<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aircraft: Aircraft</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/page/10/?d=1</link><description>Aircraft: Aircraft</description><language>en</language><item><title>North American FJ-1 Fury</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-fj-1-fury-r1922/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury05.jpg.f43d7d365650175924b019fcdc57ab27.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The North American FJ-1 Fury is an early turbojet-powered carrier-capable fighter aircraft used by the United States Navy (USN). Developed by North American Aviation (NAA) starting in 1945, it became the first jet aircraft in USN service to serve at sea under operational conditions. This first version of the FJ was a straight-winged jet, briefly operational during the transition to more successful designs. An evolution of the FJ-1 would become the land-based XP-86 prototype of the United States Air Force's enormously influential F-86 Sabre, which in turn formed the basis for the Navy's carrier-based, swept-winged North American FJ-2/-3 Fury.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In late 1944, the USN sought proposals for a follow-on aircraft to supplement its first jet fighter, the McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom; three competing proposals from NAA, McDonnell Aircraft Corporation and Vought were selected. The NAA NA-134 was ordered on 1 January 1945 as the XFJ-1 and would be developed in parallel with the Vought F6U Pirate (the competing McDonnell proposal would eventually evolve into the McDonnell F2H Banshee). The XFJ-1 was a straight-wing, tricycle gear fighter with a single General Electric J35 turbojet fed by an intake passing through the fuselage; to avoid bifurcating the intake and thus increasing drag, the cockpit was placed entirely above the intake duct, giving the aircraft a squat appearance. It was armed with six .50 BMG machine guns mounted next to the air intake, making it the last aircraft ordered by the USN to use .50 BMG guns as its primary armament. The wing, empennage, and canopy strongly resembled that of the piston-engined P-51D Mustang, North American Aviation's highly successful World War II fighter, enclosing a relocated cockpit accommodation further forward in relation to the Mustang's design, to ensure good forward pilot visibility for carrier operations.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first flight of the prototype XFJ-1 was conducted on 27 November 1946, and the first of 30 deliveries of the improved NA-141, designated FJ-1, took place in March 1948.[6] Flown by Navy squadron VF-5A, the FJ-1 made the USN's first operational aircraft carrier landing with a jet fighter at sea on 10 March 1948 aboard USS Boxer, pioneering US jet-powered carrier operations and underscoring the need for catapult-equipped carriers.The Fury was capable of launching without catapult assistance, but on a crowded flight deck the capability was of limited use. Taking off without a catapult launch limited the FJ-1 to a perilous, slow climb that was considered too risky for normal operations.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As German research into swept wing aerodynamics was not yet available when the design was finalized, the FJ-1 used a straight wing. Folding wings were not used because dive brakes mounted in the wings made them unfeasible. To conserve carrier deck space, a "kneeling" nose gear strut along with a swiveling "jockey wheel" allowed the FJ-1 to be stacked tail-high, close to another FJ-1.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Before the first production FJ-1 was even delivered, the initial order for 100 units was trimmed to only 30 because more promising naval fighter designs had entered development. The production aircraft were initially used in testing at NAS North Island, California. VF-5A, soon redesignated as VF-51, operated the type from Boxer in March 1948 and from USS Princeton in August 1948, but operations did not go well, and the aircraft proved to have weak landing gear. One of the four FJ-1s to operate from Princeton was destroyed in a hard landing on arrival and went over the side; fortunately the pilot was rescued, but further accidents resulted in the cancellation of the operations after only two days. Although VF-51 went to sea on Boxer one more time in May 1949, the FJ-1s were phased out afterwards in favor of the new F9F-2 Panther.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Ending its service career in U.S. Naval Reserve units, the FJ-1 was eventually retired in 1953. The one highlight in its short service life was VF-51's win in the Bendix Trophy Race for jets in September 1948. The unit entered seven FJ-1s, flying from Long Beach, California to Cleveland, Ohio, with VF-51 aircraft taking the first four places, ahead of two California Air National Guard Lockheed F-80 Shooting Stars. Number built: 33 (including 3 prototypes)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XFJ-1</strong><br />
	Prototype aircraft, powered by a 3,820 lbf (17 kN) General Electric J35-GE-2 turbojet engine, three built.<br />
	<strong>FJ-1 Fury</strong><br />
	Single-seat fighter aircraft, powered by a 4,000 lbf (17.8 kN) Allison J35-A-2 turbojet engine, armed with six 0.50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns, 30 built a further 70 were cancelled.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury01.jpg.a6c5a6b0de949e8f598146b7e9b0bfa9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64198" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury01.thumb.jpg.bc6a219f884d9e7cababe3d7fcb1493b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-1 Fury 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury02.jpg.326ad1adb0bad379c4bad71559111440.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64199" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury02.thumb.jpg.8028413297b899239caac00e58a26b15.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-1 Fury 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury03.jpeg.68b34e6f4ebf6717bd90c13633d33a9a.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64200" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury03.thumb.jpeg.06c6851494943e9f94fce393baac3674.jpeg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-1 Fury 03.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury04.jpg.a6cf5e6918557f54be5323779dafd278.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64201" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-1Fury04.thumb.jpg.9773f452671291323d2b8bfaac551fb3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-1 Fury 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1922</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 07:47:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American FJ-4B Fury</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-fj-4b-fury-r1902/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury01.jpg.d26bf428525c9df539dbab39ddf062af.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The North American FJ-4 Fury is a swept-wing carrier-capable fighter-bomber for the United States Navy and Marine Corps. The final development in a lineage that included the Air Force's F-86 Sabre, the FJ-4 shared its general layout and engine with the earlier FJ-3, but featured an entirely new wing design and was a vastly different design in its final embodiment.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Compared to that of the FJ-3, the FJ-4's new wing was much thinner, with a six percent thickness-to-chord ratio, and featured skin panels milled from solid alloy plates. It also had an increased area, and tapered more sharply towards the tips. Slight camber behind the leading edge improved low speed characteristics. The main landing gear design had to be considerably modified to fold wheel and strut within the contours of the new wing. The track of the main wheels was increased and because they were closer to the center of gravity, there was less weight on the nosewheel. Wing folding was limited to the outer wing panels.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The FJ-4 was intended as an all-weather interceptor, a role that required considerable range on internal fuel. The FJ-4 had 50% more fuel capacity than the FJ-3 and was lightened by omitting armor and reducing ammunition capacity. The new wing was "wet"; that is, it provided for integral fuel tankage. The fuselage was deepened to add more fuel, and had a distinctive "razorback" rear deck. A modified cockpit made the pilot more comfortable during the longer missions. The tail surfaces were also extensively modified and had a thinner profile. The overall changes resulted in an aircraft that had little in common with the earlier models, although a family resemblance was still present. The two prototypes had the same Wright J65-W-4 engine as the FJ-3, but production aircraft had the J65-W-16A of 7,700 lbf (34 kN) thrust.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first FJ-4 flew on 28 October 1954 and delivery began in February 1955.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Of the original order for 221, the last 71 were modified in the FJ-4B fighter-bomber version. This had a stronger wing with six instead of four underwing stations and stronger landing gear. Additional aerodynamic brakes under the aft fuselage made landing safer by allowing pilots to use higher thrust settings, and were also useful for dive attacks. External load was doubled. The most important characteristic of the FJ-4B, however, was that it was capable of carrying a nuclear weapon on the inboard port station. It was equipped with the LABS or Low-Altitude Bombing System for the delivery of nuclear weapons. The Navy was eager to maintain a nuclear role in its rivalry with the Air Force, and it equipped 10 squadrons with the FJ-4B. It was also flown by three Marine squadrons. In April 1956 the Navy ordered 151 more FJ-4Bs, for a total of 152 FJ-4s and 222 FJ-4Bs produced, and 1,115 FJ aircraft of all variants delivered to the Navy and Marine Corps.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Navy ordered six FJ-4s to be converted to FJ-4F to test rocket engines, but only two were completed. These featured the North American Rocketdyne AR-1 engine, installed in a fairing above the tail pipe of the jet engine. It ran on hydrogen peroxide and JP-4 jet fuel, and provided an additional 5,000 lbf (22 kN) of thrust for short periods. The FJ-4F reached speeds of Mach 1.41 and altitude of 71,000 ft (21,600 m).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	With the 1962 adoption of the Tri-Service aircraft designation system, the FJ-4 became the F-1E and the FJ-4B the AF-1E. AF-1Es served with United States Naval Reserve units until the late 1960s. Number built    374
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XFJ-4</strong><br />
	Two prototypes with a J65-W-4 engine and re-designed fuselage. <br />
	<strong>YFJ-4</strong><br />
	One FJ-4 used for development testing. <br />
	<strong>FJ-4 Fury</strong><br />
	Single-seat fighter-bomber version, powered by a 7,700 lbf (34 kN) Wright J65-W-16A turbojet engine, 150 built. <br />
	<strong>FJ-4B Fury</strong><br />
	Single-seat ground-attack close support version with six underwing pylons, 222 built. <br />
	<strong>FJ-4F Fury</strong><br />
	Test and evaluation aircraft, fitted with an auxiliary rocket motor and supplementary fuel tank, two conversions from FJ-4. <br />
	<strong>F-1E Fury</strong><br />
	Redesignation of the FJ-4. 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>AF-1E Fury</strong><br />
	Redesignation of the FJ-4B. <br />
	<strong>AF-1F (NA-295)</strong><br />
	Proposed light-attack version with TF30 engine, competitor to the A-7; not built.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury02.jpg.630c3bebf1956e8c696a24d71681d851.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64099" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury02.thumb.jpg.1e74620bd316e9b6776337044ed9e3d3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-4B Fury 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury03.jpg.3b191ccf29476e13ab1c86085decef38.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64100" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury03.thumb.jpg.4e90afb8a0737c8a4425b4b0a3bf6f64.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-4B Fury 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury04.jpg.530b98d4f59c8f0c6fcef39f8714bea9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64101" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury04.thumb.jpg.8d44c9f9826e4e50c4306d3facff164d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-4B Fury 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury05.jpg.484933f5a06548c1a7bc0288ef73193c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="64102" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_07/NorthAmericanFJ-4BFury05.thumb.jpg.d8b66f2016c13e75f2da8e381c3cf138.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American FJ-4B Fury 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1902</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2025 07:06:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American P-51 Mustang (incl CAC CA-17 and CA-18)</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-p-51-mustang-incl-cac-ca-17-and-ca-18-r44/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1583142100_CAC_CA18_Mustang_IV_A68-750_25032007_YMAV.jpg" /></p>
<p>The Mustang was designed in 1940 by North American Aviation (NAA) in response to a requirement of the British Purchasing Commission. The Purchasing Commission approached North American Aviation to build Curtiss P-40 fighters under license for the Royal Air Force (RAF). Rather than build an old design from another company, North American Aviation proposed the design and production of a more modern fighter. The prototype NA-73X airframe was rolled out on 9 September 1940, 102 days after the contract was signed, and first flew on 26 October.</p><p> </p><p>
At the start of the Korean War, the Mustang, by then redesignated F-51, was the main fighter of the United Nations until jet fighters, including North American's F-86, took over this role; the Mustang then became a specialized fighter-bomber. Despite the advent of jet fighters, the Mustang remained in service with some air forces until the early 1980s. After the Korean War, Mustangs became popular civilian warbirds and air racing aircraft.</p><p> </p><p>
<strong>Mustangs in the RAAF</strong></p><p> </p><p>
The Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation (CAC) built two models of the Mustang for  the RAAF.-</p><p>
</p><ul><li><strong>CA-17</strong> First Mustang production contract; 80 assembled from imported components (c/nos. 1326–1405, 1326–1345 also assigned North American c/nos. NA110-34366 to -34385).<br />
</li><li><strong>CA-18</strong> Second Mustang production contract; 120 built, production of a further 50 cancelled (c/nos. 1406–1525).<br />
</li></ul><p></p><p>
In November 1944, 3 Squadron RAAF became the first Royal Australian Air Force unit to use Mustangs. At the time of its conversion from the P-40 to the Mustang, the squadron was based in Italy with the RAF's First Tactical Air Force.</p><p>
3 Squadron was renumbered 4 Squadron after returning to Australia from Italy, and converted to P-51Ds. Several other Australian or Pacific-based squadrons converted to either CAC-built Mustangs or to imported P-51Ks from July 1945, having been equipped with P-40s or Boomerangs for wartime service; these units were: 76, 77, 82, 83, 84 and 86 Squadrons. Only 17 Mustangs reached the RAAF's First Tactical Air Force front-line squadrons by the time World War II ended in August 1945. </p><p> </p><p>
76, 77 and 82 Squadrons were formed into 81 Fighter Wing of the British Commonwealth Air Force, which was part of the British Commonwealth Occupation Force stationed in Japan from February 1946. 77 Squadron used its P-51s extensively during the first months of the Korean War, before converting to Gloster Meteor jets.</p><p>
Five reserve units from the Citizen Air Force also operated Mustangs. 21 "City of Melbourne" Squadron, based in the state of Victoria; 22 "City of Sydney" Squadron, based in New South Wales; 23 "City of Brisbane" Squadron, based in Queensland; 24 "City of Adelaide" Squadron, based in South Australia; and 25 "City of Perth" Squadron, based in Western Australia; all of these units were equipped with CAC Mustangs, rather than P-51D or Ks. The last Mustangs were retired from these units in 1960 when CAF units adopted a nonflying role.8</p><p> </p><p>
For the P-51 story, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_P-51_Mustang" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CAC_CA18_Mustang_IV_A68-750_25032007_YMAV.jpg.5431925cef03ed89851f0defb2dea3b9.jpg" data-fileid="43719" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43719" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="CAC_CA18_Mustang_IV_A68-750_25032007_YMAV.jpg_thumb.5431925cef03ed89851f0defb2dea3b9.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CAC_CA18_Mustang_IV_A68-750_25032007_YMAV.jpg_thumb.5431925cef03ed89851f0defb2dea3b9.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/A68-118CACMustangYMAV20130303.JPG.23bfa10e3e18620e39971fc9099efc25.JPG" data-fileid="43720" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="43720" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="A68-118CACMustangYMAV20130303.JPG_thumb.23bfa10e3e18620e39971fc9099efc25.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/A68-118CACMustangYMAV20130303.JPG_thumb.23bfa10e3e18620e39971fc9099efc25.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MustangVH-BPBYMAV25-03-2007.jpg.ca4bfea00b6f7c7253c73eebaf1361f0.jpg" data-fileid="43721" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43721" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MustangVH-BPBYMAV25-03-2007.jpg_thumb.ca4bfea00b6f7c7253c73eebaf1361f0.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/MustangVH-BPBYMAV25-03-2007.jpg_thumb.ca4bfea00b6f7c7253c73eebaf1361f0.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CACCA-18MustangVH-AGJYMAV20090315.jpg.4ad2408892be0d7c4f96d6faf576da39.jpg" data-fileid="43722" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43722" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="CACCA-18MustangVH-AGJYMAV20090315.jpg_thumb.4ad2408892be0d7c4f96d6faf576da39.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CACCA-18MustangVH-AGJYMAV20090315.jpg_thumb.4ad2408892be0d7c4f96d6faf576da39.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CACCA-18MustangVH-BOBYMAV20070326.jpg.eb50a5745bc26d750b6be37b94e06728.jpg" data-fileid="43723" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43723" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="CACCA-18MustangVH-BOBYMAV20070326.jpg_thumb.eb50a5745bc26d750b6be37b94e06728.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/CACCA-18MustangVH-BOBYMAV20070326.jpg_thumb.eb50a5745bc26d750b6be37b94e06728.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">44</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American T-28 Trojan</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-t-28-trojan-r595/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1836864340_NorthAmericanT-28B_VT-2_over_NAS_Whiting_Field_c1973.jpeg.864e9ec3e8e403821ca0ae0b6e020c8c.jpeg" /></p>
<p>
	Besides its use as a trainer, the T-28 was successfully employed as a counter-insurgency aircraft, primarily during the Vietnam War. It has continued in civilian use as an aerobatics and Warbird performer.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On September 24, 1949, the XT-28 (company designation NA-159) was flown for the first time, designed to replace the T-6 Texan. The T-28A arrived at the Air Proving Ground, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, in mid-June 1950, for suitability tests as an advanced trainer by the 3200th Fighter Test Squadron, with consideration given to its transition, instrument, and gunnery capabilities. Found satisfactory, a contract was issued and between 1950 and 1957, a total of 1,948 were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Following the T-28's withdrawal from U.S. military service, a number were remanufactured by Hamilton Aircraft into two versions called the Nomair. The first refurbished machines, designated T-28R-1 were similar to the standard T-28s they were adapted from, and were supplied to the Brazilian Navy. Later, a more ambitious conversion was undertaken as the T-28R-2, which transformed the two-seat tandem aircraft into a five-seat cabin monoplane for general aviation use. Other civil conversions of ex-military T-28As were undertaken by PacAero as the Nomad Mark I and Nomad Mark II.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the operational history and 13 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_T-28_Trojan" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specifications below are for the T-28D variant.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/1035402501_NorthAmericanT-28twoseat.jpg.6199ae91b78e847a85b6c79838b4fa76.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47420" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/837754146_NorthAmericanT-28twoseat.thumb.jpg.16ff48431ad5aabbecd3699d8fc7b4cf.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American T-28 two seat.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/219950169_NorthAmericanT-28VA-122.jpg.e3097bf576af8618067d0439e2fa896b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47421" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/700759670_NorthAmericanT-28VA-122.thumb.jpg.e196f8932d1e63f7274b102d61c14c57.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North American T-28 VA-122.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/535869884_NorthAmricaneT-2819930524PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.jpg.1160ec89c0a0a66eaf24ed270139ba6f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47422" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/279766001_NorthAmricaneT-2819930524PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.thumb.jpg.3f08c616e5bdb44d0cc6a72132949a92.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North Amrican eT-28 19930524  Photo by Edwin van Apstal.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/North_American_T-28A_Trojan_USAF.jpg.f0cbdf6571699a68826e5f5013b0a5f3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47423" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/North_American_T-28A_Trojan_USAF.thumb.jpg.d4995bb6547c4753f9ce14d4453bdc30.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="North_American_T-28A_Trojan_USAF.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/north-american-aviation-t-28d-trojan-vh-pfm-ymav-20170305_33296429805_o.jpg.dd55e428d7b397f80d386fb593b724ae.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47424" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_12/north-american-aviation-t-28d-trojan-vh-pfm-ymav-20170305_33296429805_o.thumb.jpg.38122f21a69ed85c9f7b52c143c509f7.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="north-american-aviation-t-28d-trojan-vh-pfm-ymav-20170305_33296429805_o.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">595</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:57:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>North American T-6 Texan (aka Harvard and SNJ)</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/north-american-t-6-texan-aka-harvard-and-snj-r367/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1597025519_VH-XSA-North-American-Harvard-YMPC-20140302.JPG" /></p>

<p>Designed by North American Aviation, the T-6 is known by a variety of designations depending on the model and operating air force. The United States Army Air Corps (USAAC) and USAAF designated it as the AT-6, the United States Navy the SNJ, and British Commonwealth air forces the Harvard, the name by which it is best known outside the US. Starting in 1948, the new United States Air Force (USAF) designated it the T-6, with the USN following in 1962. It remains a popular warbird aircraft used for airshow demonstrations and static displays. It has also been used many times to simulate various Japanese aircraft, including the Mitsubishi A6M Zero, in movies depicting World War II in the Pacific. A total of 15,495 T-6s of all variants were built.</p><p> </p><p>
The first model went into production and 180 were supplied to the USAAC as the BC-1 and 400 to the RAF as the Harvard I. The US Navy received 16 modified aircraft, designated the SNJ-1, and a further 61 as the SNJ-2 with a different engine.</p><p> </p><p>
For more information, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_T-6_Texan" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> There are so many variants, they warranted their own Wikipedia page <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_T-6_Texan_variants" rel="external nofollow">here.</a></p><p> </p><p>
The specifications below are for the T-6G variant.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-XSANorthAmericanHarvardYMPC20140302.JPG.b7272b583238079b4360173041f20c47.JPG" data-fileid="45293" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45293" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="VH-XSANorthAmericanHarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.b7272b583238079b4360173041f20c47.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-XSANorthAmericanHarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.b7272b583238079b4360173041f20c47.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-XSANorthAmericanHarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.b7272b583238079b4360173041f20c47.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-TXNNoorduynAT-6HarvardYMPC20140302.JPG.af51061850e40ff5dc1addfbea947761.JPG" data-fileid="45294" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45294" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="VH-TXNNoorduynAT-6HarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.af51061850e40ff5dc1addfbea947761.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-TXNNoorduynAT-6HarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.af51061850e40ff5dc1addfbea947761.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-TXNNoorduynAT-6HarvardYMPC20140302.JPG_thumb.af51061850e40ff5dc1addfbea947761.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AT-6DTexanVH-XNZ.jpg.13f404408f090d328cc900fd7092973a.jpg" data-fileid="45295" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45295" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AT-6DTexanVH-XNZ.jpg_thumb.13f404408f090d328cc900fd7092973a.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AT-6DTexanVH-XNZ.jpg_thumb.13f404408f090d328cc900fd7092973a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AT-6DTexanVH-XNZ.jpg_thumb.13f404408f090d328cc900fd7092973a.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-NZNSNJ-3YMAV20070325.JPG.c559e806a4cff4e7bfa438a5e1d2c639.JPG" data-fileid="45296" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45296" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="VH-NZNSNJ-3YMAV20070325.JPG_thumb.c559e806a4cff4e7bfa438a5e1d2c639.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-NZNSNJ-3YMAV20070325.JPG_thumb.c559e806a4cff4e7bfa438a5e1d2c639.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/VH-NZNSNJ-3YMAV20070325.JPG_thumb.c559e806a4cff4e7bfa438a5e1d2c639.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SouthernKnightsAT6HarvardFormationTeam.jpg.3bc8349018f97ebfa68fe438a7dea134.jpg" data-fileid="45297" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45297" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="SouthernKnightsAT6HarvardFormationTeam.jpg_thumb.3bc8349018f97ebfa68fe438a7dea134.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SouthernKnightsAT6HarvardFormationTeam.jpg_thumb.3bc8349018f97ebfa68fe438a7dea134.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/SouthernKnightsAT6HarvardFormationTeam.jpg_thumb.3bc8349018f97ebfa68fe438a7dea134.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">367</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop A-17A Nomad</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-a-17a-nomad-r1713/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad01.JPG.e82393d7c32a93e02c88780e917fe559.JPG" /></p>
<p>
	The Northrop A-17, also known as the Northrop Model 8, a development of the Northrop Gamma 2F model, was a two-seat, single-engine, monoplane, attack bomber built in 1935 by the Northrop Corporation for the United States Army Air Corps. When in British Commonwealth service during World War II, the A-17 was called Nomad.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Northrop Gamma 2F was an attack bomber derivative of the Northrop Gamma transport aircraft, developed in parallel with the Northrop Gamma 2C, designated the YA-13 and XA-16. The Gamma 2F had a revised tail, cockpit canopy and wing flaps compared with the Gamma 2C, and was fitted with new semi-retractable landing gear. It was delivered to the United States Army Air Corps for tests on 6 October 1934, and after modifications which included fitting with a conventional fixed landing gear, was accepted by the Air Corps. A total of 110 aircraft were ordered as the A-17 in 1935.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The resulting A-17 was equipped with perforated flaps, and had a fixed landing gear with partial fairings. It was fitted with an internal fuselage bomb bay, that carried fragmentation bombs, and external bomb racks.
</p>

<p>
	Northrop developed a new landing gear, this time completely retractable, producing the A-17A variant. This version was again purchased by the Army Air Corps, who placed orders for 129 aircraft. By the time these were delivered, the Northrop Corporation had been taken over by Douglas Aircraft Company, with export models being known as the Douglas Model 8.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For operational history in 10 countries and details of 11 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_A-17" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad02.JPG.10ec29dec52f0f02639ccec568ead310.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60968" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad02.thumb.JPG.7c290368acc29b75676a60252cbe3de7.JPG" data-ratio="55.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop A-17A Nomad 02.JPG"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad03.JPG.dbe2531f1ca5824f3fd721f13897ff44.JPG" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60969" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad03.thumb.JPG.d578c5c5fedb87eb9d6a020cbdbf4fd1.JPG" data-ratio="67.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop A-17A Nomad 03.JPG"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad04.jpg.1e6bc908cc85b9b01b6cdfed2d9fc019.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60970" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad04.thumb.jpg.eb3941f36a80a1cb8dc8ef8ddc1f110b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop A-17A Nomad 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad05.jpg.c0075fa2cf6c52a53b2be48452bc5cca.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60971" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_06/NorthropA-17ANomad05.thumb.jpg.6bbf5a1dd1f1db3e89f318d2647b9a03.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop A-17A Nomad 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1713</guid><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:32:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop BT</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-bt-r1761/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-101.jpg.bc0931ce2e424a6bd1e850d3c2d1f89d.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Northrop BT was an American two-seat, single-engine monoplane dive bomber built by the Northrop Corporation for the United States Navy. At the time, Northrop was a subsidiary of the Douglas Aircraft Company. While unsuccessful in its own right, the BT was subsequently redesigned into the Douglas SBD Dauntless, which would form the backbone of the Navy's dive bomber force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design of the initial version began in 1935. It was powered by a 700 hp (520 kW; 710 PS) Pratt and Whitney XR-1535-66 double row air-cooled radial engine and had hydraulically actuated perforated split flaps (dive brakes), and main landing gear that retracted backwards into fairing "trousers" beneath the wings. The perforated flaps were invented to eliminate tail buffeting during diving maneuvers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The next iteration of the BT, the XBT-1, was equipped with a 750 hp (560 kW; 760 PS) R-1535. This aircraft was followed in 1936 by the BT-1, powered by an 825 hp (615 kW; 836 PS) R-1535-94 engine. One BT-1 was modified with a fixed tricycle landing gear and was the first such aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The final variant, the XBT-2, was a BT-1 modified to incorporate landing gear which folded laterally into recessed wheel wells, leading edge slots, a redesigned canopy, and was powered by an 800 hp (600 kW; 810 PS) Wright XR-1820-32 radial. The XBT-2 first flew on 25 April 1938, and after successful testing the Navy placed an order for 144 aircraft. In 1939 the aircraft designation was changed to the Douglas SBD-1 with the last 87 on order completed as SBD-2s. By this point, Northrop had become the El Segundo division of Douglas aircraft, hence the change.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The U.S. Navy placed an order for 54 BT-1s in 1936 with the aircraft entering service during 1938. BT-1s served on USS Yorktown and Enterprise. The type was not a success in service due to poor handling characteristics, especially at low speeds, "a fatal flaw in a carrier based aircraft." It was also prone to unexpected rolls and a number of aircraft were lost in crashes.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XBT-1</strong><br />
	Prototype, one built.<br />
	<strong>BT-1            </strong>(Specifications below)<br />
	Production variant, 54 built.<br />
	<strong>BT-1S</strong><br />
	A BT-1 (c/n346, BuNo 0643) was fitted with a fixed tri-cycle undercarriage. This aircraft was damaged in a crash on 6 February 1939, returned to Douglas and repaired to BT-1 standard.
</p>

<p>
	Comparison between the XBT-1 (BuNo 9745) and XBT-2 (BuNo 0627) on 4 December 1936<br />
	<strong>XBT-2</strong><br />
	One BT-1 modified with fully retractable landing gear and other modifications.<br />
	<strong>BT-2</strong><br />
	Production variant of the XBT-2, 144 on order completed as SBD-1 and SBD-2.<br />
	<strong>Douglas DB-19</strong><br />
	One BT-1 (c/n346, BuNo 0643), the former BT-1S, was modified as the DB-19 which was tested by the Imperial Japanese Navy as the Douglas DXD1 (long designation - Douglas Navy Experimental Type D Attack Aircraft)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-102.jpg.28238d4f4af344290d67072bef5caeb8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61657" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-102.thumb.jpg.d5347901e6ecdc8564ad81a9be6bc94f.jpg" data-ratio="55.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop BT-1 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-103.jpg.6585700b1653894e5bee9aa1fa0c1a76.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61658" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-103.thumb.jpg.1572edea83320349c9d179d19a4f6b19.jpg" data-ratio="52.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop BT-1 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-104.jpg.75fd0becab0b0fd6151c5c67ef6ba799.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61659" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-104.thumb.jpg.5e2b5ea1ae2559fdba737771c835b8b6.jpg" data-ratio="48.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop BT-1 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-105.jpg.d87c9103126adfa99b4314a21e969951.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61660" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_08/NorthropBT-105.thumb.jpg.fd8662c5f6cd86dd663e894adf20ffa0.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop BT-1 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1761</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 07:06:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop F-15 Reporter</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-f-15-reporter-r2058/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1503.jpg.1f1aad71c8b0daefb64dda681b7dcb08.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Northrop F-15 Reporter (later RF-61) was an American unarmed photographic reconnaissance aircraft. Based on the Northrop P-61 Black Widow night fighter, it was the last piston-powered photo-reconnaissance aircraft designed and produced for the United States Air Force. Though produced in limited quantities, and with a relatively short service life, the F-15's aerial photographs of the Korean Peninsula would prove vital in 1950, when North Korea invaded the south.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The F-15 Reporter was created when the guns were removed from the experimental XP-61E, the last fighter variant of the P-61 Black Widow. With less than six months flying time, the first XP-61E was taken back to the Northrop modification shop where it was converted into an unarmed photographic reconnaissance aircraft. All the guns were removed, and a new nose was fitted, capable of holding an assortment of aerial cameras. The aircraft, redesignated XF-15, flew for the first time on 3 July 1945, with Northrop test pilot L. A. "Slim" Parrett at the controls. A P-61C-1-NO (serial number 42-8335) was also modified to XF-15 standards as the XF-15A. Apart from the turbosupercharged R-2800-C engines, it was identical to the XF-15 and flew for the first time on 17 October 1945. For unknown reasons Northrop subcontracted the nose for the F-15A to the Hughes Tool Company of Culver City, California. The F-15A used the existing P-61C wings (without fighter brakes), engines and tail sections but with an entirely new, more streamlined fuselage housing a crew of two under a continuous bubble-canopy.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As a result of continuing development trouble with the Howard Hughes-designed XF-11, the staff of the Army Air Force Headquarters determined an immediate need for 320 F-15 Reporters. Even before the first flight of the XF-15 an initial contract for 175 aircraft was signed in June 1945. Following testing it was determined that the F-15 Reporter possessed similar performance and flight characteristics to the troublesome XF-11, despite the Reporter being powered by less powerful engines, and using mostly pre-existing parts. This spelled the end to further development of the XF-11.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first production F-15A was accepted in September 1946. However, the contract was abruptly canceled in 1947, possibly because the performance of the aircraft was rapidly being overshadowed by jets, with the last of only 36 examples being accepted by the United States Army Air Forces in April of that year. The last F-15 to be produced (serial number 45-59335) was produced as an F-15A-5-NO, which differed from the Block-1 version mainly in having a new internal camera installation in the nose. It seems that this change had been contemplated for the last 20 F-15s as well, since some records indicate that these were all eventually re-designated as F-15A-5-NO.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The F-15 had a revised center pod with pilot and camera operator seated in tandem under a single bubble canopy. The first XP-61E, from which the first XF-15 was converted, had the canopy hinged to the side, while all subsequent XF-15 and production F-15 employed a sliding canopy. The aircraft's six cameras were placed in an elongated nose, replacing the XP-61Es four guns. Production F-15A were powered by the same turbosupercharged R-2800-73 engines as the P-61C. The aircraft had a takeoff weight of 32,145 lb (14,580 kg) and a top speed of 440 mph (382 kn, 708 km/h) at 33,000 ft (10,058 m). In the end, only 36 of the 175 ordered F-15As were built, and all were constructed from aircraft originally contracted to be built as P-61C.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong>XF-15</strong><br />
	The first prototype, converted from the first XP-61E.<br />
	<strong>XF-15A</strong><br />
	The second prototype, converted from a P-61C (number 43-8335).<br />
	<strong>F-15A Reporter</strong><br />
	Photoreconnaissance variant with a new center pod with pilot and camera operator seated in tandem under a single bubble canopy, and six cameras taking place of radar in the nose. Powered by the same turbosupercharged R-2800-73 engines as the P-61C. The aircraft had a takeoff weight of 32,145 lb (14,580 kg) and a top speed of 440 mph (382 kn, 708 km/h). Only 36 of the 175 ordered F-15As were built before the end of the war. After formation of the United States Air Force in 1947, F-15A was redesignated RF-61C. F-15As were responsible for most of the aerial maps of North Korea used at the start of the Korean War.<br />
	<strong>RF-61C Reporter</strong>      (Specifications below)<br />
	USAF designation for the F-15C from 1948 onwards.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number built    36
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1501.jpg.4b5b4e423dac1803176e49795e0cd845.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65642" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1501.thumb.jpg.7064c3c4a4ec97f129add9657545b8e2.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop F-15 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1502.jpg.cd6994fc86c478ee1c77bbf0ecdf2c60.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65643" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1502.thumb.jpg.56037751cc8711bd69e33f5aab1204d8.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop F-15 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1504.jpg.65db4407e8381ab1bfc8d97f532257fb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65645" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1504.thumb.jpg.ec7fff8d38edc5b18c5f294a7cbfdb19.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop F-15 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1505.jpg.086b58690772af9315cbd15c874c58ae.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65646" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/NorthropF-1505.thumb.jpg.bf3fb69e63e89a202f766cf0893fd32e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop F-15 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2058</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:20:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop N-3PB</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-n-3pb-r1855/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB05.jpg.76bf582e8abe61fda9ba00c26c53711f.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Northrop N-3PB Nomad was a single-engined American floatplane of the 1940s. Northrop developed the N-3PB as an export model based on the earlier Northrop A-17 design. A total of 24 were purchased by Norway, but were not delivered until after the Fall of Norway during the Second World War. Exiled Norwegian forces used them from 1941, operating from Iceland, for convoy escort, anti-submarine patrols, and training purposes from "Little Norway" in Canada. Within two years of delivery, the design was obsolete for front-line service and the remaining N-3PBs were replaced by larger aircraft in 1943.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Following increased international tension surrounding the German annexation of the Sudetenland in 1938, the Norwegian parliament granted extraordinary appropriations to modernize the Norwegian Armed Forces. The Royal Norwegian Navy Air Service (RNNAS) and the Norwegian Army Air Service were prioritized for funds from the 50,000,000 kr Norwegian Neutrality Fund. The RNNAS' share of the funds was reserved to buy 12 Heinkel He 115 torpedo bombers and 24 reconnaissance aircraft, as well as several new naval air stations. The Dornier Do 22, Northrop 8-A, Northrop 2GP and Vultee V-11 GB were considered and proposals retrieved. The commission quickly decided the Vultee V-11 GB was the best aircraft to satisfy both air services' needs. On the part of the Royal Norwegian Air Service, the requirements were for a reconnaissance aircraft with a range of 1,500 km (930 mi), a top speed of no less than 320 km/h (200 mph) and to carry a 900 kg (2,000 lb) torpedo or the equivalent in bombs.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 30 December 1939, Norway sent a purchasing commission to the United States, consisting of a Royal Norwegian Navy Air Service contingent headed by Cmdr. Kristian Østby, and a Norwegian Army Air Service contingent led by Birger Fredrik Motzfeldt. The goal of the commission was to inspect the Vultee V-11, which would serve as a new common reconnaissance bomber for the two air services. Amongst the requirements the commission hoped to fill was replacing the Royal Norwegian Navy Air Service's M.F.11 biplane patrol aircraft. Once in the US, the commission found that Vultee would not be able to deliver the V-11 within a reasonable amount of time so another aircraft had to be found. Motzfeldt quickly found that the Douglas 8A-5N would satisfy the NOAAS' requirements. As the Douglas 8A-5N could not be fitted with floats, Østby continued to look for an aircraft suitable for the RNNAS. After visits to many of the aviation companies in February 1940, Østby determined that only one manufacturer had both a design and available production capacity, Northrop Aircraft Incorporated. The commission ordered 24 floatplanes based on the Model 8-A, renamed the N-3PB, "off the drawing board" (literally, the aircraft being ordered prior to the type having flown) from Northrop on 8 March 1940, at a total cost of 6,550,000 kr to meet this requirement. Half the amount was paid shortly before Operation Weserübung, the German invasion of Norway, on 9 April 1940.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Model 8-A, the export model of the Northrop Attack Bomber series had to be redesigned to meet the requirements of the Norwegian order. The new N-3PB was the first product of Northrop Aircraft, which had reformed in 1939 and was a low-winged cantilever monoplane fitted with twin floats. First intended for a lower-powered engine, the N-3PB was ultimately powered by a Wright Cyclone radial engine, of the same type specified for the Douglas 8A-5N bombers and Curtiss Hawk 75A-8s ordered by Norway at the same time, simplifying the maintenance and operation requirements for the Norwegian military aircraft fleets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	With the Norwegian operation requirements drawn up for a coastal reconnaissance floatplane, a series of modifications were requested to the original design. The changes included a redesign of the float structure to accommodate either a torpedo or bomb load carried under the center fuselage to supplement five underwing bomb racks. Additional armament changes led to a combination of six machine guns replacing the four machine guns (two fixed forward, two flexible rear-mounted 7.9 mm)/one cannon (forward facing, fixed 20 mm) arrangement that was in the initial design. Provision for a rear under-fuselage gun was also made. Further equipment requirements including fitting a rear fuselage-mounted camera as well as changes to instruments and radio equipment.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Before Northrop could complete any aircraft, Norway was invaded by Germany. The invasion and occupation of Norway necessitated that the armament of the N-3PB, originally to be installed in Norway, had to be changed. Initial specifications listed one Oerlikon 20 mm cannon in each wing, as well as two 7.9 mm Fabrique Nationale machine guns each in the fuselage and rear gunner stations. Owing to the lack of availability of the originally specified armament, Norwegian-manufactured Colt heavy machine guns were substituted with four Colt MG53A .50 cal. machine guns in the wings and two .30 cal. Colt MG40s mounted in dorsal and ventral positions of the gunner's rear cockpit.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of operational history, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_N-3PB_Nomad" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB01.jpg.e5d8445664cf22b1d09afececf300729.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63492" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB01.thumb.jpg.337a3c100956c960726648b0522a2a9e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop N-3PB 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB02.jpg.0eb0722b7908fdef46af2f85dfbc43e5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63493" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB02.thumb.jpg.7936ac76274e46c4c9adb73b23e1c5ee.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop N-3PB 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB03.jpg.5afe807a83b6d98c92f40dbe91e2ad8b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63494" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB03.thumb.jpg.8cd71477c61ec88428cd30b61da353eb.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop N-3PB 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB04.jpg.d09e0f005b7448d48f6367fe1b167405.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63495" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_04/NorthropN-3PB04.thumb.jpg.2cc88226d0e1fede85f746f2df37be74.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop N-3PB 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1855</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:12:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop P-61 Black Widow</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-p-61-black-widow-r753/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1923533632_NorthropP-61BlackWidowgreenairborne.jpg.c3616b763ed78f9d87c1a644fe477ea6.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The P-61 had a crew of three: pilot, gunner, and radar operator. It was armed with four 20 mm (.79 in) Hispano M2 forward-firing cannon mounted in the lower fuselage, and four .50 in (12.7 mm) M2 Browning machine guns mounted in a remote-controlled dorsal gun turret.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	It was an all-metal, twin-engine, twin-boom design developed during World War II. The first test flight was made on May 26, 1942, with the first production aircraft rolling off the assembly line in October 1943. The last aircraft was retired from government service in 1954.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although not produced in the large numbers of its contemporaries, the Black Widow was effectively operated as a night-fighter by United States Army Air Forces squadrons in the European Theater, Pacific Theater, China Burma India Theater, and Mediterranean Theater during World War II. It replaced earlier British-designed night-fighter aircraft that had been updated to incorporate radar when it became available. After the war, the P-61—redesignated the F-61—served in the United States Air Force as a long-range, all-weather, day/night interceptor for Air Defense Command until 1948, and Fifth Air Force until 1950.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On the night of 14 August 1945, a P-61B of the 548th Night Fight Squadron named Lady in the Dark was unofficially credited with the last Allied air victory before VJ Day. The P-61 was also modified to create the F-15 Reporter photo-reconnaissance aircraft for the United States Army Air Forces and subsequently used by the United States Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XP-61's spine-mounted dorsal remote turret could be aimed and fired by the gunner or radar operator, who both had aiming control and gyroscopic collimator sighting posts attached to their swiveling seats, or could be locked forward to be fired by the pilot in addition to the 20 mm (.79 in) cannon. The radar operator could rotate the turret to engage targets behind the aircraft. Capable of a full 360° rotation and 90° elevation, the turret could be used to engage any target in the hemisphere above and to the sides of the XP-61. A brief assessment of the turret by the British Aeroplane &amp; Armament Experimental Establishment in 1944 found problems with the aiming and "jerky movement" of the guns.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The total number built was 706.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development, design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_P-61_Black_Widow" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1528552134_NorthropP-61BlackWidow01.jpg.9c79987fbba366c6b54f83f784199fb8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="49058" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/649236942_NorthropP-61BlackWidow01.thumb.jpg.a253c41697408aefe931e19fad324547.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop P-61 Black Widow 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/2003950931_NorthropP-61BlackWidow313.jpg.85348e132ae67b79ed5ae6089d312f87.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="49059" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1563508831_NorthropP-61BlackWidow313.thumb.jpg.19b69b5145c234a5cb9ee607b082f8cf.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop P-61 Black Widow 313.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/697615482_NorthropP-61BlackWidowmuseum.jpg.f5943b667dba57964a35bc72df5c43a7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="49060" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/476506430_NorthropP-61BlackWidowmuseum.thumb.jpg.196eee37536789d2352e5389705f02a5.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop P-61 Black Widow museum.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/1810524001_NorthropP-61BBlackWidow728.jpg.c8f8de6a8029742f5ea6e0954d14cdb9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="49061" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_04/566312944_NorthropP-61BBlackWidow728.thumb.jpg.42c3703870327956e91e9da191e61be5.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Northrop P-61B Black Widow 728.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">753</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:16:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Northrop YC-125 Raider</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/northrop-yc-125-raider-r1708/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider01.jpg.975ed6613d65e310275631fb2effa265.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Northrop YC-125 Raider was a 1940s American three-engined STOL utility transport built by Northrop Corporation, Hawthorne, California.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Northrop's first postwar civil design was a three-engined STOL passenger and cargo transport named the Northrop N-23 Pioneer, which was intended to replace the Ford Trimotors of the Central American airline Transportes Aéreos Centro Americanos (TACA). The Pioneer could carry 36 passengers or cargo, with a cargo door and a "chin" hatch allowing the loading of 36 ft (11 m) lengths of pipes or timber into the aircraft's cabin. It first flew on 21 December 1946. The aircraft had good performance, resulting in an order of 40 aircraft from TACA, but political manoeuvring from Pan-Am after the shipping company Waterman Steamship Corporation purchased a major stake in TACA led to TACA losing rights to operate to or from the United States, which in turn caused TACA to cancel its order for the Pioneer. Despite extensive sales tours, no further orders were obtained. The Pioneer was lost in a fatal crash on 19 February 1948 when it lost a new tailfin design in flight.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1948, the United States Air Force expressed interest in an aircraft of the same configuration and placed an order with Northrop for 23 aircraft, 13 troop transports designated the C-125A Raider and 10 for Arctic rescue work designated the C-125B. With the company designation N-32 Raider the first aircraft flew on 1 August 1949.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was powered by three 1,200 hp (890 kW) Wright R-1820-99 Cyclone radial engines. The aircraft could also be fitted with JATO rockets that enabled it to take off in less than 500 feet (150 m). The 13 troop transporters were designated YC-125A in-service and the Arctic rescue version the YC-125B.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Canadian company Canadair considered building the N-23 under licence but did not proceed.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Deliveries of the YC-125 to the USAF began in 1950. These aircraft did not serve long as they were underpowered and they were soon sent to Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas and relegated to be ground instructional trainers until retired in 1955 and declared surplus.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Most of the surplus aircraft were purchased by Frank Ambrose and sold to bush operators in South and Central America.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>N-23 Pioneer</strong><br />
	Prototype three-engined STOL transport, one built.<br />
	<strong>N-32 Raider</strong><br />
	Company designation of military version of the N-23.<br />
	<strong>YC-125A Raider</strong><br />
	N-32 with seats for thirty troops, 13 built.<br />
	<strong>YC-125B Raider</strong> (Specifications below)<br />
	Arctic rescue version of the N-32 with twenty stretchers and provision for a ski undercarriage. Ten built (serials 48-618/627).<br />
	<strong>CL-3</strong><br />
	Proposed Canadair licensed produced variant from 1949, with 3 x Canadian Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1820 engines. Was redesignated CL-12 in the same year. Project was dropped sometime around early 1950.[citation needed]<br />
	<strong>N-74</strong><br />
	Another proposed Canadair variant. Improvements including the replacement of the three engines with two Allison T56 turboprops were studied. Project abandoned in the early 1950s.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider02.jpg.56c5315dd70cd090a2db44a976054bcd.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60866" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider02.thumb.jpg.33cbdf6254435ad9b5aaa2d3720adf88.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="northrop yc-125 raider 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider03.jpg.6c3b49b11e79cdb7937f39162ea2f652.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60867" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider03.thumb.jpg.953e677f93b7c3a6ec6c45dfd7179c28.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="northrop yc-125 raider 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider04.jpg.c28f03381fe8e6cefdc09227e5b64061.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60868" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider04.thumb.jpg.aa08f3e262b1df97b5e68924bac503a1.jpg" data-ratio="54.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="northrop yc-125 raider 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider05.jpg.9785ae06d25e94c132d7c402b2c23c3d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60869" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_05/northropyc-125raider05.thumb.jpg.c37477bd8e8ebf980c02ce59cff58cb2.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="northrop yc-125 raider 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1708</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Percival P.56 Provost</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/percival-p56-provost-r852/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/627862834_Percival_Provost_NLXF603.jpg.5bb6eb688f91c9a7c8e97b8f93edc079.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Percival P.56 Provost is a basic trainer aircraft that was designed and manufactured by British aviation company Percival.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During the 1950s, the Provost was developed for the Royal Air Force (RAF) as a replacement for the Percival Prentice. Designed by Henry Millicer, it was a single-engined low-wing monoplane, furnished with a fixed, tailwheel undercarriage and, like the preceding Prentice, had a side-by-side seating arrangement. First flying on 24 February 1950, the prototypes participated in an official evaluation, after which the type was selected to meet Air Ministry specification T.16/48.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Provost entered service with the RAF during 1953 and quickly proved to be more capable than the preceding Prentice. It was a relatively successful aircraft, being exported for multiple overseas operators. Various models were developed, both armed and unarmed, to meet with customer demands. The Provost later adapted to make use of a turbojet engine, producing the BAC Jet Provost. During the 1960s, the type was withdrawn from RAF service in favour of its jet-powered successor. It continued to be used for decades after with various export customers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Provost was an all-metal, single-engined, two-seat monoplane, featuring fixed conventional landing gear with a fully-castering tailwheel. It was developed to provide training that was better-suited to the increasingly-complicated operational aircraft that were then being brought into service. The main two seats in the cockpit were positioned in a side-by-side configuration, enabling the instructor to sit directly alongside the student, easing training by allowing for mutual close observation and for flight procedures to be more readily demonstrated; a third seat had been originally specified for use by an observer, but this position was later omitted following little use. The cockpit was considered to be relatively bulky amongst its contemporary rivals, a feature that did not heavily impinge upon the aircraft's overall performance. The type was designed to be easy to maintain; various components were intentionally interchangeable where possible and there was a generous provision of access hatches in the fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of design, development, operational history and the 6 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percival_Provost" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/Percival_P.56_Provost_T1_XF877.jpg.162a5e126566e3c4a4b1c15da4bb0e8a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50048" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/Percival_P.56_Provost_T1_XF877.thumb.jpg.496afec5cf00d431a5ca6f69d1372007.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival_P.56_Provost_T1_XF877.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/933913301_Percival_Provost_T1WV562.jpg.fb1567dfd6479d13b1bf91e29b9fe03d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50049" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1498546521_Percival_Provost_T1WV562.thumb.jpg.89b3ebf70109a06cc07f37dfe6ff189c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival_Provost_T1 WV562.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1954408179_Percival_Provost_T1WW421.jpg.a80bfd070edbd58316ede351f9e890f4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50050" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/127985839_Percival_Provost_T1WW421.thumb.jpg.1f129404df693a64c08756a76c8eb3dd.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival_Provost_T1 WW421.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/Percival-Provost-WW397.jpg.ffc1999f796bf6ca6119aaeff52227f1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50051" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/Percival-Provost-WW397.thumb.jpg.cb071ec4e7716b3d8fd5cce14db2a32d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival-Provost-WW397.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">852</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:45:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Percival Prentice</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/percival-prentice-r850/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/903728329_PercivalPrenticeVR259.jpg.e7a2467553ce0bf4fccfdd041ac70670.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Percival Prentice was a basic trainer of the Royal Air Force in the early postwar period. It is a low-wing monoplane with a fixed tailwheel undercarriage. Front seating was in a side-by-side configuration with a rear seat provided.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Designed to meet Air Ministry Specification T.23/43, the Prentice was the first all-metal aircraft to be produced by the Percival Aircraft Company. The prototype Prentice TV163 first flew from Percival's factory at Luton Airport, Bedfordshire on 31 March 1946. Early trials revealed inadequate rudder control, resulting in a revised rudder and a large cutout in the elevators. The aircraft were later modified with turned-up wingtips. Over 370 were delivered to the RAF between 1947 and 1949.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An unusual design feature was the provision for three seats. While the instructor and pupil were equipped with dual controls in a side-by-side arrangement in the front, a second pupil sat in the rear seat without controls to receive "air experience". Both pupils could communicate with the instructor. Night flying training was to be carried out in daylight by means of amber screens incorporated into the canopy and the use of special goggles. The amber screens were folded back when not in use.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Several hundred Prentices were ordered for RAF use. Since the Percival factory was concentrating on production of the Percival Proctor and the Merganser light transport aircraft, production was sub-contracted to the Blackburn Aircraft works at Brough.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Forty-two aircraft were built under licence by Hindustan Aircraft for the Indian Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Prentice T.1</strong><br />
	Standard three-seat trainer for Royal Air Force and export. 251 hp (187 kW) de Havilland Gipsy Queen 32 engine.<br />
	<strong>Prentice T.2</strong><br />
	Fitted with supercharged 296 hp (221 kW) Gipsy Queen 51.[6] One built.<br />
	<strong>Prentice T.3</strong><br />
	Fitted with 345 hp (257 kW) Gipsy Queen 70-2.[6] 62 built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1730006006_PercivalPrenticeG-AOKL.jpg.96a1cb035e1fcf58397f5891f52a4359.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50033" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/2034856586_PercivalPrenticeG-AOKL.thumb.jpg.133c720fef827a2dca5d7a8b09668b62.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Prentice G-AOKL.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/115249683_PercivalPrenticeG-AOLU.jpg.2e0c972c8535d15434f6a6379d290a98.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50034" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/615851945_PercivalPrenticeG-AOLU.thumb.jpg.8b41264dbb0885c887463dcf401fc3ad.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Prentice G-AOLU.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1198788665_PercivalPrenticeG-APPL.jpg.6740fb0309544ccab72a44a53b913a4e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50035" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1460969163_PercivalPrenticeG-APPL.thumb.jpg.09925c258961c5c5e08f4f470ea4de34.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Prentice G-APPL.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/349303849_PercivalPrenticeVR249.jpg.353ba5d58de5931eeef6c8080faa3617.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50036" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/460787122_PercivalPrenticeVR249.thumb.jpg.4dd0e6b539264c046da352ee0e131b30.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Prentice VR249.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">850</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 08:59:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Percival Proctor</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/percival-proctor-r851/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1944223237_PercivalProctorRM221.jpg.65b76c5d091e0245742764b5984133b5.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Percival Proctor was a British radio trainer and communications aircraft of the Second World War. The Proctor was a single-engined, low-wing monoplane with seating for three or four, depending on the model.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Proctor was developed from the Percival Vega Gull in response to Air Ministry Specification 20/38 for a radio trainer and communications aircraft. To meet the requirement, the aircraft based on the Vega Gull had larger rear cabin windows and the fuselage was six inches longer. Modifications were made to the seats to enable the crew to wear parachutes, and other changes to enable a military radio and other equipment to be fitted. In early 1939 an order was placed for 247 aircraft to meet operational requirement OR.65.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype aircraft, serial number P5998, first flew on 8 October 1939 from Luton Airport. and the type was put into production for the RAF and Fleet Air Arm. The prototype was tested as an emergency bomber during 1940 but this idea was abandoned as the invasion threat receded. Although the first 222 aircraft were built by Percival at Luton, most of the remaining aircraft were built by F. Hills &amp; Sons of Trafford Park near Manchester. They built 812 Proctors of several marks between 1941 and 1945, assembling most of the aircraft at Barton Aerodrome.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Whilst the very early Proctors (Mks I to III.) followed very closely the last incarnation of the Vega Gull, and consequently retained most of its performance, later versions became much heavier and less aerodynamic, with inevitable detrimental effects upon their performance. The later marks of Proctor, whilst looking broadly similar, were in fact a complete redesign of the aircraft and were much enlarged, heavier and even less efficient. Flight performance was poor. There were later plans to fit them with the 250 hp Queen 30 and larger airscrew, but only one trial aircraft was so fitted as the all-metal Prentice was being developed to replace the Proctor, utilising the Queen 30 etc. The Prentice itself proved to be a very poor aircraft (even worse than the later Proctors) and served in the RAF for only a handful of years before withdrawal as it was deemed unsatisfactory. The remaining Proctors in use soldiered-on after Service use in private hands until the 1960s. At this point, owing to concerns about the degradation of glued joints in their wooden airframes, they were all grounded. Several surviving Proctors have been rebuilt with modern adhesives and should be returned to the air shortly. Early Proctors still make good light aircraft, as they combine the Vega's attributes of Long-range, speed and load-carrying ability. Notably, all Proctors inherited the Vega Gull's feature of wing-folding.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Governor-General's Flight RAAF operated one Proctor from 1945 to 1947.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Notable Owners</strong><br />
	Nevil Shute flew his Proctor from England to Australia and terminated the return flight in Italy, 1500 miles short of his goal, after a ground loop caused by a crosswind landing damaged the undercarriage. Italian bureaucracy delayed the importation of replacement parts and he was forced to return to England by commercial airline.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of operational history and the nine variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percival_Proctor" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1687429656_PercivalProctorG-AKIU.jpg.9ff217143672448926bdaadc081de033.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50037" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1990882021_PercivalProctorG-AKIU.thumb.jpg.3dc1eaeaf29ac55b22f56d8350b24b99.jpg" data-ratio="44.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Proctor G-AKIU.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1659711350_PercivalProctorVH-AUCmono.jpg.df23f9dffd7982f229266399d0c6625e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50038" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/494187323_PercivalProctorVH-AUCmono.thumb.jpg.2333bcc49973e07deb69d12929dbe10b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Proctor VH-AUC mono.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1308392221_PercivalProctorVH-AUC.jpg.aaf660b2414f81cca1b87d78339dd915.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50039" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1534150283_PercivalProctorVH-AUC.thumb.jpg.b04eaafdaac44afdaaa46fbb5acf002d.jpg" data-ratio="53" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Proctor VH-AUC.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/817453307_PercivalProctorZK-AQZ.jpg.934e275b859408816310452e73346894.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50040" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/22980492_PercivalProctorZK-AQZ.thumb.jpg.ebe54e28d9a2f7fb9d1f00b731a9adf3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Percival Proctor ZK-AQZ.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">851</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 09:12:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Petlyakov Pe-2</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/petlyakov-pe-2-r1550/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-201.jpg.a2853ef1733cf27c3a95c5546faad512.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	<br />
	The Petlyakov Pe-2 (Russian: Петляков Пе-2) was a Soviet twin-engine dive bomber used during World War II. One of the outstanding tactical attack aircraft of the war, it also proved successful as a heavy fighter, as a night fighter (Pe-3 variant) and as a reconnaissance aircraft. The Pe-2 was, numerically, the most important Soviet bomber of World War II, at their peak comprising 75% of the Soviet twin-engine bomber force.[4] The Soviets manufactured Pe-2s in greater numbers (11,430 built) during the war than any other twin-engine combat aircraft except for the German Junkers Ju 88 and the British Vickers Wellington.[3][5] Several communist air forces flew the type after the war, when it became known by the NATO reporting name Buck.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1937, Vladimir Petlyakov was the leader of the Heavy Aircraft Brigade at the Tupolev OKB responsible for the development of the ANT-42 four-engined long-range bomber (which would eventually enter service as the TB-7/Pe-8). However, that same year saw the start of Stalin's Great Purge, and none were spared suspicion; Andrei Tupolev, the head of the OKB, was coerced into signing a "confession" in October 1937 that he had formed an anti-Soviet group that included Petlyakov, and both men along with many others were arrested.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Too valuable to be simply executed, unlike many others arrested during the Great Purge, Petlyakov and other weapons designers were instead sent to sharashkas, special prisons run by the NKVD where such valuable prisoners could continue their work under close scrutiny. In 1938, Petlyakov was tasked with leading the first Special Technical Department (STO — SpetsTekhOd'yel) for aviation that also included other future well-known designers such as Vladimir Myasishchev, a colleague of Petlyakov's at the Tupolev OKB.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Because the Russian word for "100" (сотка — "sotka") sounds somewhat like the pronunciation of "STO", the STO was later renamed KB-100, and there Petlyakov proposed the development of a twin-engine interceptor against high-altitude long-range bombers, particularly those being developed in Germany such as the Junkers Ju 86P and Henschel Hs 130. His proposal was accepted in March 1938, with the requirement that the first prototype be ready for its first flight before the end of 1939. The project was initially given the name Samolyot 100 (lit. "Aircraft 100") and later called VI-100 (Vysotnyi Istrebitel — "High-Altitude Fighter").
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The VI-100 project was an ambitious one for its time, with advanced features such as a pressurised cabin, all-metal construction, turbo-superchargers, and many electrically actuated systems. In addition, the performance requirements were also quite demanding: it was to be capable of reaching 630 km/h at an altitude of 10,000 m, a ceiling of 12,500 m, and a range of 1,400 km. The aircraft would also need a reinforced structure in order to withstand the Mach stresses of making diving attacks from high altitude against enemy bomber formations. In order to assist with the challenging development of the "100", other OKBs such as those of Yakovlev, Mikoyan &amp; Gurevich, and Sukhoi were also enlisted. The first full-scale VI-100 mock-up was completed in May 1939, and the first flight of the prototype occurred on 22 December 1939.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details on the development, design, armament, operational history and 21 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petlyakov_Pe-2" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> Number built    11,070 (+ 360 Pe-3 night fighter variant).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="57500" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-202.jpg.deca212d9428225dcc572738c2c352a0.jpg" rel=""><img alt="PetlyakovPe-202.thumb.jpg.a7427af5e60e7f17d57452a7bdf1b7fb.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57500" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-202.thumb.jpg.a7427af5e60e7f17d57452a7bdf1b7fb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="57501" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-203.jpg.17c3cac8a8a9062b406a2aec94bda3d2.jpg" rel=""><img alt="PetlyakovPe-203.thumb.jpg.cd5e130b4ce5b8b56dbe11b4fe6b7dcd.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57501" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-203.thumb.jpg.cd5e130b4ce5b8b56dbe11b4fe6b7dcd.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="57502" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-204.jpg.072adbdb07d1f1d0ee2ffc74b4fb3ab2.jpg" rel=""><img alt="PetlyakovPe-204.thumb.jpg.08eddf818f97db7aa9b748a715efc0ca.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57502" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-204.thumb.jpg.08eddf818f97db7aa9b748a715efc0ca.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" data-fileext="jpg" data-fileid="57503" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-205.jpg.cc7c648f164ca98f8c00138d57505cb2.jpg" rel=""><img alt="PetlyakovPe-205.thumb.jpg.46c46817d4ccbe63ecdb9ba81650ff08.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="57503" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_05/PetlyakovPe-205.thumb.jpg.46c46817d4ccbe63ecdb9ba81650ff08.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1550</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 04:23:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Piaggio P.108</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/piaggio-p108-r1873/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10801.jpg.9490b303c87b53f6332cc143c874e9cc.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Piaggio P.108 Bombardiere was an Italian four-engine heavy bomber that saw service with the Regia Aeronautica during World War II. The prototype first flew on 24 November 1939 and it entered service in 1941. It was one of a handful of Italian combat aircraft that could match the best manufactured by the Allies. Four versions of the P.108 were designed, but only one, the P.108B bomber, was produced in any quantity before the armistice. The other variants included the P.108A anti-ship aircraft with a 102 mm (4 in) gun, the P.108C, an airliner with an extended wingspan and re-modelled fuselage capable of carrying 32 passengers, and the P.108T transport version designed specifically for military use. Only one P.108A and 24 P.108Bs were built. The combined total number of all versions (and prototypes) was at least 39, almost certainly more than 44. Most of the P.108Cs were subsequently modified for use as military transport aircraft and could accommodate up to sixty passengers.[5] Nine P.108 Ts were used by Luftwaffe transport units until the end of the war.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number built    36 + 1 prototype (P.108B bombers); 12 + 1 prototype (P.108T transport)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of design and development of the variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaggio_P.108" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10802.jpg.0441c3a7b22614d7fc80cca11cabb5e8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63762" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10802.thumb.jpg.217b2cc3d288c98188e40b9c5e36adcc.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Piaggio P.108 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10803.jpg.9c285e3aac1707c274f7e09f31c70537.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63763" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10803.thumb.jpg.2549abacf0bd0f0c5f38e31598b801b0.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Piaggio P.108 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10804.jpg.1e264845d2deed0d73fdb681a5041235.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63764" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10804.thumb.jpg.2eeb8cb8c33f3248240a3ab60446906c.jpg" data-ratio="44" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Piaggio P.108 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10805.jpg.b16179bbe1d8c0e0faa18c7f23c6d24d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="63765" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_06/PiaggioP.10805.thumb.jpg.4102bafd4ea1092a171b503f6172d247.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Piaggio P.108 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1873</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2025 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Piaggio P.149D</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/piaggio-p149d-r6/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1583021745_Piaggio-P.149D-D-EARY.jpg" /></p>
<p>The aircraft was built under licence by Focke-Wulf in West Germany as the FWP.149D.</p><p> </p><p>
The P.149 was developed as a four-seat touring variant of the earlier P.148. The P.149 is an all-metal, low-wing cantilever monoplane with a retractable tricycle landing gear with room for four or five occupants. The prototype first flew on 19 June 1953.</p><p> </p><p>
Only a few were sold, until the German Air Force selected the aircraft for a training and utility role. Piaggio delivered 72 aircraft to Germany, and another 190 were built in Germany by Focke-Wulf as the FWP.149D.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EARY.jpg.8a8c168b6fd46cc4fb311572d3c466e4.jpg" data-fileid="43589" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43589" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PiaggioP.149DD-EARY.jpg_thumb.8a8c168b6fd46cc4fb311572d3c466e4.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EARY.jpg_thumb.8a8c168b6fd46cc4fb311572d3c466e4.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EDPO.jpg.9fd39fba010c28287f4f87fc490be59d.jpg" data-fileid="43590" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43590" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PiaggioP.149DD-EDPO.jpg_thumb.9fd39fba010c28287f4f87fc490be59d.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EDPO.jpg_thumb.9fd39fba010c28287f4f87fc490be59d.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EGIT.jpg.1ca1a3e92c85d19d205d42de3e24cdd7.jpg" data-fileid="43591" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43591" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PiaggioP.149DD-EGIT.jpg_thumb.1ca1a3e92c85d19d205d42de3e24cdd7.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DD-EGIT.jpg_thumb.1ca1a3e92c85d19d205d42de3e24cdd7.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DN-149LT.jpg.335885c5be415e4c1586d90f4f1603c6.jpg" data-fileid="43592" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43592" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PiaggioP.149DN-149LT.jpg_thumb.335885c5be415e4c1586d90f4f1603c6.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DN-149LT.jpg_thumb.335885c5be415e4c1586d90f4f1603c6.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DOO-FDF.jpg.38a32a971fbb0052a3e302b4a0708898.jpg" data-fileid="43593" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="43593" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PiaggioP.149DOO-FDF.jpg_thumb.38a32a971fbb0052a3e302b4a0708898.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/PiaggioP.149DOO-FDF.jpg_thumb.38a32a971fbb0052a3e302b4a0708898.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">6</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Polikarpov I-15</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/polikarpov-i-15-r1084/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1290294368_PolikarpovI-1501.jpg.c62dcbfbf34e67e567fca6d21290f391.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Polikarpov I-15 (Russian: И-15) was a Soviet biplane fighter aircraft of the 1930s. Nicknamed Chaika (Russian: Чайка, "Seagull") because of its gulled upper wings, it was operated in large numbers by the Soviet Air Force, and together with the Polikarpov I-16 monoplane, was one of the standard fighters of the Spanish Republicans during the Spanish Civil War, where it was called Chato (snub-nose).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The design for the 14th fighter for the VVS, the I-14, started as an advanced (for the era) monoplane under the direction of Andrei Tupolev. He grew concerned that the design would not mature, and ordered two backup biplane designs as the I-14A and B just to be safe. Polikarpov had just been released from prison in August 1932, and was handed the I-14A project. When both the I-14 and I-14A were ordered into production, Polikarpov's design, a development of the I-5 fighter became the famous I-15.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first flight was made in October 1933 with V.P. Chkalov at the controls, powered by an imported Wright R-1820 Cyclone engine. The I-15, also known by its development name TsKB-3, was a small biplane fighter with a gulled upper wing. The single bay wings were of wooden construction, while the fuselage was of mixed steel and duralumin construction, with a fabric covered rear fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production started in 1934, initially being powered by the Shvetsov M-22, a license-built version of the Bristol Jupiter radial engine. While less powerful than the Cyclone, the M-22 powered aircraft were still superior to the I-5 which it replaced, demonstrating excellent manoeuvrability. Production switched to the 515 kW (691 hp) Shvetsov M-25 engine (a license-built, metricified Cyclone) in late 1936. A total of 671 I-15s were built, 284 in the Soviet Union and a further 287 under license by CASA in Spain.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The gulled upper wing of the I-15 was unpopular with some pilots, as it was felt to restrict visibility, so Polikarpov's design bureau produced a revised version, again powered by the M-25, with a longer span un-gulled upper wing. This version, the I-15bis, commenced production in 1937, a total of 2,408 I-15bis' being delivered by the time production finished in 1940.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_I-15" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/136511942_PolikarpovI-1502.jpg.e14e2fce60091354bb898300bdf34291.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51890" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/9442703_PolikarpovI-1502.thumb.jpg.753108d96babbf31eeb81b76d9d219ae.jpg" data-ratio="60.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov I-15 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/972032206_PolikarpovI-1503.jpg.20f1637578bde8108ff540ee4eeefe84.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51891" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1838545322_PolikarpovI-1503.thumb.jpg.f01441f125ace5c3191d02cebd94e22c.jpg" data-ratio="61.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov I-15 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2104457868_PolikarpovI-1504.jpg.d7ce72080a67aa3bdb4fe57fe235847b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51892" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2134847280_PolikarpovI-1504.thumb.jpg.4e49271d03704c51cc1f9a03d341013b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov I-15 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/895069235_PolikarpovI-1505.jpg.0c5bf527940bd2f758d66d0315efdde1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51893" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/56033329_PolikarpovI-1505.thumb.jpg.2ecb610bc70ef451ca09547d10be67ff.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov I-15 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1084</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 02:23:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Polikarpov I-16</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/polikarpov-i-16-r1372/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1149431114_polikarpovi-1604.jpg.fe1f73ccd95b63a0829030cf5993aca0.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Polikarpov I-16 (Russian: Поликарпов И-16) is a Soviet single-engine single-seat fighter aircraft of revolutionary design; it was the world's first low-wing cantilever monoplane fighter with retractable landing gear to attain operational status and as such "introduced a new vogue in fighter design". The I-16 was introduced in the mid-1930s and formed the backbone of the Soviet Air Force at the beginning of World War II. The diminutive fighter, nicknamed "Ishak" or "Ishachok" ("donkey" or "burro") by Soviet pilots, figured prominently in the Second Sino-Japanese War, the Battle of Khalkhin Gol, Winter War and the Spanish Civil War – where it was called the Rata ("rat") by the Nationalists or Mosca ("fly") by the Republicans.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	While working on the Polikarpov I-15 biplane, Nikolai Nikolaevich Polikarpov began designing an advanced monoplane fighter. It featured cutting-edge innovations such as retractable landing gear and a fully enclosed cockpit, and was optimized for speed with a short stubby fuselage, and a Wright R-1820 radial engine in a NACA cowling. The aircraft is small, light and simple to build.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Full-scale work on the TsKB-12 prototype began in June 1933, and the aircraft was accepted into production on 22 November 1933, a month before it took to the air. The TsKB-12 was of mixed construction, using a wooden monocoque fuselage and wings employing a KhMA chrome-molybdenum steel alloy wing spar, dural ribs and D1 aluminum alloy skinning on the center and leading edges, with the remaining portions of the wings fabric covered. Another modern feature were the ailerons which ran along almost the entire trailing edge of the wing and also operated as flaps (in the manner of more modern flaperons) by drooping 15°. The cockpit was covered by a 40-centimetre-wide (16 in) canopy which featured an Aldis-type tubular gun sight which could slide back and forth on runners fitted with rubber bungee cords. A 225 l (59.4 US gal) fuel tank was fitted directly in front of the cockpit. The main landing gear is fully retractable by a hand crank. The armament consisted of a pair of 7.62×54mmR (0.30 in) ShKAS machine guns in the wings, mounted on the outboard side of the main gear and 900 rounds of ammunition.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A total of 10,292 (6,848 fighters and 3,444 trainers) werre built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of design and deevelopment, operational history and an extensive list of variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_I-16" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/858217477_polikarpovi-1601.jpg.a8d677d786e63f1ff15937f4a252387c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54922" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/118966948_polikarpovi-1601.thumb.jpg.8ebf5d70225ccc270feaf794581b348f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="polikarpov i-16 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1466036692_polikarpovi-1602.jpg.b02941e8d38897a161f15b7f04a15290.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54923" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/95681086_polikarpovi-1602.thumb.jpg.08fa6585174d8cffb88d3d3799868c4f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="polikarpov i-16 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1464697893_polikarpovi-1603.jpg.37315e1963a67e09b0766dd54ac49a21.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54924" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1406310634_polikarpovi-1603.thumb.jpg.ba3494f75fe9b2473cd1bdd0f3604ffc.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="polikarpov i-16 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1955600903_polikarpovi-1605.jpg.dcaa320c542a8d1a7813cd891b2afcbb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54925" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_08/1266742000_polikarpovi-1605.thumb.jpg.5bd8a37370160a6e7d816c51b022841d.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="polikarpov i-16 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1372</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2022 06:25:44 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Polikarpov Po-2</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/polikarpov-po-2-r1652/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-201.jpg.6f03729fdeb5ef332fc613ab03a69717.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Polikarpov Po-2 (also U-2, for its initial uchebnyy, 'training', role as a flight instruction aircraft) served as an all-weather multirole Soviet biplane, nicknamed Kukuruznik (Russian: Кукурузник,[3][N 1] NATO reporting name "Mule"). The reliable, uncomplicated design of the Po-2 made it an ideal trainer aircraft, as well as doubling as a low-cost ground attack, aerial reconnaissance, psychological warfare and liaison aircraft during war, proving to be one of the most versatile light combat types to be built in the Soviet Union. As of 1978 it remained in production for a longer period of time than any other Soviet-era aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Production figures for Polikarpov U-2 and Po-2 bombers and trainers combined are between 20,000 and 30,000 with production ending as early as 1952. Precise figures are hard to obtain since low-rate production by small repair shops and air clubs is believed to have continued until 1959.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was designed by Nikolai Polikarpov to replace the U-1 trainer (a copy of the British Avro 504), which was known as Avrushka to the Soviets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype of the U-2, powered by a 74 kW (99 hp) Shvetsov M-11 air-cooled five-cylinder radial engine, first flew on 7 January 1928 piloted by M.M. Gromov. Aircraft from the preproduction series were tested at the end of 1928 and serial production started in 1929 in Factory number 23 in Leningrad. Its name was changed to Po-2 in 1944, after Polikarpov's death, according to the then-new Soviet naming system, usually using the first two letters of the designer's family name, or the Soviet government-established design bureau that created it. Production in the Soviet Union ended in 1953, but license-built CSS-13s were still produced in Poland until 1959.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Only two examples made theeir way to Australia/New Zealand, both to New Zealand,one of which is shown in the photo above.This aircraft has been rebuilt from a wreck occurring in Russia.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For operational history and a large number of variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polikarpov_Po-2" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-202.jpg.5e0ca793fc322bc6bf1f47d522e8c0c8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59795" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-202.thumb.jpg.86dee8121a246e533bbe68c7e655b451.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov Po-2 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-203.jpg.af7141812e8567c18ababdf94ee6ef46.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59796" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-203.thumb.jpg.48038ba06b9a3f74fa7ee76701cfe1e4.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov Po-2 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-204.jpg.b6a9829863d44ac5860e3901409844c6.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59797" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-204.thumb.jpg.20cd675d4c8e0fbd05905b0f608473e4.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov Po-2 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-205.jpg.d3e6f79735eefe3bf036bf6731c86a22.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59798" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_01/PolikarpovPo-205.thumb.jpg.9a6cbf861aa417cd6f6abd80772570c7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Polikarpov Po-2 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1652</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:38:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Potez 630</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/potez-630-r1036/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/516736507_Potez63101.jpg.fc1f90e1b420db0c205db772b2fc2cb5.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Potez 630 and its derivatives were a family of twin-engined aircraft developed for the French Air Force in the late 1930s. The design was a contemporary of the British Bristol Blenheim (which was larger and designed purely as a bomber) and the German Messerschmitt Bf 110 (which was designed purely as a fighter).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Potez 630 was in use by several operators during the Second World War. Following the Battle of France, both the Vichy French Air Force and Free French Air Forces used the type; a number of captured aircraft were operated by several air wings of the Axis powers. After the end of the conflict in 1945, a handful of aircraft were used for training purposes for some time.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 31 October 1934, the French Ministry of Air issued a specification for a heavy fighter. The specification demanded the aircraft be capable of performing three principal roles: fighter direction, in which it was required to lead formations of single-engine fighters with sufficient maneuverability; day attack, in which the type was also to escort friendly close air support and bomber aircraft; and nightfighter operations. Specified performance details included a maximum speed of 450 km/h at 4,000 meters, a 300 km/h cruising speed, and an endurance of at least four hours. Armament requirements included two fixed forward-firing 20 mm cannons and a single machine gun to the rear for self-defence. The sought aircraft was also required to accommodate two/three seats along with a twin-engine configuration; however, some of the performance limitations imposed upon the aircraft, such as the maximum weight, served to restrict the range of suitable engines to power the type.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The original Potez 630 was developed to meet this specification; two variants of the aircraft were originally submitted for consideration, one (the 630) powered by Hispano-Suiza 14AB radial engines and the other (the 631) with the Gnome-Rhône 14N. Other companies also produced submissions in response, including Breguet Aviation, Hanriot, Chantiers aéronavals Étienne Romano, and Loire-Nieuport. Each of the competing manufacturers were requested to produce a single prototype for evaluation at their own expense; work on the first prototype, designated as the Potez 630-01, commenced in April 1935. In addition to the Potez 630, the same specification had ultimately resulted in the successful Breguet 690 series of attack aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The original engines of the Potez 630-01 were progressively replaced with improved models of Hispano-Suiza engine, gradually increasing thrust to reach 700 hp on takeoff. At its maximum takeoff weight of 3,850 kg, the prototype was capable of a maximum speed of 460 km/h and a maximum range of 1,300 km when flown at an economical cruising speed of 300 km/h. In March 1937, the second prototype, designated Potez 630-02, performed its maiden flight from Méaulte. The Potez 631-01 was damaged after a landing with its landing gear not being locked into the down position; after repairs, it was handed over to CEMA for official trials in November 1937.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For ore details of the development, design, operational history and variants of the 630, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potez_630" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/854021088_Potez63001.png.747a177a284ac338b79e1c6039795d23.png" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51572" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/67839944_Potez63001.thumb.png.ba14b072c333cd18ec9a8f608e649f3f.png" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Potez 630 01.png"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/466719043_Potez63002.jpg.4e462aa7c71e828821c79532fbc5c8c8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51573" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1174225393_Potez63002.thumb.jpg.7f25748adc2f545d7a1643995095c4d7.jpg" data-ratio="34.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Potez 630 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/154654004_Potez63102.jpg.5129e799b57c7ac18b5f188fca7d55dd.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51574" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1534197482_Potez63102.thumb.jpg.ebfbbb96164ab858f27b8ad5fdc8c9de.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Potez 631 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/1333889879_Potez63103.jpg.3bab0d00e8cb885d70b64701093dcf5d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51575" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_10/335326683_Potez63103.thumb.jpg.18acbf9389fda1c1fec29d575702919a.jpg" data-ratio="46.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Potez 631 03.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1036</guid><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:39:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>PZL TS-11 Iskra</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/pzl-ts-11-iskra-r1091/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/2081955591_IskraJet05.jpg.606d6f077cf55ee442fc0f447f660598.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The PZL TS-11 Iskra (English: Spark) is a Polish jet trainer, developed and manufactured by aircraft company PZL-Mielec. It was used by the air forces of Poland and India. It is notable as being the first domestically-developed jet aircraft to be produced by Poland, its service for over 50 years as the principal training aircraft of the Polish Air Force, and at the time of its retirement was the oldest jet-propelled aircraft still in service in Poland.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	As a part of efforts to preserve Poland's ability to independently develop aircraft in an era of political and economic subservience to the neighbouring Soviet Union, during the 1950s, Polish engineers at the Poland's Aviation Institute (IL) commenced early work upon the design of what would become the first jet aircraft to be developed in Poland. Following the death of Joseph Stalin, work on the initiative could be performed more openly and government officials became supportive of such a venture. The fledgling design was heavily influenced by the requirements specified by the Polish Air Force, who had formalised a requirement for a jet-propelled aircraft for training purposes. On 5 February 1960, the first prototype conducted its maiden flight, powered by an imported British Armstrong Siddeley Viper turbojet engine.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	During 1963, deliveries of the first production model of the type, designated as the TS-11 Iskra bis A, commenced to the Polish Air Force. During the 1960s, the Iskra competed to be selected as the standard jet trainer throughout the Warsaw Pact. However, it was not selected to fulfil this significant role, the rival Czechoslovakian Aero L-29 Delfín having been chosen instead, which went on to be built in greater numbers for a wide number of export customers. Production of the TS-11 came to an end during 1987, however the type remained in service with the Polish Air Force and the Indian Air Force into the 21st century. From 1969 onwards, a handful of TS-11s have been used by the Polish Air Force's Biało-Czerwone Iskry aerobatics display team, who performed their last display on 22 August 2021. It has also been used for aerial reconnaissance purposes. During the aircraft's later years of service, several examples have been sold onto private owners.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The PZL TS-11 Iskra is an all-metal jet-propelled trainer aircraft. It is relatively conventional in layout, featuring a trapezoid-shaped mid-wing arrangement. These wings, which only had a gentle angle of sweep along the leading edge, feature air intakes embedded into the wing root. The TS-11's single turbojet engine is accommodated within the main fuselage, its exhaust is located beneath the boom-mounted tail fin, which provides the aircraft with a fairly unusual silhouette. Both of the crew, typically being the student in the front and instructor in the back, are provided with ejector seats for emergency egress.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Some models of the TS-11 can be armed; armaments have consisted of a single nose-mounted Nudelman-Rikhter NR-23 cannon with 80 rounds, along with a total of four underwing hardpoints that were compatible with a variety of different weapons, including bombs and rockets. Most models of the aircraft lack a radar set; however, the specialised TS-11R reconnaissance variant is provided with such equipment. The TS-11 can also be outfitted with various cameras for the purpose of performing aerial photography missions. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	There are four Iskra registered in Australia.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on development, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_TS-11_Iskra" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/782987953_IskraJet01.jpg.612cb9914e6870f549c31f4539d5e922.jpg" data-fileid="51938" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Iskra Jet 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51938" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1623337033_IskraJet01.thumb.jpg.aac002dcfc6e8b7fd5ee269d3125d815.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1890199030_IskraJet02.jpg.54e6fae65fc6cb5a734ab4cdf33611e0.jpg" data-fileid="51939" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Iskra Jet 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51939" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/671628695_IskraJet02.thumb.jpg.d913f8de60bfbeffdc4a400a5b3653bd.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1499374889_IskraJet03.jpg.6a3da5a0478509f8f3277e5dbff095df.jpg" data-fileid="51940" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Iskra Jet 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51940" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/543232049_IskraJet03.thumb.jpg.4eb26b653ed8989a9cfdfbb3c15225cb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1659352967_IskraJet04.jpg.a1bfabd96377fe1bb42f27e27040abdf.jpg" data-fileid="51941" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Iskra Jet 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="51941" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/787936652_IskraJet04.thumb.jpg.f2b1bbfc5c52c0d9ff99d696b52cba2c.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1091</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:38:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Reggiane Re.2000 Falco</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/reggiane-re2000-falco-r1658/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco04.jpg.f4ad383e1ccab69d99e2920943962532.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Reggiane Re.2000 Falco I was an Italian all metal, low-wing monoplane developed and manufactured by aircraft company Reggiane. The type was used by the Regia Aeronautica (Italian Air Force) and the Swedish Air Force during the first part of the Second World War.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Re 2000 was developed by a team headed by aircraft designers Roberto Longhi and Antonio Alessio to be a lightly-built and highly maneuverable interceptor/fighter aircraft. The emergent design, which had been designated as the Re 2000 Falco I, was equipped with a Curtiss-Wright-style retractable undercarriage, bore substantial similarities to the American-built Seversky P-35. On 24 May 1939, the prototype performed its maiden flight. Flight testing of the prototype revealed it to be able to outfight several significant combat aircraft of the time, including even the more modern Macchi C 200 and the German Messerschmitt Bf 109E fighters. During the run up to and following the outbreak of the Second World War, the aircraft was ordered by several nations, including the Hungarian, Swedish, British and Italian governments.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Upon entering squadron service, the Re 2000 soon proved to be a technically advanced aircraft, being well balanced and extremely aerodynamic during flight, but was not without its faults. Although the aircraft was potentially superior to Italian contemporary fighters (Fiat G 50 and Macchi C 200), the Re 2000 was not considered to be satisfactory by Italian military authorities. Consequently, the manufacturer built the type for export and almost all of the first production served with the Swedish Air Force and Hungarian Air Force, rather than in the Regia Aeronautica. The Re.2000 served as the starting point for several derivatives, including the MÁVAG Héja, Reggiane Re.2001, Re.2002, Re.2003, Re.2004, Re.2005, Re.2006 and Re.2007 combat aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Reggiane Re.2000 is an Italian all metal, low-wing monoplane fighter aircraft. It is the first aircraft to be designed by Reggiane to employ aluminum stressed skin construction, as opposed to the wooden or mixed wood and metal structures that had been traditionally used in contemporary Italian aircraft such as the Savoia-Marchetti SM.79 (which had been previously produced by Reggiane under license). The stressed skin fuselage was highly streamlined, save for the protrusions of the hard-rivetted finish. The majority of the aircraft's exterior, including the tail, was metal-skinned; however, the control surfaces had fabric coverings.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was furnished with an elliptical wing, the internal structure of which comprised a multi-cell configuration using a total of five spars, stress-skin covering, and integral fuel tanks within the center section. The wing made use of a modified N.38 airfoil section and was outfitted with Frise-type ailerons complete with static and aerodynamic balance, along with a split-continuous flap.[6] The cockpit of the Re.2000 featured a large backwards-sliding canopy; it is claimed that this canopy provided "almost unrestricted all-round visibility".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more extensive details of development, design, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggiane_Re.2000_Falco_I" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a> There were five Italian variants with a total of 186 built, and three variants built under licence in Hungary under the name Mavag Héja of which 204 were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco01.jpg.d3f5b4fb05ecf1baf491f25ea1d239a5.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59885" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco01.thumb.jpg.0b0dd859dce7c4ae5055e6bf528adf17.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Reggiane Re.2000 Falco 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco02.jpg.5b6d3f7b0ad6af7841802f05d9057ff4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59886" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco02.thumb.jpg.b8a1f3f41cce170bdaf8eda7176a48ce.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Reggiane Re.2000 Falco 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco03.jpg.8b149e4afbe59ba37c5a5c92adee19c7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59887" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco03.thumb.jpg.f2da65e9a4dd0a1caa0765993cef0edc.jpg" data-ratio="49.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Reggiane Re.2000 Falco 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco05.jpg.a02c8ee29868ddc25612f37ee446f290.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59889" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_02/ReggianeRe.2000Falco05.thumb.jpg.87f30d17b65488780c0f9f720056abb9.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Reggiane Re.2000 Falco 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1658</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Republic F-84 Thunderjet</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/warbirds/republic-f-84-thunderjet-r931/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1004308899_RepublicF-84ThunderjetFS-194.jpg.783484ca737bf22edf64a7fec33cfd1d.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Republic F-84 Thunderjet was an American turbojet fighter-bomber aircraft. Originating as a 1944 United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) proposal for a "day fighter", the F-84 first flew in 1946. Although it entered service in 1947, the Thunderjet was plagued by so many structural and engine problems that a 1948 U.S. Air Force review declared it unable to execute any aspect of its intended mission and considered canceling the program. The aircraft was not considered fully operational until the 1949 F-84D model and the design matured only with the definitive F-84G introduced in 1951. In 1954, the straight-wing Thunderjet was joined by the swept-wing F-84F Thunderstreak fighter and <a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/republic-rf-84f-thunderflash-r884/" rel="">RF-84F Thunderflash</a> photo reconnaissance aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Thunderjet became the USAF's primary strike aircraft during the Korean War, flying 86,408 sorties and destroying 60% of all ground targets in the war as well as eight Soviet-built MiG fighters. Over half of the 7,524 F-84s produced served with NATO nations, and it was the first aircraft to fly with the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds demonstration team. The USAF Strategic Air Command had F-84 Thunderjets in service from 1948 through 1957.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The F-84 was the first production fighter aircraft to utilize inflight refueling and the first fighter capable of carrying a nuclear weapon, the Mark 7 nuclear bomb. Modified F-84s were used in several unusual projects, including the FICON and Tom-Tom dockings to the B-29 Superfortress and B-36 bomber motherships, and the experimental XF-84H Thunderscreech turboprop.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The F-84 nomenclature can be somewhat confusing. The straight-wing F-84A to F-84E and F-84G models were called the Thunderjet. The F-84F Thunderstreak and RF-84F Thunderflash were different airplanes with swept wings. The XF-84H Thunderscreech (not its official name) was an experimental turboprop version of the F-84F. The F-84F swept wing version was intended to be a small variation of the normal Thunderjet with only a few different parts, so it kept the basic F-84 number. Production delays on the F-84F resulted in another order of the straight-wing version; this was the F-84G.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development and design, operational history and long list of variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84_Thunderjet" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/879530316_RepublicF-84Thunderjet1231.jpg.933136199008558f016cf349a3ead632.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50581" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/167448914_RepublicF-84Thunderjet1231.thumb.jpg.bcd27109bc6aa7745c7f372eba5ab5e5.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic F-84 Thunderjet 1231.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1547365169_RepublicF-84ThunderjetFS-595.jpg.c2dd285044ecc53e23d95f7db11598b3.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50582" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/310416498_RepublicF-84ThunderjetFS-595.thumb.jpg.fe1933dd67064183ec0f70d0cae235d6.jpg" data-ratio="56" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic F-84 Thunderjet FS-595.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1251710795_RepublicF-84ThunderjetFS-613.jpg.28ed8d124b0cda0a0a2f6456bc0d4a7e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50583" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/192743923_RepublicF-84ThunderjetFS-613.thumb.jpg.1bf2616e15cc33d17407aaaf46372f01.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic F-84 Thunderjet FS-613.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1948747269_RepublicF-84ThunderjetThunderbirds.jpg.d669196f5f1c8486d315ace707bf1a34.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50584" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1794289300_RepublicF-84ThunderjetThunderbirds.thumb.jpg.45542094b80f2c869ac25dd7fe1e3d84.jpg" data-ratio="53.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic F-84 Thunderjet Thunderbirds.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1350880550_RepublicF-84Thunderjet-FS-437.jpg.8fea678006ecd560ea9a33cd2d6b7663.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50585" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1306751827_RepublicF-84Thunderjet-FS-437.thumb.jpg.d7a5654d38d0b55102678e964e2c054e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Republic F-84 Thunderjet-FS-437.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">931</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
