proceeded to production.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Short Stirling was a four-engined monoplane heavy bomber designed to provide a previously unmatched level of strategic bombing capability to the Royal Air Force (RAF). It was powered by four Bristol Hercules radial engines which were spaced across its mid-mounted wing. The Stirling has the distinction of being the only British bomber of the period to see service that had been designed from the start with four engines - the Avro Lancaster was a re-engined, stretched-wingspan Avro Manchester while the Halifax was planned to be powered by twin Rolls-Royce Vulture engines but was similarly re-designed to use an arrangement of four Merlin engines in 1937.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although smaller than both of the pre-war American "XBLR"-designation designs (the 149-foot wingspan, 35-ton Boeing XB-15 and the 212-foot wingspan, 79-ton Douglas XB-19) and nearly as large Soviet experimental heavy bomber designs, the Stirling had considerably more power and far better payload/range than anything then flying from any British-based aviation firm. The massive 14,000 lb (6.25 long tons, 6,340 kg) bomb load put it in a class of its own, double that of any other bomber. It was longer and taller than the Handley Page Halifax and the Avro Lancaster which replaced it but both of these were originally designed to have twin engines.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development, design, operational history and six variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Stirling" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1586225891_ShortSterlinghardstand.jpg.e7d9ed6af02267d741e94be476b2f0ba.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48249" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1129059222_ShortSterlinghardstand.thumb.jpg.1c057b1084651b84d9e40ef259a74652.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Sterling hard stand.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1026909357_ShortSterlingleftqtr.jpg.c9c6a49ba455918772dcaca117579324.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48250" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/170646105_ShortSterlingleftqtr.thumb.jpg.7866badc3e01428c0e37757b6722e4d8.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Short Sterling left qtr.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/833257490_shortstirlinginflight.jpg.55f205249a5fb7bc7eb1183ad8935a06.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48251" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1372770737_shortstirlinginflight.thumb.jpg.89a4921163928a6a0771585bad82fb00.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="short stirling in flight.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/2116911348_shortstirlingwithcrew.jpg.7647d1c79c6a50f767ebcd6597c80ef8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48252" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/1326302576_shortstirlingwithcrew.thumb.jpg.df28fb29938fc5561666228f6dafdc9a.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="short stirling with crew.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">663</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 11:47:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Short Sturgeon</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/short-sturgeon-r1433/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/1366123986_shortsturgeon01.jpg.61919f076150e01c51a24500e00fbbdb.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Short Sturgeon was a planned British carrier-borne reconnaissance bomber whose development began during Second World War with the S.6/43 requirement for a high-performance torpedo bomber, which was later refined into the S.11/43 requirement which was won by the Sturgeon. With the end of the war in the Pacific production of the aircraft carriers from which the Sturgeon was intended to operate was suspended and the original reconnaissance bomber specification was cancelled.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Sturgeon was then redesigned as a target tug which saw service with the fleet for a number of years. Later, the basic Sturgeon design was reworked as a prototype anti-submarine aircraft. The many modifications that resulted turned the promising design into a "hapless and grotesque-looking hybrid."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The development process leading to the S.38 Sturgeon began with the 1943 S.6/43 requirement for a high-performance torpedo bomber with a bomb bay that could accommodate six 500-pound (230 kg) bombs or any of the current standard aerial torpedoes, operating from Audacious and Centaur-class aircraft carriers. A maximum all-up-weight of 24,000 lb (11,000 kg) was specified. Short Brothers were not invited to respond to S.6/43, but the preliminary responses from the other participating manufacturers indicated that a twin-engined design meeting all requirements was likely to weigh in excess of 24,000 lbs, while a single-engined design was unlikely to exceed the performance of in-service aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	S.6/43 was allowed to proceed, and there are indications that Shorts submitted two uninvited tenders, a single-engined Bristol Centaurus design and a twin-Rolls-Royce Merlin design. However, none of the original S.6/43 submissions was adopted and no reference to the Shorts submissions has been located in the official documentation. Focus instead shifted to splitting the requirements, with the torpedo bomber requirement becoming O.5/43, eventually leading to the Fairey Spearfish, while S.11/43 was written for a reconnaissance aircraft able to operate as a bomber.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specification S.11/43 called for the design and construction of a twin-engine naval reconnaissance aircraft for visual and photographic reconnaissance and shadowing, by day or night, and also able to operate as a bomber. The specification included a maximum all-up weight of 24,000 lb, height (stowed) of 17 ft (5.2 m), length of 45 ft (13.7 m) and a wingspan of 60 ft (18.3 m) (spread) / 20 ft (6.1 m) (folded). Powered wing-folding was also required.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Shorts submitted the twin-Merlin S.38 Sturgeon as their tender to S.11/43, while Armstrong Whitworth proposed the twin-Merlin powered AW.54. After the AW.54 was criticized for lack of power, the AW.54A with two MetroVick F.3 turbojets was submitted. Submissions were also made by Blackburn and Fairey (also with twin-Merlin designs) and by Westland with a mixed-power design comprising a Pratt &amp; Whitney R-4360 Wasp Major radial in the nose and a Halford H.1 turbojet in the tail. On 19 October 1943, Shorts received the "Instruction to Proceed" and an order for three prototypes designated Sturgeon S.1, with military serials RK787, RK791 and RK794 assigned. The final tailored S.11/43 requirements followed in February 1944.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The pilot's cockpit was a sub-assembly bolted to the front of the spar, placing him level with the leading edge of the wing, the navigator was behind the centre section of the wing and the radio operator — separated from the navigator by his equipment — behind him. The navigator and radio operator entered through a door, which acted as a ladder when opened, in the starboard side with their seats being offset to port. The cameras were installed in the fuselage behind the radio operator. One of the Sturgeon's unfortunate failings was in placement of controls. The fire extinguisher switch was located next to the cockpit switches required for firing the engine starter cartridges, resulting in some inadvertent mishaps and some unintended hilarity for ground crews.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on design and development, operational history, and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_Sturgeon" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/1427860094_shortsturgeon02.jpg.2a1b9265e3068ffb90ceef256926d214.jpg" data-fileid="55843" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="short sturgeon 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="55843" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/125040394_shortsturgeon02.thumb.jpg.e391a49f2808c8bb46b78acacae0f57d.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/1576149690_shortsturgeon03.jpg.aff14979a77de0af8e6a9988ac3ca7e4.jpg" data-fileid="55844" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="short sturgeon 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="55844" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/1637528929_shortsturgeon03.thumb.jpg.cab341f5a8b226656b105b00afaf929e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/820886139_shortsturgeon04.jpg.7965f10711f6b6331294e35aa78ad02b.jpg" data-fileid="55845" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="short sturgeon 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="55845" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/776043104_shortsturgeon04.thumb.jpg.df6d4a78f4a0e010ea88807876dffe49.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/479761243_shortsturgeon05.jpg.e4b1e484da507321fe20fcd8cc5af42e.jpg" data-fileid="55846" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="short sturgeon 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="55846" data-ratio="45.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/1081082274_shortsturgeon05.thumb.jpg.178cee61e0b96a0a3a54e97725a98ee6.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/451589645_shortsturgeon06.jpg.2446faa2e64decf272eaa7c3aac10bc6.jpg" data-fileid="55847" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="short sturgeon 06.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="55847" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_12/945409395_shortsturgeon06.thumb.jpg.57218855c81bb6b01312c7e5d349da2b.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1433</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 02:24:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>SNCAC Martinet</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/sncac-martinet-r1553/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/Nordnc70203.jpg.4a8dfef7cd53813ceceea5b29ca4a8c7.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The SNCAC Martinet was a German-designed but French-built twin-engined military trainer and light transport monoplane. It was operated by the French military and in small numbers by French airlines from the late 1940s.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	To aide the German war effort the SNCAC factory at Bourges was ordered to produce 455 Siebel Si 204s light transports for the Luftwaffe. Production started in 1942 and 168 had been delivered before the Liberation stopped production. The French decided to continue producing the aircraft and designated the aircraft NC.700. Only a prototype NC.700 was built powered by Renault 12S-00 engines (derived from the German AS-411) although the designation was also used for a small number of aircraft originally intended for the Luftwaffe and diverted to the French Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The company then produced two variants; the NC.701 Martinet based on the Si 204D with a glazed unstepped nose and powered by two Renault 12S engines, and the NC.702 Martinet with a conventional stepped windscreen nose based on the Si 204A.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Martinet was used by both the French Air Force and Navy and the final example did not retire until 1963. A small number were used by commercial operators including Air France but were soon replaced by larger aircraft like the Douglas DC-3. A number were used by the French Postal Service but they were grounded following an accident to F-BBFA is July 1946. The aircraft was used by the IGN for photo-survey work and a few aircraft were also exported to Poland and Sweden for use on photo-mapping duties.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>NC.700</strong><br />
	A Renault 12S powered Si-204, one prototype.<br />
	<strong>NC.701  </strong>(Specifications below)<br />
	Trainer version with dual controls and transparent nose based on the Si-204D. Room for five students as a radio trainer.<br />
	<strong>NC.702</strong><br />
	Eight-seat transport version based on the Si-204A.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>NC701</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/nc70204.jpg.97b51619ef1fd9ae771f0ea20d7d5f08.jpg" data-fileid="57834" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="nc702 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57834" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/nc70204.thumb.jpg.027036dc728ad8669dcdb5c5fc84c471.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>NC702</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/nc70205.jpg.ad3e4a4d20c1bff6960825b49203ac60.jpg" data-fileid="57835" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="nc702 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57835" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/nc70205.thumb.jpg.9792a52352bd8396372daf45085461d5.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/Nordnc70201.jpg.93a102965208cf453f7a2e6b88af8d01.jpg" data-fileid="57836" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Nord nc702 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57836" data-ratio="49.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/Nordnc70201.thumb.jpg.f3684917cdb3a17e108311a30942ac18.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/Nordnc70202.jpg.b24daf81d4ab183f026e6e1f66c2d51d.jpg" data-fileid="57837" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Nord nc702 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57837" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_06/Nordnc70202.thumb.jpg.60ad61b6eedba8c7626af59386451319.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1553</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2023 05:45:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Soko G-2 Galeb</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/soko-g-2-galeb-r1039/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/610349945_SokoG-2Galeb23191.jpg.6b327416dd8fe4fb243321ec371f981e.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Soko G2 Galeb (English: Seagull) is a Yugoslav single engine, two-seater jet trainer and light ground-attack aircraft. The G2 was developed during the 1950s by the Aeronautical Technical Institute at Žarkovo as a replacement for the Lockheed T-33 in service with the Yugoslav Air Force (Serbo-Croatian Latin: <em>Ratno vazduhoplovstvo i protivvazdušna odbrana – RV i PVO</em>). Production started in 1965 at the Soko aircraft factory in Mostar, and ended in 1985 with 248 aircraft delivered. The G2 had the distinction of being the first mass-produced jet aircraft in socialist Yugoslavia. It also served as a basis for the single-seat ground-attack J-21 Jastreb.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The RV i PVO took delivery of 128 aircraft that were used by the Air Force Academy for training new pilots. The second largest operator of the Galeb was Libya, which acquired over 100 aircraft during the 1970s. A small number were also acquired by Zaire, Zambia and Indonesia. During the breakup of Yugoslavia, the Galebs were used for ground attack sorties throughout Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. By 1992, RV i PVO G-2s relocated to Serbia and Montenegro where they operated with the Air Force of the new FR Yugoslavia. The aircraft remained in service until 1999 when the majority of them were destroyed on ground during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Libyan Air Force's G2s were used during the Libyan Civil War by Gaddafi forces, with an unknown number surviving the war and being reported in service as late as 2013. A single aircraft remains in service with the Technical Test Center of the Serbian Armed Forces. A number of aircraft are still flown by civilians as warbirds, including the private aerobatic team "Stars" from Novi Sad.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	John Travolta is listed as a private owner, and the hangar photo below (177) was taken at Lilydale in 2011.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development, design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soko_G-2_Galeb" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1133388399_SokoG-2Galeb112.jpg.d98aadb7c7abcbd6655b31b03ebcadae.jpg" data-fileid="51610" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Soko G-2 Galeb 112.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51610" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/644657454_SokoG-2Galeb112.thumb.jpg.aa9e64509153fdd4a8eefd594d5cd1e5.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1781053268_SokoG-2Galeb23251.jpg.420701b8438e7089985c6b9800a23203.jpg" data-fileid="51611" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Soko G-2 Galeb 23251.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51611" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/846903312_SokoG-2Galeb23251.thumb.jpg.aeb8c880689058145ec39884490ca2c2.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/698122404_SokoG-2GalebN102PP.jpg.907c9ca067abbdfe7d2e27a48ec80d80.jpg" data-fileid="51612" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Soko G-2 Galeb N102PP.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51612" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1548265014_SokoG-2GalebN102PP.thumb.jpg.ded3f265f34109ff5fdc764f14f9cbf0.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/800610282_SokoG-2GalebYU-YAK.jpg.ea1b5e335ce75dd7a322c75e3f3173db.jpg" data-fileid="51613" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Soko G-2 Galeb YU-YAK.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51613" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/953916219_SokoG-2GalebYU-YAK.thumb.jpg.ea1467506208db4f2279820f637fcb5e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/2044607960_VH-YUESokoG2GalebYLIL13112011.jpg.e42cb4b75241fe391b2e9a91f0e804c7.jpg" data-fileid="51614" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="VH-YUE Soko G2 Galeb YLIL 13112011.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51614" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1998545964_VH-YUESokoG2GalebYLIL13112011.thumb.jpg.24973895dd1abb662f26c9164c114eca.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1039</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:08:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Soko-J-20-Kraguj</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/soko-j-20-kraguj-r1727/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj01.jpg.ca321e00fbdc77c5689ee965d53d7ea0.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Soko J-20 Kraguj (from Serbian: крагуј, lit. 'sparrowhawk') is a light military, single-engine, low-wing single-seat aircraft with a metal airframe, capable of performing close air support, counterinsurgency (COIN), and reconnaissance missions, that was designed by VTI and manufactured by SOKO of Yugoslavia, first flown in 1962.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It is of classic semi-monocoque, metal structure with a slightly tapered wing. The pilot is accommodated in an enclosed, heated and ventilated cockpit with adjustable seats. The cockpit canopy slides backwards to open. The landing gear is non-retractable with a tail wheel. Rubber dampers provide shock absorption, and hydraulic brakes are used for wheel braking.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The power plant comprises one 340 hp Textron Lycoming GSO-480-B1J6 piston engine and Hartzell HC-B3Z20-1/10151C-5 three-blade metal variable-pitch propeller. The engine cooling airflow is intensified by means of two specially designed ejectors. 36 US Gal of fuel contained in two rubber tanks enables a flight range of 350 NM for the fully armed configuration of the aircraft. 28 V DC electric power is supplied from a 1,5 kW generator and a storage battery. De-fogging and de-icing of the windshield is done by blowing of hot air.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was specially designed for low-altitude missions against day and night visible ground targets in a broad area. It was readily available to be loaded with weapons and supplied through a flexible system of auxiliary airfields that required no special preparations, especially in mountainous regions. Yugoslav military planners assumed that potential aggressor will first disable airfields. Therefore, J-20 Kraguj was designed to take-off from short unprepared runways, even ones covered in deep snow when fitted with skis. It was also called a "Partisan aircraft".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Kraguj P-2 was intended for close ground force support, and could be used for training of pilots in visual day/night flights, aiming, missile firing and bombing of ground targets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj02.jpg.7adbd2d259bb6ba639e27d780ac0d140.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61171" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj02.thumb.jpg.9ab7c1bb9213bd463c4c06da3856052e.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="soko-j-20-kraguj 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj03.jpg.1e0583c4fef29ac37bc2cdbe1422147e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61172" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj03.thumb.jpg.5e6840a3f59952509c5a9a64b1be5ea7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="soko-j-20-kraguj 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj04.jpg.bd3b67d995b9bf73e447422840150d24.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61173" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj04.thumb.jpg.cf5143e91071f6d9d1fac7f62a2db9d9.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="soko-j-20-kraguj 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj05.jpg.ba23fdebecf19266aabebe72362c98f5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61174" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/soko-j-20-kraguj05.thumb.jpg.2beab4bca276540916817cb78b5629db.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="soko-j-20-kraguj 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1727</guid><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:01:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Sud Aviation Vautour</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/sud-aviation-vautour-r1476/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/811569462_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB02.jpg.ed5fc24c5b2258e31305c9b16d943ff7.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Sud-Ouest Aviation (SNCASO) S.O. 4050 Vautour II (French for vulture) was a French jet-powered bomber, interceptor, and attack aircraft developed and manufactured by aircraft company Sud Aviation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Vautour was operated by France's Armée de l'Air, having been originally developed by Sud Aviation in response to a French requirement for a jet aircraft for bombing, low-level attack and all-weather interception operations. The Vautour was used in the Force de frappe under the Commandement des Forces Aériennes Stratégiques; each aircraft was suitable for the carriage of a nuclear weapon. The shortcomings of the type as a bomber, such as its lack of radar or other advanced navigation/attack systems, led to the type being replaced by the more capable Dassault Mirage IV. The Vautour never saw combat use with the French Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The only other customer for the Vautour was Israel. During its service with the Israeli Air Force (IAF), the type undertook various mission and roles and was quickly used in combat. Vautours were used during the wars between Israel and its neighbors, including the Six-Day War and the War of Attrition. Only one air-to-air kill was recorded by a Vautour; the type was used more for bombing and ground strafing and was reportedly considered by Israel to be comparable to the Soviet-built Ilyushin Il-28 medium bombers used by its regional adversaries. During the early 1970s, the Vautour was replaced by the American Douglas A-4 Skyhawk.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Sud Aviation Vautour was a jet-propelled mid-sized combat aircraft, typically employed as a bomber and attack aircraft, as well as having some usage as an interceptor. In terms of its basic configuration, it had a shoulder-wing monoplane configuration, furnished with a 35° swept wing and a "flying" tail. Power was provided by a pair of SNECMA Atar 101 turbojet engines, which were carried in pods located underneath the wings. The Vautour was equipped with a bicycle-type landing gear configuration in which the main units were located upon the underside of the fore and aft fuselage, these were augmented by smaller stabilizing gear set into bottom of the engine pods. The internal space of the central fuselage was largely dedicated to a large 5.0 meter (16 ft 5 in) weapons bay, along with substantial internal fuel tankage. 149 units were produced.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details on development, design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud_Aviation_Vautour" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1980514336_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB01.jpg.9f5e30099313e03ce0d1c27966fccec4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56327" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/276747828_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB01.thumb.jpg.64254a5de4d9ad1bd12b6a06f469f5b5.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Sud-Est 4050 Vautour IIB 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1681727255_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB03.jpg.64a8754b57b5056a927a53e8b5e645dc.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56329" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/85157175_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB03.thumb.jpg.ffe960fe198fa37ab9d0ebe724827dd6.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Sud-Est 4050 Vautour IIB 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1190799167_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB04.jpg.4dc160b6c45fe517085e42c06548a326.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56330" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1027817610_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB04.thumb.jpg.63e69e82723c94b28cdc19636b0b7869.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Sud-Est 4050 Vautour IIB 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1341056910_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB05.jpg.24328be7c1d89601f80d9e02306229c6.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="56331" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1413230_Sud-Est4050VautourIIB05.thumb.jpg.5df9093cca855d1bb75dfb96ea8879c9.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Sud-Est 4050 Vautour IIB 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1476</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:54:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Supermarine Seagull III</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/supermarine-seagull-iii-r1196/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1496671017_SupermarineSeagullIII05.jpg.9fc5d938dd7acd2e65d877960d3aae8d.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Supermarine Seagull III was a British designed and built amphibian bi-plane.  The prototype, the Seagull I, was developed in 1921 and this led to improvements for the construction of 25 Seagull II, in 1922, for use by the Royal Navy and Royal Air Force.  Further improvements resulted in the Seagull III, fitted with a Napier Lion V engine, becoming available in 1925.   The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) ordered six of these aircraft in 1925 to replace its Fairey IIID seaplanes at a cost of £ 8,000 each.  The aircraft were freighted to Australia arriving in mid-1926 with the first test flight conducted in June of that  year.  A further three aircraft were ordered in 1927.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The  Seagull was constructed from timber and canvas and the Australian version had a radiator modified for tropical usage. The lower wing was set in the shoulder position and the engine was mounted in a nacelle slung from the upper wing; powering a four-blade propeller in ‘tractor’ configuration.  The aircraft carried a crew of three with the pilot being a RAAF officer, the observer (navigator) a naval officer and the telegraphist air gunner a naval rating. The Seagulls were allocated to 101 Flight RAAF and three aircraft took part in the Great Barrier Reef Survey during 1926-27 and were based at Bowen in far north Queensland.  Due to their size and the logistics / engineering needs the aircraft were based ashore and carried out regular flights over the reef to conduct photographic surveys in support of survey work being conducted by HMA Ships Geranium and  Moresby.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Seagulls were normally located at RAAF Base Point Cook, Victoria but following the commissioning of the sea plane carrier HMAS Albatross, in January 1929, they were embarked regularly for training exercises; where the aircraft proved very useful in spotting, and signalling corrections, for the fall of shot during gunnery practice firings.  The Seagulls were also employed on reconnaissance flights where they were also adept in locating other vessels and signalling, via wireless telegraphy, the location of the ships. The range of the wireless telegraphy equipment was however only 30 kilometres in good weather conditions. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number ordered - 9.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For further information on the Seagull III, <a href="https://www.navy.gov.au/aircraft/supermarine-seagull-iii" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1597151_SupermarineSeagullIII01.jpg.b11e44b170fa99c0b20d8b5300ca9006.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52813" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1114202333_SupermarineSeagullIII01.thumb.jpg.3b2dc4d8988992106fac874a22e6302a.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Supermarine Seagull III 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/515787814_SupermarineSeagullIII02.jpg.5e9b18aa08ff4ba8a057b5b39a4de316.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52814" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1205261174_SupermarineSeagullIII02.thumb.jpg.35132fe83da42bba6daf1d2367726f4a.jpg" data-ratio="46" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Supermarine Seagull III 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1328655107_SupermarineSeagullIII03A9-6.jpg.228080f2c5f2abbd90080184d4621958.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52815" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1868256065_SupermarineSeagullIII03A9-6.thumb.jpg.a5c20347c0ab69002439cb15f053e8b1.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Supermarine Seagull III 03 A9-6.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/835563022_SupermarineSeagullIII04.jpg.0dd424514f44ee1aa4118eed0881ca4a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52816" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/462240512_SupermarineSeagullIII04.thumb.jpg.52bc81dc1447c3414d4cba0bbb50380c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Supermarine Seagull III 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1196</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:14:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Supermarine Spitfire</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/supermarine-spitfire-r371/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1597190907_spitfire-rg-v-takeoff-ymav-20110306.jpg" /></p>

<p>Many variants of the Spitfire were built, using several wing configurations, and it was produced in greater numbers than any other British aircraft. It was also the only British fighter produced continuously throughout the war. The Spitfire continues to be popular among enthusiasts; nearly 60 remain airworthy, and many more are static exhibits in aviation museums throughout the world.</p><p> </p><p>
The Spitfire was designed as a short-range, high-performance interceptor aircraft by R. J. Mitchell, chief designer at Supermarine Aviation Works, which operated as a subsidiary of Vickers-Armstrong from 1928. Mitchell pushed the Spitfire's distinctive elliptical wing with cutting-edge sunken rivets (designed by Beverley Shenstone) to have the thinnest possible cross-section, helping give the aircraft a higher top speed than several contemporary fighters, including the Hawker Hurricane. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his death in 1937, whereupon his colleague Joseph Smith took over as chief designer, overseeing the Spitfire's development throughout its multitude of variants.</p><p> </p><p>
For details of the development and producton, design, testing, operational history of the Spitfire, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Spitfire" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> This link provides further links the large number of variants over the lengthy life of the Spitfire.</p><p> </p><p>
Specifications below are for the Spitfire Mk VB.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-rg-v-takeoff-ymav-20110306.jpg.5cd30f7a521809d53de18a326dee9655.jpg" data-fileid="45312" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45312" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="spitfire-rg-v-takeoff-ymav-20110306.jpg_thumb.5cd30f7a521809d53de18a326dee9655.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-rg-v-takeoff-ymav-20110306.jpg_thumb.5cd30f7a521809d53de18a326dee9655.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-rg-v-takeoff-ymav-20110306.jpg_thumb.5cd30f7a521809d53de18a326dee9655.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20110306.jpg.224667747649db5f26518bc64ff5e599.jpg" data-fileid="45313" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45313" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20110306.jpg_thumb.224667747649db5f26518bc64ff5e599.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20110306.jpg_thumb.224667747649db5f26518bc64ff5e599.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20110306.jpg_thumb.224667747649db5f26518bc64ff5e599.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20170305.JPG.415dd7aebc41edde2a53b43e701c7ca9.JPG" data-fileid="45314" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45314" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20170305.JPG_thumb.415dd7aebc41edde2a53b43e701c7ca9.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20170305.JPG_thumb.415dd7aebc41edde2a53b43e701c7ca9.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMAV-20170305.JPG_thumb.415dd7aebc41edde2a53b43e701c7ca9.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMPC20140302.JPG.ef887dd146396f8349476a5aba0e3e4a.JPG" data-fileid="45315" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45315" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Spitfire-RG-V-YMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.ef887dd146396f8349476a5aba0e3e4a.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.ef887dd146396f8349476a5aba0e3e4a.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/Spitfire-RG-V-YMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.ef887dd146396f8349476a5aba0e3e4a.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-ymav-20130303.jpg.52fa85e519d85159554e8a6e5ad49d08.jpg" data-fileid="45316" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45316" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="spitfire-ymav-20130303.jpg_thumb.52fa85e519d85159554e8a6e5ad49d08.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-ymav-20130303.jpg_thumb.52fa85e519d85159554e8a6e5ad49d08.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/spitfire-ymav-20130303.jpg_thumb.52fa85e519d85159554e8a6e5ad49d08.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">371</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Supermarine Walrus</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/supermarine-walrus-r1100/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/486727704_SupermarineWalrus01.jpg.15c89c2655e146d93935d1019f854c73.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	<br />
	The Supermarine Walrus (originally known as the Supermarine Seagull V) was a British single-engine amphibious biplane reconnaissance aircraft designed by R. J. Mitchell and manufactured by the British aircraft company Supermarine.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Walrus made its maiden flight in 1933, the design effort having commenced as a private venture four years earlier. It shared its general configuration with that of the earlier Supermarine Seagull. Having been designed to serve as a fleet spotter for catapult launching from cruisers or battleships, the aircraft was largely employed in other roles, notably as a maritime patrol aircraft and as a rescue aircraft for ditched aircrew. The Walrus featured numerous innovations for the period, being the first British squadron-service aircraft to incorporate in one airframe a fully retractable main undercarriage, completely enclosed crew accommodation and an all-metal fuselage. Early-build aircraft featured the original metal hull design for its greater longevity in tropical conditions, while later-build examples instead used a wooden counterpart to conserve the use of light metal alloys.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first examples of the Seagull entered service with the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) in 1935. The type was subsequently adopted in quantity by the Fleet Air Arm (FAA), Royal Air Force (RAF), Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) and Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF). Hundreds of Walruses were in operational service throughout the Second World War, where it was prolifically operated against Axis submarines. It was also adopted by the RAF Search and Rescue Force for recovering downed personnel. An intended replacement, the Supermarine Sea Otter, which possessed considerably more power, was introduced during the conflict but never fully displaced the Walrus. The Walrus continued to serve in a limited capacity with several militaries around the world during the postwar era, while some aircraft were also operated in a civil capacity in regions such as Australia and the Antarctic. It was largely succeeded by the first generation of rescue helicopters.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Supermarine Walrus was a single-engine amphibious biplane principally designed to conduct the maritime observation mission. The single-step hull was constructed from aluminium alloy, with stainless-steel forgings for the catapult spools and mountings. Metal construction was used because experience had shown that wooden structures deteriorated rapidly under tropical conditions. The fabric-covered wings were slightly swept back and had stainless–steel spars and wooden ribs. The lower wings were set in the shoulder position with a stabilising float mounted under each. The elevators were high on the tail-fin and braced on either side by 'N' struts. The wings could be folded, giving a stowage width of 17 ft 6 in (5.33 m). The single 620 hp (460 kW) Pegasus II M2 radial engine was housed at the rear of a nacelle mounted on four struts above the lower wing and braced by four shorter struts to the centre-section of the upper wing. This powered a four-bladed wooden pusher propeller. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the development, design, operational history, civil use, and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Walrus" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1044837671_SupermarineWalrus02.jpg.9266bce52e4ca29f573531ae59680487.jpg" data-fileid="51994" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Supermarine Walrus 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51994" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/128657960_SupermarineWalrus02.thumb.jpg.003401035a78118abeb972d0f48b5b3d.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1396850775_SupermarineWalrus04.jpg.2b0fc378614be9458fb5da4b0a6f503f.jpg" data-fileid="51996" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Supermarine Walrus 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51996" data-ratio="48.67" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/272533840_SupermarineWalrus04.thumb.jpg.83ebe89c41203da66ba479b38d668bfe.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/258220050_SupermarineWalrusRAAFMuseum.jpg.85ccc885bfd453ae6e273f2aafa51287.jpg" data-fileid="51997" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Supermarine Walrus RAAF Museum.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51997" data-ratio="66.67" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/426919988_SupermarineWalrusRAAFMuseum.thumb.jpg.8a43777c30796c552b32c317385208a3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/961536492_SupermarineWalrus06.jpg.eb9d7322b75ebf7561018081563bad6a.jpg" data-fileid="51998" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51998" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" alt="26480895_SupermarineWalrus06.thumb.jpg.d65ad0d0b7cfbe8adeab1c03f52acfe4.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/26480895_SupermarineWalrus06.thumb.jpg.d65ad0d0b7cfbe8adeab1c03f52acfe4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1100</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 11:53:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tachikawa Ki-9</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/tachikawa-ki-9-r1952/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-91.jpg.6446407db0d37a79847144ad8c4d2f1c.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Tachikawa Ki-9 (九五式一型練習機, Kyūgo-shiki ichigata renshuki) was an intermediate training aircraft of the Imperial Japanese Army Air Force built by Tachikawa Aircraft Company Ltd in the 1930s. It was known to the Allies under the nickname of "Spruce" during World War II. This aircraft was mistakenly identified as a Tatchikawa by the British.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Ki-9 was a two-seat, unequal wingspan biplane design. Tachikawa originally planned to use the same basic airframe for both basic training and intermediate training, differentiating the two models by the use of different engines.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype Ki-9 flew on 7 January 1935, powered by a 261 kW (350 hp) nine-cylinder Hitachi Ha-13a radial engine. The second prototype was identical, and the third prototype was powered by a 112 hp (80 kW) Nakajima NZ seven-cylinder radial engine. The third prototype exhibited stability problems due to a center of gravity issue, and, as a result, the primary trainer model was abandoned and the Ki-9 was developed only for the intermediate trainer. Tachikawa subsequently developed the Ki-17 for the primary trainer role. The first production aircraft were delivered in 1935.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Ki-9 was introduced to service as the Army Type 95-1 Medium Grade Trainer Model A under the former aircraft naming nomenclature system. The first version had a complex, split-axle landing gear with fairings over the top of the wheels. In 1939, this was modified and simplified, the fuselage slightly shortened, and the total weight reduced. The resulting Army Type 95-1 Model B or Ki-9-kai had improved maneuverability and flight characteristics. This version was quickly superseded by the Army Type 95-1 Model C, or Ki-9-otsu, in full production.
</p>

<p>
	Both versions were used widely for blind-flying training with a folding hood over the rear cockpit, and several were modified with a glazed canopy over the rear cockpit for use as a staff officer transport plane.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Some were pressed into service for use as "special attack" (kamikaze in American terminology) aircraft in the closing days of the war, fitted with either a 100 kg anti-ship bomb, an oil drum filled with explosives, or fuel in the rear cockpit.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production by Tachikawa totaled 2,395 aircraft, ending in 1942. At least another 220 Ki-9s were constructed by Tokyo Gasu Denki (also known as Gasuden) from 1943 to 1945.
</p>

<p>
	The Ki-9 was also flown in wartime by Japanese satellite countries and postwar by the fledgling government of Indonesia and captured units by the Republic of China.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Ki-9 (Army Type 95-1 Medium Grade Trainer Model A)</strong>: Initial version two-seat intermediate trainer aircraft.<br />
	<strong>Ki-9-ko (Army Type 95-1 Medium Grade Trainer Model B)</strong>: Improved version.<br />
	<strong>Ki-9-otsu (Army Type 95-1 Medium Grade Trainer Model C)</strong>: Standard production version.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-92.jpg.6cf45958bc9d02e2214cb148a9d2283f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64416" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-92.thumb.jpg.67faae1045c2bb285da29945349b462a.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa Ki-9 2.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-93.jpg.d66bc914750568eb27e4cd27922dbf60.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64417" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-93.thumb.jpg.c1db89590fd5668dfbea7d37c2fff7ee.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa Ki-9 3.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-94.jpg.a0b9756d2aedfa00307c6b6cb5249456.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64418" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-94.thumb.jpg.ed6c4da4768190b0531cabeff2aa65ef.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa Ki-9 4.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-95.jpg.f71e74ad53a44826ffa2f399157f7749.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64419" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKi-95.thumb.jpg.1a8a96eaed0e9463a8604a11e88d2244.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa Ki-9 5.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1952</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tachikawa KKY</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/tachikawa-kky-r1951/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY3.jpg.f8e10393108533aa14561fb7f64f9349.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Tachikawa KKY, full name Tachikawa Army Small and Light Ambulance Aircraft, was designed to rescue injured or sick patients from places without established airfields. Following two earlier prototypes, twenty-one production examples were built between 1936 and 1940 and served in the Second Sino-Japanese War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In August 1932, the Japanese Army placed an order for a small ambulance aircraft, capable of using rough airstrips and holding two stretcher cases and a medical attendant, with what was then the Aeroplane Factory of Ishikawajima Shipbuilding Company. Though the prototype was completed in December 1933, its development was protracted, and it was not ready for production until 1936. By then, the Ishikawajima Company had become the Tachikawa Aeroplane Co.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It was a single bay cabin biplane with wings attached to the upper and lower longerons and braced on each side with near-parallel interplane struts. The wings had wooden structures and were fabric-covered.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The KKY was powered by a 120–130 hp (89–97 kW) Cirrus Hermes IV four cylinder air-cooled, inverted inline engine and the later KKY-2 by a 150 hp (110 kW) Gasuden Jimpu seven cylinder radial engine. The fuselage had a welded steel tube structure, flat-sided behind the engine, with a windowed cabin that included the pilot's seat just ahead of the wing leading edge with the patients and attendant under the wing. The tail, with an aluminium structure and fabric-covered, was conventional with a tailplane on top of the fuselage and braced to it from below. The vertical tail had a strongly-blunted triangular profile.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As its purpose was to rescue patients from rough airfields or unmade airstrips, the ambulance needed a robust undercarriage. This had split axles mounted on a short, central, V-strut from the fuselage underside. Both short, faired shock absorber legs and their rearward drag struts were mounted on the lower fuselage longerons. Wheels with wide, low-pressure tires were available for missions to unmade strips.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Twenty-one Aikoku-go (privately funded) production KKYs were built between 1936 and 1940. They were active in the Second Sino-Japanese War, which began in 1937 and became part of World War II, when China entered on the Allies' side shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY1.jpg.51f5913b241a16487280f926c01fc960.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64411" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY1.thumb.jpg.467de24bc2e97956717caab04e25f319.jpg" data-ratio="54" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa KKY 1.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY2.jpg.30816eae06d75c496d062f57c9ca4e15.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64412" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY2.thumb.jpg.c950c231ab14394f4b517f816c49105b.jpg" data-ratio="46.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa KKY 2.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY3.jpg.e44f43c149d864b7bcc60ab0a3a8cd7d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64413" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY3.thumb.jpg.ce95e4c16162ac095da0131ca7befa68.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa KKY 3.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY5.jpg.9f77491dd3e361b9126b964290716a5c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64414" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_08/TachikawaKKY5.thumb.jpg.aa027063d45e67d45e0bab10f1a45115.jpg" data-ratio="42.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Tachikawa KKY 5.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1951</guid><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 01:46:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Taylorcraft L-2 Grasshopper</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/taylorcraft-l-2-grasshopper-r121/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1585657311_Taylorcraft-Grasshopper-N36406.jpg" /></p>
<p>In 1941 the United States Army Air Forces ordered four Taylorcraft Ds with the designation YO-57. They were evaluated in the summer of 1941 during maneuvers in Louisiana and Texas where they were used for support purposes such as light transport and courier. General Innis P. Swift, commander of the 1st Cavalry Division, coined the 'grasshopper' name after witnessing a bumpy landing. This led to a production order under the designation O-57 Grasshopper. In March 1942, the designation was changed to L-2 Grasshopper.</p><p> </p><p>
In World War II, the AAF began using the L-2 in much the same manner as the observation balloon was used in France during World War I—spotting enemy troop and supply concentrations and directing artillery fire on them. It was also used for other types of liaison and transport duties and short-range reconnaissance which required airplanes that could land and take off in minimum distances from unprepared landing strips.</p><p> </p><p>
Postwar, a number of L-2s were converted for civilian use and are operated by private pilot owners in the United States as the Model DCO-65. Several are still airworthy in 2011.</p><p> </p><p>
The L-2 series meet the standards for Light Sport Aircraft (other than the L-2M, which has a gross weight rating 5 pounds over the 1,320-lb limit), thus can be flown by pilots holding the Sport Pilot Certificate.</p><p> </p><p>
For details of the 20 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylorcraft_L-2" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN36406.jpg.5e965963ad65436da755f67663e6c2d6.jpg" data-fileid="44037" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="44037" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="TaylorcraftGrasshopperN36406.jpg_thumb.5e965963ad65436da755f67663e6c2d6.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN36406.jpg_thumb.5e965963ad65436da755f67663e6c2d6.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN51451.jpg.e7bf0e936bd2bc017ed5f57f7259b063.jpg" data-fileid="44038" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="44038" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="TaylorcraftGrasshopperN51451.jpg_thumb.e7bf0e936bd2bc017ed5f57f7259b063.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN51451.jpg_thumb.e7bf0e936bd2bc017ed5f57f7259b063.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN53771.jpg.8608f83e5bf8d66895228a707891544e.jpg" data-fileid="44039" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="44039" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="TaylorcraftGrasshopperN53771.jpg_thumb.8608f83e5bf8d66895228a707891544e.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/TaylorcraftGrasshopperN53771.jpg_thumb.8608f83e5bf8d66895228a707891544e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">121</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Link Trainer - From Amusement Park Attraction to Vital Wartime Equipment</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/the-link-trainer-from-amusement-park-attraction-to-vital-wartime-equipment-r665/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/A13_108_port_side.jpg.581742b7f60a334c9b21d4c8d4dff474.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Link Trainer,  or Pilot Trainer, was the world's first commercially built flight simulator. It was designed and built by Edwin Albert Link in the 1930s. The Link Trainer would form an integral part of pilot training programmes the world over and was instrumental for the final Allied victory during WW2. Over 10,000 Link trainers were manufactured during the Second World War and were used by almost every country. Just over 170 were employed by the RAAF for training.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Edwin Link wanted to fly, but found that his instructors were not good at teaching, so that the high cost of training was being wasted. He reasoned that if there was a way to replicated the basic movements of an aircraft flying, but without the flying bit, students could be taught to fly at a greatly reduced cost. At the time he was working for the family's Link Piano and Organ Company. There he became expert in the design and use of bellows systems to control movement.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1931, he received U.S Patent 1825462 in which he described his invention.
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.png.6323dd234e19139cd13e5bb1c372c79b.png" data-fileid="48269" data-fileext="png" rel=""><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48269" data-ratio="106.19" width="565" alt="image.thumb.png.fef78a726ea2edca8c5dafbe3a10f620.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.thumb.png.fef78a726ea2edca8c5dafbe3a10f620.png" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	You can read the whole Patent description here: <a href="https://patents.google.com/patent/US1825462A/en" rel="external nofollow">https://patents.google.com/patent/US1825462A/en</a>
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	 
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48270" data-ratio="68.75" width="576" alt="image.png.4578c25c06814ef3ed91583fefb8e835.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.png.4578c25c06814ef3ed91583fefb8e835.png" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /><span>http://www.vintagewings.ca/Portals/0/Vintage_Stories/ArchivedStories/Link3.jpg</span><span> </span>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Due to the Depression, sales of the trainer to flying schools were virtually non-existent, so, as indicated in the Patent, he attached a coin operated mechanism to the trainer and sold them to amusement parks. By 1934, he was running out of money. So, he made contact with the US Army Air Corps, pleading for the opportunity to demonstrate his technology. The Corps agreed and on "the" day, Ed took off from Binghamton and flew to the field at Newark, NJ, landing in a "pea soup" fog without incident!  The Corps soon followed with an $21,000 order for 6 simulators and Ed was "on his way".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The value to pilot training soon proved itself as WWII placed extreme demand on pilot training, not only in the USA, but throughout the world. Prior to the start of the war, Link sold his trainers to both Germany and Japan, so it would seem obvious that pilots from the Axis Powers did their instrument flying training in Link trainers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>USE BY THE RAAF</strong>
</p>

<p>
	Throughout the ages, the number 13 has been shunned by the superstitious as an ill omen. Many air forces purposely delete the numeral from aircraft serials, but the RAAF overcame the problem by allotting "dat ol' devil number" to the ground-operated Link Trainer. In the RAAF, pilots logged time in aircraft type <strong>A13</strong>. Early RAAF versions included the Mks D, D2, and ANT18, of which 140 were acquired, mainly during World War II Consequently, an uncontrolled spin or an accidental crash would result in nothing more than a red-faced student who could benefit by his mistake. The history of individual RAAF Link Trainers can be found here: <a href="http://www.adf-serials.com.au/2a13.htm" rel="external nofollow">http://www.adf-serials.com.au/2a13.htm</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This video gives a good account of the history of the Link Trainer: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeWrKjkL-os&amp;t=627s" rel="external nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeWrKjkL-os&amp;t=627s</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	This is the panel the student looked at
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48271" data-ratio="59.25" width="292" alt="image.jpeg.f60a0a55efed693c0a42a0079a9d151f.jpeg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.jpeg.f60a0a55efed693c0a42a0079a9d151f.jpeg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /><img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48272" data-ratio="129.95" width="197" alt="image.jpeg.c945d1e3824115da2dbee545e20c46aa.jpeg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.jpeg.c945d1e3824115da2dbee545e20c46aa.jpeg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
</p>

<p>
	The simulated performance figures in terms of Never Exceed speed, Rate of Climb, Cruise speed etc might be found in the operating manual. As the Link Trainer was used during the early stages of flight training, these values might be expected to mimic those of the typical flying training aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Flight missions were planned and controlled by the Simulator Instructor who could add factors such as wind direction and strength and turbulence as the student gained experience. A feature of the instructor's control was a device called a "crab" which was a three-wheeled device that would respond to airspeed and direction inputs from the Link's pilot's controls and track across a map to produce a record of the "flight"
</p>

<p style="text-align:center;">
	<img class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="48273" data-ratio="77.65" width="255" alt="image.jpeg.336ab5e29ee835d864212eaaa2acd050.jpeg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_02/image.jpeg.336ab5e29ee835d864212eaaa2acd050.jpeg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /><img alt="Image result for link trainer crab" data-ratio="56.00" width="300" data-src="https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSQXzT-QeX1BegkiazEdV62sNgUO9BYmQqJsA&amp;usqp=CAU" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">665</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Timm N2T Tutor</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/timm-n2t-tutor-r1197/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1635022534_TimmN2T-101.jpg.f12899066cc9d2d19aeea26bc87c45bd.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Timm N2T Tutor is an American training monoplane built by the Timm Aircraft Corporation for the United States Navy as the N2T-1.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Timm S-160 (or Timm PT-160K) was a conventional tandem open-cockpit monoplane trainer first flown on the 22 May 1940 by test pilot Vance Breese. It was powered by a Kinner R-5 radial engine and was a low-wing cantilever monoplane with a tailwheel landing gear. It had an unusual feature in that the airframe structure was made from resin impregnated and molded plywood, creating a composite material stronger and lighter than plywood. This process was patented as the Nuyon process and marketed as the aeromold process. The S-160 received the first approval for a plastic-wood construction, (ATC #747), on 28 August 1941.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The PT-175-K variant was fitted with a Kinner R-53 engine. This was followed by the PT-220-C with a 220 hp (164 kW) Continental W-670-6 engine and larger tail.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The PT-220C was evaluated by the United States Navy, which ordered 262 aircraft in 1943 as the N2T-1, incorporating only slight changes from the prototypes. The N2T-1 was a U.S. Navy basic trainer which the Navy nicknamed "Tiny Timm." The entire initial order was delivered in 1943 with no follow-on contract due to the military placing too many orders for Army and Navy trainers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although popular and relatively reliable, the N2T-1 was not built for long-term use, especially being made almost entirely of a wood based composite material that proved to be susceptible to decomposing. Postwar, the N2T was sold to private owners and 10 remained on the U.S. civil aircraft register in 2001.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>PT-160-K (ATC#747)</strong><br />
	Version with a 160 hp (119 kW) Kinner R-5 engine.<br />
	<strong>PT-175-L</strong><br />
	Version with a 175 hp (130 kW) Kinner R-53 engine.<br />
	<strong>PT-220-C (ATC#750)</strong><br />
	Version with a 220 hp (164 kW) Continental W-670-6 engine.<br />
	<strong>N2T-1</strong><br />
	Production version of the PT-220C for the United States Navy, 262 built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1410212088_TimmN2T-102.jpg.7c78210effe940377110bf30c1481bc5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52817" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/755176684_TimmN2T-102.thumb.jpg.62216ad89df25835d64ddb0e8983170e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Timm N2T-1 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1067017169_TimmN2T-103.jpg.8567bd9faaba43c90065776266640a7e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52818" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/311273541_TimmN2T-103.thumb.jpg.64441ad35701dff962228725b862d1f3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Timm N2T-1 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/322605558_TimmN2T-104.jpg.53048c0d0d39c68c20aa908047f4d860.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52819" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1541208181_TimmN2T-104.thumb.jpg.de2d0e948b15246c6f92cbaf7e7fb1e5.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Timm N2T-1 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1209703269_TimmN2T-105.jpg.69ed80b1040808705acf10b2b19297c3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="52820" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/835783246_TimmN2T-105.thumb.jpg.025b9f318bc374e46d1a8e08309137d7.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Timm N2T-1 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1197</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 03:05:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tupolev Tu-128</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/tupolev-tu-128-r1491/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/364496954_TupolevTu-12804.jpg.f239d11e731f4010419e2bbca0613260.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Tupolev Tu-28 (NATO reporting name Fiddler) was a long-range interceptor aircraft introduced by the Soviet Union in the 1960s. The official designation was Tu-128, but this designation was less commonly used in the West. It was the largest and heaviest fighter ever in service.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Iosif Nezval, of Tupolev Design Bureau. led development of the new interceptor aircraft. The work began in 1958, based on an existing single prototype of the unsuccessful Tu-98 supersonic bomber. The military designation of the interceptor was at first Tu-28, but it was changed in 1963 to Tu-128, identical to the designation used by the OKB.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Tu-128 had a broad, low/mid-mounted swept wing carrying the main landing gear in wing-mounted pods, and slab tailplanes. Two Lyulka AL-7F-2 turbojet engines were mounted in the fuselage. The two-man crew of pilot and navigator were seated in tandem.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Tu-128, with its maximum weight of 43 tonnes, was the heaviest fighter to enter service. It was an interceptor with high wing loading, unsophisticated but reliable avionics and poor visibility. It was not an agile aircraft, intended only to combat NATO bombers like the B-52 not engage in dogfights with smaller aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The interceptor made its initial public appearance in the 1961 Tushino air parade. Western experts, unaware that the bulge on the belly carried testing instruments, mistook it for a large ventral radar for a mixed interceptor/AWACS role.[3] The production version lacked the bulge and had a large nose radome housing a radar, known as RP-S[nb 4] Smerch, having a detection range of about 50 km (31 mi) and a lock-on range of about 40 km (25 mi).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Armament of the Tu-128 was four Bisnovat R-4 air-to-air missiles (known as K-80 during development; NATO reporting name AA-5 'Ash'). Usually two of them were R-4Rs with semi-active radar homing and two were R-4T infrared-homing missiles, with the former on the outer pylons and the latter on the inner underwing pylons. There was no internal weapons bay.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production of the Tu-128 ended in 1970 with a total of 198 aircraft having been built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Development of various projects designated Tu-28A, Tu-28-80, Tu-28-100, Tu-138, and Tu-148 were proposed by the Tupolev Design Bureau but all were abandoned.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For background, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-28" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1028126909_TupolevTu-12801.jpg.4c17289e1c3a1363112838ce2ce09090.jpg" data-fileid="56449" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Tupolev Tu-128 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="56449" data-ratio="55" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1198286792_TupolevTu-12801.thumb.jpg.813b74e5591f76a027b61dd6995815d7.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/198654234_TupolevTu-12802.jpg.1113728d061497718379296ef534bfce.jpg" data-fileid="56450" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Tupolev Tu-128 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="56450" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1000836239_TupolevTu-12802.thumb.jpg.f083791212985a1984f1d72905d8521d.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1632456562_TupolevTu-12803.jpg.4a6bba69b06452da21db3abd71819e46.jpg" data-fileid="56451" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Tupolev Tu-128 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="56451" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1101296570_TupolevTu-12803.thumb.jpg.e96ce999502bd7f4726e0d7b10e0f2b7.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1700353675_TupolevTu-12805.jpg.397d099dd1564ba6fba498123345b8ac.jpg" data-fileid="56453" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Tupolev Tu-128 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="56453" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/36054327_TupolevTu-12805.thumb.jpg.89b4df70590e38e40a9719054ea395d6.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/2116913912_TupolevTu-12806.jpg.21cd67cef2614d126f5a9a82a1ffe8cf.jpg" data-fileid="56454" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Tupolev Tu-128 06.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="56454" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_01/1615496687_TupolevTu-12806.thumb.jpg.d76fbec033732290217e64ef29e0c781.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1491</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2023 00:38:34 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
