<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Aircraft: Aircraft</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/page/2/?d=1</link><description>Aircraft: Aircraft</description><language>en</language><item><title>Bell V-280 Valor</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/bell-v-280-valor-r1356/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/101883839_BellV-280Valor01.jpg.d6485fb44cf45a7e058b0c469cd51d04.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bell V-280 Valor is a tiltrotor aircraft being developed by Bell and Lockheed Martin for the United States Army's Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program. The aircraft was officially unveiled at the 2013 Army Aviation Association of America's (AAAA) Annual Professional Forum and Exposition in Fort Worth, Texas. The V-280 made its first flight on 18 December 2017 in Amarillo, Texas.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The V-280 is designed for a cruising speed of 280 knots (320 mph; 520 km/h), hence the name V-280, a top speed of 300 knots (345 mph; 556 km/h), a range of 2,100 nautical miles (2,400 mi; 3,900 km), and an effective combat range of 500 to 800 nmi (580 to 920 mi; 930 to 1,480 km). Expected maximum takeoff weight is around 30,000 pounds (14,000 kg). In one major difference from the earlier V-22 Osprey tiltrotor, the engines remain in place while the rotors and drive shafts tilt. A driveshaft runs through the straight wing, allowing both prop rotors to be driven by a single engine in the event of engine loss. The V-280 will have retractable landing gear, a triple-redundant fly by wire control system, and a V-tail configuration. The wings are made of a single section of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite, reducing weight and production costs. The V-280 will have a crew of four and be capable of transporting up to 14 troops. Dual cargo hooks will give it a lift capacity to carry a 10,000 lb (4,500 kg) M777A2 Howitzer while flying at a speed of 150 knots (170 mph; 280 km/h). The fuselage is visually similar to that of the UH-60 Black Hawk medium lift helicopter. When landed, the wing is more than 7 ft (2.1 m) from the ground, allowing soldiers to egress easily out of two 6-foot (1.8 m) wide side doors and door gunners to have wide fields of fire.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Although the initial design is a utility configuration, Bell is also working on an attack configuration. Whether different variants of the V-280 would fill utility and attack roles or a single airframe could interchange payloads for either mission, Bell is confident the Valor tiltrotor platform can fulfill both duties; the U.S. Marine Corps is interested in having one aircraft to replace utility and attack helicopters, but the Army, which leads the program, is not committed to the idea and wants distinct platforms for each mission. Bell and Lockheed claim an AV-280 variant can launch rockets, missiles, and even small unmanned aerial vehicles forward or aft with no rotor interference, even in forward flight and cruise modes with the rotors forward.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The V-280 prototype (air vehicle concept demonstrator, or AVCD) was powered by the General Electric T64. The specific engine for the model performance specification (MPS) was unknown at the time, but has funding from the Army's future affordable turbine engine (FATE) program. The V-tail structure and ruddervators, made by GKN, will provide high levels of maneuverability and control to the airframe. It will be made of a combination of metals and composites.[8] Features in the interior include seats that wirelessly charge troops’ radios, night-vision goggles, and other electronic gear and windows that display three-dimensional mission maps.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of development, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_V-280_Valor" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/284817946_BellV-280Valor02.jpg.75cc84a04be4cecbafcbafc8e7f9146b.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54587" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1753706800_BellV-280Valor02.thumb.jpg.768eea66402593ee3b30afaf69298c2a.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell V-280 Valor 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1284873761_BellV-280Valor03.jpg.925a0ed45cc0bd7b35f7eca29aef49c7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54588" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/565735894_BellV-280Valor03.thumb.jpg.f445d6718b678ae4bd404888dec66417.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell V-280 Valor 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1935198529_BellV-280Valor04.jpg.ac82811c11151c93417700f8128935a0.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54589" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/628977710_BellV-280Valor04.thumb.jpg.2894388327601e37140c9d5fc1c24c58.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell V-280 Valor 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1133165842_BellV-280Valor05.jpg.a6d09d53e097e56b1f1e5447a5a7f304.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54590" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1975242517_BellV-280Valor05.thumb.jpg.44b3072b3a61e7d543e0a46a0c39ab4f.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell V-280 Valor 05.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/1643271356_BellV-280Valor06.jpg.706837041df31e36d99fa1b2345799e8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="54591" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_06/442084877_BellV-280Valor06.thumb.jpg.480b48842c598072725fa453d7b4e523.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bell V-280 Valor 06.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1356</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2022 03:12:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Beriev A-50</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/beriev-a-50-r1205/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/80299586_BerievA-5002.jpg.3c108cd8ab16ef11a882b92ab5ab73aa.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Beriev A-50 (NATO reporting name: Mainstay) is a Soviet airborne early warning and control (AEW&amp;C) aircraft based on the Ilyushin Il-76 transport. Developed to replace the Tupolev Tu-126 "Moss", the A-50 first flew in 1978. Its existence was revealed to the Western Bloc in 1980 by Adolf Tolkachev. It entered service in 1984, with about 40 produced by 1992.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The mission personnel of the 15-man crew derive data from the large Liana surveillance radar with its antenna in an over-fuselage rotodome, which has a diameter of 9 metres (30 ft) Detection range is 650 kilometres (400 mi) for air targets and 300 kilometres (190 mi) for ground targets.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The A-50 can control up to ten fighter aircraft for either air-to-air intercept or air-to-ground attack missions. The A-50 can fly four hours at 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) from its base at a maximum takeoff weight of 190 metric tons (420,000 lb). The aircraft can be refuelled by Il-78 tankers.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The radar "Vega-M" is designed by MNIIP, Moscow, and produced by NPO Vega. The "Vega-M" can track up to 150 targets simultaneously within 230 kilometres (140 mi). Large targets, like surface ships, can be tracked at a distance of 400 kilometres (250 mi).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Development work on a modernized version, the A-50U, began in 2003; state tests started on 10 September 2008, using a Russian Air Force A-50 "37 Krasnyy" as a prototype. It replaces analog avionics with a new digital avionics suite, made by Vega Radio Engineering Corporation, that speeds data processing and improves signal tracking and target detection. Crew rest, toilet and galley facilities are also included in the upgrade.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	After completing the joint state tests, Beriev has delivered the first A-50U to the Russian Air Force. The aircraft, "47 Krasnyy'"RF-92957, was handed over at Beriev's facility in Taganrog on 31 October 2011.[8] It was accepted by an aircrew serving with the 2457th Aviation Base for Combat Operation of Airborne Early Warning Aircraft (Aviabaza Boevogo Primeneniya Samolyotov Dal'nego Radiolokatsionnogo Obnaruzheniya) at Ivanovo Severny, which is the only base using the A-50 operationally (it operates 16 aircraft). The fourth A-50U, "41 Taganrog", was delivered to the Russian Aerospace Forces on 7 March 2017. The fifth A-50U, "45 Krasnyy", was delivered on 6 December 2018. 7 aircraft have been delivered as of December 2021.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The A-50U upgrade forms the basis of the concept for Beriev A-100 AEW&amp;C. Its configuration will be similar, but with a new Vega Premier active electronically scanned array radar.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In late December 2015, the A-50 started operations over Syria, flying from Russia, to support Russian military intervention in the Syrian Civil War. In December 2018, it was deployed to Crimea.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beriev_A-50" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1681494225_BerievA-5001.jpg.f38223d4ca69c53079995aa76c1243f8.jpg" data-fileid="52857" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Beriev A-50 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="52857" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1347488535_BerievA-5001.thumb.jpg.602dac581fe58a7c958c3bfcfabeda16.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/829438679_BerievA-5003.jpg.9437b83d45fea92c1b55c663fb234f49.jpg" data-fileid="52858" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Beriev A-50 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="52858" data-ratio="56" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1678503908_BerievA-5003.thumb.jpg.3fe06f5f02e9c79e28614e4c538b3337.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/2048272133_BerievA-5004.jpg.aa37a607555d1f1dbd55f7fd0f515db4.jpg" data-fileid="52859" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Beriev A-50 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="52859" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/105150558_BerievA-5004.thumb.jpg.adb0c3332ab05d8ef0cce4ef1424d477.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/657554485_BerievA-5005.jpg.9304172d69630a40a83506c21b0e8339.jpg" data-fileid="52860" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Beriev A-50 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="52860" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/491372499_BerievA-5005.thumb.jpg.e3328e1b6283351bac42434907218279.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1205</guid><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2022 05:47:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Beverley</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/blackburn-beverley-r550/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1429496946_BlackburnBeverleyXB259.jpg.7c8489b64299ddd1ca4a3af7c275531a.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The aircraft was a high-wing cantilever monoplane with a fixed undercarriage. The large fuselage had a tailboom and tailplane with twin fins. The tailboom allowed access to the rear of the fuselage through removable clamshell doors. A 36 ft (11 m) main fuselage space was supplemented by passenger accommodation in the tailboom. The main cargo hold could accommodate 94 troops, with another 36 in the tailboom. In operation, it was regarded as "ungainly but highly effective" and was described by Air Chief Marshal Sir Robert Freer as "like something out of the Ark, but it was a superb supply dropper."
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A device called an Elephant's Foot could be fitted under the centre of the fuselage just forward of the clamshell doors when loading heavy items to prevent the aircraft from tipping back.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft was designed for carrying large bulkloads and landing on rough or imperfect runways, or dirt strips. It could trace its design back to the GAL49 Hamilcar glider of the Second World War. When it entered service it was the largest aircraft in the Royal Air Force (RAF). It had a large cargo hold of about 6,000 ft3 (170 m3). Paratroopers in the upper passenger area jumped through a hatch in the base of the boom just in front of the leading edge of the tailplane. Paratroopers in the cargo hold exited through side doors.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details including operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Beverley" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/11906871_BlackburnBeverleyatRAFChurchFenton.jpg.f2ee7f850699cb81b7a75554754d379d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46808" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/154071929_BlackburnBeverleyatRAFChurchFenton.thumb.jpg.6c0f91d9c34e98e058f668bffdc92038.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Beverley at RAF Church Fenton.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/448519405_BlackburnBeverleycamo.jpg.4c4c3948ff4ea5243b6b56cf8cacce37.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46809" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/880068347_BlackburnBeverleycamo.thumb.jpg.4e31b1b6f85fb9c80ec4f926d28baa12.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Beverley camo.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/2062395774_BlackburnBeverleyparked.jpg.a6bcedf041842ae61bbfda56915b1c02.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46810" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/199478404_BlackburnBeverleyparked.thumb.jpg.715d213a3b99e88d415e86e75fdd6b46.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Beverley parked.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/2049819833_BlackburnBeverleyXH124.jpg.b4c31af6d8af82233590dbf0dba8f1b7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46812" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1840015393_BlackburnBeverleyXH124.thumb.jpg.a3574e9233c3ab37c9a9b94b66938793.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Beverley XH124.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">550</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 02:41:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Blackburn Buccaneer</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/blackburn-buccaneer-r551/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/2000399642_BlackburnBuccaneerS2Btake-off.jpg.97ade4953c3b86c7b0f5f9766bfa9b7c.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	Designed and initially produced by Blackburn Aircraft at Brough, it was later officially known as the Hawker Siddeley Buccaneer when Blackburn became a part of the Hawker Siddeley Group, but this name is rarely used.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Buccaneer was a mid-wing, twin-engine aircraft. It had a crew of two in a tandem-seat arrangement with the observer seated higher and offset from the pilot to give a clear view forwards to enable him to assist in visual search. Its operational profile included cruising at altitude (for reduced fuel consumption) before descending, just outside the anticipated enemy radar detection range, to 100 feet (30 m) for a 500-knot (930 km/h; 580 mph) dash to and from the target. Targets might be ships-at-sea or large shore-based installations at long range from the launching aircraft-carrier.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft had an all-weather operational capability provided by the pilot's head-up display and Airstream Direction Detector, for example, and the observer's navigation systems and fire control radar. The Buccaneer was one of the largest aircraft to operate from British aircraft carriers, and continued operating from them until the last conventional carrier was withdrawn in 1978. During its service, the Buccaneer was the backbone of the Navy's ground strike operations, including nuclear strike.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on the esign, operational history, armaments and eight variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_Buccaneer" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Specifications below are for the Buccaneer S.2 model, of which 84 units were built.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/839575067_BlackburnBuccaneerairborneheadon.jpg.1f943422f24124c9b4f2f169acfab728.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46813" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/341349087_BlackburnBuccaneerairborneheadon.thumb.jpg.1970d02600bbf079d00df21f6453a775.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Buccaneer airborne head on.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1602088778_BlackburnBuccaneerairborneleftturn.jpg.648b0898526d6eb5ea2e4c694484e9df.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46814" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/342837959_BlackburnBuccaneerairborneleftturn.thumb.jpg.1d7cbbfd006f87686e783aaa18304f1e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Buccaneer airborne left turn.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1650235268_BlackburnBuccaneercarrierlaunch.jpeg.4a2e110b4bdf2d4a48100ea713d1193d.jpeg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46815" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/511671723_BlackburnBuccaneercarrierlaunch.thumb.jpeg.2ae75c8ad0c013cc60d4d344cb58ce27.jpeg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Buccaneer carrier launch.jpeg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1713550918_BlackburnBuccaneerwingsfolded.jpg.d278991868443d6c41f9e38fede303d8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="46816" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1753939432_BlackburnBuccaneerwingsfolded.thumb.jpg.8ced8524723d92edcd88299f25408603.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Blackburn Buccaneer wings folded.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">551</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:23:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing AH-64 Apache</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-ah-64-apache-r479/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1600332570_AH_64_APACHE_attack_helicopter-head-on.jpg" /></p>

<p>It features a nose-mounted sensor suite for target acquisition and night vision systems. It is armed with a 30 mm (1.18 in) M230 chain gun carried between the main landing gear, under the aircraft's forward fuselage, and four hardpoints mounted on stub-wing pylons for carrying armament and stores, typically a mixture of AGM-114 Hellfire missiles and Hydra 70 rocket pods. The AH-64 has significant systems redundancy to improve combat survivability.</p><p> </p><p>
The Apache began as the Model 77 developed by Hughes Helicopters for the United States Army's Advanced Attack Helicopter program to replace the AH-1 Cobra. The prototype YAH-64 was first flown on 30 September 1975. The U.S. Army selected the YAH-64 over the Bell YAH-63 in 1976, and later approved full production in 1982. After purchasing Hughes Helicopters in 1984, McDonnell Douglas continued AH-64 production and development. The helicopter was introduced to U.S. Army service in April 1986. The advanced AH-64D Apache Longbow was delivered to the Army in March 1997. Production has been continued by Boeing Defense, Space &amp; Security, with over 2,400 AH-64s being produced by 2020.</p><p> </p><p>
For details of the development, design, operational history and variants of the AH-64, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_AH-64_Apache" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH_64_APACHE_attack_helicopterheadon.jpg.480b22c3876be3deaebed087367876ad.jpg" data-fileid="45906" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45906" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AH_64_APACHE_attack_helicopterheadon.jpg_thumb.480b22c3876be3deaebed087367876ad.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH_64_APACHE_attack_helicopterheadon.jpg_thumb.480b22c3876be3deaebed087367876ad.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH_64_APACHE_attack_helicopterheadon.jpg_thumb.480b22c3876be3deaebed087367876ad.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apache-PrinceHarry.jpg.83ae2b37db71ef98e92a4132042592a3.jpg" data-fileid="45907" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45907" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AH-64Apache-PrinceHarry.jpg_thumb.83ae2b37db71ef98e92a4132042592a3.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apache-PrinceHarry.jpg_thumb.83ae2b37db71ef98e92a4132042592a3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apache-PrinceHarry.jpg_thumb.83ae2b37db71ef98e92a4132042592a3.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apachefiringmissile.jpg.37ec09970c47bbc0e2c4fc2cb18e841e.jpg" data-fileid="45908" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45908" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AH-64Apachefiringmissile.jpg_thumb.37ec09970c47bbc0e2c4fc2cb18e841e.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apachefiringmissile.jpg_thumb.37ec09970c47bbc0e2c4fc2cb18e841e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64Apachefiringmissile.jpg_thumb.37ec09970c47bbc0e2c4fc2cb18e841e.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH64DLongbowApache.jpg.eecf57f6c5b5f2010da9758801208c57.jpg" data-fileid="45909" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45909" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AH64DLongbowApache.jpg_thumb.eecf57f6c5b5f2010da9758801208c57.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH64DLongbowApache.jpg_thumb.eecf57f6c5b5f2010da9758801208c57.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH64DLongbowApache.jpg_thumb.eecf57f6c5b5f2010da9758801208c57.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg.ad3c9573615507430bc232c77f4ae173.jpg" data-fileid="45910" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45910" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg_thumb.ad3c9573615507430bc232c77f4ae173.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg_thumb.ad3c9573615507430bc232c77f4ae173.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/AH-64D_Apache_Longbow.jpg_thumb.ad3c9573615507430bc232c77f4ae173.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">479</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing B-47 Stratojet</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-b-47-stratojet-r878/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/208035340_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2275.jpg.983d8bb1c1ece05f1cd4fe0854a1cdd9.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing B-47 Stratojet (Boeing company designation Model 450) is a retired American long-range, six-engined, turbojet-powered strategic bomber designed to fly at high subsonic speed and at high altitude to avoid enemy interceptor aircraft. The primary mission of the B-47 was as a nuclear bomber capable of striking targets within the Soviet Union.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Development of the B-47 can be traced back to a requirement expressed by the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) in 1943 for a reconnaissance bomber that harnessed newly developed jet propulsion. Another key innovation adopted during the development process was the swept wing, drawing upon captured German research. With its engines carried in nacelles underneath the wing, the B-47 represented a major innovation in post-World War II combat jet design, and contributed to the development of modern jet airliners. Suitably impressed, in April 1946, the USAAF ordered two prototypes, designated "XB-47"; on 17 December 1947, the first prototype performed its maiden flight. Facing off competition such as the North American XB-45, Convair XB-46 and Martin XB-48, a formal contract for 10 B-47A bombers was signed on 3 September 1948. This would be soon followed by much larger contracts.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The XB-47, which looked nothing like contemporary bombers, was described by Boyne as a "sleek, beautiful outcome that was highly advanced". The 35-degree swept wings were shoulder-mounted, the inboard turbojet engines mounted in twin pods, at about a third of the span, and the outboard engines singly near the wing tip. This arrangement reduced the bending moment at the wing roots, saving structural weight. The engines' mass acted as counter-flutter weights.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A total of 2,042 units were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details on the development, design,operational history and 17 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-47_Stratojet" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1331817821_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2104.jpg.348b0b010ce4ea007eb5fa81e0df60a9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50202" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/322154929_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2104.thumb.jpg.2fa10b5593407a58413051d95b11e80a.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing B-47E Stratojet 53-2104.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1351755461_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2276.jpg.d039cb6ddff94b6112536ff8cbb7cc81.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50203" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/160079957_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2276.thumb.jpg.7476e06eb8adce2e956557de0ffd3447.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing B-47E Stratojet 53-2276.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/2119384444_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2280.jpg.16374a9c9ed72ccf5f214a79e0c1711e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50204" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/623871177_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2280.thumb.jpg.662713ea565fdab4366cf9ac02c4432d.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing B-47E Stratojet 53-2280.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1351000603_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2385.jpg.b69dd2f1cc52e0b682c4edc06cd416db.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50205" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1198463551_BoeingB-47EStratojet53-2385.thumb.jpg.872da44b2f1de368c3d9ac477ea33c73.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing B-47E Stratojet 53-2385.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">878</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing B-52 Stratofortress</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-b-52-stratofortress-r450/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1599220219_b-52-stratofortress_007.jpg" /></p>

<p>The B-52 was designed and built by Boeing, which has continued to provide support and upgrades. It has been operated by the United States Air Force (USAF) since the 1950s. The bomber is capable of carrying up to 70,000 pounds (32,000 kg) of weapons, and has a typical combat range of more than 8,800 miles (14,080 km) without aerial refueling. The B-52 completed sixty years of continuous service with its original operator in 2015. After being upgraded between 2013 and 2015, the last airplanes are expected to serve into the 2050s.</p><p> </p><p>
In September 2006, the B-52 became one of the first US military aircraft to fly using alternative fuel. It took off from Edwards Air Force Base with a 50/50 blend of Fischer–Tropsch process (FT) synthetic fuel and conventional JP-8 jet fuel, which burned in two of the eight engines. On 15 December 2006, a B-52 took off from Edwards with the synthetic fuel powering all eight engines, the first time an air force aircraft was entirely powered by the blend. The seven-hour flight was considered a success. This program is part of the Department of Defense Assured Fuel Initiative, which aimed to reduce crude oil usage and obtain half of its aviation fuel from alternative sources by 2016. On 8 August 2007, Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne certified the B-52H as fully approved to use the FT blend.</p><p> </p><p>
For full details of the origin, development upgrades and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p> </p><p>
Specifications below are for the B-52H variant.</p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-520177PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG.e798287a78ccc6893741c745dc80af9d.JPG" data-fileid="45742" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45742" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="B-520177PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.e798287a78ccc6893741c745dc80af9d.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-520177PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.e798287a78ccc6893741c745dc80af9d.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-520177PhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.e798287a78ccc6893741c745dc80af9d.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52FlyoverbombdoorsopenPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG.efb4833d1a243d8cde601392e4d626c9.JPG" data-fileid="45743" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45743" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="B-52FlyoverbombdoorsopenPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.efb4833d1a243d8cde601392e4d626c9.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52FlyoverbombdoorsopenPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.efb4833d1a243d8cde601392e4d626c9.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52FlyoverbombdoorsopenPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.efb4833d1a243d8cde601392e4d626c9.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52flypastPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG.6af4a1abd97038e9134252e3b150a23b.JPG" data-fileid="45744" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45744" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="B-52flypastPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.6af4a1abd97038e9134252e3b150a23b.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52flypastPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.6af4a1abd97038e9134252e3b150a23b.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52flypastPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.6af4a1abd97038e9134252e3b150a23b.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52gearandflapsdownPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG.102f86909ab15cd2247295c6f778f338.JPG" data-fileid="45745" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45745" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="B-52gearandflapsdownPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.102f86909ab15cd2247295c6f778f338.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52gearandflapsdownPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.102f86909ab15cd2247295c6f778f338.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/B-52gearandflapsdownPhotobyEdwinvanApstal.JPG_thumb.102f86909ab15cd2247295c6f778f338.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-guam-3000.jpg.2e6f227dd4ceedc1084829e4db0aebb8.jpg" data-fileid="45746" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45746" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="b-52-guam-3000.jpg_thumb.2e6f227dd4ceedc1084829e4db0aebb8.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-guam-3000.jpg_thumb.2e6f227dd4ceedc1084829e4db0aebb8.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-guam-3000.jpg_thumb.2e6f227dd4ceedc1084829e4db0aebb8.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-stratofortress_007.jpg.7b7a52fb5c26a628d68933b5cb3284a3.jpg" data-fileid="45747" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45747" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="b-52-stratofortress_007.jpg_thumb.7b7a52fb5c26a628d68933b5cb3284a3.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-stratofortress_007.jpg_thumb.7b7a52fb5c26a628d68933b5cb3284a3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/b-52-stratofortress_007.jpg_thumb.7b7a52fb5c26a628d68933b5cb3284a3.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">450</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing C-97G Stratofreighter</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-c-97g-stratofreighter-r2053/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter01.jpg.be326d50f7ac7345d13818ea4dc93217.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing C-97 Stratofreighter is a long-range heavy military cargo aircraft developed from the B-29 and B-50 bombers. Design began in 1942. The first of three prototype XC-97s flew on 9 November 1944 and the first of six service-test YC-97s flew on 11 March 1947. All nine were based on the 24ST alloy structure and Wright R-3350 engines of the B-29, but with a larger-diameter fuselage upper lobe (making a figure eight or "double-bubble" section) and they had the B-29 vertical tail with the gunner's position walled off. The first of three heavily revised YC-97A incorporating a wing with higher-strength 75ST alloy, taller vertical tail and larger Pratt &amp; Whitney R-4360 engines of the B-50 bomber, flew on 28 January 1948 and was the basis of the sole YC-97B, all production C-97s, KC-97s and civilian Stratocruiser aircraft. Between 1947 and 1958, 888 C-97s in several versions were built, 811 being KC-97 tankers. C-97s served in the Berlin Airlift, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Some aircraft served as flying command posts for the Strategic Air Command, while others were modified for use in Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadrons (ARRS).
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The C-97 Stratofreighter was developed towards the end of World War II by fitting a second lobe on top of the fuselage and wings of the B-29 Superfortress with the tail, wing, and engine layout being nearly identical. The XC-97 and YC-97 can be distinguished from the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser and later C-97s by the shorter fin, and later ones by the flying boom and jet engines on the tanker models.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The prototype XC-97 was powered by the same 2,200 hp (1,600 kW) Wright R-3350 engines as used in the B-29. The XC-97 took off for its first flight on November 9, 1944, just after the death of Boeing president Philip G. Johnson.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 9 January 1945, the first prototype, piloted by Major Curtin L. Reinhardt, flew from Seattle to Washington, D.C. in 6 hours 4 minutes, an average speed of 383 mph (616 km/h) with 20,000 lb (9,100 kg) of cargo. The tenth and all subsequent aircraft were fitted with the 3,500 hp (2,600 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney Wasp Major engines and taller fin and rudder of the B-50 Superfortress
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The C-97 had clamshell doors under its tail so that two retractable ramps could be used to drive in cargo, but it was not a tactical airlifter able to deliver to primitive forward bases. The doors could not be opened in flight, but could be removed to carry out air drops. The C-97 had a useful payload of 35,000 lb (16,000 kg), which could include two 2½-ton trucks, towed artillery, or light tracked vehicles such as the M56 Scorpion. The C-97 featured cabin pressurization, which made long flights more comfortable.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The C-97 was developed into the civilian Boeing 377 Stratocruiser, a transoceanic airliner that could be fitted with sleeper cabins and featured a lower deck lounge. The first Stratocruiser flew on July 8, 1947. Only 56 were built.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number built    77 (plus 811 tankers)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For operational history and details of the 25 variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_C-97_Stratofreighter" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter02.jpg.8df1afd6d319ac6a1f8992b4ede578f3.jpg" data-fileid="65619" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing C-97G Stratofreighter 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="65619" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter02.thumb.jpg.dc05672d7866b36daa4f890240ec4da5.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter03.jpg.e4d6ed16201865c3841a6b7b3c4af96e.jpg" data-fileid="65620" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing C-97G Stratofreighter 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="65620" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter03.thumb.jpg.1c8f74717484cfd035e292ba4bc65e7e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter04.jpg.914f8a553e0258aa359b7b174bcab236.jpg" data-fileid="65621" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing C-97G Stratofreighter 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="65621" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2026_01/BoeingC-97GStratofreighter04.thumb.jpg.d743984e910848cbead2a64c60db0d3b.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2053</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:59:35 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing CH-47 Chinook</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-ch-47-chinook-r1263/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1170952337_BoeingCH-47Chinook06.jpg.26a1aa3f00c0a2c22676b1ff7bc31628.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing CH-47 Chinook is a tandem rotor helicopter developed by American rotorcraft company Vertol and manufactured by Boeing Vertol. The Chinook is a heavy-lift helicopter that is among the heaviest lifting Western helicopters. Its name, Chinook, is from the Native American Chinook people of Washington state.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Chinook was originally designed by Vertol, which had begun work in 1957 on a new tandem-rotor helicopter, designated as the Vertol Model 107 or V-107. Around the same time, the United States Department of the Army announced its intention to replace the piston engine–powered Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave with a new, gas turbine–powered helicopter.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Chinook possesses several means of loading various cargoes, including multiple doors across the fuselage, a wide loading ramp located at the rear of the fuselage and a total of three external ventral cargo hooks to carry underslung loads. Capable of a top speed of 170 knots (200 mph; 310 km/h), upon its introduction to service in 1962, the helicopter was considerably faster than contemporary 1960s utility helicopters and attack helicopters, and is still one of the fastest helicopters in the US inventory. Improved and more powerful versions of the Chinook have also been developed since its introduction; one of the most substantial variants to be produced was the CH-47D, which first entered service in 1982; improvements from the CH-47C standard included upgraded engines, composite rotor blades, a redesigned cockpit to reduce workload, improved and redundant electrical systems and avionics, and the adoption of an advanced flight control system. It remains one of the few aircraft to be developed during the early 1960s – along with the fixed-wing Lockheed C-130 Hercules cargo aircraft – that has remained in both production and frontline service for over 50 years.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The military version of the helicopter has been exported to nations across the world; the U.S. Army and the Royal Air Force (see Boeing Chinook (UK variants)) have been its two largest users. The civilian version of the Chinook is the Boeing Vertol 234. It has been used by civil operators not only for passenger and cargo transport, but also for aerial firefighting and to support logging, construction, and oil extraction industries.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the development, design, operational history and 16 variants and derivitives, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CH-47_Chinook" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/73700032_BoeingCH-47Chinook01.jpg.458802343f61738944c611b710def212.jpg" data-fileid="53261" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing CH-47 Chinook 01.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="53261" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/957543956_BoeingCH-47Chinook01.thumb.jpg.b3197c30c10f3aaf2f40616b342e6bbb.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1257127664_BoeingCH-47Chinook02.jpg.cfbda7658984785127e837bd40f91398.jpg" data-fileid="53262" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing CH-47 Chinook 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="53262" data-ratio="52.5" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/269537603_BoeingCH-47Chinook02.thumb.jpg.150ff9441feecdf3ca0ee744ada6932f.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1121152593_BoeingCH-47Chinook03.jpg.32c6cb7343c3820ce932c8be5a14aa49.jpg" data-fileid="53263" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing CH-47 Chinook 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="53263" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1177514397_BoeingCH-47Chinook03.thumb.jpg.5d370611656d87454aa4e4d3aa47a556.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1474446724_BoeingCH-47Chinook04.jpg.8c2dcdf89634bc1f303f64e95943a495.jpg" data-fileid="53264" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing CH-47 Chinook 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="53264" data-ratio="66.67" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/859314508_BoeingCH-47Chinook04.thumb.jpg.f42be8e7f5b36e7aa84fe163ca63b64a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/99764712_BoeingCH-47Chinook05.jpg.c130d7e2cbb2c1662fe8723e989856f6.jpg" data-fileid="53265" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="Boeing CH-47 Chinook 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="53265" data-ratio="56.17" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_02/1635915965_BoeingCH-47Chinook05.thumb.jpg.5068864668fd23f6236b894368ed63b3.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1263</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2022 09:47:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing E-7A Wedgetail AEW&C]]></title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-e-7a-wedgetail-aewc-r314/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1594955465_Wedgetail-E-7A-N3588J-RAAF.jpg" /></p>

<p>It is lighter than the 707-based Boeing E-3 Sentry, and has a fixed, active electronically scanned array radar antenna instead of a rotating one. It was designed for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) under "Project Wedgetail" and designated E-7A Wedgetail.</p><p> </p><p>
The E-7A Wedgetail is based on a Boeing 737-700, with the addition of an advanced Multi-Role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) radar, and 10 state-of-the-art mission crew consoles which can track airborne and maritime targets simultaneously.</p><p> </p><p>
It is a highly advanced aircraft, providing an airborne early warning and control platform that can gather information from a wide variety of sources, analyse it, and distribute it to other assets.</p><p> </p><p>
The E-7A Wedgetail can:</p><p>
</p><ul><li>control the tactical battle space;<br>
</li><li>provide direction for assets in the air, at sea and on land; and<br>
</li><li>support aircraft such as tankers and intelligence platforms.<br>
</li></ul><p></p><p>
For more details,  <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_AEW%26C" rel="external nofollow">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.airforce.gov.au/technology/aircraft/intelligence-surveillance-and-reconnaissance/e-7a-wedgetail" rel="external nofollow">here.</a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AN3588JRAAF.jpg.9c574b007c5705b9ccef3e38c5941642.jpg" data-fileid="45006" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45006" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="WedgetailE-7AN3588JRAAF.jpg_thumb.9c574b007c5705b9ccef3e38c5941642.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AN3588JRAAF.jpg_thumb.9c574b007c5705b9ccef3e38c5941642.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AN3588JRAAF.jpg_thumb.9c574b007c5705b9ccef3e38c5941642.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAFtakeoff.jpg.10b89644d5bce682fc22c907709b2104.jpg" data-fileid="45007" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45007" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAFtakeoff.jpg_thumb.10b89644d5bce682fc22c907709b2104.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAFtakeoff.jpg_thumb.10b89644d5bce682fc22c907709b2104.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAFtakeoff.jpg_thumb.10b89644d5bce682fc22c907709b2104.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAF.jpg.02bbe76287526a16b92fe57e652682fa.jpg" data-fileid="45008" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45008" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAF.jpg_thumb.02bbe76287526a16b92fe57e652682fa.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAF.jpg_thumb.02bbe76287526a16b92fe57e652682fa.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-004RAAF.jpg_thumb.02bbe76287526a16b92fe57e652682fa.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-005RAAF.JPG.b15cc7bfe56f5ba01b55d66faca4d70b.JPG" data-fileid="45009" data-fileext="JPG" rel=""><img data-fileid="45009" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="WedgetailE-7AA30-005RAAF.JPG_thumb.b15cc7bfe56f5ba01b55d66faca4d70b.JPG" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-005RAAF.JPG_thumb.b15cc7bfe56f5ba01b55d66faca4d70b.JPG" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-005RAAF.JPG_thumb.b15cc7bfe56f5ba01b55d66faca4d70b.JPG"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-006RAAF.jpg.bb3a48b85c4f4515f7334f7f24788456.jpg" data-fileid="45010" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45010" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="WedgetailE-7AA30-006RAAF.jpg_thumb.bb3a48b85c4f4515f7334f7f24788456.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-006RAAF.jpg_thumb.bb3a48b85c4f4515f7334f7f24788456.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/WedgetailE-7AA30-006RAAF.jpg_thumb.bb3a48b85c4f4515f7334f7f24788456.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">314</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing KC-46 Pegasus</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-kc-46-pegasus-r1623/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus01.jpg.1033902dd4fd7151c5584c76524f26e4.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing KC-46 Pegasus is an American military aerial refueling and strategic military transport aircraft developed by Boeing from its 767 jet airliner. In February 2011, the tanker was selected by the United States Air Force (USAF) as the winner in the KC-X tanker competition to replace older Boeing KC-135 Stratotankers. The first aircraft was delivered to the Air Force in January 2019. The Air Force intends to procure 179 Pegasus aircraft by 2027.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 2006, the USAF released a request for proposal (RFP) for a new tanker program, KC-X, to be selected by 2007. Boeing announced it may enter a higher capability tanker based on the Boeing 777, named the KC-777 Strategic Tanker. Airbus partnered with Northrop Grumman to offer the Airbus A330 MRTT, the tanker version of the A330, which was marketed to the USAF under the designation KC-30. In January 2007, the USAF issued the KC-X Aerial Refueling Aircraft RFP, calling for 179 tankers, four system development and demonstration and 175 production, in a contract worth an estimated US$40 billion (~$54.7 billion in 2022).[12] Northrop and EADS expressed dissatisfaction at how the RFP was structured and threatened to withdraw, leaving only Boeing in the running.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In February 2007, Boeing announced it was offering the KC-767 Advanced Tanker for the KC-X, stating that the KC-767 was a better fit than the KC-777 for the requirements. In April 2007, Boeing submitted its KC-767 tanker proposal to USAF. The KC-767 offered for this KC-X round was based on the in-development 767-200LRF (Long Range Freighter), rather than the -200ER on which Italian and Japanese KC-767 aircraft are based, differing by combining the -200ER fuselage, -300F wing, gear, cargo door and floor, -400ER digital flightdeck and flaps, uprated engines, and "sixth-generation" fly-by-wire fuel delivery boom.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Boeing submitted its final proposal in January 2008. In February 2008, the DoD chose the KC-30 over the KC-767, the USAF subsequently designated it KC-45A. Boeing submitted a protest to the United States Government Accountability Office in March 2008 and waged a public relations campaign in support of their protest. In June, after USAF admissions on bidding process flaws, the GAO upheld Boeing's protest and recommended the contract be rebid. In July 2008, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced that the USAF would reopen bidding, and put the contract into an "expedited recompetition" with Defense Undersecretary John Young in charge of the selection process, not the USAF. A draft of the revised RFP was provided to contractors in August 2008 for comments. However, in September 2008, the DoD canceled the KC-X solicitation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In September 2009, the USAF began a new round of bids with a clearer set of criteria, including reducing the number of requirements from 800 to 373 in an attempt to simplify the process and allow a more objective decision to be made. In March 2010, Boeing announced it would bid the KC-767 for the new KC-X round. EADS stated in April 2010 it would submit a bid without Northrop Grumman as a U.S. partner. Boeing submitted its KC-767 "NewGen Tanker" bid, based on the 767-200 with an improved version of the KC-10's refueling boom, and cockpit displays from the 787, in July 2010. Boeing submitted a revised bid in February 2011.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In addition to the KC-X, observers speculate that a modified KC-46 will be used as the basis of the KC-Y tanker program, the second step of the USAF's three-step tanker renewal plan, as replacing it with something entirely new is likely too big a risk. In September 2016, Air Mobility Command stated that the follow-on KC-Y acquisition program to replace the remaining KC-135s had been abandoned in favor of further KC-46s with upgrades.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The KC-46 Pegasus is a variant of the Boeing 767 and is a widebody, low-wing cantilever monoplane with a conventional empennage featuring a single fin and rudder. It has a retractable tricycle landing gear and a hydraulic flight control system. The Pegasus is powered by two Pratt &amp; Whitney PW4062 engines, one mounted under each wing. It has been described as combining "the 767-200ER's fuselage, with the 767-300F's wing, gear, cargo door and floor, with the 767-400ER digital flightdeck and flaps".[90] The KC-46 uses a similar Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) to that implicated in two 737 MAX crashes; in March 2019, the USAF began reviewing KC-46 training due to this feature. Unlike the 737, the KC-46's MCAS takes input from dual redundant angle of attack sensors and disengages with stick input by the pilot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The flightdeck has room for a crew of four with a forward crew compartment with seats for 15 crew members and in the rear fuselage either palletized passenger seating for 58, or 18 pallets in cargo configuration. The rear compartment can also be used in an aero-medical configuration for 54 patients (24 on litters). Quick ingress from the ground is available via a ladder that can be pulled down near the front landing gear. The KC-46A can carry 212,299 lb (96,297 kg) of fuel, 10 percent more than the KC-135, and 65,000 lb (29,000 kg) of cargo. Survivability is improved with infrared countermeasures and the aircraft has limited electronic warfare capabilities. It uses manual flight controls, allowing unrestricted maneuverability to avoid threats anywhere in the flight envelope.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	At the rear of the KC-46 is a fly-by-wire refueling boom supplemented by wing air refueling pods at each wingtip and a centerline drogue system under the rear fuselage so it can handle both types of refueling in one mission. The boom includes a hydraulic relief valve system, similar to those on the KC-10 and KC-767 tankers, to relieve axial pressure in the event of excessive loads building up on the boom. In order to address the stiff boom issue, which keeps a KC-46 from refueling lightweight, thrust-limited receivers like the A-10, Boeing is replacing the current actuator with one using a pressure-flow PQ valve in the 2023 time frame.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Rather than using a single boom operator seated or prone at the tail looking out a window, the Aerial Refueling Operator Station (AROS) seats two operators at the front of the tanker. AROS includes three main displays for each operator to display images from multiple multi-spectral cameras distributed around the aircraft. The central 2D/3D display provides a rear-facing view for boom refueling operations. Boom operators can execute their mission in total darkness with both aircraft blacked out. The hybrid 2D-3D system requires stereoscopic glasses to be fully effective.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Remote Vision System (RVS) that feeds video to the AROS has been problematic, motion viewed in the RVS versus which can create a depth compression and curvature effect. Blackouts and washouts on the displays during refueling, caused by shadows or direct sunlight are a problem that will be fixed by the RVS 2.0 upgrade along with depth perception issues via the use of new cameras and a full-color high-definition screen. Experienced boom operators of older tankers still prefer the KC-46, even with its current drawbacks.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus02.jpg.ea5f12593a3b508a115f4572219bb37a.jpg" data-fileid="59390" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="KC-46 Pegasus 02.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59390" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus02.thumb.jpg.0dba2af92a2e5a6a9a58a0783ff4cdae.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus03.jpg.93c455bb9ee93d040798c7d1479a9d2a.jpg" data-fileid="59391" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="KC-46 Pegasus 03.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59391" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus03.thumb.jpg.3742e0b8be3739171150927c40b8f57f.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus04.jpg.c9e03aee618b85b3dac6091bbba6ecee.jpg" data-fileid="59392" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="KC-46 Pegasus 04.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59392" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus04.thumb.jpg.3e84dad21115b09cba342a0f7f3188b8.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>

<p>
	<a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus05.jpg.a1f51e45f3c9ae67798dd9d237d24cea.jpg" data-fileid="59393" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img alt="KC-46 Pegasus 05.jpg" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" data-fileid="59393" data-ratio="56.33" style="height:auto;" width="600" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_12/KC-46Pegasus05.thumb.jpg.bbeb484a40770fff0cf5d793c23c21ff.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></a>
</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1623</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:55:21 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-mq-28-ghost-bat-r1688/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat01.jpg.45bf873b095a88b8214cf94ef072d069.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat, previously known as the Boeing Airpower Teaming System (ATS), is a Loyal Wingman class stealth, multirole, unmanned combat aerial vehicle in development by Boeing Australia for the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). It is designed as a force multiplier aircraft capable of flying alongside crewed aircraft for support as part of an integrated system including space-based capabilities, and performing autonomous missions independently using artificial intelligence.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Ghost Bat is an uncrewed aerial vehicle incorporating artificial intelligence and utilising a modular mission package system in the nose of the aircraft. The entire nose section can be removed and quickly swapped for another with a different payload for various missions including combat, force reconnaissance and electronic warfare. Developed under Air Force Minor Program DEF 6014, one role will be to utilise the Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) concept to support and protect manned Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) aircraft, such as the F-35A, F/A-18F, E-7A, and KC-30A while they conduct operations.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The UAV is designed to act as a "loyal wingman" that is controlled by a parent aircraft to accomplish tasks such as scouting or absorbing enemy fire if attacked, as well as operating independently. It has a 2000-mile ferry range or 900-mile combat radius. The UAV also has a jet engine which allows it to fly in the high subsonic flight regime and keep up with manned fighters. Boeing has said it has 'fighter-like' maneuverability. The MQ-28A prototype did not use any radiation-absorbent material (RAM) coating and instead relied on its shape to reduce its radar cross section (RCS). The aircraft wing is Boeing's largest resin-infused single composite component, leveraging proven technology from Boeing 787 wing's trailing edge. Three key manufacuring innovations were incorporated in the areas of robotic drill and fill, shimless assembly, and full-size determinant assembly.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The aircraft is the first combat aircraft designed and developed in Australia in over half a century. In February 2019, Boeing said that it will "depend on the market" whether the aircraft is manufactured in Queensland or the US. Ghost Bat will remain a sovereign Australian program, with aircraft only being produced in Australia and the lead partner on the program being the RAAF. On 21 September 2021, Boeing Australia unveiled the launch of a new manufacturing facility for its Loyal Wingman uncrewed aircraft at Wellcamp Airport in Toowoomba, Queensland. On 4 November 2021, Boeing Australia announced the Melbourne facility had already commenced construction of its fifth aircraft whilst the new Towoomba facility is under construction. On 26 March 2024, Boeing Australia announced the start of construction on a 9000 square-meter facility to support construction of the Ghost Bat.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The RAAF initially planned to buy three Airpower Teaming System (ATS) systems, as part of the Loyal Wingman Advanced Development Program (LWADP). The three drones were built at an automated production line in Melbourne, Victoria, a proof of concept for full-scale production. The order was increased to six with an A$115 million contract days after the first flight. As of 9 May 2023, the Australian government confirmed its commitment to funding 10 aircraft for the RAAF, not including three prototypes that will not be owned by the government or operated by the RAAF, taking the government’s total investment in the Loyal Wingman program to over A$600 million. The uncrewed platforms are scheduled to enter service with the RAAF in 2024-25.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For testing and possible uses, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_MQ-28_Ghost_Bat" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<span></span>
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat02.jpg.8ede0f60339fd483e672001c5840fca4.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60437" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat02.thumb.jpg.d3e3158fab740cc649696b5a4e520ef7.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MQ-28 ghost bat 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat03.jpg.15edce1bbf41c034b42f7de389debdbf.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60438" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat03.thumb.jpg.00e7fbc3abf7db0af00d8597f973388b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MQ-28 ghost bat 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat04.jpg.1a149422c303d4360d1baeed620d6c3d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60439" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat04.thumb.jpg.bef88f9a43b577d7a567d06eae6c301b.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MQ-28 ghost bat 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat05.jpg.936f6c83861d0bb3d8d6207a52950445.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="60440" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_03/MQ-28ghostbat05.thumb.jpg.885b12a30bc168c3910ce3fc5122de05.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="MQ-28 ghost bat 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1688</guid><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 05:47:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing P-8 Poseidon</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-p-8-poseidon-r328/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/1595498961_P-8a-Poseidon-RAAF-airborne.jpg" /></p>

<p>The P-8 is being operated in the anti-submarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare (ASUW), and shipping interdiction roles. It is armed with torpedoes, Harpoon anti-ship missiles and other weapons, and is able to drop and monitor sonobuoys, as well as operate in conjunction with other assets, including the Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton maritime surveillance unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).</p><p> </p><p>
The P-8 is operated by the United States Navy, the Indian Navy, Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) and the UK's Royal Air Force (RAF). It has also been ordered by the Royal Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF), the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF), and the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN).</p><p> </p><p>
The P-8 is to replace the P-3 Orion. The P-8 is a militarized version of the 737-800ERX, a 737-800 with 737-900-based wings. The fuselage is similar to, but longer than, the 737-700-based C-40 Clipper transport aircraft in service with the USN. The P-8 has a strengthened fuselage for low-altitude operations and raked wingtips similar to those fitted to the Boeing 767-400ER, instead of the blended winglets available on 737NG variants. In order to power additional onboard electronics, the P-8 has a 180kVA electric generator on each engine, replacing the 90kVA generator of civilian 737s; this required the redesigning of the nacelles and their wing mountings. The P-8 has a smoother flight experience, subjecting crews to less turbulence and fumes than the preceding P-3, allowing them to concentrate better on missions.</p><p> </p><p>
On 20 July 2007, the Australian Minister for Defence announced that the P-8A was the preferred aircraft to replace the Royal Australian Air Force fleet of Lockheed AP-3C Orions in conjunction with a then yet-to-be-selected unmanned aerial vehicle. The RAAF accepted its first P-8 on 27 September 2016; it arrived in Australia on 14 November. The RAAF has received 12 P-8As by 13 December 2019.</p><p> </p><p>
For more information, including variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_P-8_Poseidon" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonRAAFairborne.jpg.f551faaa9baac7fd63b4c89ff5d2b61e.jpg" data-fileid="45080" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45080" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="P-8aPoseidonRAAFairborne.jpg_thumb.f551faaa9baac7fd63b4c89ff5d2b61e.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonRAAFairborne.jpg_thumb.f551faaa9baac7fd63b4c89ff5d2b61e.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonRAAFairborne.jpg_thumb.f551faaa9baac7fd63b4c89ff5d2b61e.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonrightbank.jpg.93eff8e1cf1ed3039741a2ab9ceacf2a.jpg" data-fileid="45081" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45081" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="P-8aPoseidonrightbank.jpg_thumb.93eff8e1cf1ed3039741a2ab9ceacf2a.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonrightbank.jpg_thumb.93eff8e1cf1ed3039741a2ab9ceacf2a.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidonrightbank.jpg_thumb.93eff8e1cf1ed3039741a2ab9ceacf2a.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidontakeoff.jpg.8e15d6b2c3496e7575da15c67200755b.jpg" data-fileid="45082" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45082" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="P-8aPoseidontakeoff.jpg_thumb.8e15d6b2c3496e7575da15c67200755b.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidontakeoff.jpg_thumb.8e15d6b2c3496e7575da15c67200755b.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8aPoseidontakeoff.jpg_thumb.8e15d6b2c3496e7575da15c67200755b.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8APoseidon.jpg.e3ab5c69a59be4f4fd5ab3cf1becda42.jpg" data-fileid="45083" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45083" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="P-8APoseidon.jpg_thumb.e3ab5c69a59be4f4fd5ab3cf1becda42.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8APoseidon.jpg_thumb.e3ab5c69a59be4f4fd5ab3cf1becda42.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8APoseidon.jpg_thumb.e3ab5c69a59be4f4fd5ab3cf1becda42.jpg"></a></p><p><a class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8A-PoseidonRAAF12th-and-Final.jpg.c485e85153e617f9cefb373aa0e6ef98.jpg" data-fileid="45084" data-fileext="jpg" rel=""><img data-fileid="45084" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="P-8A-PoseidonRAAF12th-and-Final.jpg_thumb.c485e85153e617f9cefb373aa0e6ef98.jpg" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8A-PoseidonRAAF12th-and-Final.jpg_thumb.c485e85153e617f9cefb373aa0e6ef98.jpg" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_09/P-8A-PoseidonRAAF12th-and-Final.jpg_thumb.c485e85153e617f9cefb373aa0e6ef98.jpg"></a></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">328</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing T-7 Red Hawk</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-t-7-red-hawk-r1087/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1695291625_Boeing-SaabT-X01.jpg.7fc3a4f7d43494088b091822ee144000.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk, originally known as the Boeing T-X, is an American/Swedish advanced jet trainer produced by Boeing in partnership with Saab. It was selected on 27 September 2018 by the United States Air Force (USAF) as the winner of the T-X program to replace the Northrop T-38 Talon.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The USAF's Air Education and Training Command (AETC) began developing the requirements for a replacement for the Northrop T-38 Talon as early as 2003. Originally, the replacement trainer was expected to enter service around 2020. A fatigue failure of a T-38C killed the two-person crew in 2008 and the USAF advanced the target date of initial operational capability (IOC) to 2017. In the Fiscal 2013 budget proposal, the USAF suggested delaying the initial operating capability to FY2020 with the contract award not expected before FY2016. Shrinking budgets and higher priority modernization projects pushed the IOC of the T-X program winner to "fiscal year 2023 or 2024". Although the program was left out of the FY 2014 budget entirely, the service still viewed the trainer as a priority.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In cooperation with its Swedish aerospace partner, Saab, Boeing's submission to the competition was the Boeing T-X, a single-engine advanced jet trainer with a twin tail, tandem seating, and retractable tricycle landing gear. The submitted aircraft and demonstration models featured a General Electric F404 afterburning turbofan engine.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Boeing revealed its aircraft to the public on 13 September 2016. The first T-X aircraft flew on 20 December 2016.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 27 September 2018, Boeing's design was officially announced as the USAF's new advanced jet trainer to replace the T-38 Talon. A total of 351 aircraft, 46 simulators, maintenance training, and support are to be supplied at a program cost of US$9.2 billion.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In May 2019, Saab announced that it would open a U.S. manufacturing facility for the T-X in Indiana in partnership with Purdue University.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) is looking to replace 33 BAE Hawk Mk 127 Lead-in Fighter (LIF) jet trainers, which it first ordered in 1997. Boeing intends to participate in the tender of the RAAF’s LIFT program.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of design, avionics, operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_T-7_Red_Hawk" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/461016747_Boeing-SaabT-X02.jpg.d4f2bb3ff68afe4edb036eedb94d8afd.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51909" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/619853320_Boeing-SaabT-X02.thumb.jpg.243af59c24bf39591718e143f5a7ba4e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing-Saab T-X 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/217902408_Boeing-SaabT-X03.jpg.3ccd920a21f8a1bd1dc0811d6c05c856.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51910" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/569890222_Boeing-SaabT-X03.thumb.jpg.183d9aedf1584c07b51bc48d6de94f4e.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing-Saab T-X 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1605322328_Boeing-SaabT-X04.jpg.b48a5603db03dcf3d18881cf5d3e8330.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51911" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/225173657_Boeing-SaabT-X04.thumb.jpg.9543f1588362e22b30c5a3d113c11198.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing-Saab T-X 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/1552181346_Boeing-SaabT-X05.jpg.238ae6be4a5b0fdb6199418a6e28c354.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="51912" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_11/929302483_Boeing-SaabT-X05.thumb.jpg.33c6ca52ac2637e4d77d8a1789e4af46.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing-Saab T-X 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1087</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 10:45:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing-vertol-ch-46-sea-knight-r578/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1566291809_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight157682.jpg.f143908d409b0b1abcfeb38a6f76f0df.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	It was designed by Vertol and manufactured by Boeing Vertol following Vertol's acquisition by Boeing.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Development of the Sea Knight, which was originally designated by the firm as the Vertol Model 107, commenced during 1956. It was envisioned as a successor to the first generation of rotorcraft, such as the H-21 "Flying Banana", that had been powered by piston engines; in its place, the V-107 made use of the emergent turboshaft engine. On 22 April 1958, the V-107 prototype performed its maiden flight. During June 1958, the US Army awarded a contract for the construction of ten production-standard aircraft, designated as the YHC-1A, based on the V-107; this initial order was later cut down to three YHC-1As though. During 1961, the US Marine Corps (USMC), who had been studying its requirements for a medium-lift, twin-turbine cargo/troop assault helicopter, selected Boeing Vertol's Model 107M as the basis from which to manufacture a suitable rotorcraft to meet their needs. Known colloquially as the "Phrog" and formally as the "Sea Knight", it was operated across all US Marine Corps' operational environments between its introduction during the Vietnam War and its frontline retirement during 2014.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Sea Knight was operated by the USMC to provide all-weather, day-or-night assault transport of combat troops, supplies and equipment until it was replaced by the MV-22 Osprey during the 2010s. The USMC also used the helicopter for combat support, search and rescue (SAR), casualty evacuation and Tactical Recovery of Aircraft and Personnel (TRAP). The Sea Knight also functioned as the US Navy's standard medium-lift utility helicopter prior to the type being phased out of service in favor of the MH-60S Knighthawk during the early 2000s. Several overseas operators acquired the rotorcraft as well. Canada operated the Sea Knight, designated as CH-113; the type was used predominantly in the search and rescue (SAR) role until 2004. Other export customers for the type included Japan, Sweden, and Saudi Arabia. The commercial version of the rotorcraft is the BV 107-II, commonly referred to simply as the "Vertol".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the development, design, operational history and the 39 vaiants (including overseas variants), <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Vertol_CH-46_Sea_Knight" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The specifications below are for the CH-46E model.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/2062941455_BoeingVertol(Kawasaki)KV-107-IIA-584-4848.jpg.ef001c8f580db5535e343732c99e6b5e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47209" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1735204186_BoeingVertol(Kawasaki)KV-107-IIA-584-4848.thumb.jpg.6e3343056c3e229013d1f4b6d9089871.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing Vertol (Kawasaki) KV-107-IIA-5 84-4848.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/170485885_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight2578.jpg.ec44cf37f15be21f549bba078f4327bb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47210" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/596542706_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight2578.thumb.jpg.2576617a16d9af497aca894ceef8b1bf.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight 2578.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1146482074_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight4832.jpg.18034eb9aae3d7afade9279170f1513f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47211" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/770326691_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight4832.thumb.jpg.fd9069bc229f459c2ef23f95d391f747.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight 4832.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1683544755_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight6470.jpg.fea1b53ad398a7b700787044c5e3f49e.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="47212" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2020_11/1035924008_BoeingVertolCH-46SeaKnight6470.thumb.jpg.940e9b9917f32e2590ef7cf8f9c217cb.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight 6470.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">578</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:36:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boeing&#x2013;Saab T-7 Red Hawk</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boeing%E2%80%93saab-t-7-red-hawk-r1591/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk01.jpg.6ed14cd56e99657ed82f87079ec39c09.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk, initially known as the Boeing T-X (later Boeing–Saab T-X), is an American/Swedish supersonic advanced jet trainer produced by Boeing with Saab. On 27 September 2018, the United States Air Force (USAF) picked it for the T-X program to replace the Northrop T-38 Talon as the service's advanced jet trainer.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first production T-7 was rolled out on 28 April 2022.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Boeing intends to offer an armed version of the T-7 to replace aging Northrop F-5 and Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet fleets around the world.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 18 May 2023, the Government Accountability Office released a report on the T-7 program detailing problems with the software and safety systems and other delays that saw the USAF delay a production decision to February 2025. The report said that a schedule provided by Boeing in January 2023 was optimistic and dependent on favorable assumptions. Notwithstanding the delayed production decision, the report noted that Boeing still planned to start producing the first T-7s in early 2024.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 28 June 2023, the first flight of the T-7A production aircraft was conducted from St. Louis Lambert International Airport, by Major Bryce Turner, a test pilot with the 416th Flight Test Squadron at Edwards Air Force Base, California, and Steve Schmidt, Boeing’s chief T-7 test pilot.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	On 21 September 2023, the first Red Hawk was shipped to the US Air Force.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The T-7's design allows for future missions to be added, such as the aggressor and light attack/fighter roles. In the training environment, it has been specifically designed for high-G and high angle-of-attack maneuvers and night operations, with an emphasis on being easily maintained. The aircraft is equipped with a single GE F404 turbofan engine, but produces three times the total thrust as the twinjet T-38.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>BTX-1</strong><br />
	Two prototypes were constructed for evaluation:<br />
	N381TX, the first prototype built and first T-7 to fly<br />
	N382TX, the second prototype used in testing<br />
	<strong>T-7A Red Hawk  </strong>(Specifications below)<br />
	Production aircraft for the USAF as the winner of the T-X program to replace the Northrop T-38 Talon. Designated eT-7A prior to delivery, identifying it as a digitally engineered aircraft.<br />
	<strong>T-7B</strong><br />
	a variant proposed for the United States Navy's Tactical Surrogate Aircraft program, with a possible sale of 64 aircraft.<br />
	<strong>F/T-7X</strong><br />
	a variant proposed for the USAF's Advanced Tactical Trainer program, with a possible 100 to 400 aircraft sale.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk02.jpg.12b1ad5bafed002228f61fee020a164d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59076" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk02.thumb.jpg.671004fd3a442f8a55bf6fd9e73994bc.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk03.jpg.2dbc3f20383fe3caf1cc951428dc0aa6.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59077" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk03.thumb.jpg.3544a1ee6fdc0fc5772ff95a5218d9e4.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk04.jpg.3dcd7e4bea9f858eadee394ce102a278.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59078" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk04.thumb.jpg.19dd3be58342410f0fa55c16c271de86.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk05.jpg.3b41609520ceb698a467f4c13614d1a2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="59079" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_11/BoeingSaabT-7RedHawk05.thumb.jpg.57326d4dae8e7b2f2f644f2f8db490f2.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boeing–Saab T-7 Red Hawk 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1591</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 00:52:37 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Boulton Paul Balliol and Sea Balliol</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/boulton-paul-balliol-and-sea-balliol-r883/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/384363132_BoultonPaulBalliolWL732.jpg.952089c1480f039b0f78b0fc88f742ae.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Boulton Paul Balliol and Sea Balliol are monoplane military advanced trainer aircraft built for the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (FAA) by Boulton Paul Aircraft. Developed in the late 1940s, the Balliol was designed to replace the North American Harvard trainer. It used the Rolls-Royce Merlin engine. The Sea Balliol was a naval version for deck landing training.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Balliol was developed to meet Air Ministry Specification T.7/45 for a three-seat advanced trainer powered by a turboprop engine, competing against the Avro Athena. It was a conventional low-wing monoplane with a retractable main undercarriage and a fixed tailwheel. Pilot and instructor sat side by side ahead of a second student who would watch the instruction given to the pilot. In August 1948, Boulton Paul received an order for four prototypes, to be powered by the Rolls-Royce Dart turboprop, and in August 1946, this was followed by an order for 20 pre-production aircraft, with ten each to be powered by the Dart and the Armstrong Siddeley Mamba turboprop, with delays to development of the Dart meaning that the prototypes would now be fitted by the Mamba. The Mamba was not flight ready when the first prototype was completed, so it was fitted with a 820 hp (611 kW) Bristol Mercury 30 radial engine for initial testing. Thus powered, it first flew on 30 May 1947. The second prototype, powered by the intended Mamba, first flew on 17 May 1948, the world's first single-engined turboprop aircraft to fly. The Air Ministry had meanwhile had second thoughts about its training requirements, and in 1947 issued a new specification, T.14/47, requiring a two-seat trainer, powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin piston engine, available in large numbers from surplus stocks, rather than the expensive turboprop engines.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Merlin powered Balliol, designated Balliol T.2, first flew on 10 July 1948, and after extensive evaluation, it was chosen over the Athena, with large orders being placed to replace some of the Harvards in RAF service. The observer's seat of the Mk 1 was removed, the side-by-side seats remaining.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Sea Balliol T.21 had folding wings and arrestor hook for deck landings.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	By 1951, however, the Air Ministry changed its mind about its training requirements yet again and decided to introduce a jet-powered advanced trainer, the de Havilland Vampire T.Mk11.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>P.108 Balliol T.Mk 1</strong><br />
	Prototypes, 3 built, powered by the Armstrong Siddeley Mamba turboprop engine<br />
	<strong>Balliol T.Mk 2</strong><br />
	Two-seat advanced training aircraft for the RAF; 196 built, (166 built by Boulton Paul, and 30 built by Blackburn Aircraft).<br />
	<strong>Sea Balliol T.Mk 21</strong><br />
	Two-seat advanced training aircraft for FAA. A total of 30 built by Boulton Paul.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1541907647_BoultonPaulBalliolG-ANSF.jpg.6aa3aae7557a1f9f1dfd408148d9d7dd.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50236" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/2127550457_BoultonPaulBalliolG-ANSF.thumb.jpg.7618ee3ada192dc4f2f403fde1204a64.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Balliol G-ANSF.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/108762561_BoultonPaulBalliolT.2_WN507.jpg.673caea3e4010978b8d9d4f75af870ae.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50237" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1210778656_BoultonPaulBalliolT.2_WN507.thumb.jpg.03df66e9f40355a5023f8ea5328f9603.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Balliol T.2_WN507.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/888418774_BoultonPaulBalliolVR956.jpg.970f81be7181b5d4d1ba4d9c7c50a92a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50238" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/356779167_BoultonPaulBalliolVR956.thumb.jpg.8e299be14cbeb9f59dcb4c9b574c04a3.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Balliol VR956.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/1976577970_BoultonPaulSeaBalliol.jpg.10a20f367794b3a87b75c46985a07c41.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50239" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_08/257562459_BoultonPaulSeaBalliol.thumb.jpg.d4da9157457914bf09f24ba3f1aba5c0.jpg" data-ratio="48.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Boulton Paul Sea Balliol.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">883</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 04:09:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Br&#xE9;guet 1050 Aliz&#xE9;</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/br%C3%A9guet-1050-aliz%C3%A9-r866/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/605354921_BreguetBr.1050Alize59.jpg.404571bf78a499ac026e2eaf36a5a77a.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Bréguet Br.1050 Alizé (French: "Tradewind") is a French carrier-based anti-submarine warfare aircraft. It was developed in the 1950s, based loosely on the second prototype Bréguet Vultur attack aircraft which had been modified into the Bréguet Br.965 Épaulard anti-submarine warfare aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Alizé was a low-wing monoplane of conventional configuration powered by a single Rolls-Royce Dart turboprop engine. It had a CSF radar system with a retractable antenna dome in its belly. The cockpit accommodated a crew of three, including pilot, radar operator, and sensor operator. The pilot was seated in front on the left, the navigator in front on the right, and the sensor operator sat sideways behind them. The landing gear was of tricycle configuration, with the main gear retracting backwards into nacelles in the wings. The main gear had dual wheels, and the front part of the nacelles accommodated sonobuoys. The Alizé had a yoke-style arresting hook.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The internal weapons bay could accommodate a homing torpedo or depth charges, and underwing stores pylons could carry bombs, depth charges, rockets, or missiles. Typical underwing stores included 68 mm (2.68 in) rocket pods or AS.12 wire-guided antiship missiles.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number built    89
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/739546473_BreguetBr.1050Alize24.jpg.a526eab54ccd8c3bdd747e9e6cb5a17c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50138" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1191658681_BreguetBr.1050Alize24.thumb.jpg.e6b4dfb0751bac45fd859754a0faf386.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet Br.1050 Alize 24.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1694069179_BreguetBr.1050Alize31.jpg.97c4894c936b7c37176a15acb5cd7171.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50139" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1913038500_BreguetBr.1050Alize31.thumb.jpg.b841c92a9a5f2805fa06acb96c014b4c.jpg" data-ratio="49.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet Br.1050 Alize 31.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1206125544_BreguetBr.1050Alize40.jpg.95fe875b4f8bda4bdd942b236459f728.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50140" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/678739815_BreguetBr.1050Alize40.thumb.jpg.87b072bb06c7190bda59a51f331c2af4.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet Br.1050 Alize 40.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1255033974_BreguetBr.1050Alize86.jpg.e072a00339a33ae9c1411b301b3cb48a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50141" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/823072321_BreguetBr.1050Alize86.thumb.jpg.020cfedcf492de9aa3fc16984692014b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet Br.1050 Alize 86.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">866</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:22:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Br&#xE9;guet 1150 Atlantic</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/br%C3%A9guet-1150-atlantic-r865/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/143317054_Breguet1150Atlantic6112Airborne.jpg.a991eed8cb00541746bd3a6f8c62ba4d.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Breguet Br.1150 Atlantic is a long-range maritime patrol aircraft designed and manufactured by French aircraft manufacturer Breguet Aviation.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Designed in response to a 1958 NATO specification as a replacement for the Lockheed P2V Neptune, Breguet's submission was declared the winner over several competing bids. To produce the Atlantic, a multinational consortium, Société d'Étude et de Construction de Breguet Atlantic (SECBAT), was established. During 1963, an initial order for 60 Atlantics – 40 for France and 20 for Germany – was received. Follow-on orders from export customers followed shortly thereafter. It was first introduced to operational service during 1965.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Atlantic has been operated by a number of countries, commonly performing maritime roles such as reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare. The Atlantic is also capable of carrying air-to-ground munitions to perform ground-attack missions; a small number of aircraft were also equipped to perform ELINT operations. An updated version, the Atlantique 2 or ATL2, was produced by Dassault Aviation for the French Navy in the 1980s. A further improved model, the Atlantique 3, was proposed during the 1990s but ultimately unbuilt. Other operators of the Atlantic have included the German Navy, the Italian Air Force, the Pakistan Navy, and the Royal Netherlands Navy.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Breguet Br.1150 Atlantic is a twin-engined, mid-winged monoplane with a "double-bubble" fuselage; the upper lobe comprising a pressurised crew compartment, and the lower lobe housing a 9 m (27 ft 6 in) long weapons bay, with sonobuoy tubes aft of the weapons bay. A radar scanner is housed in a retractable underfuselage radome, while a magnetic anomaly detector is housed in a tail boom. It is powered by a pair of Rolls-Royce Tyne turboprop engines. An all-aluminium structure is used throughout the Atlantic's airframe; corrosion is alleged to be a considerable problem due to environmental factors imposed by the maritime environment.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more details of the development, design and operational history of the Atlantic, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Br%C3%A9guet_1150_Atlantic" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/927970262_Breguet1150Atlantic6112.jpg.7dd47047cd7cfe1abc8f2404da93a7a7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50133" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/380451271_Breguet1150Atlantic6112.thumb.jpg.bdc76bdac69176a949e7be695cfc944b.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet 1150 Atlantic 61+12.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/2069934885_Breguet1150AtlanticDutchNavy253.jpg.2fb587371acb42e99e2a008639f9e675.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50134" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/1680791224_Breguet1150AtlanticDutchNavy253.thumb.jpg.1ed5621e3216440873c7fa1a8ae9544c.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet 1150 Atlantic Dutch Navy 253.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/889881125_Breguet1150AtlanticFrenchAir.jpg.d576ffb1401bd6a6f49ccc4a03d28ec2.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50135" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/2036473541_Breguet1150AtlanticFrenchAir.thumb.jpg.8f53ec04c9cecdaefe17e2e4fe702085.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet 1150 Atlantic French Air.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/662721153_Breguet1150AtlanticGermanNavy6117.jpg.7c8533797988e1ff1c71e2d7578a7231.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="50137" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_07/947463488_Breguet1150AtlanticGermanNavy6117.thumb.jpg.f44d96d894ceb8e2129a8d84b5870dc5.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Breguet 1150 Atlantic German Navy 61+17.jpg"></a></p><p>
<a class="ipsAttachLink" href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/file/attachment.php?id=50136" data-fileExt='webp' data-fileid='50136'>Breguet 1150 Atlantic German Navy 61+17.webp</a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">865</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:11:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bristol Belvedere</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/bristol-belvedere-r647/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/844721108_BristolBelvedereXG448.jpg.022026b59e57fdf0d3ecc4441b50d90c.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	It was designed by Raoul Hafner for a variety of transport roles including troop transport, supply dropping and casualty evacuation. It was operated by the Royal Air Force (RAF) from 1961 to 1969. The Belvedere was Britain's only tandem rotor helicopter to enter production, and one of the few not built by Boeing or Piasecki.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Belvedere was based on the Bristol Type 173 10-seat (later 16-seat) civilian helicopter which first flew on 3 January 1952. The 173 project was cancelled in 1956 and Bristol spent time on the Type 191 and Type 193 to Royal Navy and Royal Canadian Navy specifications. These two naval variants were cancelled, but the RAF expressed an interest in the aircraft and the Type 192 "Belvedere" was created. Three Type 191 airframes were almost complete when the order was cancelled, but they were used to aid the development of the Type 192. The first two were used as test rigs for the new Napier Gazelle engines and the third was used for fatigue tests. 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Type 192 shared some of its design features with the cancelled naval variants, which made it less than ideal for transporting troops. The front undercarriage was unusually tall, originally designed to give adequate clearance for loading torpedoes underneath the fuselage in the anti-submarine warfare role. This left the main passenger and cargo door 4 feet (1.2 m) above the ground. The engines were placed at either end of the cabin. (By comparison the purpose-designed troop transport contemporary Boeing Vertol CH-46 Sea Knight had its engines above the aft cabin to permit a rear loading ramp). To provide access to the cabin from the cockpit there was a small entry past the engine that resulted in a bulge on the left side of the fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The first Type 192 prototype XG447 flew on 5 July 1958 with tandem wooden rotor blades, a completely manual control system and a castored, fixed quadricycle undercarriage. From the fifth prototype, the rotors fitted were all-metal, four-bladed units. Production model controls and instruments allowed night operations. The prototype machines had an upwards-hinged main passenger and cockpit door, which was prone to being slammed shut by the downwash from the rotors. This was replaced by a sliding door on the later aircraft.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Twenty-six Belvederes were built, entering service as the Belvedere HC Mark 1. The Belvederes were originally designed for use with the Royal Navy but were later adapted to carry 18 fully equipped troops with a total load capacity of 6,000 lb (2,700 kg). The two rotors were synchronised through a shaft to prevent blade collision, allowing the aircraft to operate through only one engine in the event of an emergency. In that case, the remaining engine would automatically run up to double power to compensate.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For more information on operational history and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Belvedere" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/56207869_BristolBelvedereoverhead.jpg.d8158a5a01b44805b63801bd76f03d5f.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48035" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/60803297_BristolBelvedereoverhead.thumb.jpg.abe066eb0bc6d40988af3cd382bd64f0.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Belvedere overhead.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1696635034_BristolBelvedereslung.jpg.de831a7c8e04197afcc74c7bedd633fe.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48036" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/1339475962_BristolBelvedereslung.thumb.jpg.60771995b870375f184bb7e6cd00a0e1.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Belvedere slung.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/550261146_BristolBelvedereXG454.jpg.ae9de4c4fb9fe05d3d8a1fed8a875505.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48037" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/131214148_BristolBelvedereXG454.thumb.jpg.ba9f073c191b01fa9b59d44399be7700.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Belvedere XG454.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/2060115106_BristolBelvedereXG461slunghowitzer.jpg.217b25270cca52f34645c1044851afe9.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="48038" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2021_01/489428601_BristolBelvedereXG461slunghowitzer.thumb.jpg.3162adc3bb36afd378e01f0b58276154.jpg" data-ratio="50" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Bristol Belvedere XG461 slung howitzer.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">647</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:33:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Budd RB-1 Conestoga</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/budd-rb-1-conestoga-r1233/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1193762544_BuddRB-1Conestoga05.jpg.534cf897096d0b6723397dafa5e634a3.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Budd RB-1 Conestoga was a twin-engine, stainless steel cargo aircraft designed for the United States Navy during World War II by the Budd Company of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Although it did not see service in a combat theater, it pioneered design innovations in American cargo aircraft, later incorporated in modern military cargo airlifters.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	World War II created a great demand for military transport aircraft in the United States. Because of initial fears of a shortage of aluminum, the War Department explored the use of other materials for aircraft construction. Budd, the developer of the shotweld technique for welding stainless steel and a manufacturer of stainless steel railroad cars, automobile, bus, and truck bodies, hired an aeronautical engineering staff and worked with the U. S. Navy to develop a new twin-engine transport aircraft constructed primarily of stainless steel. The U.S. Navy accepted the proposal for the new aircraft, and placed an order for 200, to be designated RB-1. The U.S. Army Air Forces (USAAF) followed with an order for 600, designated C-93.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Conestoga was a twin-engine high-wing monoplane with tricycle landing gear. The elevated flight deck was contained in a distinctive, almost hemispherical nose section. Its two 1,200 hp (890 kW) Pratt &amp; Whitney R-1830-92 air cooled 14-cylinder, twin-row, radial engines, the same engines fitted to the C-47, drove three-bladed Hamilton Standard Hydromatic constant-speed, full-feathering propellers and powered a 24-volt electrical system. While the fuselage was thin-gauge stainless steel, only a portion of the wing was made of the metal; the trailing section of the wing and all control surfaces were fabric-covered.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Innovations</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The RB-1/C-93 was radical for its day, introducing many of the features now standard in military transports. The flight deck could accommodate three crew members, pilot and copilot side-by-side, the navigator behind them. Stairs connected the flight deck to the cargo area, which was 25 feet (7.6 m) long with an unobstructed cross-section of 8 × 8 feet (2.4m) throughout its length. Cargo loading and unloading could be accomplished in two ways: through 40 × 60 inch (102 × 152 cm) doors on both sides of the fuselage or by an electrically operated 10 × 8 foot (3.0 × 2.4 m) ramp at the aft end of the cargo area under the upswept tail, a similar development to what had been initially fitted to the Germans' own Ju 90 four-engined transport aircraft as their Trapoklappe ramp in 1939. The RB-1's loading ramp, accessed by manually operated clamshell doors, along with the tricycle landing gear, meant cargo could be loaded/unloaded at truck-bed height. A manually operated two-ton (907 kg) hoist for unloading trucks and a one-ton winch for pulling cargo up the ramp were also provided in the cargo area. The aircraft could accommodate:
</p>

<ul>
	<li>
		24 paratroopers, or
	</li>
	<li>
		24 stretchers and 16 sitting wounded, or
	</li>
	<li>
		9,600 pounds of cargo, or
	</li>
	<li>
		a 1½ ton truck, or
	</li>
	<li>
		The largest ambulance in use by the U.S. military.
	</li>
</ul>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	Number built:  20.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of the operational history of the RB-1, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budd_RB_Conestoga" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1274200416_BuddRB-1Conestoga01.jpg.110c29fbd454cf7767e5fa0c59b13a8d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="53091" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1628309006_BuddRB-1Conestoga01.thumb.jpg.63094fd50d783e26ffd3f3f1896370aa.jpg" data-ratio="78.67" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Budd RB-1 Conestoga 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/896318952_BuddRB-1Conestoga02.jpg.15600051e2fcfed8542af24de1a9a7e8.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="53092" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1300961129_BuddRB-1Conestoga02.thumb.jpg.3b7dd02676b36f4211ddfc14f0ff1f39.jpg" data-ratio="58.83" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Budd RB-1 Conestoga 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1981253036_BuddRB-1Conestoga03.jpg.31aeb8f454e8242f11c9bdf0764f21ba.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="53093" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/2107922382_BuddRB-1Conestoga03.thumb.jpg.ffdec476da15c6363f457ba57502c25d.jpg" data-ratio="63.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Budd RB-1 Conestoga 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1126913115_BuddRB-1Conestoga04.jpg.cfed27bb396f9d75ae0c48f13ba045c7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image"><img data-fileid="53094" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2022_01/1711931343_BuddRB-1Conestoga04.thumb.jpg.a9a3015dfcd01548338d1e24917fbe2b.jpg" data-ratio="71.5" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Budd RB-1 Conestoga 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1233</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:43:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/cacpac-jf-17-thunder-r1981/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder01.jpg.d6d758bf82447ae75b6276039f1beba2.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder[a] or FC-1 Xiaolong is a fourth-generation, single-engine, lightweight, multirole combat aircraft developed jointly by the Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) of China and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC). It was designed and developed as a replacement for the third-generation A-5C, F-7P/PG, Mirage III, and Mirage 5 combat aircraft in the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). The JF-17 can be used for multiple roles, including interception, ground attack, anti-ship, and aerial reconnaissance. The Pakistani designation "JF-17" stands for "Joint Fighter-17", with the "Joint Fighter" denoting the joint Pakistani-Chinese development of the aircraft and the "-17" denoting that, in the PAF's vision, it is the successor to the F-16. The Chinese designation "FC-1" stands for "Fighter China-1".
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The JF-17 can deploy diverse ordnance, including air-to-air, air-to-surface, and anti-ship missiles; guided and unguided bombs; and a 23 mm GSh-23-2 twin-barrel autocannon. Powered by a Guizhou WS-13 or Klimov RD-93 afterburning turbofan, it has a top speed of Mach 1.6. The JF-17 is the backbone and workhorse of the PAF, complementing the Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon at approximately half the cost,[5] with the Block II variant costing $25 million.[4] The JF-17 was inducted in the PAF in February 2010.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	Fifty-eight per cent of the JF-17 airframe, including its front fuselage, wings, and vertical stabiliser, is produced in Pakistan, whereas forty-two per cent is produced in China, with the final assembly and serial production taking place in Pakistan. In 2015, Pakistan produced 16 JF-17s.] As of 2016, PAC has the capacity to produce 20 JF-17s annually. By April 2017, PAC had manufactured 70 Block 1 aircraft and 33 Block 2 aircraft for the PAF. By 2016, PAF JF-17s had accumulated over 19,000 hours of operational flight. In 2017, PAC/CAC began developing a dual-seat variant known as the JF-17B for enhanced operational capability, conversion training, and lead-in fighter training. The JF-17B Block 2 variant went into serial production at PAC in 2018 and 26 aircraft were delivered to the PAF by December 2020. In December 2020, PAC began serial production of a more advanced Block 3 version of the aircraft with an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, a more powerful Russian Klimov RD-93MA engine, a larger and more advanced wide-angle Head-Up Display (HUD), electronic countermeasures, an additional hardpoint, and enhanced weapons capability.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	PAF JF-17s have seen military action, both air-to-air and air-to-ground, including bombing terrorist positions in North Waziristan near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border during anti-terror operations in 2014 and 2017 using both guided and unguided munitions, shooting down an intruding Iranian military drone near the Pakistan-Iran Border in Balochistan in 2017, in Operation Swift Retort during the 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes and aerial skirmish between India and Pakistan, and during Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar in 2024 in which Pakistan launched a series of air and artillery strikes inside Iran's Sistan and Baluchestan province targeting Baloch separatist groups. In March and December 2024, PAF JF-17s were used in cross-border airstrikes against Pakistani Taliban hideouts inside Afghanistan. Nigerian Air Force (NAF) JF-17s have seen military action in anti-terrorism and anti-insurgency operations in Nigeria. Myanmar Air Force has also frequently deployed its JF-17 fleet against various insurgent groups. During the May 2025 India–Pakistan conflict, the PAF deployed JF-17s in combat in both the air-to-air and air-to-ground roles.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	For details of design and development, operational history, users and other interest and variants, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAC/PAC_JF-17_Thunder" rel="external nofollow">click here.</a>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder02.jpg.47a1adfde0064d1a0c0952d7d0b3bcb1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65136" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder02.thumb.jpg.442f6200a50b804f463c81c4c023d240.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PAC JF-17 Thunder 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder03.jpg.91160b6c322aeb1d8d75eec3d8ee72ec.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65137" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder03.thumb.jpg.4a8fe94da9eb0dd5e429a8f6e8c54344.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PAC JF-17 Thunder 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder04.jpg.f0442597df1a8da135b92ba6ec4f27a7.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65138" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder04.thumb.jpg.1d419a6702a32c8c4633112bc33c1d74.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PAC JF-17 Thunder 04.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder05.jpg.dd8d8611ea8406ce3ca862954c9c1d3c.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="65139" src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2025_12/PACJF-17Thunder05.thumb.jpg.43a8aab90ba94455ff1777663df179c8.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="PAC JF-17 Thunder 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1981</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Canadair CP-107 Argus</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/canadair-cp-107-argus-r1579/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus05.jpg.313e0f3fa77857b0c87caa848fc40519.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Canadair CP-107 Argus (company designation CL-28) is a maritime patrol aircraft designed and manufactured by Canadair for the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF). In its early years, the Argus was reputedly the finest anti-submarine patrol bomber in the world. The Argus served throughout the Cold War in the RCAF's Maritime Air Command and later the Canadian Force's Maritime Air Group and Air Command.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	The Argus replaced the last of the Avro Lancasters as well as the Lockheed Neptunes that had been bought as an interim measure pending the arrival of the Argus in the maritime reconnaissance or patrol role.
</p>

<p>
	One of the most effective anti-submarine warfare (ASW) aircraft of its day, the Argus was a mainstay for the RCAF. A large amount of equipment was carried, including: search radar, sonobuoys, electronic counter measures (ECM), explosive echo ranging (EER) and magnetic anomaly detector (MAD). Up to 8,000 lb (3,600 kg) of weapons could be carried in the bomb bays, including torpedoes and depth charges.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	A flight crew of 15 consisting of three pilots, three navigators (Observer Long range), two flight engineers and six radio officers (observer rad) until the early 1960s when the crew included both commissioned officers (tactical navigator/radio navigator) and non commissioned officers (observers), the number of which was dependent on the mission. Four crew bunks and a galley were provided to extend the efficiency of the crew on long patrols (average 18 hrs). The CL-28 had an endurance of approximately 26½ hours with full armament.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	An Argus flown by 407 Maritime Patrol Squadron on 1-2 October 1959 held the Canadian military record of slightly over 31 hours for the longest flight by an unrefuelled aircraft, while covering a distance of 4,570 mi (7,350 km) from RNZAF Base Ohakea in New Zealand to Naval Air Station Barbers Point in Hawaii, before continuing across the rest of Pacific and most of Canada. Due to unexpectedly strong headwinds that greatly increased fuel consumption, they chose to land in RCAF Station North Bay where they had less than an hour of fuel remaining, after an additional 20 hours of flying. The 31 hour record flight broke the previous distance record, set by another Argus from the same squadron, of 4,210 mi (6,780 km). The principal difference between the Mk.1 and Mk.2 was in the different navigation, communication and tactical electronic equipment fitted internally. Externally, the Mk II had a smaller redesigned nose radome and additional ECM antenna above the fuselage.
</p>

<p>
	<br />
	The Argus flew its last service mission on 24 July 1981, and was replaced by the Lockheed CP-140 Aurora.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Variants</strong>
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	<strong>Argus Mk.1/CL-28-1</strong> : Long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft for the RCAF. This aircraft was fitted with an American AN/APS-20 radar in a chin-mounted radome. 13 built. (serials 20710-20722)<br />
	<strong>Argus Mk.2/CL-28-2</strong> : Long-range maritime reconnaissance aircraft for the RCAF. This aircraft was fitted with a British ASV-21 radar in a chin-mounted radome. 20 built. (serials 20723-20742)
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus01.jpg.d9356fde391668a31be08b090c6937f1.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58921" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus01.thumb.jpg.224ac9809f77feba9661bd6e00ab932e.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Canadair CP-107 Argus 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus02.jpg.ec5e6ba0e8cf4ef167f142786dae04fe.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58922" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus02.thumb.jpg.0163f9f0492f305dbd08416706e5630a.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Canadair CP-107 Argus 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus03.jpg.5720fe539bed39496fa0d5905df8a350.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58923" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus03.thumb.jpg.e6380fabb788e23c1fd28cd254ad1901.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Canadair CP-107 Argus 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus04.jpg.cb1d7ec42e8d846c527adcde9a594dae.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="58924" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2023_10/CanadairCP-107Argus04.thumb.jpg.b81ce80eb926a322bdc35319523c2134.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Canadair CP-107 Argus 04.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1579</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Caproni Vizzola Ventura  (C22J)</title><link>https://www.aircraftpilots.com/aircraft/military/caproni-vizzola-ventura-c22j-r1778/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J04.jpg.9c2e16095c5f931fdbfe280170aa7324.jpg" /></p>
<p>
	The Caproni Vizzola C22 Ventura was a light jet-powered aircraft developed in Italy for use as a military trainer. It was of conventional sailplane configuration and bore a family resemblance to the Caproni Calif gliders, although the Ventura had an almost entirely metal structure. The student and instructor sat side by side under an expansive canopy, and weapons hardpoints were provided under each of the slender, high-mounted wings. It had retractable, tricycle undercarriage.
</p>

<p>
	 
</p>

<p>
	In 1981, Agusta acquired 50% of the C22 programme and proposed a new version, the C22R, which was to have been a reconnaissance aircraft also capable of Forward Air Control and ELINT operations. The basic C22J trainer was exhibited at the Farnborough Air Show in 1980[1] and September 1982, but failed to attract any customers, and the proposed C22R was never actually built.
</p>

<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J01.jpg.d47dd681e7b1173b91089b89abe278cb.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61933" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J01.thumb.jpg.2fe057815f28f3d5b1240595717382ec.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Caproni C22J 01.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J02.jpg.5c7b7d517bf1098da192fe025ea5ce4d.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61934" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J02.thumb.jpg.1804a8f455cb82239f48675e3eaff0e5.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Caproni C22J 02.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J03.jpg.3790d08b2cdec0c3f357c04048b23717.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61935" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J03.thumb.jpg.e8324ca6730d827566f9f3bcb4047c34.jpg" data-ratio="56.17" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Caproni C22J 03.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J05.jpg.b9cf78acb73e6407d1c8c22c1f7fee3a.jpg" class="ipsAttachLink ipsAttachLink_image" ><img data-fileid="61936" src="https://www.recreationalflying.com/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" data-src="https://www.aircraftpilots.com/uploads/monthly_2024_09/CaproniC22J05.thumb.jpg.aa433e5da90eb7edbd3503beede6fd2d.jpg" data-ratio="56.33" width="600" class="ipsImage ipsImage_thumbnailed" alt="Caproni C22J 05.jpg"></a></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1778</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
